Examining the Effect of World Price Transfer to Domestic Markets for Sensitive and Certain Agricultural Products in Iran

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 4, Volume 29, Issue 1, April 2015, Pages 55-67   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v0i0.39534

Authors

M. Shabanzadeh-Khoshrody^{* 1}; A. Mahmoodi²; R. Esfanjari Kenari³

¹University of Tehran

²Payam Noor University

³University of Zabol

Abstract

Introduction: Agriculture as one of old sectors of economy has been important role in the supply food for peoples and raw materials. Globalization causes rapid growth of world trade and reduces information and communications costs. Globalization and rapid growth of trade increases the potential benefits of trade for agriculture from various aspects. The potential benefits of trade for agriculture increases from three aspects. Direct increase in the domain of agricultural sector activities for competition in the global market results in the benefits of access to global markets. This is especially true in cases where there is comparative advantage and the indirect effects of increased global trade on non-agricultural sectors that cause the domestic demand for food change from qualitative and quantitative aspects, are the benefits of this event. However, during the process of globalization, how to influence prices in different markets, including the impact of world prices on domestic prices is an important issue in trade policy analysis. During this process domestic prices are directly related to world prices. With this approach, the main objective of this study is to examine the effect of world price transfers to domestic markets for sensitive and certain agricultural products in Iran during 1360-91.
Materials and Methods: To achieve this goal in this study, the Armington and the foreign currency elasticity of ten selected agricultural products in Iran including wheat, barley, rice, corn, soybean meal, vegetable oil (soybean and sunflower), sugar, eggs, poultry and beef, have been estimated and examined using Autoregressive Distribution lag Model (ARDL). In order to investigate speed of adjustment or in other words the speed of movement towards equilibrium, typically the error correction model (ECM) is used. Existence of cointegration or in other words, long term relationship between a set of economic variables provide the basis for the use of error correction model. In fact, error correction model links the short term fluctuations of the variables to their long term equilibrium values and shows adjustment speed and long term movement towards equilibrium.
Results and Discussion: The results of the present study show transfer of the world price fluctuations to the domestic market in the long run is more than in the short run. Moreover, if the products face a gap in domestic demand, and the local production is so limited that it cannot limit the import of that product, the products would be more affected by fluctuations in world prices. The results of ECM model reveal that the speed of adjustment towards long run equilibrium for most products is low such that if the shock enters the market of each product a long time is required for correcting the short-run and long-run imbalance equilibrium and bring it back to the first equilibrium.
Conclusion: The results showed that most of the crops under review (e.g. corn) face with the low gap of demand and the ability of domestic production in limiting the imports is low. Therefore, a significant portion of these products are imported from abroad. Given that the country is faced with a crisis of drought and water shortage problems, the price policies cannot eliminate this problem and help stabilize the market by encouraging increased production Thus, they lead to increased demand for imports. Under such circumstances, the only way to increase production in the country is enhancement of productivity in the agricultural sector. Of course, this is only possible in the long run. For products such as rice and meat the elasticity of substitution of domestic production with imports is small. In other words, if a policy is adopted that results in an increase in the price of these products, the share of these products of the total imports does not increase that much in comparison with other products. To support these products, policies can be used such as import tariffs in the short run. Since in the ECM model for the majority of products, the adjustment speed or the speed to move to the long-run equilibrium is slow, it is necessary to consider the harmful effects and consequences of shocks in the economy. Because if a shock is entered into the model, to correct the imbalance between short-run and long-run equilibrium and come back to long-run equilibrium needs a long time.

Keywords: Armington Elasticity, Autoregressive Distribution lags Model (ARDL), Currency Elasticity, Price Transfer

Keywords

Armington Elasticity; Autoregressive Distribution lags Model (ARDL); Currency Elasticity; Price Transfer

References

1- Bakhsodeh M. 2007. Transmission of world prices to domestic markets of Iranian agricultural products. 6‏th Conference of the Agricultural Economics, Iran, Mashhad. (‏in Persian)

2- Balliu J., and Baukez H. 2004. Exchange Rate Pass – Through Effects in Industrialized Countries. Bank of Canada Review.

3- Banerjee A., Dolado J.J. and Master R. 1992. On simple tests for cointegration: the cost of simplicity. Bank of Spain working paper, no. 9302.

4- Berben R. 2004. Exchange Rate Pass –Through in Netherlands. Has It Changed? Applied Economic Letters, 11:141-143.

5- Centeral bank of the Islamic republic of Iran. 2014. Time series of macroeconomic variables. http://www.cbi.ir. (‏in Persian)

6- Farajzadeh Z., and Esmaeili A. 2009. Analysis of Price Transmission in the global market of pistachios. Journal of agriculture economy and development, 17: 69-98.(‏in Persian)

7- Faryadras V., and Moghadasi R. 2004. Evaluation of Iranian agricultural tariff system during 1982- 2003. Journal of agriculture economy and development, 12(48):1-23.(‏in Persian)

8- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2004. The state of food insecurity in the world, monitoring progress towards the world food summit and millennium development goals, Economic and Social Development Department.

9- Fomby B.T. 1998. How to model multivariate time series data. Department of Economics, Southern Methodist .University Dallas, USA.

10- Jalil A., and Mahmud S. 2009. Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A-cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12):5167–5172.

11- Mah J.‬ 2000. An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of Korea the case of information technology products. Journal of Asian Economics‬, 11: 237 – 244.

12- Militaru M. 2014. Transmission of Agricultural Commodity Prices into Romanian Food Prices. National Bank of Romania, Romania.

13- Minot N. 2011. Transmission of World Food Price Changes to Market in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute.

14- Noferesti M. 2008. Unit Root and Cointegration in Econometrics. Samt Publication, Tehran. (‏in Persian)

15- Pesaran M.H., and Pesaran B. 1997. Working With Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

16- Pesaran M.H., and Shin Y. 1999. An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom, S. (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Chapter 11.

17- Pesaran M.H., and Smith R.P. 1998. Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of Economic Survey, 12: 471–505.

18- Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. and Smith R.J. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16: 289–326.

19- Rahimibadr B., Alishahi M. and Mojaradnashtarodi M. 2009. Determination the list of Iranian special agricultural products in the framework of the Doha Round of WTO negotiations. 6‏th Conference of the Agricultural Economics, Iran, Mashhad. (‏in Persian)

20- Robles M. 2011. Price Transmission from International Agricultural Commodity Market to Domestic Food Price: Case Study in Asia and Latin America. International Food Policy Research Instiute.

21- Siddiki J.‏U. 2000. Demand for money in Bangladesh: A cointegration analysis. Applied Economics, 32: 1977-1984.

22- Statistical Center of Iran. 2014. Time series of macroeconomic variables. www.amar.org.ir. (‏in Persian)

23- Taheri F., Moghadasi R. and Mosavi S.N. 2010. The Structur of market and price transmition in the world market of maize. Journal of agriculture economy, 3: 185-209. (‏in Persian)

24- Valdes A. and Foster W. 2005. Reflections on the Role of Agriculture in Pro-Poor Growth. Research Workshop: The Future of Small Farms, Wye, Kent.

25- Yousefmoteghaed H., and Moghadasi R. 2013. Examining the transmission of world prices to domestic market some of agricultural products (wheat, barley and rice) using Entropy maximization, 17:81-99. (‏in Persian)