Depositional environment and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Eocene successions in the south of Kerman region (Lut Block): significance of nummulite accumulations (or nummulite Banks)

رخساره‌های رسوبی

Article 6, Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages 272-287   

Document Type: مقالات پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/sed.facies.v11i2.66889

Authors

masoud Ghafari¹; massih afghah^{* 2}; vahid ahmadi²

¹Fars science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch

²Islamic Azad University of Shiraz

Abstract

Introduction
Up to now, the few studies have been investigated on the shallow benthic Eocene successions from the eastern Lut Block. Here, the larger benthic foraminifera were practically one of the most important components for reconstructing of the paleoenvironmental conditions. In fact, they were abundant during the Paleogene, and are as a useful tool for sedimentary and paleoecology interpretations. The highest diversity and abundance of the Large Benthic Foraminifera (LBF) was during Eocene, where they were known as the Foraminiferal limestones within (neritic) carbonate succession. The LBF are generally recognized with calcareous algae (red algae) which can be used as paleoenvironment indicator.  However, the investigation of the facies data which is combined with paleontologic characteristics confirm paleoecologic condition during deposition of Eocene strata in the studied area. Eventually, vertical distribution of identified microfacies and sequence stratigraphy of the mentioned succession supports the depositional system and paleoenvironmental condition.
 
Methods and Results 
In this study, the Eocene carbonate marine successions were investigated in south of Kerman from the Khan Gazan and Khadagan sections with thickness of 75 m and 48 m, respectively. The identification of the microscopic data are provide by Embry and Kelovan (1971) and Dunham (1962). Field work and laboratory studies based on LBF stratigraphic distribution of the Eocene deposits led to the identification of seven facies includes: (FT1) Terrigenous bioclast packstone, (FT2) Nummulites rudstone, (FT3) Bioclast–coralline algal packstone/grainstone, (FT4) Coralline algal rudstone/bindstone, (FT5) Coral wackstone/boundstone, (FT6) Nummulithoclastic packstone/grainstone, (FT7) Bioclast packstone/ grainstone into a carbonate ramp model, which can be divided into four depositional environments: tidal flat, lagoon, shoal and open marine. The regional discrimination most likely reflects their position on separate tectonic blocks on which different facies conditions developed due to different tectonic movements. Based on Catuneanu (2006), the results of sequence stratigraphy studies were identified two third-order depositional sequences containing of four systems tracts.  The gradual vertical changes of the facies and the process of rising of sea-level from the shallow area to seaward direction are well illustrated with lateral facies changes such as the nummulitic accumulations or banks that represents of a high-energy conditions and tests transport to the deepest parts of the basin.
 
Discussion
According to studies, the frequency of microspheric forms increases with increasing water depth, while megalospheric forms are frequently in shallower or relatively deep areas (Beavington- Penny and Racey, 2004). Quartz grains are characterized by well sorting, sub-rounded, and maturity, which represents a large transport distance to the deepest parts of the basin. The proximity of coralline red algae facies trough FT5 can be referred to the margins of coral reefs. Also, Field observation suggests the development of small reefal build-ups (Patch Reef) with limited lateral extensions resulting from coral and coralline red algae assemblages in the Khan Gazan section. The evidence of our study on the FT5 in the Kagan section is indicating a gradual deepening trend of the basin. Likewise, developing of the Nummulites banks show a decrease in seawater levels as major sea-level fluctuation, thereby, the Khan Gazan section is deposited in an environment with high energy conditions and near to the origin of sediments.
In addition, the nummulite accumulations (nummulite banks) or low-relief buildups into the middle ramp area under influence of a moderate-high energy condition (e.g. currents and waves) were represented with predominance of Nummulites perforatus monospecific tests for the first time in this region. According to field work, the mentioned nummulites Bank is assigned to B form (reaching to 10 cm in diameter).  The Nummulites banks were not referred to original biocoenosis which were formed by wave activity as parautochtonous or residual assemblage (Papazzoni, 2008). Combination of LBF and coralline algal facies was previously recorded from northeastern Italy (Bassi, 2005) which is close to FT5 of studied sections. The predominant facies associations are shown an overall transgression-regression cycle of the Eocene successions in the east Lut Block.
 
Conclusion
In order to reconstruction of the paleoenvironment and geologic history of the Eocene succession of the Lut Block, the litho and biostratigraphic studies of other exposures are required. Actually, vertical distribution of facies of several stratigraphic sections and their correlation supports paleo-tectonic behavior of various location during deposition of Lut Block Eocene sediments.
 
Keywords: Eocene; Sequence Stratigraphy; Kerman; Facies; Nummulites.
 
References
Bassi, D., 2005. Larger foraminiferal and coralline algal facies in Upper Eocene strominfluenced shallow     water carbonate platform (Colli Berici, north-eastern Italy), Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 226, 17-35.
Beavington-Penney, S. J., Racey, A., 2004. Ecology of extant nummulitids and other larger benthic       foraminifera: applications in palaeoenvironmental analysis. Earth Sci.Rev., 67: 219-265.
Papazzoni, C.A. 2008. Preliminary palaeontological observations on some examples of “nummulite    banks”: sedimentary or biological origin?, Note Brevi, www.socgeol.it, 135-138.
Catuneanu, O., 2006. Principle of Sequence Stratigraphy, Elsevier, 375p.

Keywords

eocene; facies; Kerman; Nummulites; Sequence stratigraphy

References

آقانباتی، ع.، 1385. زمین شناسی ایران. سازمان زمین شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور، 586 ص.

حاجیان، ج.، 1375. زمین شناسی ایران: پالئوسن ـ ائوسن در ایران. سازمان زمین شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور، 460 ص.

شهمرادی، م.، فاریابی، ع.، 1390. زیست چینه ‌نگاری و بوم ‌شناسی دیرینه روزن‌داران نهشته‌های پالئوسن ـ ائوسن در برش ابارق، شمال غرب شهر بم، کرمان. دومین همایش زمین ‌شناسی فلات ایران، دانشگاه زرند کرمان.

Adey, W.H., 1978. Algal ridges of the Caribbean Sea and West Indies. Phycologia, 17: 361-367.

Arni, P., 1965. L'evolution des Nummulitinae en tantquefacteur de modification des depôtslittoraux. Memoir Bureau Recherches Geology Minières, 32: 7-20.

Aigner, T., 1985. Biofabrics as dynamic indicators in nummulite accumulations. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 55: 131-134.

Bassi, D., 2005. Larger foraminiferal and coralline algal facies in an Upper Eocene storminfluenced, shallow-water carbonate platform (ColliBerici, north-eastern Italy). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 226: 17-35.

Beavington-Penney, S.J., Paul Wright, V., & Racey, A., 2005. Sediment production and dispersal onforaminifera‐dominated early Tertiary ramps: the Eocene El Garia Formation, Tunisia. Sedimentology, 52: 537-569.

Beavington-Penney, S.J., & Racey, A., 2004. Ecology of extant nummulitids and other larger benthic foraminifera: applications in palaeoenvironmental analysis. Earth-Science Reviews, 67: 219-265.

Berberian, M., & King, G.C.P., 1981. Towards a paleogeography andtectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18: 210-265.

Catuneanu, O., 2006. Principles of Sequence Stratigraphy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1-375.

Catuneanu, O., Abreu, V., Bhattacharya, J.P., Blum, M.D., Dalrymple, R.W., Eriksson, P.G., Fielding, C.R., Fisher, W.L., Galloway, W.E., Gibling, M.R., Giles, K.A., Holbrook, J.M., Jordan, R., Kendall, C.G.St.C., Macurda, B.O.J., Martinsealln, A.D., Neal, Mi.J.E., Nummedal, D., Pomar, L., Posamentier, H.W., Pratt, B.R., Sarg, J.F., Shanley, K.W., Steel, R.J., Strasser, A., Tucker, M.E., & Winker, C., 2009. Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy. Earth-Science Reviews, 92: 1-33.

d'Archiac, A., 1850. Histoire des progrès de la geologie de 1834 à 1849, Première partie.3, Formation nummulitique, rochesigneesoupyrogènes des epoques quaternairesettertiaires. Societe Geologique de France, Paris, 1-624.

Dunham, R.G., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham, W.E., (ed.), classification of carbonate Rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 1: 108-121.

Flugel, E., 2010. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks, Analysis, Interpretation and Application. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1-976.

Foster, M.S., 2001. Rhodoliths: between rocks and soft places. Journal of Phycology, 87: 659-667.

Ghasemipurafshar, Y., Vaziri, M.R., Dastanpour, M., & Arab, A.L., 2015. Lutetian Schizaster fauna (Echinoidea, Spatangoida) from Sargaz area, south of Kerman, Iran. Journal of Science, Islamic Republic of Iran, 26: 131-138.

Hadi, M., Parandavar, M., Kiani, M., & Dabaghisadr, F., 2016a. The first marine record of the Bartonian Nummulites and Calcareous nannofossils at the Tihoiyeh section of the Jiroft area (Central Iran). European Geosciences Union General Assembly, Vienna.

Hadi, M., Mosaddegh, H., & Abbassi, N., 2016b. Microfacies and biofabric of nummulite accumulations (Bank) from the Eocene deposits of Western Alborz (NW Iran). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 124: 216-233.

Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J., & Vail, P.R., 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science, 235: 1156-1167.

Heydari, E., Hassanzadeh, J., Wade, W.J., & Ghazi, A.M., 2003. Permian-Triassic boundary in the Abadeh section of Iran with implication for mass extinction, Part1- Sedimentology. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 193: 405-423.

Hottinger, L., 1977. Distribution of larger Peneroplidae, Borelisand Nummulitidae in the Gulf of Elat, Red Sea. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletins, 15: 35-109.

Hunt, D., & Tucker, M.E., 1992. Stranded parasequences and the forced regressive wedge systems tract: deposition during base level fall. Sedimentary Geology, 81: 1-9.

Macintyre, I.J., Rutzler, K., Norris, J.N., Smith, K.P., Cairns, S.D., Bucher, K.E., & Steneck, R.S., 1991. An early Holocene reef in the western Atlantic: submersible investigations of a deep relict reefoff the west coast of Barbados, W.I. Coral Reefs, 10 (3): 167-174.

Nabavi, M.H., 1976. An introduction to the geology of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran, 1-109, (In Persian).

Papazzoni, C.A., 2008. Preliminary palaeontological observations on some examples of “nummulite banks”: sedimentary or biological origin? Rendiconti Online della Società Geologica Italiana, 2: 135-138

Racey, A., 2001. A review of Eocene Nummulite accumulations: structure, formation and reservoir potential. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 24: 79-100.

Schaub, H., 1981. Nummulites at Assilines de la Tethys paleogène: taxinomie, phylogenèse et biostratigraphie. Atlas I: Hans Schaub: Birkhäuser, 105: 1-236.

Seddighi, M., Briguglio, A., Hohenegger, J., & Papazzoni, C.A., 2015. New results on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fossil Nummulites tests from two Nummulite Banks from the Bartonian and Priabonian of Northern Italy. Bollentin Society Paleontology Italy, 54: 106-116.

Steller, D.L., & Foster, M.S., 1995. Environmental factors influencing distribution and morphology of rhodoliths in Bahia Conception, B.C.S., Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marin Biology and Ecology, 194: 201- 212.