Life Cycle Assessment of Alfalfa Production and Prediction of Emissions using Multi-Layer Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System in Bukan Township

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 10, Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 15, 2018, Pages 119-136   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v8i1.56600

Authors

O. Ghaderpour; Sh. Rafiee^* ; M. Sharifi

Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Agricultural productions has been identified as a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG) on a global scale with about 14% of global net CO₂ emissions coming from agriculture. Identification and assessment of environmental impact in the production system will be leading to achieve the goals of sustainable development, which would be achieved by life cycle assessment. To find the relationship between inputs and outputs of a production process, artificial intelligence (AI) has drawn more attention rather than mathematical models to find the relationships between input and output variables by training, and produce results without any prior assumptions. The aims of this study were to life cycle assessment (LCA) of Alfalfa production flow and prediction of GWP (global warming potential) per ha produced alfalfa (kg CO₂ eq.(ha alfalfa)^-1) with respect to inputs using ANFIS.
Materials and Methods
The sample size was calculated by using the Cochran method, to be equals 75, then the data were collected from 75 alfalfa farms in Bukan Township in Western Azerbaijan province using face to face questionnaire method. Functional unit and system boundary were determined one hectare of alfalfa and the farm gate, respectively. Inventory data in this study was three parts, included: consumed inputs in the alfalfa production, farm direct emissions from crop production and indirect emissions related to inputs processing stage. Direct Emissions from alfalfa cultivation include emissions to air, water and soil from the field. Data for the production of used inputs and calculation of direct emission were taken from the EcoInvent®3.0 database available in simapro8.2.3.0 software and World Food LCA Database (WFLD). Primary data along with calculated direct emissions were imported into and analyzed with the SimaPro8.2.3.0 software. The impact-evaluation method used was the CML-IA baseline V3.02 / World 2000. Damage assessment is a relatively new step in impact assessment. The purpose of damage assessment is to combine a number of impact category indicators into a damage category (also called area of protection). To assess the damage in this study, IMPACT 2002+ V2.12 / IMPACT 2002+ method was used. ANFIS is a multilayer feed-forward network which is applying to map an input space to an output space using a combination of neural network learning algorithms and fuzzy reasoning. In order to enable a system to deal with cognitive uncertainties in a manner more like humans, neural networks have been engaged with fuzzy logic, creating a new terminology called ‘‘neuro-fuzzy method. An ANFIS is used to map input characteristics to input membership functions (MFs), input MF to a set of if-then rules, rules to a set of output characteristics, output characteristics to output MFs, and the output MFs to a single valued output or a decision associated with the output. The main restriction of the ANFIS model is related to the number of input variables. If ANFIS inputs exceed five, the computational time and rule numbers will increase, so ANFIS will not be able to model output with respect to inputs. In this study, the number of inputs were ten, including machinery, diesel fuel, nitrogen, phosphate, electricity, water for irrigation, labor, pesticides, Manure and seed and GWP was as the model output signal. To solve this problem and employ all input variables, we proposed clustering input parameters to four groups. Correspondingly, the proposed model was developed using seven ANFIS sub-networks. To obtain the best results several modifications were made in the structure of ANFIS networks, and some parameters were calculated to compare the results of different models. Making a comparison between different topologies the employment of some indicators was a pivotal to get a good vision of various the structures, such as the correlation coefficient (R), Mean Square Error (MSE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). In addition, for checking comparison between experimental and modeled data, the t-test was performed. The null hypothesis was equality of data average. To develop ANFIS models, MATLAB software (R2015a) was used.
Results and Discussion
Impact categories including Global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), human toxicity potential (HTP), terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (TEP), oxidant formation potential (OFP), acidification potential (AP), Abiotic depletion (AD) and Abiotic depletion (fossil fuels) were calculated as 13373 kg CO₂ eq, 19.78 kg PO4-2 eq, 2054 kg 1,4-DCB eq, 38.7 kg 1,4-DCB eq, 3.84 kg Ethylene eq, 90.64 kg SO₂ eq, 0.015 kg Sb eq and 205169 MJ, respectively. The results of damage assessment of alfalfa production revealed that electricity in three categories, human health damage, climate change and ecosystem quality had maximum role, but in the resources damage category was the largest share of damage related direct emissions. The value of the climate change was calculated as 13373 kg CO₂ eq. The best structure was including five ANFIS network in the first layer, two network in the second layer and a network in output layer. Values of R, MSE and RMSE for the final ANFIS in k-fold model were 0.983, 0.107 and 0.327 and in C-means model were 0.999, 0.007 and 0.082, respectively. The p-value in t-test was 0.9987 that indicates non-significant difference between the mean of modeling and experimental data. Coefficient of determination (R²) between actual and predicted GWP based on the best k-fold and C-means models were 0.994 and 0.99, respectively. The coefficient of determination for these index demonstrated the suitability of the developed network for prediction of GWP of alfalfa production in the studied area.
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study, to reduce the emissions, electricity consumption should be reduced. Adapting of electro pumps power with the well depth and the amount of required water taken for field will be a possible solution to reduce the use of electricity in order to trigger of electro pumps and thus reducing of emissions related to it. In some situations, the type of mineral fertilizer is the main determinant of emissions at the whole farm level and changing the type of fertilizer could significantly reduce the environmental impact. Comparison of GWP modeling results using two methods of k-fold and C-means revealed that C-means method has higher accuracy in prediction of GWP. Also the high quantities for the determination coefficient related to both modeling methods demonstrates high correlation between actual and predicted data.

Keywords

Alfalfa; ANFIS; Bukan township; Electricity; GWP; LCA; Modeling

References

1. Asgharipour, M. R., S. M. Mousavinik, and F. F. Enayat. 2016. Evaluation of energy input and greenhouse gases emissions from alfalfa production in the Sistan region, Iran. Energy Reports 2: 135-140.

2. Anonymous. 2014. Agricultural Jihad statistics. Available from: http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=95a8e7d0-e5f0-4f2d-a241-92106c74dcc.

3. Anonymous. 2010. Statistical Center of Iran. The estimated population of each city. Available from: http://www.amar.org.ir.

4. Azamathulla, H. M., A. A. Ghani, and S. Y. Fei. 2012. ANFIS-based approach for predicting sediment transport in clean sewer. Applied Soft Computing 12 (3): 1227-1230.

5. Bacenetti, J., A. Fusi, M. Negri, R. Guidetti, and M. Fiala. 2014. Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production. Science of the total environment 466: 1066-1077.

6. Brentrup, F., J. Küsters, H. Kuhlmann, and J. Lammel. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 20 (3) :247-264.

7. Carozzi, M., R. M. Ferrara, G. Rana, and M. Acutis. 2013. Evaluation of mitigation strategies to reduce ammonia losses from slurry fertilisation on arable lands. Science of the Total Environment 449: 126-133.

8. Cellura, M., S. Longo, and M. Mistretta. 2012. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of protected crops: an Italian case study. Journal of cleaner production 28: 56-62.

9. CML, 2013. CML e IA (Version 4.2). Institut of Environmental Sciences, Leiden

University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

10. Fahimifard, S. M., M. Salarpour, and M. Sabouhi. 2011. Comparison of ANFIS, ANN and ARIMA Models Performance to Forecasting Case study: Weekly Egg Price. Agricultural Economics and Development 19 (74): 181-205. (In Farsi).

11. Farjam, A., M. Omid, A. Akram, and Z. Fazel Niari. 2014. A neural network based modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for predicting seed and grain corn yields. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 16 (4): 767-778.

12. Ghaderpour, O., and Sh. Rafiee. 2015. Analysis and modeling of energy and production of dryland chickpea in the city of Bukan. The 9th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and mechanization. Karaj, Iran. (In Farsi).

13. Ghobadian, B., H. Rahimi, A. M. Nikbakht, G. Najafi, and T. F. Yusaf. 2009. Diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using waste cooking biodiesel fuel with an artificial neural network. Renewable Energy 34 (4): 976-982.

14. Guinee, J. B., M. Gorree, R. Heijungs, G. Huppes, K. R. A. de Koning, A. Wegener Sleeswijk, S. Suh, H. Udo de Haes, H. Bruijn, R.v. Duin, and M. A. J. Huijbregts. 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

15. Ho, Y. C., and C. T. Tsai. 2011. Comparing ANFIS and SEM in linear and nonlinear forecasting of new product development performance. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (6): 6498-6507.

16. IPCC. IPCC Assessment Report 4. 2007.

17. Iriarte, A., J. Rieradevall, and X. Gabarrell. 2010. Life cycle assessment of sunflower and rapeseed as energy crops under Chilean conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(4): 336-345.

18. Joseph, T., K. Baah, A. Jahanfar, and B. Dubey. 2015. A comparative life cycle assessment of conventional hand dryer and roll paper towel as hand drying methods. Science of The Total Environment 515: 109-117.

19. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, A. Keyhani, and M. Movahedi. 2013a. Evaluating of Energy and environmental indexes in Cultivation of potato with a life-cycle approach in the Fereydoun city of Esfahan province of Iran. Biosystem Engineering 44 (1): 66-57. (In Farsi).

20. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, H. Mousazadeh, and P. Sefeedpari. 2013b. Prognostication of environmental indices in potato production using artificial neural networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 52: 402-409.

21. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, and H. Mousazadeh. 2013c. Regression modeling of field emissions in wheat production using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. Electronic Journal of Energy & Environment 1 (2): 9-19.

22. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, H. Mousazadeh, and S. Clark. 2014a. Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Journal of Cleaner Production 73: 183-192.

23. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, and H. Mousazadeh, 2014b. Development of an intelligent system based on ANFIS for predicting wheat grain yield on the basis of energy inputs. Information processing in agriculture 1 (1): 14-22.

24. Khoshnevisan, B., Sh. Rafiee, M. Omid, and H. Mousazadeh. 2014c. Prediction of potato yield based on energy inputs using multi-layer adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Measurement 47: 521-530.

25. Khoshnevisan, B., S. Rafiee, J. Iqbald, S. Shamshirbande, M. Omid, N. B. Anuarf, and A.W. Abdul Wahabg. 2015. A Comparative Study between Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference Systems for Modeling Energy Consumption in Greenhouse Tomato Production-A Case Study in Isfahan Province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17 (1): 49-62.

26. Kizilaslan, H. 2009. Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy 86 (7): 1354-1358.

27. Mirhaji, H., M. Khojastehpour, M. H. Abbaspour-Fard, and S.M. Mahdavi-Shahri. 2012. Environmental impact assessment of Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) production with life cycle assessment method (Case Study: South Khorasan province farms). Journal of Agroecology 4 (2): 112-120. (In Farsi).

28. Mohaddes, S. A., and S. M. Fahimifard. 2015. Application of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in Forecasting Agricultural Products Export Revenues (Case of Iran’s Agriculture Sector). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17 (1): 1-10.

29. Mousavi-Avval, Sh., Sh. Rafiee, M. Sharifi, and S. Hoseynpour. 2015. Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of canola production in Mazandaran province of Iran by applying two different approaches. Biosystem Engineering 46 (3): 265-274. (In Farsi).

30. Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Sh. Rafiee, M. Sharifi, S. Hosseinpour, B. Notarnicola, G. Tassielli, and P. A. Renzulli. 2016. Application of multi-objective genetic algorithms for optimization of energy, economics and environmental life cycle assessment in oilseed production. Journal of Cleaner Production. (In Press).

31. Naderloo, L., R. Alimardani, M. Omid, F. Sarmadian, P. Javadikia, M. Y. Torabi, and F. Alimardani. 2012. Application of ANFIS to predict crop yield based on different energy inputs. Measurement 45 (6): 1406-1413.

32. Nemecek, T., X. Bengoa, J. Lansche, P. Mouron, V. Rossi, and S. Humbert. 2014. Methodological Guidelines for the Life Cycle Inventory of Agricultural Products, Version 2.0, July 2014, World Food LCA Database (WFLDB). Quantis and Agroscope, Lausanne and Zurich, Switzerland.

33. Nemecek, T., D. Dubois, O. Huguenin-Elie, and G. Gaillard. 2011. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Agricultural Systems 104 (3): 217-232.

34. Nemecek, T., T. Kagi. 2007. Life cycle inventories of agricultural production system. Ecoinvent report No. 15.

35. Pourshirazi, Sh., Gh. Resam, and M. H. Rajabi. 2013. Evaluation of the environmental impact and energy consumption in rice production systems. The 1th conference and exhibition on environmental energy & clean industry. Tehran, Iran.

36. PRe Consultants. 2014. SimaPro 8.2.3.0 Database Manual. More information on: http://cml.leiden.edu/software/data-cmlia.html and http://www.pre-sustainability.

com /simapro/.

37. Ramedani, Z., M. Omid, and A. Keyhani. 2012. A method based on neural networks for generating solar radiation map. International journal of energy and environment 3 (5): 775-786.

38. Rebitzer, G., T. Ekvall, R. Frischknecht, D. Hunkeler, G. Norris, T. Rydberg, W.P. Schmidt, S. Suh, B.P. Weidema, and D.W. Pennington. 2004. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment international 30 (5): 701-720.

39. Sahle, A., and J. Potting. 2013. Environmental life cycle assessment of Ethiopian rose cultivation. Science of the total environment 443: 163-172.

40. Sedghi, R., and Y. Abbaspour-Gilandeh. 2014. Prediction of the fragmentation of soil during tillage operations using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 4 (2): 387-398. (In Farsi).

41. Sherafat, M., H. Mobli, and M. Khanali. 2015. Analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission in tea production. The 9th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and mechanization. Karaj, Iran. (In Farsi).

42. Sonesson, U., J. Berlin, and F. Ziegler. 2010. Book of environmental assessment and management in the food industry. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Num 194.

43. Taheri-Rad, A., A. Nikkhah, M. Khojastehpour, and Sh. Nowrozie. 2014. Assessing GHG emissions, and energy and economic analysis of cotton production in the Golestan province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5 (2): 428-445. (In Farsi).

44. Weidema, B. P., C. Bauer, R. Hischier, C. Mutel, T. Nemecek, J. Reinhard, and G. Wernet. 2013. Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

45. Yang, Z., Y. Liu, and C. Li. 2011. Interpolation of missing wind data based on ANFIS. Renewable Energy 36 (3): 993-998.