Development and field evaluation of an intercropping machine for corn and bean

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 2, Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 12, 2016, Pages 283-297   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v6i2.40405

Authors

A. Mondani; S. H. Karparvarfard^*

Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Maximum efficiency of natural resources, reduced risk of production, improved fertility of soil, and increased production per area enjoyment have made intercropping a preferential practice compared with cropping. One of the fundamental problems in this kind of cropping is non-existence of suitable machines. In this research, a new intercropping machine has been designed and built for intercropping of corn and bean with precise ratios and different planting patterns.
Materials and Methods
The experiments were conducted at the Badjgah Research Station, Shiraz University, located in NW Shiraz, Iran. The soil texture was clay loam (16% sand, 48% silt, and 35% clay). The plot size was 9 m wide and 12 m long. The total number of the plots were 9. The basic components of intercropping machine were an adjustable frame to adjust row spacing for each unit planter about 550 mm horizontally independently (the row spacing between corn and bean planting lines was considered 375 mm), a hinged frame for adjustment of seeding depth and possible poor emergence of plants due to very deep or shallow planting, metering case frames for installing the vacuum metering disk units around which the seed drums have a row of 36 holes of 4.5 and 5.5 mm diameter for corn and bean, respectively, seed delivery tubes, a suction fan, shovel openers used for bedder planting for corn and lister planting for bean, a knife covering attachment, seed-firming wheels, interchangeable gears which are mechanical chain drives for 43 varying seeding rates driven by carrying wheel drives, two metal seed hoppers whose lower side walls’ slope can be adjust at a maximum level of 45 . A front wheel assist, Massey Ferguson tractor (MF-399) (ITM, Tabriz, Iran) with a maximum engine power of 81 kW was used for field test of intercropping machine. Moldboard plow was used for primary tillage and the depth of plowing was 25 cm. Next, by an offset disk harrow, the field was disked twice for pulverizing lumps, mulching the surface and firming the underneath soil to provide a smooth uniform seedbed. In this study, the common bean seed (var. Derakhshan) and corn hybrid seed (SC-704) with 93 and 83 percent of germination and 97 and 98 percent of purity, respectively, were used. This machine was operated in five different distance patterns between corn and bean seeds on each row: 55 mm and 215 mm in the first pattern, 85 mm and 185 mm in the second pattern, 110 mm and 150 mm in the third pattern, 130 mm and 120 mm in the fourth pattern, and 160 mm and 100 mm in the fifth pattern for corn and bean, respectively. For all patterns, the depth of planting for corn and bean seeds was chosen as 20, 40, and 60 mm. In addition, the forward speed was assumed to be constant (4 km h-1). By using split plots with three replicates and SAS software (2002), the results were analyzed.
Results and Discussion
The multiple index, miss index, precision index, and quality of feed index was evaluated. The analysis of variance for bean planting unit showed that difference distance between seeds and various planting depth were significantly higher for multiple index (P< 0.01), but their interactions were not significant (P 0.05). Also, with decreasing the seeds distances, the multiple index was increased (P< 0.05). Moreover, comparing the results of the average multiple index in different levels of planting depth indicated that the multiple index was decreased when at higher depths of planting (P< 0.05). The seeds distance and planting depth were significantly higher for miss index and quality of feed index (P< 0.01), but their interactions were not significant for either index (P> 0.05). The precision index was significant was affected by different levels of seeds distance (P< 0.05) and was higher for different levels of seeds planting depths (P< 0.01), but their interactions were not significant. In corn planting unit, the results showed that the different distances between seeds and planting depths were significantly higher for multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index, and precision index (P< 0.01). Also their interactions were significant for multiple index (P< 0.05), but the other indices showed no significant interactions (P> 0.05).
Conclusions
The data suggested a higher quality index once corn and bean were respectively plated at 160 and 215 mm seed distance with a planting depth of 60 mm being optimum for each corn and bean.

Keywords

Bean; corn; Intercropping; Planter; Quality of feed index

References

1. Ghanbari Bonjar, A. 2000. Intercropped wheat (Triticum aestivum) and bean (Vica faba) as a low – input forage. Wye College, University of London, London.

2. Kachman, S. D., and J. A. Smith. 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transaction of the ASAE 38 (2): 379-387.

3. Koocheki, A., M. Hosseini, and A. Hashemi- Dezfooli. 2009. Sustainable agricultural systems. Mashhad: Jahad-E-Daneshgahi Publications. 7th printing. PP. 162. (In Farsi).

4. Lazanyi, J. 2000. Grass pea and green manure effects in the great Hungarian plain. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter 1: 28-30.

5. Liebman, M., and A. S. Davis. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low- input farming systems. Weed Research 40: 27-47.

6. Majnoon Hoseini, N. 1992. Bean of Iran. Jihad Tehran University Publications. PP. 240. (In Farsi).

7. Mazaheri, D. 1994. Intercropping. Tehran University Publication. PP. 262. (In Farsi).

8. Mohler, C. L., and M. Liebman. 1987. Weed productivity and composition in sole crop and intercrops of barley and field pea. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 685-699.

9. Muhammad, I., M. Rafig, A. Sultan, M. Akram, and M. Arifgoher. 2006. Green fodder yield and quality evolution of maize and cowpea sown alone and in combination. Journal of Agricultural Research 44 (1): 121-129.

10. Mushagalusa, G. N., J. F. Ledent, and X. Draye. 2008. Shoot and root competition in potato /maize intercropping: Effect on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 180-188.

11. Pandey, I. B., V. Bharati, and S. S. Mishra. 2003. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) -based intercropping systems on maize yield and associated weeds under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48: 30-33.

12. Prin, S. U., and J. Dwit. 2005. Intercropping cereal and grain legumes, A Farmers Perspective, Research at the Louis Bolk inStitute live Stock Department, w.w.w.agric.nsw.gov.au.

13. Sauke, H., and K. Ackermann. 2006. Weed suppression in mixed cropped grain peas and false flax (Camelina sativa L.). Weed Research 46: 453-461.

14. Zhang, F., and L. Li. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient- use efficiency. Plant and Soil 248: 305-312.