Remote Sensing of Residue Management in Farms using Landsat 8 Sensor Imagery

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 6, Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 14, 2017, Pages 388-400   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v7i2.50118

Authors

M. A. Rostami^* ; H. Afzali Gorouh

Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Kerman Agricultural and Resource Research and Education Center, AREEO, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Preserving of crop residues in the field surface after harvesting crops, making difficult farm operations. The farmers for getting rid of crop residues always choose the easiest way, i.e. burning. Burning is one of the common disposal methods for wheat and corn straw in some region of the world. Present study was aimed to investigate the accurate methods for monitoring of residue management after wheat harvesting. With this vision, the potential of Landsat 8 sensor was evaluated for monitoring of residue burning, using satellite spectral indices and Linear Spectral Unmixing Analysis. For this purpose, correlation of ground data with satellite spectral indices and LSUA data were tested by linear regression.
Materials and Methods
In this study we considered 12 farms where remained plants were burned, 12 green farm, 12 bare farms and 12 farms with full crop residue cover were considered. Spatial coordinates of experimental fields recorded with a GPS and fields map were drawn using ArcGissoftware, version of 10.1.
In this study,t wo methods were used to separate burned fields from other farms including Satellite Spectral Indices and Linear Spectral unmixing analysis. In this study, multispectral landsat 8 image was acquired over 2015 year. Landsat 8 products are delivered to the customer as radiometric, sensor, and geometric corrections. Image pixels are unique to Landsat 8 data, and should not be directly compared to imagery from other sensors. Therefore, DN value must be converted to radiance value in order to change the radiance to the reflectance, which is useful when performing spectral analysis techniques, such as transformations, band ratios and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), etc.
In this study, a number of spectral indices and Linear Spectral Unmixing Analysis data were imported/extracted from Landsat 8 image. All satellite image data were analyzed by ENVI software package. The spectral indices used in this study were NDVI, BAI, NBR and NBRT. Classification accuracy was evaluated and expressed by confusion matrix and Kappa coefficient.
Natural surfaces are rarely composed of a single uniform material. Spectral mixing occurs when materials with different spectral properties are represented by a single image pixel. The condition where scale of the mixing is large (macroscopic), mixing would occur in a linear fashion. However for microscopic situations, the mixing is generally nonlinear. The linear model ahich wasadopted in this study, assumes that there is no interaction between materials. Assumption of LSUA is that each pixel on the surface is a physical mixture of several constituents weighted by surface abundance, and the spectrum of the mixture is a linear combination of the endmember reflectance spectra.
Within the context of this study, LSUA is a classification method that can determine contribution of each material (or endmember) such as soil or residue for each image pixel.
Results and Discussion
The spectral response curve extracted from Landsat 8 image used as input into the LSUA model in ENVI software. As expected, crop burned residue (Ash) spectra had lower reflectance when compared to the soil, residue and green plant spectra. The contrast between residue, green plant, soil and residue ash spectra was particularly evident in the NIR and SWIR bands. It is suggested that these bands are essential for residue discrimination. Differences of reflectance in the visible bands were minimal, providing little discrimination between residue, green plant, soil and residue ash. Burned area estimated by LSUA method from Landsat 8 image was correlated against the ground data (measured coincident to the ground data). The overall accuracy of classification with BAI index and LSUA method was 91.7 and 88.3 and Kappa coefficient was 0.89 and 0.84 respectively.
Results indicated that burned field area can be located and its area can be estimated using Landsat 8 images. The Index BAI was selected as discernment index for burned/unburned fields in Landsat 8 images.
Conclusion
Present study was aimed to evaluate the accurate methods for monitoring residue management after wheat harvesting. With this vision, the potential of Landsat 8 sensor local data for monitoring residue burning was evaluated using satellite spectral indices and Linear Spectral Unmixing Analysis. Results indicate that residue ash spectra had lower reflectance when compared to the residue, soil and green plant except NIR band spectra. The contrast between residue, soil, green plant and residue ash spectra was particularly evident in the NIR bands. Results indicated that burned field area can be located and its area can be estimated using Landsat 8 images. The Index BAI was selected as discernment index for burned/unburned fields in Landsat 8 images.

Keywords

Crop residue; Landsat 8 sensor; Linear Spectral Unmixing Analysis; Spectral indices

References

1. Alonso, F. G., S. M. Miguel, and J. M. Cuevas. 2007. Using AWiFS and MODIS data to estimate burned areas: the case of Galicia forest fires during the 2006 summer season. Remote Sensing Laboratory, CIFOR-INIA, Madrid.

2. Bannari, A., A. Pacheco, K. Staenz, H. McNairn, and K. Omari. 2006. Estimating and mapping crop residues cover on agricultural lands using hyperspectral and IKONOS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 104: 447-459.

3. Darvishsefat, A. A., M. Pir Bavaghar, and M. Rajab-Pourrahmati. 2005. Remote Sensing for GIS Managers. University of Tehran Press//3269. (In Farsi).

4. Eva, H., and E. F. Lambin. 1998. Remote sensing of biomass burning in tropical regions: Sampling issues and multisensor approach. Remote Sensing Environment 64: 292-315.

5. Ghooshchi, F., A. Joorabloo, M. Silspoor, and H. Hadi. 2010. Effect of primary tillage method and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop residual management on the soil and silage corn (Zea mays L.) characteristics. Journal of Agroecology 2 (3): 428-436. (In Farsi).

6. Godwin, R. J. 1990. Tillage for Crop Production in Areas of Low Rainfall. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. ISBN-10: 9251025428.

7. Golshan, M., M. Faghihi, T. Roushan-Zamir, M. Marandi, B. Esteki, and P. l. Dadvand. 2002. Early effects of burning rice farm residues on respiratory symptoms of villagers in suburbs of Isfahan, Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering 12: 125-131.

8. Holden, Z. A., A. M. S. Smith, P. Morgan, M. G. Rollins, and P. E. Gessler. 2005. Evaluation of novel thermally enhanced spectral indices for mapping fire perimeters and comparisons with fire atlas data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26 (21): 4801-4808.

9. Lillesand, T., R. W. Kiefer, and J. Chipman. 2014. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.

10. Mar, T. F., T. V. Larson, R. A. Stier, C. Claiborn, and J. Q. Koenig. 2004. An analysis of the association between respiratory symptoms in subjects with asthma and daily air pollution in Spokane, Washington. Inhal Toxicol 16: 809-815.

11. Martin, P., I. Gomez, and E. Chuvieco. 2005. Performance of a burned-area index (BAI) for mapping Mediterranean burned scars from MODIS data. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Remote Sensing and GIS Applications to Forest Fire Management: Fire Effects Assessment 193-197. Universidad de Zaragoza. ISBN 84-96214-52-4.

12. McCarty, J. L., C. O. Justice, and S. Korontzi. 2007. Agricultural burning in the southeastern United States detected by Modis. Remote Sensing of Environment 108: 151-62.

13. McCarty, J. L., T. Loboda, and S. Trigg. 2008. A hybrid remote sensing approach to quantifying crop residue burning in the United States. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24 (4): 515-527.

14. McCarty, J. L., S. Korontzi, C. O. Justice, and T. Loboda. 2009. The spatial and temporal distribution of crop residue burning in the contiguous United States. Science of the Total Environment 407: 5701-5712.

15. Najafinezhad, H., Z. Davari, and N. Rashidi. 2005. Effect of seed bed preparing method on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and some soil characteristics in double cropping system. Seed and Plant 21 (2): 315-330. (In Farsi).

16. Pacheco, A., and H. McNairn. 2011. Mapping Crop Residue Cover over Regional Agricultural Landscapes in Canada. Available at: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/isrse-4/211104015Final00921.pdf. Accessed 19 September 2012.

17. Pacheco, A., and H. McNairn. 2010. Evaluating multispectral remote sensing and spectral unmixing analysis for crop residue mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 114: 2219-2228.

18. Richards, J. A. 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis (Vol. 3). Berlin et al.: Springer.

19. Singer, R. B., and T. B. McCord. 1979. Mars: Large scale mixing of bright and dark materials and implications for analysis of spectral reflectance. Lunar Planet Science 10: 1825-1848.

20. Tucker, C. J. 1979. Red and Photographic Infrared Linear Combinations for Monitoring Vegetation', Remote Sensing of Environment 8(2): 127-150.

21. USGS. 2015. Landsat 8 Data Products. Available at: http://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat8.php. Accessed 10 Febrary 2015.