The Impact of Good Governance on the Relationship between Resource Abundance and Financial Development in Oil Countries

اقتصاد پولی مالی

Article 4, Volume 24, Issue 13, April 2017, Pages 90-114   

Document Type: پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pm.v24i14.20443

Authors

nahid rajabzadeh moghani; mohamad ali falahi^* ; mehdi khodaparast mashhadi

ferdowsi university of mashhad

Abstract

One of the effective factors on economic growth and development is financial development. Indeed, today the level of economic development is determined by the level of financial development in the countries. Hence, many studies try to identify effective factors in financial development. Natural resource abundance is one of the factors that has effect on financial development of countries. From the 1980s, most studies have only investigated the relationship between natural resource abundance and economic growth. They only try to explain the reason of the resource curse. In these studies the effect of resource abundance on financial development is neglected. But it is claimed that one of the reasons of slow economic growth in resource abundant countries is the low level of financial development.
There are five mechanisms through which resource abundance can impact financial development. The first mechanism is the Dutch disease. The exploitation of natural resources tends to shift factors of production away from the manufacturing sector. Thus, resource abundance tends to shrink the traded sector. But trade is found to play an important role in financial development. Therefore, resource abundance which weakens the traded sector may have a negative impact on financial development. Second, governments’ access to huge amounts of oil rents reduces the governments' need for financing through taxes. In these circumstances a government has no obligation against people and the people have also less demand for accountability in order to define and guarantee property rights and economic security. Weak property rights leads to poor business environment. As a result, investment incentives are reduced. Secure property rights increase the incentives of innovations and creativity. Since entrepreneurs are the main demanders of credit in financial markets, undermining property rights leads to weaken financial markets. Third, economic rent of resource abundance increase opportunities for rent-seeking and corruption. Rent seeking can cause corruption in government, business of people and distortion in allocation of recourse. Corruption may induce a lack of confidence in the government and hence undermine its policy credibility. Because of low policy credibility, it will be difficult for the government to implement some financial reforms. In addition, rent seeking leads to reduced incentives of creativity and innovations. In these conditions, economic creators prefer to gain high rent by abusing weak institutions. Since entrepreneurs are potential promoters of financial development, if the number of entrepreneurs is reduced by resource booms, financial development may also slow down because the demand for it is weakened. Forth, resource abundance tends to weaken private and public incentives to accumulate human capital. Empirical studies show that there is a negative link between human capital and natural resource abundance. Since human and physical capital complement each other in firms, weakening human capital reduce physical capital and investment. In addition, resource abundance reduces social capital. Since social capital determines the level of trust in society and trust is the basis of the financial contracts, resource abundance reduces the level of financial development. Fifth, establishment of democracy is not easily possible in resource abundant countries and power is only in the hands of particular groups and rent seekers. There are lots of scholars like Clague, Keefer, Knack and Olson (1996) and Olsson (1993) that examined the relationship between democracy and financial development. They show that democratic regimes provide better field of protection of property rights, contract enforcement and encourage more investment than authoritarian regimes. Thus, democracy promotes financial developments.
Beside above mechanisms it should be emphasized that environmental factors can have impact on the relationship between natural resource abundance and financial development. It is expected that resource abundance reduce financial development in the countries with weak institutional quality. In contrast, mentioned mechanisms do not work in the countries with high level of institutional quality. In other words, resource abundance cannot have a negative impact on financial development in the countries with good institutional quality. World Bank introduces governance indicators to show institutional quality of countries. Three researchers named Kufmann, Kraay and Lobaton (1999) create these indicators. They combined the results of various international institutions such as EIU, ICRG, Heritage Foundation and Freedom House about economic, political and social situations and then introduced new indicators as governance indicators. These indicators include voice and accountability, political stability, control of corruption, regulatory quality, government effectiveness and rule of law.
In this paper, countries with respect to good governance indicators are categorized into three groups. They include countries with high, medium, and low institutional quality. In this study, using the panel data method for 22 selected oil exporting countries over 1996-2009, the effect of resource abundance on two financial development index (i.e., private credit by deposit money banks and other financial institutions/ GDP and M2/GDP) is examined. Among 22 countries, 5 of them have weak institutional quality, 8 of them have medium institutional quality, and 9 of them have high institutional quality.
The results indicate that the relationship between resource abundance and two financial development indices is positive and significant in countries with high governance, but negative in countries with low and weak governance. The results also indicate that there is no significant relationship between resource abundance and financial development in countries with the average level of governance. Therefore improving institutional quality seems necessary to enhance financial development in oil economies.

Keywords

Financial development; Governance; Resource Abundance; Oil Exporting Countries

References

[1] Andersen, J.J., & Aslaksen, S. (2008). Constitutions and the resource curse. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 227-246.

[2] Auty, R. (2001). Resource Abundance and Economic Development. UNU/WIDER Studies in Development Economics. Oxford University press.

[3] Baland, J. & Francois, P. (2000). Rent Seeking and Resource Booms. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 527-542.

[4] Baltagi, B.H., Demetriades, P.O. & Law, S.H. (2009). Financial Development and Openness: Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Development Economics, 89, 285-296.

[5] Beck, T. (2010). Finance and Oil: Is there a Resource Curse in Financial Development?. CEPR Discussion Paper.

[6] Beck, T., Demirguc-kunt, A. & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, Inequality and the Poor: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27-49.

[7] Clague, C., Keefer, P., Knack, S. & Olson, M. (1996). Prpperty and Contract Rights in Autocracies and Democracies. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 243-276.

[8] Ebrahimi, M. & Salarian, M. (2009). Study of the effects of the resource curse phenomenon in Oil Exporting Countries and the effect of Presence in OPEC Organization on Economic Growth of its Members. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 6(1), 77-100. (In Persian)

[9] Gilfason, T. & Zoega, G. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment. CEPR Discussion Papers.

[10] Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556.

[11] Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural resources, education, and economic development. European Economic Review, 45, 847–859.

[12] Hodler, R. (2006). The Curse of Natural Resources in Fractionalized Countries. European Economic Review, 50,1367-1386.

[13] Hodler, R. & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Do Natural Resource Revenue Hinder Financial Development? The Role of Political Institutions. Oxcarre Research Paper.

[14] King, R.G. & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717-737.

[15] Malekosadati, S. (2007). The Effects of Good Governance (Based on World Bank Indicators) on Economic Growth in Selected Countries). M. A Thesis. Allameh Tabataba'i University. (In Persian)

[16] Matsen, E. & Torvik, R. (2005). Optimal Dutch disease. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 494–515.

[17] Mehlum, H. and Moene, K. & Torvil, R. (2006). Institutions and Recourse Curse. Economic Journal, 116, 1-20.

[18] Mehrara, M. & Talakesh Naeeni, H. (2009). The Study of relationship Between Financial Development and Economic Growth in Selected Countries Using Dynamic Panel Data. Knowledge and Development Journal, 16(26), 143-168. (In Persian)

[19] Mehrara, M., Abrishami, H. & Zamanzade Nasrabadi, H. (2010). Resource curse or institutions. Journal of Economic Research, 10(3), 205-233. (In Persian)

[20] Mohamdzadeh, P., Mamipour, S. & Feshari, M. (2010). Application of Stata Software in Econometrics. First Volume. Noor Elm Publications. (In Persian)

[21] Olsson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, Democracy and Development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567-576.

[22] Olsson, O. (2007). Conflict diamonds. Journal of Development Economics. 82, 267-286.

[23] Rahmani, T. & Golestani, M. (2009). An Analysis of the Oil Resource Curse and Rent Seeking on Income Distribution in Selected Oil Rich Countries. Journal of Economic Research, 89, 57-86. (In Persian)

[24] Rasti, M. (2009). A comparative study of various dimensions of development (economic, commercial, financial and human) in OPEC Countries. Commercial Surveys, 39, 65-77. (In Persian)

[25] Rasti, M. (2009). The Effects of Trade on Financial Development in Economy of Iran. Commercial Surveys, 27, 56-63. (In Persian)

[26] Razmi, M.J, Shahraki, S. & Kalaee, M.R. (2011). The study of Relationship between International trade and Economic Growth Using Good Governance Indicator. Quarterly Journal of Commerce, 59, 137-162. (In Persian)

[27] Robinson, J.A., Torvik, R. & Verdier, T. (2006). Political foundations of the resource curse. Journal of Development Economics, 79, 447–468.

[28] Ross, M. (2001). Political Economy of Resource Curse. World politics, 51(2), 297-322.

[29] Sameti, M., Shahnazi, R. & Shabani, Z. (2010). Security, Property Rights, Regulation and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Research in Iran, 15(44), 85-109. (In Persian)

[30] Van Wijnbergen, S. (1984). The Dutch disease: a disease after all?. Economic Journal, 94, 41–55.

[31] Yung, B. (2011). Dose democracy Foster Financial Development? An Empirical Analysis. Economic Letters, 112(3), 262-265.

[32] Yuxiang, K. & Chen, Z. (2010). Resource Abundance and Financial Development: Evidence from China. Resource Policy, 36, 72-79.