Effect of Airflow Velocity on Pre-cooling Process of Pomegranate by Forced Cooling Air under Unsteady State Heat Transfer Condition

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 7, Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 15, 2018, Pages 79-91   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v8i1.48911

Authors

M. A. Behaeen^{* 1}; A. Mahmoudi¹; S. F. Ranjbar²

¹Biosystems Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

²Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Pomegranate (Punica grantum L.) is classified into the family of Punicaceae. One of the most influential factors in postharvest life and quality of horticultural products is temperature. In precooling, heat is reduced in fruit and vegetable after harvesting to prepare it quickly for transport and storage. Fikiin (1983), Dennis (1984) and Hass (1976) reported that cold air velocity is one of the effective factors in cooling vegetables and fruits. Determining the time-temperature profiles is an important step in cooling process of agricultural products. The objective of this study was the analysis of cooling rate in the center (arils) and outer layer (peel) of pomegranate and comparison of the two sections at different cold air velocities. These results are useful for designing and optimizing the precooling systems.
Materials and Methods
The pomegranate variety was Rabab (thick peel) and the experiments were performed on arils (center) and peel (outer layer) of a pomegranate. The velocities of 0.5, 1 and 1.3 m s^-1 were selected for testing. To perform the research, the cooling instrument was designed and built at Department of Biosystems Engineering of Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran. In each experiment six pt100 temperature sensors was used in a single pomegranate. The cooling of pomegranate was continued until the central temperature reached to 10°C and then the instrument turned off. The average of air and product temperatures was 7.2 and 22.2°C, respectively. The following parameters were measured to analyze the process of precooling: a) Dimensionless temperature (θ), b) Cooling coefficient (C), c) Lag factor (J), d) Half-cooling time (H), e) Seven-eighths cooling time (S), f) Cooling heterogeneity, g) Fruit mass loss, h) Instantaneous cooling rate, and i) convective heat transfer coefficient.
Results and Discussion
At any air velocity, with increasing the radius from center to outer layer, the lag factor decreased and cooling coefficient increased. Also, half-cooling time and seven-eighths cooling time reduced and so cooling rate enhanced. Thus, despite a reduction lag factor, due to a significant increase in cooling coefficient, half and seven-eighths cooling declined. Dimensionless temperature, θ, less than 0.2 and 0.1 in the center and peel and at different velocities had little impact on the rate of cooling in pomegranate. The difference in primary cooling time (0-500 sec) and in high lag factor (greater than 1) occurred, which represents an internal resistance of heat transfer in fruit against the airflow. Cooling the center of pomegranate starts with time delay which causes the beginning of the cooling curve becomes flat. Seven-eighths cooling time is the part of half-cooling time. The range of S was 2.5-3.5H in the present study. At first, cooling heterogeneity at 0.5 m s^-1 was low in the center and peel of pomegranate and then with increasing the velocity up to 1 m s^-1, it enhanced and again decreased at 1.3 m s^-1. After a period of cooling (5000 sec), almost layers of pomegranate reached the same temperature and so heterogeneity reduced. The maximum instantaneous cooling rate was 8.09 × 10-4 ºC s^-1 at 1.3 m s^-1 in the center of pomegranate. By increasing the airflow velocity from 0.5 to 1.3 m s^-1, the convective heat transfer coefficient increased from 11.05 to 17.51 W m-2 K^-1. Therefore, the velocity of cold air is an important factor in variation of convective heat transfer coefficient.
Conclusion
Cooling efficiency is evaluated based on rapid and uniformity of cooling. Cooling curves against time reduced exponentially at the different airflow velocities in the center (aril) and outer layer (peel) of pomegranate. By increasing the air flow velocity, half and seven-eighths cooling time reduced and cooling rate increased that showed direct impact of this variable. The main reason was the variation of convective heat transfer coefficient. The lowest level of uniformity obtained at the highest velocity (1.3 m s^-1), which made more uniform temperature distribution in the fruit. The results showed that applied method in this experiment could be used for the fruits which are similar to sphere and could explain the unsteady heat transfer without complex calculations in the cooling process. Based on the results of this research, the airflow velocity of 1.3 m s^-1 is recommended for forced air precooling operations of pomegranate.

Keywords

Cooling rate; Pomegranate; Precooling; Unsteady heat transfer

References

1. Anon. 1994. ASHRAE handbook: Method of precooling fruit, vegetables, and cut flowers. Refrigeration Systems and Applications.

2. AOAC, 1980. Official methods of analysis. AOAC, 13th edition, No. 22.013, p 361.

3. Askari Ardeh-Asli, E. 2006.Postharvest Technology.Yavaran publication, Iran, PP 430-431. (In Farsi).

4. Brosnan, T., and D. Sun. 2001. Precooling techniques and applications for horticultural products – a review. International Journal of Refrigeration 32: 154-170.

5. Castro, L. R., C. Vigneault, and L. A. B. Cortez. 2004. Effect of container opening area on air distribution during precooling of horticultural produce. Transactions of the ASAE 47 (6): 2033-2038.

6. Castro, L. R., C. Vigneault, and L. A. B. Cortez. 2005. Cooling performance of horticultural produce in containers with peripheral openings. Postharvest Biology and Technology 38: 254-261.

7. Dehghannya, J., M. Ngadi, and C. Vigneault. 2011. Mathematical modelling of airflow and heat transfer during forced convection cooling of produce considering various package vent areas. Food Control 22: 1393-1399.

8. Dennis, C. 1984. Effect of storage and distribution conditions on the quality of vegetables. Acta Horticulture 163: 85-104.

9. Dincer, I. 1993. Heat transfer coefficients in hydrocooling of spherical and cylindrical food products. Energy 18 (4): 335-340.

10. Dincer, I. 1995a. Airflow precooling of individual grapes. Journal of Food Engineering 26: 243-249.

11. Dincer, I. 1995b. Development of Fourier-Reynolds correlations for cooling parameters. Applied Energy 51: 125-138.

12. Dincer, I. 1996. An exact solution on the estimating of heat transfer rates during deep-freezing of slab products. Journal of Food Engineering 30: 417-423.

13. Dincer, I., and S. Dost. 1996. New correlations for heat transfer coefficients during direct cooling of products. International Journal of Energy Research 20 (7): 587-594.

14. Dincer, I. 1997. New effective Nusselt-Reynolds correlations for food cooling applications. Journal of Food Engineering 31: 59-67.

15. Emond, J. P., F. Mercier, S. O., Sadfa, M. Bourre, and A. Gakwaya. 1996. Study of parameters affecting cooling rate and temperature distribution in forced air precooling of strawberry. Transactions of the ASAE 39 (6): 2185-2191.

16. Fadavi, A., M. Barzegar, and M. H. Azizi. 2006. Determination of fatty acids and total lipid content in oilseed of 25 pomegranates varieties grown in Iran. Journal of Food Composition Analysis 19: 676-680.

17. Fikiin, A. G. 1983. Investigating the factors of intensifying fruits and vegetable cooling. International Journal of Refrigeration 6: 176-181.

18. Geankoplis, C. J. 1978. Transport Processes and Unit Operations. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

19. Golob, P., G. Farrell, and G. E. Orchard. 2002. Postharvest science and technology, Principles and practices.Vol. 1. Blackwell Science, p. 554.

20. Guillou, R. 1960. Forced air fruit cooling. Transactions of the ASAE 3 (2): 16-18.

21. Guillou, R. 1970. Precooling in the west. ASHRAE Symposium on Precooling Fruits and Vegetables 4: 3-11.

22. Hass, E., G. Felsenstein, A. Shitzer, and G. Manor. 1976. Factors affecting resistance to airflow through packed fresh fruit. ASHRAE Transactions 82 (2): 548-554.

23. Iranmanesh, M., and M. Malekyarand. 2012. Postharvest physiology (fruits & vegetables). Scientific and Applied Education Institute Publication. (In Farsi).

24. Kader, A. A. 2002. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. Cooperative Extension of University of California, Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, Publication No. 3311.

25. Kumar, R., A. Kumar, and U. N. Murthy. 2008. Heat transfer during forced air precooling of perishable food products. Biosystems Engineering 99: 228-233.

26. Lambrinos, G., H. Assimaki, H. Manolopoulou, E. Sfakiotakis, and J. Porlimgis. 1997. Air precooling and hydrocooling of Hayward kiwifruit. Acta Horticulture 444: 561-566.

27. Lindsay, R. T., M. A. Neale, and H. J. M. Messer. 1983. Ventilation rates for positive ventilation of vegetables in bulk bins. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 28 (1): 33-44.

28. Mohseni, A. 2009. Identification and introduction of the best pomegranate exportcultivars in Iran. Office of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Publications of Agricultural Education. P. 38. (In Farsi).

29. Nalbandi, H., H. R. Ghasemzadeh, S. Seiidlou, F. Ranjbar, and J. Dehghanniya. 2014. Mathematical modelling of airflow and heat transfer during forced-air cooling of strawberries. ISESCO JOURNAL of Science and Technology 10 (17): 69-76.

30. Smale, N. J., J. Moureh, and J. Cortella. 2006. A review of numerical models of airflow in refrigerated food applications. International Journal of Refrigeration 29: 911-930.

31. Thompson, J. F., F. G. Mitchel, T. R. Rumsey, R. F. Kasmire, and C. H. Crisosto. 1998. Commercial cooling of fruits, vegetables, and flowers. University of California., ANR Publication 21567.

32. Zou, Q., O. U. Linus, and R. A. Mckibbin, 2006a. CFD modelling system for airflow and heat transfer in ventilated packaging for fresh foods: I. Initial analysis and development of mathematical models. Journal of Food Engineering 77 (4): 1037-1047.

33. Zou, Q., O. U. Linus, and R. A. Mckibbin. 2006b. CFD modelling system for airflow and heat transfer in ventilated packaging for fresh foods: II. Computational solution, software development and model testing. Journal of Food Engineering 77 (4): 1048-1058.