Storability evaluation of Golab apple with acoustic and penetration methods

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 17, Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11, 2016, Pages 188-200   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v6i1.28765

Authors

M. R. Bayati^{* 1}; A. Rajabipour¹; H. Mobli¹; A. Eyvani²; F. Badii²

¹Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

²Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AERI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Apple fruit (Mauls domestica Borkh, Rosaceae) after citrus fruits, grape and banana, is the fourth important fruit in the world and is considered the most important fruit of temperate regions. In terms of trade volume, Iran is fourth producer and 17th exporter in the world. Among Iranian cultivars of apple fruit, known as “Golab apple”. Golab apple is one of the fragrant and tasty varieties and meanwhile is very sensitive and also its period of the postharvest shelf life is very short. In a study, the firmness of pear fruit during 4 weeks of storage was monitored using non-destructive impulse response (I-R) and destructive Magness-Taylor (M-T) puncture tests. The results of this study showed that the dominant frequency, stiffness coefficient and elasticity coefficient as a function of time could be expressed as a decreasing linear function (Gómez et al., 2005). Tiplica et al., (2010), showed that acoustic measurement can be a useful tool to discriminate different apple batches with a low error rate. Starting from the spectrum of the signal recorded by a microphone after the impact of a small hammer on the fruit, 18 key features were identified and used for the classification of apples belonging to 10 different varieties. The study aimed to evaluate apple firmness measured using both the penetrometer and acoustic methods. The methodologies were applied to Royal Gaya and Golden Smoothee apples harvested from 12 different orchards in Catalonia (Spain), on six different dates, and over three seasons. The results obtained showed a noticeable correlation between Magness Taylor firmness and acoustic measurements in Royal Gala, but no correlation was found for Golden Smoothee. In this study, also, acoustic measurements seemed to be a good tool for evaluating changes in tissue firmness during long-term storage (Molina-Delgado et al., 2009). In another study, it was presented a novel approach based on the simultaneous profiling of the mechanical and acoustic response of the flesh tissue to compression, using a texture analyzer coupled with an acoustic device. The methodology was applied to a 86 different apple cultivars, measured after two months postharvest cold storage and characterised by 16 acoustic and mechanical parameters. The results demonstrate the good performance of our combined acoustic-mechanical strategy in measuring apple crispness as it is perceived by human senses (costa et al, 2011). Hence, present study was about postharvest durability evaluation of this apple in cold storage and effect of methylcellulose coating on durability of this sensitive apple for both intact and damaged ones.
Materials and Methods: After obtaining Golab apples, from one of the gardens of Karaj (Alborz province, Iran), 240 of them were selected. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the firmness of apples with two methods: penetration (destructive) and acoustic (non destructive). The tests were performed in Agricultural Engineering Research Institute in Karaj. Firmness is one of the fruit characteristics that changes during storage. In present study, this characteristic of the apple fruit was assessed by two mentioned methods. Half of the apples were damaged with identified and controlled impact. In the next stage, another half of apples in both groups (the intact apples and the bruised apples) were coated with methylcellulose. Effect storage on apple in four groups, including: Intact and uncoated apples, intact and coated (with methylcellulose) apples, bruised and uncoated apples and bruised and coated apples during about ten weeks of cold storage at 2˚C and 85% RH was studied by the acoustic and the penetration tests. Acoustic parameters including: natural frequency, firmness index, elasticity coefficient were measured by recording audio signals resulting from non destructive impacts of a pendulum using a sound analyzer microphone and then the conversion of those parameters were performed from the time domain to the frequency domain by the corresponding formulas and software. Penetration test measurements were performed using a texture analyzer and its software. The tests were carried out every week. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out using Excel 2007 and SPSS 16 software and the significance of the results was determined using Duncan's test at the 5% confidence level.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance showed effect of independent variables including: effects of coating, impact and time and also interaction effects on dependent variables including: natural frequency, acoustic index and modulus of elasticity and penetration index on the tested apples. Effects of coating and time were significant at the 5% confidence levelon all dependent variables. But the impact and interaction effect were not significant on dependent variables (Table 1). In general, bruise and lack of coating on the apples during the 10 weeks of storage, were reduced acoustic parameters. In the penetration test, changes were similar to acoustic test (Table 2). In this test, all curves have downward trend and combination of independent variables: coated and intact apples were reasons of more penetration resistance of apples in all of the groups. The condition was continued until the end of storage time, despite of the downwards slopped curves in all groups. In penetration test, coated apples keep more firmness than other groups (groups of apples without coating) and thus the apple's quality would stay better, too (Fig.7).
Conclusions: In general, the following results were obtained from this research: The results showed that the acoustic and penetration parameter were decreased during 10 weeks of storage. Reduction of these parameters continued until the end of storage period, but this reduction was significant only up to eighth week. Also at this time, the acoustic parameters (natural frequency, firmness index, elasticity coefficient) and penetration firmness in intact and coated apples were 14.26%, 4.11%, 14% and 40% respectively higher compared to other apples. Due to the more tangible acoustic parameters changes, especially acoustic index and modulus of elasticity (having the more slope than the penetration firmness). One could use acoustic tests for more accurate evaluation of apples firmness and quality changes. Finding correlation between acoustic parameters and penetration parameter showed that, correlation between acoustic parameters in each case is greater than correlation between these parameters with penetration parameter.

Keywords

Acoustic test; Golab apple; Non destructive tests; Texture analyzer

References

1. Barriga-Te´llez, L. M., M. G. Garnica-Romo, J. I. Aranda-Sa´nchez, G. A. Correa, M. C. Bartolome´-Camacho, and H. E. Martı´nez-Flores. 2011. Nondestructive tests for measuring the firmness of guava fruit stored and treated with methyl jasmonate and calcium chloride. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 46: 1310-1315.

2. Chen, H., F. Duprat, M. Grotte, D. Loonis, and E. Pietri. 1995. Influence of the apple deffect on the frequency response spectra during nondestructive acoustic sensing of fruit firmness. International Agrophysics 9: 143-151.

3. Cherng, A. P., and F. Ouyang. 2003. A firmness index for fruits of ellipsoidal shape. Biosystems Engineering 86 (1): 35-44.

4. Costa, F., L. Cappellin, S. Longhi, W. Guerra, P. Magnago, D. Porro, C. Soukoulis, S. Salvi, R. Velasco, F. Biasioli, and F. Gasperi. 2011. Assessment of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit texture by a combined acoustic-mechanical profiling strategy. Postharvest Biology and Technology 61 (1): 21-28.

5. De Belie, N., S. Schotte, P. Coucke, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2000. Development of an automated monitoring device to quantify changes in firmness of apples during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 18: 1-8.

6. De Ketelaere, B., M. S. Howarth, L. Crezee, J. Lammertyn, K. Viaene, I. Bulens, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2006. Postharvest firmness changes as measured by acoustic and low-mass impact devices: a comparison of techniques. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 275-284.

7. Duprat, F., M. Grotte, E. Pietri, and D. Loonis. 1997. The acoustic impulse response method for measuring the overall firmness of fruit. Journal of Agricultural Enjineering Research 66: 251-259.

8. Felföldi, J., and V. Zsom-Muha. 2010. Investigation of ripening process of fruit and vegetable samples by acoustic method. ISHS Acta Horticulture 858: 393-398.

9. Gomez, A. H., A. G. Pereira, W. Jun, and H. Yong. 2005. Acoustic testing for peach fruit ripeness evaluation during peach storage stage. Revista Ciencias Tecnicas Agropecuarias 14 (2): 28-34.

10. Gomez, A. H., J. Wang, and A. G. Pereira. 2005. Impulse response of pear fruit and its relation to Magness-Taylor firmness during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 35: 209-215.

11. Hadian-Deljou, M., and H. Sarikhani. 2012. Effect of salicylic acid on maintaining post-harvest quality of apple cv. "Golabe-Kohanz". Journal of Crops Improvement 14 (2): 71-82. (In Farsi).

12. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). 1991. Code of practice of for cold storage of apples. 1st Revision, 4th Edition, ISIRI number 946. (In Farsi).

13. Javadi, S., S. M. Nassiri, A. Jafari, and A. Salehi. 2012. Determination of texture of Kiwifruit using impact nondestructive method. The 7th National Coference on Agricultural Machinery Enginnering and Mechanization, Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi).

14. Khoshnam, F., H. Mobli, S. R. Hassan Beygi, A. Rajabipour, Sh. Rafiee, and A. Eyvani. 2012. Melon ripeness detection using non-destructive acoustic impulse response. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 13 (3). (In Farsi).

15. Masoudi, M., A. Tabatabaeefar, and A. M. Borghaee. 2007. Determination of storage effect on mechanical properties of apples using the uniaxial compression test. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 49 (3): 29-33.

16. Mehinagic, E., G. Royer, R. Symoneaux, and F. Jourjan. 2006. Relationship between apple sensory attribute and instrumental parameter of texture. Journal of Fruit and Omamental Plant Research 14 (2): 25-37.

17. Mirzaei, R., S. Minaei, and M. H. Khoshtagaza. 2013. Investigation of apple characteristics using Finite Element Modal analysis. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 3 (1): 48-57.

18. Molina-Delgado, D., S. Alegre, P. Barreiro, C. Valero, M. Ruiz-Altisent, and I. Recasens. 2009. Addressing potential sources of variation in several non-destructive techniques for measuring firmness in apples. Biosystems Engineering 104: 33-46.

19. Molina-Delgado, D., S. Alegre, J. Puy, and I. Recasens. 2009. Relationship between acoustic firmness and Magness Taylor firmness in Royal Gala and Golden Smoothee apples. Food Science and Technology International 31-40.

20. Nabizadeh, F., and M. Esmaiili. 2010. Changes on Texture of Golden Delicious Apple during Storage in a Commercial Cooling Room Affected by Harvesting Date. Journal of Food Research 20 (2): 33-43. (In Farsi).

21. Saadatinia, M., B. Emadi, and H. Sadrnia. 2011. Design, development andevaluation of system for determination of watermelon maturity on the base of acoustic ecitation. The 1st National Conference in Agricultural Mechnization and New Technologies, Ahvaz, Iran. (In Farsi).

22. Taniwaki, M., M. Tohrob, and N. Sakurai. 2010. Measurement of ripening speed and determination of the optimum ripeness of melons by a nondestructive acoustic vibration method. Postharvest Biology and Technology 56: 101-103.

23. Tiplica, T., P. Vandewalle, S. Verron, C. Gremy-Gros, and E. Mehinagic. 2010. Identification of apple varieties using acoustic measurements. International Metrology Conference CAFMET Cairo, Egypt.

24. Zdunek, A., J. Cybulska, D. Konopacka, and K. Rutkowski. 2010. New contact acoustic emission detector for texture evaluation of apples. Journal of Food Engineering 99: 83-91.

25. Zdunek, A., and R. Ranachowski. 2006. Acoustic emission in puncture test of apples during shelf-life. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities 9 (4).

26. Zude, M., B. Herold, J. M. Roger, V. Bellon Maurel, and S. Landahl. 2006. Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life. Journal of Food Engineering 77 (2): 254-260.

27. Zdunek A., L. Frankevych, K. Konstankiewicz, and Z. Ranachowski. 2008. Comparison of puncture test, acoustic emission and spatial-temporal speckle correlation technique as methods for apple quality evaluation. Acta Agrophysica 11 (1): 303-315.