Assessing GHG emissions, and energy and economic analysis of cotton production in the Golestan province

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 19, Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10, 2015, Pages 428-445   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v5i2.28373

Authors

A. R. Taheri-Rad¹; A. Nikkhah²; M. Khojastehpour^{* 1}; Sh. Nowrouzieh³

¹Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

²Young Researchers and Elite Club, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

³Cotton Research Institute of Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Golestan province is one of Northern provinces in Iran. The area under cultivation of agricultural products in this province is 724.697 hectares, of which about 694.618 hectares are used for farm products (AJMDC, 2011). Cotton as one of oilseed is a potential feedstock for biodiesel production (Ahmad et al., 2011). In the study of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for cotton production in Alborz province, results showed that the total energy input was 31.237 MJ ha-1. Energy efficiency and energy productivity were 1.85 and 0.11, respectively, and greenhouse gas emissions of cotton production in Alborz province were 1195.25 kg CO2eq ha-1 (Pishgar-Komleh et al., 2012). Another study on energy analysis, greenhouse gas emissions and economic analysis of agricultural production was performed in Northern Iran (AghaAlikhani et al., 2013; Royan et al., 2012; Pishgar-Komleh et al., 2011; Mohammadi et al., 2010; Taheri-Garavand et al., 2010). The aims of this study were to determine the energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and economic analysis of cotton production in the Golestan province and also to determine the effect of energy inputs on cotton yield.
Materials and methods: This research was conducted during 2011-2012 in three areas including Gorgan, Aq’qala and Gonbad in the Golestan province. The primary data were collected from the rice producers through a field survey with the help of a structured questionnaire. The number of subjects were studied by the Cochran formula (Snedecor and Cochran, 1980). Accordingly, 43 cotton producers were determined. In this study, eight energy inputs including seed, labor, machinery, diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers, chemicals, water for irrigation and farmyard manure for cotton production system were considered as independent variables. The outputs of the system including lint and seed were considered as dependent variable. Energy indices including energy efficiency, energy productivity, specific energy and net energy were calculated. In this study, the effect of energy inputs on yield was estimated using the Cobb-Douglas function. In order to determine the sensitivity of energy inputs in the production of cotton in the Golestan province, the marginal physical productivity method was applied. Greenhouse gas emissions, inputs of agricultural machinery, fuel, chemical fertilizers, chemicals and farmyard manure in cotton production in the Golestan province were calculated by the coefficients of each of these inputs. For economic evaluation of cotton production in the Golestan province, the variable costs, fixed and total production per unit area were considered. Economic indices of total production value, gross income, net income, economic productivity and benefit to cost ratio were estimated. Data analysis was performed using JMP8 software.
Results and Discussion: Cotton yield in the Golestan province was about 2650 kg ha-1. Average cotton yield in the Alborz province was reported to be 3430 kg ha-1 (Pishgar-Komleh et al., 2012). In this study, diesel fuel had the highest energy consumer among other inputs like the other studies that have been done on energy crop production in Iran. Labor energy input with energy consumption of 2413 MJ ha-1, is known to be the fourth high-energy input in cotton production in the Golestan province. However, in many studies in Iran, this input was accounted to be less than one percent of the energy consumption in the production of agricultural products (Saeedi et al., 2013; Khoshnevisan et al., 2013; Mobtaker et al., 2012; Mobtaker et al., 2010). Chemical energy input with 1036 MJ ha-1, was allocated as 3.6% of energy consumption in the cotton production in the region. Seed energy input was the lowest energy among the other inputs in cotton production in the Golestan province. The results revealed that the total energy inputs for cotton production in the Golestan province was 28.898 MJ ha-1. The average energy efficiency for cotton production in the Golestan province was obtained to be 1.58. Energy productivity for cotton production in the Golestan province was calculated to be 0.092. From the results of Cobb-Douglas function to determine the relationship between energy input and yield of cotton in Golestan province, the effects of human labor, diesel fuel, water for irrigation, chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure inputs on the yield were positive, and the effects of agriculture machinery and chemicals inputs on cotton yield were negative. Greenhouse gas emission from diesel fuel input hadthe highest value of 646.23 kg CO2eq ha-1 with a 45.2 percent share. Farmyard manure with 23.5 percent of greenhouse emissions was identified as the second largest input in greenhouse gas emissions in cotton production. Variable costs, fixed and total cotton production in the Golestan province were calculated to be 3042429, 851880 and 3894309 Toman ha-1, respectively. Benefit to cost ratio for the cotton production in the Golestan province was calculated as 1.16.
Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the energy efficiency for cotton production in the Golestan province was less than the energy efficiency for cotton production in the Alborz province, Hatay province of Turkey, and canola, soybean and sunflower production in the Golestan province. Also, the energy efficiency of cotton production was less than that of cotton production in Antalya Turkey and canola in the Mazandaran province. The highest share of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions belonged to diesel fuel with the share of 45.6 and 45.2 percent, respectively. However, this input accounted for 2.7 percent of variable costs.

Keywords

Cobb-douglas; Cotton; energy; greenhouse gas

References

1. AghaAlikhani, M., H. Kazemi-Poshtmasari, and F. Habibzadeh. 2013. Energy use pattern in rice production: A case study from Mazandaran province, Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 69: 157-162.

2. Ahmadi, M., and M. AghaAlikhani. 2012. Energy use analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in Golestan Province and a few strategies for increasing resources productivity. Agroecology 4 (2): 151-158 (In Farsi).

3. Ahmad, A. L., N. H. M. Yasin, C. J. C. Derek, and J. K. Lim. 2011. Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15: 584-593.

4. Anonymous. Annual cotton statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran (AJMDC). 2012.

5. Anonymous. Annual agricultural statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran (AJMDC). 2011. Available from: http://www.maj.ir.

6. Anonymous. Cotton research inistitute of Iran (CRI). 2011. Available from: cri.areo.ir.

7. Brentrup, F., J. Küsters, H. Kuhlmann, and J. Lammel. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 20: 247-264.

8. Charles, R., O. Jolliet, G. Gaillard, and D. Pellet. 2006. Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 113: 216-225.

9. Dagistan, E., H. Akcaoz, B. Demirtas, and Y. Yilmaz. 2009. Energy usage and benefit-cost analysis of cotton production in Turkey.

10. Dyer, J. A., and R. L. Desjardins. 2003. Simulated Farm Fieldwork, Energy Consumption and Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Canada. Biosystems Engineering 85: 503-513.

11. Dyer, J. A., and R. L. Desjardins. 2006. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Associated with the Manufacturing of Tractors and Farm Machinery in Canada. Biosystems Engineering 93: 107-118.

12. Emadi, B., A. Nikkhah, M. Khojastehpour, and S. H. Payman. 2013. Effect of farm size on energy consumption and input costs of peanut production in Guilan province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Machinery (In press). (In Farsi).

13. Erdal, G., K. Esengün, H. Erdal, and O. Gündüz. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32: 35-41.

14. Iriarte, A., J. Rieradevall, and X. Gabarrell. 2010. Life cycle assessment of sunflower and rapeseed as energy crops under Chilean conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 336-345.

15. Khajepour, M. R. 1997. Principles of agronomy. University Publishing of Isfahan Industrial. Esfahan. Iran. (In Farsi).

16. Khan, S., M. A. Khan, M. A. Hanjra, and J. Mu. 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production. Food Policy 34: 141-149.

17. Khoshnevisan, B., S. Rafiee, M. Omid, M. Yousefi, and M. Movahedi. 2013. Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks. Energy 52: 333-338.

18. Kuswardhani, N., P. Soni, and G. P. Shivakoti. 2013. Comparative energy input–output and financial analyses of greenhouse and open field vegetables production in West Java, Indonesia. Energy 53: 83-92.

19. Lal, R. 2004. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International 30: 981-990.

20. Mirhaji H., M. Khojastehpour, and M. H. Abbaspour-Fard. 2013. Environmental impact study of wheat production in Marvdasht area of Iran. Journal of Natural Environment. (In press).

21. Mirhaji, H., M. Khojastehpour, and M. H. Abaspour-Fard. 2011. Global warming potential of wheat production in southwest of Iran. In 11th international congress on mechanization and energy in agriculture 2011-09-21. Istanbul, Turkey.

22. Mobtaker, H. G., A. Akram, and A. Keyhani. 2012. Energy use and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for alfalfa production in Iran. Energy for Sustainable Development 16: 84-89.

23. Mobtaker, H. G., A. Keyhani, A. Mohammadi, Sh. Rafiee, and A. Akram. 2010. Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for barley production in Hamedan Province of Iran. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 137: 367-372.

24. Mohammadi, A., S. Rafiee, S. S. Mohtasebi, and H. Rafiee. 2010. Energy inputs – yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renewable Energy 35: 1071-1075.

25. Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Sh. Rafiee, A. Jafari, and A. Mohammadi. 2011a. Energy flow modeling and sensitivity analysis of inputs for canola production in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 1464-1470.

26. Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Sh. Rafiee, A. Jafari, and A. Mohammadi. 2011b. Improving energy productivity of sunflower production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 1885-1892.

27. Ozkan, B., H. Akcaoz, and F. Karadeniz. 2004. Energy requirement and economic analysis of citrus production in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 45: 1821-1830.

28. Ozkan, B., R. F. Ceylan, and H. Kizilay. 2011. Comparison of energy inputs in glasshouse double crop (fall and summer crops) tomato production. Renewable Energy 36: 1639-1644.

29. Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., P. Sefeedpari, and Sh. Rafiee. 2011. Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran. Energy 36: 5824-5831.

30. Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., P. Sefeedpari, and M. Ghahderijani. 2012. Exploring energy consumption and CO [sub 2] emission of cotton production in Iran. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 4: 033115-033114.

31. Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., M. Omid, and M. D. Heidari. 2013. On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province. Energy 59: 63-71.

32. Rafiee, Sh., S. H. Mousavi Avval, and A. Mohammadi. 2010. Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy 35: 3301-3306.

33. Ramedani, Z., Sh. Rafiee, and M. D. Heidari. 2011. An investigation on energy consumption and sensitivity analysis of soybean production farms. Energy 36: 6340-6344.

34. Royan, M., M. Khojastehpour, B. Emadi, and H. G. Mobtaker. 2012. Investigation of energy inputs for peach production using sensitivity analysis in Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 64: 441-446.

35. Saeedi, M., M. Khojastehpour, M. H. Abbaspour Fard, M. Farsi, and A. Nikkhah. 2013. Calculating the energy indices of Button Mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) production: energy management approach. The Conference on Modern Management Sciences. Gorgan, Iran.

36. Samavatean, N., Sh. Rafiee, H. Mobli, and A. Mohammadi. 2011. An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield, costs and income of garlic production in Iran. Renewable Energy 36: 1808-1813.

37. Singh, H., D. Mishra, and N. M. Nahar. 2002. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India-part I. Energy Conversion and Management 43: 2275-2286.

38. Singh, S., and J. P. Mittal. 1992. Energy in Production Agriculture. Mittal Publications.

39. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press.

40. Soltani, A., M. H. Rajabi, E. Zeinali, and E. Soltani. 2013. Energy inputs and greenhouse gases emissions in wheat production in Gorgan, Iran. Energy 50: 54-61.

41. Taheri-Garavand, A., and A. Asakereh, and K. Haghani. 2010. Energy elevation and economic analysis of canola production in Iran a case study: Mazandaran province. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 1: 236-242.

42. Tsatsarelis, C. A. 1991. Energy requirements for cotton production in central Greece. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 50: 239-246.

43. Wang, M., W. Wu, W. Liu, and Y. Bao. 2007. Life cycle assessment of the winter wheat-summer maize production system on the North China Plain. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 14: 400-407.

44. Xiaomei, L., Kotelko, M. 2003. An integrated manure utilization system (imus): its social and environmental benefits. In: The 3rd international methane and nitrous oxide mitigation conference, Beijing, China, 17e21 November; (Lecture No.: AG056).

45. Yilmaz, I., H. Akcaoz, and B. Ozkan. 2005. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30: 145-155.