Design and Integration for Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oil via Transesterification Reaction

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 18, Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 15, 2018, Pages 223-234   

Document Type: Short Paper

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v8i1.34257

Authors

F. Abbaspour Aghdam¹; H. R. Kiani Manesh¹; D. Arabian^{* 2}; R. Khalilzadeh³

¹Department of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

²Institute of Basic Science, University institute of Applied Science, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Esfahan, Iran

³Department of Biotechnology, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Biodiesel is Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME) which is used as a renewable fuel in diesel engines. Extraction of lipid from various flora sources, including Sunflower, Palm, Canola or animal oils, with a Trans-Esterification reaction between alcohol and Triglyceride (TG), leads to production of Biodiesel and Glycerin.
The production cost of biodiesel is so important that is now considered as the greatest obstacle during scale-up process.
In this research, a model-type of biodiesel production unit (using vegetable oil source), was designed by Aspen HYSYS V7.2 software, then a great deal of the attempt was employed to optimize the overall yield against the processing parameters including: mass and energy consumption load, as well as some technical discussion regarding associated apparatuses.
Materials and Methods
Process Design
The simulation was carried out using Aspen HYSYS V7.2 employing Triolein (as TG), Oleic acid (as Free Fatty Acid (FFA)), and Oleat as biodiesel. Avoiding side-stream reactions as well as trans-esterification, the FFA content was taken to a mere 0.05% (%mass). Feed stream was considered as product of NaOH-catalyzed bi-reactor system operating at 60˚C and 1 atm with the overall conversion of 70% using two series reactors.
The ratio of TG to Alcohol is 1:3, however, owing to establish an appropriate reactor performance; this ratio was applied as 1:6 practically. The design was mainly intended to produce 480 m3d^-1 biodiesel with mass concentration of 99.65%.
Methanol was used in this investigation due to low cost, accessibility and handling considerations.
NRTL was taken as the Equation of State (EOS) for the process and should be used PRSV equation in the decanter.
Thermal Integration
Energy consumption was taken into account as basis of optimization in this study. Table 2 demonstrates the thermal characteristics of all streams consist of source and down-streams, while outlet stream like glycerol streams were neglected to be considered. HR-1, HR-2, HD1-1, HD2-1 and HD3-1 represent cooling water leaving reactors and condensers respectively which input cooling water temperature to utility was 25˚C. Cp also indicates the thermal capacity of each line which can be calculated by multiplying mass flow rate in specific heat capacity.
In order to calculate interval temperature, as the next step, the inlet and outlet temperatures of hot flow must be diffracted from the half of minimum approach temperature of exchangers; and the inlet and outlet cold temperatures should be summed with the half of minimum of approach temperature of exchangers. Interval enthalpy can also be calculated using following equation:
ΔH interval= ΔT interval [Cp Cold-Cp Hot]
Minimum approach temperature (ΔTmin) was also taken as 10°C in the following calculations. Results are shown in Table 3.
Results and Discussion
Mass Integration
Feed stream after reaching 60˚C and 1 atm entered into first reactor. Feed streams reacted in Reac.1, and effluent after cooling to 25˚C flowed to Sep.1. Unreacted oil sent to Reac.1 and effluent of this reactor after cooling to 25 ˚C entered into Sep. 2. Products of Reac.2 including glycerin, methanol, biodiesel and oil were conveyed to Sep.2 (25˚C) for separation of ester and glycerin. The light phase (Ester) was directed to a recycle distillation column (Dist.1) with R=1.5 and 6 trays to obtain extra-pure methanol from biodiesel. Second effluents from Sep.1 and Sep.2 including large quantities of methanol and glycerin were conveyed to second distillation tower (Dist.2) with 5 tray and R=1.5 in order to purify methanol recovery and obtain glycerin purity up to 99.63%. Due to declining expenditure, methanol recycled back to the beginning of process as a feed; while glycerin was sent out to downstream as by-product.
Effluent exited from Dist.2 flowed to Sep.3 to improve purity and remove any residual catalysts (NaOH) via HCl reaction. HCl and catalyst entered with identical molar flow and reacted with 95% conversion.
The cold and hot energy required for the whole processes were calculated: 18860 kW and 17330 kW respectively.
Heat Integration
According to Table 3 network required hot and cold energy were found to be zero and 17146.6 kW respectively; where the number “zero” indicates hot streams are able to provide energy needed of cold stream. Care should be taken that the exchanger approach temperature should not be less than the minimum selected approach temperature (ΔTmin).
Applying the new system in the process, cold and hot energy reduced to 17018 kW and 16670 kW respectively.
According to Figure 2, HEX-8 outlet stream temperature reached 291.8 ˚C after heat transfer. On the other hand, required temperature and heat of distillation tower’s re-boiler were 187.6 ˚C and 1858 kW respectively; therefore this could be used as energy source for the second distillation tower’s re-boilers. The output stream of the 3rd distillation tower virtual exchanger (SHD 3-out) was also important; this stream temperature was 565 ℃ that could be used to provide energy in the 1st distillation column re-boiler.
Finally cold energy and hot energy reduced by 19.6% and 38% reaching 15160 kW and 10990 kW respectively. Input and output streams of the process data and the main process flow diagram of the biodiesel process production are shown in table 4 and fig.3.
Conclusion
Using stream recycle and mass integration methanol, unreacted oil and feed oil consumption reduced up to 60.6%, 70% and 9% respectively. Consequently, due to energy integration by exchanger network, cold and hot energy was reduced by 19.6% and 38% respectively. This integration increases the number of exchangers and pumps power due to the integration target, because the mass and heat integration targets are just reducing the mass and heat consumption. As can be seen from table 5, the number/capacity of used facilities increased in some cases as a result of application of integration method; this item can be optimized depending on economic and operating data and changing the final target to reduce overall cost, for this purpose can be used other methods such as genetic algorithms.

Keywords

Biodiesel process design; Integration and simulation; Heat exchangers network; Pinch technology; Vegetable oil

References

1. Atadashi, I. M., M. K. Aroua, and A. Abdul Aziz. 2011. Biodiesel separation and purification: A review. Renewable Energy 36 (2): 437-443.

2. Balat, M., and H. Balat. 2010. Progress in biodiesel processing. Applied Energy 87 (6): 1815-1835.

3. Chisti, Y. 2007. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology Advances 25 (3): 294-306.

4. Fukuda, H., A. Kondo, and H. Noda. 2001. Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils. J Biosci Bioeng 92: 405-416.

5. Garcia, M., A. Gonzalo, J. L. Sanchez, J. Arauzo, and J. Pena. 2010. Prediction of normalized biodiesel properties by simulation of multiple feedstock blends. Bioresource Technology 101 (12): 4431-4439.

6. Gerpen, J. V. 2005. Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Process Technol 86: 1097-1107.

7. Gomez-Castro, F. I., V. Rico-Ramirez, J. G. Segovia-Hernandez, S. Hernandez-Castro, and M. M. El-Halwagi. 2013. Simulation study on biodiesel production by reactive distillation with methanol at high pressure and temperature: Impact on costs and pollutant emissions. Computers & Chemical Engineering 52 (0): 204-215.

8. Herbinet, O., W. J. Pitz, and C. K. Westbrook. 2008. Detailed chemical kinetic oxidation mechanism for a biodiesel surrogate. Combustion and Flame 154 (3): 507-528.

9. Hoekman, S. K., A. Broch, C. Robbins, E. Ceniceros, and M. Natarajan. 2012. Review of biodiesel composition, properties, and specifications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (1): 143-169.

10. Huang, G., F. Chen, D. Wei, X. Zhang, and G. Chen. 2010. Biodiesel production by microalgal biotechnology. Applied Energy 87 (1): 38-46.

11. Kemp, I. C. 2007. Pinch analysis and process integration. Elsevier. Oxford.

12. Levy, M. 2013. Simulation of Biodiesel Production Using Reactive Distillation (RD).

13. Lotero, E., J. G. Goodwin, D. A. Bruce, K. Suwannakarn, Y. Liu, and D. E. Lopez. 2006. The catalysis of biodiesel synthesis. Catalysis 19: 41-83.

14. Ma, K. L., C. W. Hui, and T. F. Yeeb. 2000. Constant approach temperature model for HEN retro®t. Applied thermal Engineering (20): 1505-1533.

15. Pisarello, M., B. Dalla Costa, G. Mendow, and C. A. Querini. 2010. Esterification with ethanol to produce biodiesel from high acidity raw materials: kinetic studies and analysis of secondary reactions. Fuel Processing Technology 91 (9): 1005-1014.

16. Pokoo-Aikins, G., A. Nadim, M. M. El-Halwagi, and V. Mahalec. 2010. Design and analysis of biodiesel production from algae grown through carbon sequestration. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 12 (3): 239-254.

17. Romero, R., S. L. Martinez, and R. Natividad. 2011. Biodiesel production by using heterogeneous catalysts. Alternative Fuel. ISBN 17: 978-953.

18. Rutz, D., and R. Janssen. 2007. Biofuel technology handbook. WIP Renewable Energies. Munich, Germany.

19. Ryan, L., F. Convery, and S. Ferreira. 2006. Stimulating the use of biofuels in the European Union: implications for climate change policy. Energy Policy 34: 3184-3194.

20. Sanchez, E., K. Ojeda, M. El-Halwagi, and V. Kafarov. 2011. Biodiesel from microalgae oil production in two sequential esterification/transesterification reactors: Pinch analysis of heat integration. Chemical Engineering Journal 176-177 (0): 211-216.

21. Van Gerpen, J., B. Shanks, R. Pruszko, D. Clements, and G. Knithe. 2004. Biodiesel Production Technology, National Renewable Energy Laboratory subcontractor report NREL, SR-510-36244.

22. Veljković, V. B., O. S. Stamenković, Z. B. Todorović, M. L. Lazić, and D. U. Skala. 2009. Kinetics of sunflower oil methanolysis catalyzed by calcium oxide. Fuel 88 (9): 1554-1562.

23. Westbrook, C. K., C. V. Naik, O. Herbinet, W. J. Pitz, M. Mehl, S. M. Sarathy, and H. J. Curran. 2011. Detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanisms for soy and rapeseed biodiesel fuels. Combustion and Flame 158 (4): 742-755.