The Effect of Social Loafing on Team Performance by Mediating Role of Team Social Capital

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 9, Volume 11, Autumn & Winter 2020 - Serial Number 22, February 2020, Pages 207-226   

Document Type: Articles

DOI: 10.22067/pmt.v11i2.71897

Authors

Mohsen Akbari^{* 1}; elaheh jahanshahi¹; Mohammadreza Daneshvar Deilami²

¹university of guilan

²Allameh Tabatabaie

Abstract

1- INTRODUCTION
From a long time ago, social loafing has been considered as one of the most important factors of lowering teams’ efficiency. The main purpose of this study was to examine the effect of social loafing on team performance of companies located in Science and Technology Park of the University of Tehran. Since social capital in its various forms and contexts is recognized as one of the most salient concepts of social sciences in the past two decades, the current study also considers the mediating role of team social capital in above-mentioned relationship.
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Teamwork has always been considered as one of the most important organizational variables, yet, its effectiveness is just as important and significant as the concept itself. Of factors that challenge teamwork is social loafing. Early theorists have focused on the negative role of social loafing in terms of collective activities. Social loafing refers to individuals' tendency to expend less effort when working in groups than do individually. In addition, the present study examines the mediating role of team social capital in this relationship. At the team level, social capital concentrates on the following: a) how to form certain groups and to maintain social capital as a collective asset, and b) how such a collective asset enhances the life chances of group members. Accordingly, the research hypotheses are as follows.
Hypothesis 1: Social loafing has a significant effect on team performance.
Hypothesis 2: Social loafing has a significant effect on team social capital.
Hypothesis 3: Team social capital has a significant effect on team performance.
Hypothesis 4: Team social capital mediates the relationship between social loafing and team performance.
3- METHODOLOGY
The research philosophy is positivism, its approach is deductive, and its strategy is survey. Therefore, after reviewing the literature and developing the conceptual model, a 23-item questionnaire distributed among participants. The statistical population was comprised of different teams of companies located in Science and Technology Park of the University of Tehran from which a sample of 124 teams was selected. The questionnaire's face and content validity were verified by obtaining the experts' opinions, and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed its construct validity. Also, reliability was approved by using Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, and average variance extracted. Then, gathered data was analyzed by conducting structural equation modeling in Smart-PLS software.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Research indicated that social loafing affects the performance of knowledge-intensive teams. It also indicated that Social capital mediates the relationship between social loafing and team performance. Given the obtained results, team members’ tendency to social loafing harms the performance of the team.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
Given the significant role of social loafing in reducing team productivity as well as mediating role of social capital, the following notes are discussed. At the individual level, one should pay attention to factors such as intrinsic motivation, lack of interest in the job, trait procrastination, lack of desire for career advancement, lack of self-assessment of progress, being aimless, lack of personal planning, etc. At the team level, one can refer to factors such as lack of perceived coherence, extensive workload, being hidden in the crowd, and reduced responsibility. Finally, at the organizational level, important factors are Job dissatisfaction, organizational indifference, perceived inequity, unfair compensation, ineffective salary system, ineffective performance appraisal system, etc.

Keywords

Social Loafing; Team Performance; Team Social Capital

References

Akgunduz, Y., & Eryilmaz, G. (2018). Does turnover intention mediate the effects of job insecurity and co-worker support on social loafing? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 68, 41-49.

Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254-269.

Amiri, M., & Rahmani, T. (2006). Investigating the impact of intragroup and outbound social capital on economic growth in provinces of iran. Journal of Economic Literature. (6) 111-152. (in Persian)

Amobeigy, A., & Hayati, D. (2014). Factors affecting the social capital within the group. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering.)24(, 47-56. (in Persian)

Baktay, M., & Gholipour, A. (2011). Explaining social capital as a key leverage in promoting team effectiveness. Iranian journal of management sciences. (22) 61-77. (in Persian)

Baktay, M.; Gholipour, A., & Goodarzi, S. (2011). Explaining transformational leadership and social capital as levers for promoting team effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Perspective. (6) 135-150. (in Persian)

Bartis, S.; Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1988). Evaluation and performance: a two-edged knife. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 242-251.

Boraghani F.; Abadzadeh, S.; Pedram, F. B., & Pourhosseini, S. (2016). The mediating role of psychological empowerment and quality of work life impact on organizational citizenship behavior. Iranian journal of Management Sciences. 41(11). 117-136. (in Persian)

Bowden, J. L. H.; Conduit, J.; Hollebeek, L.; Luoma-aho, D. V., & Solem, B. A. A. (2018). The role of social capital in shaping consumer engagement within online brand communities. The Handbook of Communication Engagement, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 491-504.

Charbonnier, E.; Huguet, P.; Brauer, M., & Monteil, J. M. (1998). Social loafing and self-beliefs: people's collective effort depends on the extent to which they distinguish themselves as better than others. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 26(4), 329-340.

Chittazan, A., & Mortazavi, S. (2010). Investigating the factors affecting the “social slack" phenomenon in group activities. Sterategic Management Thought. 4(25). 161-180. (in Persian)

Colombo, M. G.; Franzoni, C., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75-100.

Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human relations, 48(6), 647-667.

Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: a comparison of the united states and the people's republic of China. Administrative science quarterly, 565-581.

George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. Handbook of work group psychology, 75, 77-93.

Ghanbari, C., & Hemmati, M. (2016). Relationship of social capital with teamwork of employees. 4th International Conference on new directions in management, economics and accounting, 1-12. (in Persian)

Haghighfard, A.; Moradi, M.; Khalilzadeh, M., & Nobakhteh Sahrood Kalayi, J. (2008). Review team performance in the organization and its influencing factors. Police Human Development. 20(5), 24-44. (in Persian)

Haugen, T.; Reinboth, M.; Hetlelid, K. J.; Peters, D. M., & Høigaard, R. (2016). Mental toughness moderates social loafing in cycle time-trial performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(3), 305-310.

Hollenbeck, J. R., & Jamieson, B. B. (2015). Human capital, social capital, and social network analysis: Implications for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 370-385.

Latane, B.; Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822.

Lins, K. V.; Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.

Mousavi, M.; Rafiei, H., & Ghasemzadeh, D. (2015). The relationship between social capital within the group and happiness among citizens of Tehran. Educational and Evaluation Journal. 8(30), 87-98. (in Persian)

Nadimi, B.; Gholipour, A., & Ibn Yamini, S. (2013). Investigating the effect of team reflection on team performance in project teams organizational culture management. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences. 11(4), 63-84. (in Persian)

Oh, M.; Chung, M., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860-875.

Price, K. H. (1987). Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(3), 330-345.

Read, E. A., & Laschinger, H. K. (2015). The influence of authentic leadership and empowerment on nurses’ relational social capital, mental health and job satisfaction over the first year of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1611-1623.

Schippers, M. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: the compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 62-81.

Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 133-168.

Schermerhorn, J. R. (2002). Managing organizational behavior. John Wiley & Sons.

Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: bourdieu vs. putnam. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 40(2), 183-204.

Stohl, C., & Schell, S. E. (1991). A communication-based model of a small-group dysfunction. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 90-110.

Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1992). Self-evaluation and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 259-265.