Integrated weed control (chemical & mechanical) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Shoushtar conditions

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 2, Volume 8, Issue 1, June 2017, Pages 22-32   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v8i1.26200

Authors

adel modhej; zahra alikhani galeh^*

Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar

Abstract

Introduction
Chickpea is a poor competitor to weeds because of slow growth rate and limited leaf area development at early stages of crop growth and establishment. Crop yield loss could be be in high extent due to increasing of weed biomass, weed density and weed species. Chickpea yield losses due to weed competition have been estimated to range between 40 and 87% depending on weed species and density. Herbicides play a key role in weed control and are used extensively today. The current tendency in chickpea weed control in the Mediterranean region is to shift from the costly manual mechanical energy to the chemical energy through more usage of effective herbicides particularly with the increased adoption of winter sowing. Several herbicides with different mode of action such as Trifloralin (Treflan) and Pendimetalin (Prowl) are used for weed control in chickpea farms. Nevertheless herbicide application may have several important environmental issues. These include unintended damage occurring both on the sprayed site, and offsite. Herbicide use also injures the human and animals. Integrated weed management (IWM) is the most important strategies to avoid herbicide environmental issue and increasing inputs productivity. Furthermore, integrated weed management strategies attempt to limit the deleterious effects of weed growing on crop plants. The present report describes the effect of integrated methods on weed density and grain yield of chickpea under Shoushtar conditions.

Materials & Methods
In order to study the effects of integrated weed management (chemical and mechanical) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) a field experiment was conducted during 2009-2010 at IAU Shooshtar Branch. The experiment was designed as a randomized complete block with four replications. Treatments were consisted of eleven combinations of once and twice mechanical control (using cultivator) with Trifloralin and Pendimetalin herbicides (pre-plant) and two control treatments, consisted weedy and weed-free plots. Herbicides where mixed with soil one week before planting. Weed samples were taken by randomly throwing a quadrate of 0.25 m2 area. Analysis of variance was performed using the SAS Ver 9.1 software and treatment means were compared using LSD (Least significant difference) at 5% of probability.

Results & Discussion
Results showed that the highest weed controls was related to the treatments with twice cultivation+ Trifloralin+ Pendimetalin. Malcolmia behboudiana and Chenopodium album control in this treatment was 87.2 and 91.8%, respectively. The highest weed control with 75.6, 78.85 and 88.86% was in Trifloralin+ twice cultivation, Pendimetalin+ twice cultivation and twice cultivation+ Pendimetalin+ Trifloralin treatments, respectively.
The lowest grain yield was observed in weedy plots without weed control. Grain yield reduction under weedy treatment was 72% lower than weed free plots. There was no significant difference between control treatment without weed control and once cultivation treatment. Integrating weed control had higher controlling impact on weed growth compared with individual use of cultivation and herbicides. Twice cultivation+ Pendimetalin+ Trifloralin treatment had the highest grain yield. Higher grain yield in these treatments was due to increase in lateral branches, the number of pods per plant, and accordingly, the number of grains per plant. The effect of treatments on number of pods per main and lateral branches and also the number of pods per plant was significant. Integrated weed control treatment with twice cultivation plus both herbicides had the highest pod number per plant.
Chickpea biological yield in weedy control showed a significant reduction of 32.4% compared with weed free treatment. The highest chickpea biological yield was belonged to weed free and twice cultivation+ Pendimetalin+ Trifloralin treatments. The effect of weed control treatments on the number of pods per plant was significant.

Conclusion
In general, the results of this study showed that chickpea plants are not poor competitor to weeds only at its early stages, but at later stages of growth had a low ability to compete with weeds. Thereby, treatments such as pre-plant herbicides and once cultivation that control weeds only in the earlier stages of the crop growth are less effective than the combination of herbicide and twice cultivation.

Keywords

Chickpea; Cultivation; Trifloralin; Pendimetalin

References

1. Abbassi, R., Alizadeh, H., Zeinali khaneghah, H., and Talebi jahromi, K. 2010. Effect integrated mechanical control methods with herbicides on yield and yield components of soybean in Karaj. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 41(2): 291-303. (In Persian).

2. Corp, M., Machado, S., Ball, D., Smiley, R., Petrie, S., Siemens, M., and Guy, S. 2004. Chickpea Production Guide. Oregon State University. Extension Service, EM 8791-E.

3. Datta, A., Sindel, B.M., Jessop, R.S., Kristiansen, P., and Felton, W.L. 2007. Phytotoxic response and yield chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes with pre-emergence application of isoxaflutole. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47: 1460-1467.

4. Fathi, Gh., Ebrahimpoor, F., and Siadat, A. 2003. Weed control efficiency in corn S.C.704 in Ahvaz condition. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 34(1): 187-197.(In Persian).

5. Fereidoonpoor, M., Shirvanian, R., Behaeen, M.A., and Amin, G.A. 2008. Application of flamer for control of weeds in cotton fields and compared with conventional methods. In: Proceedings of 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 24-27 August, Hamedan, Iran. (In Persian).

6. Hernando, J.R., Portollo, E., and Fuertes, T. 1987. Weed survey and control studies on lentil in central Spain. Lens Newsletter 14: 12-14.

7. Izadi Darbandi, E., and Akram, L. 2012. Investigate the effect of Pyridate, Bentazon and Imazethapyr herbicides on growth, nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3(1): 105-118.(In Persian with English Summary).

8. Khan, I.A, Marwat, K.B., Hassan, G., Khan, R., and Ullah, Z. 2012. Suppressive capability of herbicides and plant extracts against chickpea weeds. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22(2): 67-69.

9. Lees, B. 2001. Weed control in chickpea, an Alberta perspective. Internet. http://ssca.usask.ca/conference/ 2000proceedings/Lees.html.

10. Mittal, M., and Singh, O.P. 1983. Effect of different weed control methods on growth and dry weight of associated weed in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research 6: 91-93. CAB Abstract.

11. Modhej, A., and Bedarvandi, B. 2006. Integrated weeds management in canola. In: Proceedings of 1st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Colombo, Srilanka.

12. Mousavi, S.K. 2009. Evaluation of some herbicides for weed control in chickpea, and their residual effects on wheat in the following season. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7(1): 229-239. (In Persian with English Summary).

13. Mousavi, S. K., Sabeti, P., Jafarzadeh, N., and Bazzazi, D. 2010. Evaluation of some herbicides efficacy for weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 1(1): 19-31. (In Persian with English Summary).

14. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Pulses . Mashhad Jahad University Press.

15. Patel, B.D., Patel1, V.J., Patel, J.B., and Patel, R.B. 2006. Effect of fertilizers and weed management practices on weed control in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under middle Gujarat conditions. Indian Journal Crop Science 1(1-2): 180-183.

16. Ramakrishna, A., Rupela, O.P., Reddy, S.L.N., and Sivaramakrishna, C. 1992. Promising herbicides for weed control in chickpea. International Journal of Pest Management 38(4): 398-399.

17. Sadeghipour, O., and Ghafarikhaligh, H. 2002. Effect of weeding and different herbicides on weed control in common bean. Iranian Crop Science Journal 4(4): 277-282. (In Persian with English Summary).

18. Solh, M.B., and Pala, M. 1990. Weed control in chickpea. Options Mediterranennes-Seminaries 9: 93-99.

19. Swanton, C.J., and Murphy, S.D. 1996. Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agro-ecosystem health. Weed Science 44: 437-445.

20. Swanton, C.J., and Weise, S.F. 1991. Integrated weed management: The rationale and approach. Weed Technology 5: 657-6

21. Upadhyaya, M.K., and Blackshaw R.E. 2007. Non-chemical Weed Management. CAB International Press pp: 249.

22. Yousefi, A.R.‎,‎ Alizadeh, H.‎,‎ Rahimian, H.‎‎,‎ and Jahansouz, M.R. 2006. Study on herbicidal weed control and hand-weeding control in chickpea. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 37(3): 337-346. (In Persian).

23. Zareii, R., and Modhej, A. 2012. Effect of integrated weed management (chemical and mechanical) on weed control efficiency, morphological traits and grain yield of spring corn hybrid SC. 700 under Shoushtar conditions. Journal of Crop Physiology 1: 165-173. (In Persian with English Summary).