The Function of Language as a Security Tool: Analysis of King Salman's Speech at the Riyadh Summit

پژوهش نامه ایرانی سیاست بین الملل

Article 6, Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16, June 2020, Pages 139-170   

Document Type: مقالات

DOI: 10.22067/ijip.v8i2.85195

Authors

Mohammad Salami Ostad¹; Mohammad Hossain Jamshidi^{* 2}; Sahar Bahrami Khorshid³; Mohsen Eslami⁴

¹Ph.D. Candidate of International Relations, University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran

³Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran

⁴Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Tarbiat Modares, Iran

Abstract

Since assuming office in 2015, King Salman, Saudi Arabia’s approach toward Iran has shifted from a conservative defense policy to an aggressive conservative policy. The Saudi officials have frequently attempted to define Iran as an international threat in their meetings and interviews. The current research investigates King Salman's speech at the Riyadh meeting to show how Saudi officials, particularly King Salman, have used the concepts of "security maker" and the use of "language" as tools of "verbal action" to portray the Islamic Republic of Iran as a "security threat" in the Middle East region. The research method in this article is Norman Fairclough’s " of Critical Discourse Analysis", and Ole Weaver’s theory of "securitization". Findings of the article show that King Salman condemned the Islamic Republic of Iran at the summit by using the words in international law and the delicate basis of his theological power on current issues in the international community as well as the general demands of international conventions. And in this way, it will convince the audience about the security of Iran with the content of its words.

Keywords

King salman; Critical Discourse Analysis; Securitization; Iran phobia

References

References

Ahmadian, H. (2016). Evolution in Saudi regional politics; Proceedings of king Salman, Quarterly Journal of Foreign Relations, 8(4), 97-122. (in Persian)

Al-Momani, H. A. (2017). Political discourse of Jordan: a critical discourse analysis, International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 320-350.

Anatoli, Press. (2017). Meeting of the leaders of Islamic-Arab and American countries in Saudi Arabia, Anatoli Press, 21/5/2017, at:

https://www.aa.com.tr/fa/جهان/نشست-سران-کشورهای-اسلامی-عربی-و-آمریکا-در-عربستان-سعودی/823077،, Access 15/6/2019. (in Persian)

Arab News, (2017). Full speech of King Salman at the end of president Trump's visit, The Arab News, 22/5/2017, at:

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1102971/saudi-arabia. Access 1/6/2019.

Bahrain, News Agency. (2019). King Salman stresses Saudi Arabia’s steadfast efforts to achieve more progress, Bahrain News Agency, 20/11/2019, at:

https://www.bna.bh/en/HRHPremierissuedEdict33/HMKingissuesdecrees50,51,52/KingSalmanstressesSaudiArabiassteadfasteffortstoachievemoreprogress.aspx?cms=q8FmFJgiscL2fwIzON1%2BDlrUzcG7bPYUy479cN3SBu4%3D., Access 28/5/2019.

Bahrampor, Sh. (1998). Critical discourse analysis, Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research. (in Persian)

Dahashiar, H., & Nazari, N. (2019). Securing Iran’s nuclear program in the governments of bush and obama, Iranian Policy Research International Quarterly, 7(2), 37-66. (in Persian)

Dahghani Firozabadi, S. J., & Ghorshi, S. Y. (2002). Theory and methods in security studies, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, 15(4), 7-42. (in Persian)

Dahshiri, M. R. et al., (2017). The impact of regional security on the cognitive behavior of regional security collections, Global Policy, 6(1), 43-78. (in Persian)

Diskaya, A. (2013). Towards a critical securitization theory: the copenhagen and aberystwyth schools of security studies, Aberystwyth University, May, 23-58.

Fairclough, N. (1996). Language and Power, New York: Longman Inc.

Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research. (in Persian)

Fazali, M. (2004). Discourse and analysis of critical discourse, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(14), 81-106. (in Persian)

Ghiasian, M.; Moghimi Sarani, S., & Karaimi Firozjaei, A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis of Iran and shiites in Saudi online news, Quarterly Journal of Political Research in the Islamic World, 5(1), 129-154. (in Persian)

Ghorshi, Y. (2016). Disclosure of security council resolutions on North Korea; discourse analysis from the perspective, World Politics Quarterly, 5(2), 107-145. (in Persian)

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain–Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hansen, L. (2006). Security as Practice Discourse Analysis and the Bosnia War, Abingdon: Routledge.

Horváth, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse, Institute of British and American Studies, 17, 233-285.

Liu, K., & Guo, F. (2016). A review on critical discourse analysis, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(5), 52-75.

Karimi Firozjaye, A. (2017). A review of the headlines of sports newspapers from the perspective of critical discourse: a case study of the matches between the teams of Persepolis of Iran and Al-Hilal of Saudi Arabia, Quarterly Journal of Applied Research in Sports Management, 6(3), 21-32. (in Persian)

Karimi Firozjaye, A. (2018). A study of imam khomeini's views on the university from the perspective of fairclough critical discourse analysis, Matin Research Journal, 20(77), 105-126. (in Persian)

Khani, M. H.; Shah Mohammadi, P., & Soltani, M, J. (2013). The impact of security on china's economic strategy in central asia, Quarterly Central Asia and Caucasus, 83, 53-80. (in Persian)

McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security, European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 23-56.

Mirdahghan, M., & Shokati Mogharab, S. (2013). Hidden discourse, power and media in the arab middle east, (case study: Saudi Arabia), Quarterly Journal of World Socio-Political Studies, 3(1), 145-180. (in Persian)

Mohsani, S., & Salahi, A. (2011). US purposes of securing iran's nuclear activities (looking at copenhagen school), Foreign Policy Quarterly, 25(3), 613-634. (in Persian)

Mosavi, S., & Badakhshan, A. (2016). A study of the beauty of interpretation in persian: a discourse approach, Journal of Comparative Linguistics, 6(12), 55-67. (in Persian)

Moshirzadeh, H. (2005). Evolution in theories of international relations, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)

Motamir, D. (2001). Beyond strategy: critical thought and new security studies, Strategic Studies Quarterly, (translated by Mohammad Asghari), 4(13), 383-396. (in Persian)

Munster, R. (2005). Logics of security: the copenhagen school, risk management and the war on terror, Syddansk University, Denmark.

Namamian, P., & Sohrab Baig, M. (2011). fight against terrorism; an effective strategy for achieving just world peace, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy, 3(6), 77-114. (in Persian)

Noruz, M. & Farhod, F. (2016). Saadi's cautionary education in the garden with a critical discourse analysis approach to fairclough theory, Journal of Educational Literature, 8(32), 161-190. (in Persian)

Ramazan zadeh, A.; Basharati, M., & Hashami, T. (2013). Developing the regional position and stressful relations between the islamic iepublic of Iran and Saudi Arabia, Quarterly Journal of Management and Defense Research, 12(71), 147-178. (in Persian)

Rashidi, S. S.; Baghari Khalili, A. A., & Pirozi, Gh. (2017). Chubak's critical discourse in Tangsir's novel, Literary Textbook Quarterly, 21(72), 35-62. (in Persian)

Rostami, F.; Ayoman, M. S., & Karamian Habili, K. R. (2016). The regional security system in the persian gulf and Its impact on iraqi national security after the war, Strategy Quarterly,25(78), 191-220. (in Persian)

Soltani, S. A., & Moghadasnia, M. (2016). The confrontation between the Iranian and Saudi press in the representation of mena: disaster or accident? Political Science Quarterly, 19(73), 55-82. (in Persian)

Tasnim, Press. (2019). Saudi stalemate in anti-Iranian stance in mecca meetings, Tasnim Press, 1/6/2019, at https://tn.ai/2023566, Access 6/4/2020. (in Persian)

Taureck, R. (2006). Securitization theory and securitization studies, Journal of International Relations and Development, 9, 125-156.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis, In Schiffrin et al.

Vosughi, S.; Moradifar, S. & Safari, A. (2014) Analysis of south caucasus security issues based on copenhagen school security theory, Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, 7(1), 175-194. (in Persian)

Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: securitization and international politics, International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 158-220.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2008). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 220-265.

Zare zadeh Abarghoye, R. (2017). Copenhagen's view of security: fundamentals and challenges, Afaq Security Quarterly, 10(36), 90-120. (in Persian)