Measuring the Effect of Effective Factors on the Formation of Knowledge Sharing Behavior from Student's Perspective (Case Study: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی

Article 8, Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 13, September 2017, Pages 153-173   

Document Type: مقالات پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/riis.v7i1.61819

Authors

Mojtaba Kaffashan Kakhki^* ; Yaser Aseman doreh; Zahra Mohamadian

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this paper is to identify the most important factors that can determine forming knowledge sharing behavior among students in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad along with evaluating the elements that can affect the students’ knowledge sharing behavior.
METHODOLOGY:
A descriptive survey study was conducted to test some of the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behavior among undergraduate students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. For this purpose, an exploratory study was developed to identify the most important factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior. Then, 18 experts selected the main factors using Friedman test based on which a conceptual model was developed. Determining the validity and reliability of the scale, 390 questionnaires were distributed based on the stratified random sampling technique, 371 of which were returned. To analyze the data, path analysis method and Lisrel softwares were used.
FINDINGS:
To conclude, it can be claimed that trust, motivation, attitude, and the intention of knowledge sharing are the most important factors affecting the students’ knowledge sharing behavior. Hence, universities must pay attention to these factors if they want to develop the knowledge sharing process and gain higher rate of academic participation within the university. In fact, the students' knowledge sharing behavior at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad was influenced by all the factors of the study, however, trust, motivation to share knowledge, attitude, and the intention to share knowledge were the most importance factors.
CONCLUSIONS:
Depending on the final model of this research, special attention should not only be paid to trust, motivation, positive attitude, and the intention of knowledge sharing but also to the development of the perceived value of knowledge sharing, the requirements and the infrastructure requirements, and the sharing of production knowledge as they also can facilitate this process.

Keywords

Perceived value; Perceived ease of use; Trust; Motivation; Attitude; Knowledge sharing intention; knowledge sharing behavior; Ferdowsi University of Mashahd

References

آرمسترانگ، مایکل (1389). مدیریت استراتژیک منابع انسانی. (محمد اعرابی و امید مهدیه، مترجمان). تهران: دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.

پور، سمیرا و سعید مرتضوی (1392). تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر نگرش و رفتار مبتنی بر تسهیم دانش (مورد مطالعه: پرستاران بیمارستان 17 شهریور). مطالعات رفتار سازمانی. 2 (3)، 43-70.

دالانتی، جرارد (1386). دانش در چالش: دانشگاه در جامعه دانایی. ترجمه علی بختیاری‌زاده. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.

سرخوش، مهدی؛ پیمان اخوان؛ علی کیا و علیرضا امین پور (1394). بررسی رفتار تسهیم دانش کارکنان در یک سازمان با فناوری پیشرفته مبتنی بر نظریه رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده. مدیریت نوآوری، 4، 61-80.

قربانی‌زاده، وجه‌اله و شیرین خالقی‌نیا. 1388. نقش انتقال دانش ضمنی در توانمندسازی کارکنان. پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع انسانی 1(2)، 85-105.

Abdur-Rafiu, M. A. and Opesade, A.O. (2015). "Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Academics in The Poly technic Ibadan". Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 1287.

Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17 (4), 64-77.

Ajzen, I and Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 466–487.

Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Alavi, M and Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman: New York.

Bartol, K. M and Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9 (1), 64-77.

Blau, P.M. (1963). The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Exchange in Two Government Agencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: IL.

Bock, G. W and Kim, Y. G.( 2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15 (2), 14–21.

Bock, G.W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G and Lee. J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-112.

Bollinger, A. S and Smith, R. D. (2001). Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 8–18.

Chen, C.A. (2008). Linking the knowledge creation process to organizational theories: A macro view of organization-environment change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 21(3), 259–279.

Chen, S and Quester, P. (2006). Modeling store loyalty: Perceived value in market orientation practice. The Journal of Services Marketing, 20, 188-204.

Cheng, M. Y., Ho, J. S. Y., and Lau, P. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: a study of Multimedia University Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3), 313-324.

Chow, Wing S and Chan, Lai Sheung.( 2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45, 458–465.

Chung, L. H. (2001). The Role of Management in Knowledge Transfer', Third Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference Adelaide, South Australia.

Collins, C. J and Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3), 544-60.

Constant, D., Kiesler, S and Sproull. L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5 (4), 400–421.

Cook, K. s., Obrien, J and Kollock. P. (1990). Exchange Theory: A blueprint for structure and process. In Ritzer (ed). Frontiers of social theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart, 13, 319–339.

Dawkins, C. E and Frass. J. W. (2005). Decision of union workers to participate in employee involvement: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Employee Relations, 27 (4/5), 511-31.

Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Network Structures. In In Sociological Theories in Progress. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.

Ford, D and Staples, D. (2006). Perceived value of knowledge: the potential informer's perception. Knowledge management research and practice. 4(1), 3-16

Friga, P. N. (2000). Codification Strategies in Knowledge Management Processes – Learning from Simulation.

Garbarino, E and Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 70-87.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E and Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1), 51–90.

Gerber, M., Mallett, C., and Puhse, U. (2011). Beyond intentional processes: The role of action and coping planning in explaining exercise behavior among adolescents. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9(3), 209-226.

Gottschalk, P. (2007). Knowledge management systems: value shop creation. Hershey PA: Idea Group Pub.

Granrose, Ch. S. (1984). A Fishbein-Ajzen Model of Intention to Work following Childbirth. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25, 359-372.

Igbaria, M., and Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23 (6), 587–605.

Hall, H. (2001). Social exchange for knowledge exchange', Managing knowledge: conversations and critiques University of Leicester.

Herzberg, F.(1964). The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower. Personnel Administrator, (27), 3–7.

Holsapple, C. W., and Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 235–261.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H and Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2).

Hsu, C. L and Lin, J. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management. 45 (1), 65-74.

Kalafatis, S., Pollard, M., East, R and Tsogas, M. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour: a cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (5), 441-460.

Kankanhalli, A., Tan, C. Y. B and Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 113–143.

Kolekofski, K. E. and Heminger, A. R. (2002). Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting. Information & Management, 40, 521-32.

Kowak, S.H., and Gao, SH. (2005). Attitude towards Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46 (2). 45-51.

Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3 (2), 157-189.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4), 370–396.

Mooradian, T., Renzl, B and Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management learning, 37 (4), 523-540.

Nelson, K.M., and Cooprider. J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 21 (4), 409–429.

Norudin, M.; Che Mahmood, M. H. and Nurmusli Mah, K. A. (2016). Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Learning Success in Malaysia: A Case of Private Sectors in State of Johor. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(1), 21-28.

Pacharapha, T. and Ractham, V. V. (2012). Knowledge acquisition: the roles of perceived value of knowledge content and source. Journal of Knowledge Management. 16 (5), 724-739.

Reychav, I., and Weisberg, J. (2010). Bridging intention and behavior of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2), 285-300.

Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D and Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Strategic Information Systems, 11 (3-4), 271–295.

Ryu, S., Ho, S. H and Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25 (1), 113–122.

Smith, K.G., Collins, C. J and Clark, K.D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 346-57.

Staples, D. S., and Webster. J. (2008). Exploring the Effects of Trust, Task Interdependence and Virtualness on Knowledge Sharing in Teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617-640.

Tax, S., and S. Brown. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 60, 60-76.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40 (3), 55-79.

Tylor, Sh. and Tood, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing model. Information systems research, 6 (2), 144-176.

Wilson, D. T. (1995). An integrated model of buyer-seller relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (1),1-12.

Winkelen, C. van, & McKenzie, J. (2011). Knowledge works the handbook of practical ways to identify and solve common organizational problems for better performance. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley.

Yu, T. K; Lu, L. C and Liu, T. F. (2010). Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (1), 32-41.