Exploring the Viability of Robot-Assisted Differentiated Instruction in Translation of English for Medical Purposes and Quality of Treatment

مطالعات زبان و ترجمه

Article 3, Volume 53, Issue 2, July 2020, Pages 57-94   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/lts.v52i4.84415

Authors

Saeed Khazaie^{* 1}; Amir Mashhadi²; Reza Torabi¹

¹Department of English Language, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

²Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

In parallel with the development of Educational Technology tools, this research aims to benefit from these advancements to promote the quality of teaching translation and thus address students’ educational real-world needs. Executing a robot-assisted differentiated instruction (RADI) in a full factorial design study, oral and written translation as well as the real-world workplace performance of 373 Persian and non-Persian students enrolled in the compulsory course of English for Medical Purposes (EMP) at Medical University of Isfahan (MUI) were assessed in three sets of Commercially-Off-The-Shelf, self-, and robot-made educational activities. The data gathered from the participants’ attitude, progress, performance, perception, and teachers’ journaling were analyzed both descriptively and inferentially through a mixed-effect model. The results pointed to the applicability of RADI in learning EMP translation and enhancing the participants’ transfer competence. As the findings revealed, a converging trend was evident between the participants’ attitude, performance and perception, as well as teachers’ approving journal entry. The participants’ success in oral and written translation of EMP contents through the robot-assisted platform as well as their good performance in promoting the health levels in the communities (viz., quality of treatment) could be attributed to the diverse affordances of robots coupled with the participants’ active role in meeting their educational real-world needs. The results could be used in subsequent studies on teaching translation through the medium of robots.
 

Keywords

Art of Translation; Robot-assisted Differentiated Instruction; English for Medical Purposes; Oral and Written Translation; Transitional and Bilingual Competences; Quality of Treatment

References

ترابی، ر. (1395). انگلیسی عمومی برای دانشجویان حوزة پزشکی. اصفهان: انتشارات دانشگاه علوم‌پزشکی اصفهان.

جزایری، ا. (1396). انگلیسی برای دانشجویان رشتة تغذیه. تهران: سمت.

خزایی، س.، و مشهدی، ا. (1394). بررسی تأثیر بازی مجازی بر بار شناختی و خلاقیت فراگیران در پودمان ترکیبی آموزش نوشتار انگلیسی. مجلة مرکز مطالعات و توسعة آموزش علوم پزشکی یزد، ۱۰(1)، 72-83.

دیداری، ر.، و رخشانفر، م. (1392). انگلیسی برای دانشجویان رشتة توانبخشی. تهران: سمت.

سودمند افشار، ح.، و حافظ، ف. (1397). ارزیابی کتاب درسی انگلیسی تخصصی برای دانشجویان رشتة کامپیوتر: دیدگاه دانشجویان و مدرسان زبان تخصصی رشتة کامپیوتر. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 51(3)، 33-74.

علوی، س. م. (1395). انگلیسی برای دانشجویان رشتة بهداشت. تهران: سمت.

فرحزاد، ف. (1396). فرهنگ توصیفی اصطلاحات مطالعات ترجمه. تهران: علمی.

قاسم‌زاده، ح. (1379). آیندة خلاقیت و خلاقیت آینده. تهران: ناهید.

کیهانی ع.، اکبری، ز.، برکت، ف. و ترابی، ر. (1395). انگلیسی برای دانشجویان پرستاری. تهران: سمت.

مهدیزادخانی، م.، و خوش‌سلیقه، م. (1396). ترجمة نشانه‌نظام گرافیکی: مطالعة موردی دو نسخة دوبلة حرفه‌ای. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 50(3)، 49-69.

 

Abdi, Z., & Khoshsaligheh, M. (2018). Applying multimodal transcription to Persian subtitling. Studies about Languages, 32, 21-39.

Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners' anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 523–535.

Alshehab, M. (2013). The impact of e-learning in students' ability in translation from English into Arabic at Irbid national university in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14), 123-135.

Benali, M., & Ally, A. (2020). Towards a conceptual framework highlighting mobile learning challenges. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(1), 51-63.

Candel-Mora, M. A. (2016). Translator training and the integration of technology in the translator's workflow. In D. Li (Ed.), Technology implementation in second language teaching and translation studies (pp. 49-70). London, England: Springer.

Carrio-Pastor, M. L. (2016). Technology implementation in second language teaching and translation studies. Valencia, Spain: Springer.

Cem Odacıoglu, M., & Kokturk, S. (2015, February). The effects of technology on translation students in academic translation teaching. Paper presented at the 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015). Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece. Retrieved from http:// sciencedirect. com/ science/ article/pii/S1877042815043505

Chetwynd, J. (2011). Browser-native games that use real-world XML data. In M. M. Cruz-Cunha, V. H. C. Carvalho, & P. C. A. Tavares (Eds.), Computer games as educational and management tools: Uses and approaches (pp. 122-135). Pennsylvania, PA: Information Science Reference.

Chin, K. Y., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Impact of using an educational robot-based learning system on students' motivation in elementary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(4), 333-346.

Chunmei, W. (2008). The influences of computer-assisted translation teaching. Paper presented at International Conference on Multimedia and Information Technology, Three Gorges, China. Abstract retrieved from http:// ieeexplore. ieee. org/ document/5089084/?reload=true

Chunyu, K., & Tak-ming, W. B. (2015). Evaluation in machine translation and computer-aided translation. In Ch. Sin-wai (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of translation technology (pp. 213-236). London and New York: Routledge.

Corrius, M., De Marco, M., & Espasa, E. (2016). Situated learning and situated knowledge: Gender, translating audiovisual adverts and professional responsibility. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 10(1), 59-75.

ESchool News. (2014). Transforming language instruction. Technology News and Innovation in K-12 Education, 17(4), 28-29.

Fotouhi-Ghazvini, F., Excell, P. S., Moeini, A. & Robison, D. J. (2008). A psycho-pedagogical approach to m-learning in a developing world context. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization (IJMLO), 1, 62–80.

Gerding-Salas, C. (2000). Teaching translation: Problems and solutions. Translation Journal, 4(3), 328-334.

Han, J. (2012). Emerging technologies: Robot assisted language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 1-9.

Hubscher-Davidson, S. (2007). Meeting students' expectations in undergraduate translation programs. Translation Journal, 11(1). Retrieved from https://llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/2798.html

Jafari, O. (2013). How approaches to teaching English can be used for teaching translation. Translation Journal, 17(2). Retrieved from http:// translationjournal. net/ journal/64teaching.htm

Jakobson, A. L. (1999). Logging target text production with Translog. In G. Hansen (Ed.), On translation (pp. 9-20). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lee, C. C. (2007). Graphic organizers as scaffolding for students' revision in the prewriting stage. Paper presented at Ascilit. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/ singapore07/ procs/ lee-cc.pdf

Lee, L. M., Teutsch, S. M., Thacke S. B., & Louis, M. E. S. (2010). Principles and practice of public health surveillance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Mashhadi, A., & Khazaie, S. (2015). Familiar or unfamiliar context? Application of m-games in the blended module of L2 learning. In M. Rahimi (Ed.), Handbook of research on individual differences in computer-assisted language learning (pp. 223-250). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Mehta, N. K. (2010). English language teaching through the translation method. Translation Journal, 14(1). Retrieved from http:// translationjournal. net/ journal/ 51mongolian

Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Bartneck, Ch. (2011). Robot assisted language learning through games: A comparison of two case studies. Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems, 13(3), 9-15.

Munday, J. (2016). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications (4th ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge.

Nassiri-Mofakham, F. (2017). Intelligent computational systems: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Bentham e-books.

Newmark, P. (1995). A textbook of translation. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2012). Talk to me! Games and students' willingness to communicate. In H. Reinders (Ed.), Digital games in language learning and teaching (pp. 156–187). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.

Stenström, A. B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. London, England: Longman.

Turco, T., & Elliott, S. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27-37.

Ulrych, M. (2005). Training translators: Programs, curricula, practices. In M. Tennent (Ed.), Training for the new millennium: Pedagogies for translation and interpreting. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Venuti, L. (2017). Teaching translation: Programs, courses, and pedagogies. London and New York: Routledge.

Yue, F., Tao, Y., Wang, H., Cui, Q., & Xu, B. (Eds.). (2019). Restructuring translation education: Implications from China for the rest of the world. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Yumuk, A. (2002). Letting go of control to the learners: The role of the Internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. Educational Research, 44(2), 141-156.

Zhang, B. (2013). Innovative thinking in translation studies: The paradigm of Bassnett's and Lefevere's cultural turn. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(10), 1919-1924.