Analyzing the Level of Access to Public Services at Neighborhood Scale (Case Study: Neighborhoods of Isfahan)

جغرافیاوتوسعه ناحیه ای

Article 7, Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 31, March 2019, Pages 153-178   

Document Type: scientific-research article

DOI: 10.22067/geography.v16i2.65297

Authors

Farshad Tahmasbizadeh^{* 1}; Ahmad Khademolhosseini¹; Safar Ghaedrahmati²

¹Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University

²Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Urban man has a direct relationship with the space and environment of his neighborhood which, in turn, provides the most basic requirements of humans in a daily manner. Lack of equal distribution of such basic needs across the entire neighborhoods within a city is considered as the main factor on spatial inequity, dissimilarity of urban space quality, and contexts for numerous other consequences. As a result, investigating these needs at a neighborhood scale would demonstrate a correct understanding of a balanced urban space.

Review of Literature

The subject of spatial equity has been expanded significantly during the past two decades, however, planners and scholars have failed to offer a comprehensive and all-inclusive assessment of the topic since equity cannot easily be put into action. Through the outlook of geographers, the notion of social equity involves contributing to the benefit of all, income distribution in areas, equal allocation of resources, and meeting people’s basic needs. Equality in space is the same as the environmental/geographical equality which seeks to equally meet the humans’ complex set of needs within the social environments by identifying spatial inequities as well as their causes. Achieving sustainability, balance, and equity within the urban atmosphere requires an analytical understanding of the status quo by analyzing the balance or spatial equality in cities. 

Method

The present inquiry is an applied descriptive-analytical study. Data collection was carried out using library studies and questionnaires. The required data were collected according to the literature; then, the field investigations were done so as to update the information on the status qu o. A set of questionnaires were also distributed among the experts in order to extract the relative weights of the indices. The Human Development Index (HDI) model integrated with GIS spatial analytics tools were employed to analyze the data. Furthermore, the spatial statistical tests including the average neighbor and the spatial autocorrelation were used in order to apply the scientific results for the interpretation of the results obtained from the HDI model.
What distinguishes the method in the present study from the similar research is the combined use of models with the spatial analysis tools in GIS software along with a step-by-step use of various spatial analyses while integrating them with the spatial statistics models that can consequently increase the precision of analyses and conclusion.
4 .Results and Discussion
Since 1960s, Isfahan has been witnessing a rapid surge in population. The growth rate of urban population and the service provision as well as the changes in need during the past fifty years have not been coordinated. In this regard, certain parts of the city have received higher shares of public services opposed to others. Consequently, it appears that a duality and a spatial polarization has occurred in Isfahan. Public services at the neighborhood scale accounts for a portion of individuals’ daily needs the unequal distribution of which during the development process of Isfahan has led to the imbalance.
According to the accessible spatial, regional, and descriptive information as well as the present statistics, there are 169 neighborhoods in Isfahan municipality. Taking into account the basic needs and the public services in this study, spatial equity was investigated in Isfahan. The results show the absence of equity with regards to the indices of neighborhood-related functions. Indices and activities at the neighborhood scale which are supposed to meet the citizens’ basic and daily needs are distributed unequally across the neighborhoods of Isfahan. Throughout this city, only 2.14% of the entire neighborhoods are at an advantaged level while 24.19, 47.97, and 25.69% are at semi-advantaged, disadvantaged, and completely disadvantaged levels, respectively. What is of importance in this analysis is that overall, 73% of neighborhoods in Isfahan are at disadvantaged and completely disadvantaged levels according to the neighborhood indices

Conclusion and Recommendations

The equity indices are distributed across Isfahan neighborhoods in a clustered, heterogeneous, and unbalanced manner. The actions taken by Isfahan urban management in providing public services have also been clustered. In order to enhance the status of equity across various neighborhoods in Isfahan, those at a disadvantaged or completely disadvantaged level require special planning so as to have a fair competition in line with the progress and development. Public services and equality in their distribution should be prioritized in both short and long-term strategic planning of Isfahan. Furthermore, a committee should be formed to monitor changes and developments regarding the level of access to public services in Isfahan municipality.
A number of 30 questionnaires were distributed among experts and instructors in the area of urban management and urbanism based on an investigation of literature, in line with evaluating the value and importance of neighborhood equity indices.

Keywords

Isfahan; neighborhood; Social justice; Space justice

References

1. پور محمدی، م. (1386). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری. تهران: سمت.

2. تقوایی، ع؛ بمانبان، م؛ پورجعفر، م. و بهرام‌پور، م. (1394). میزان سنجش عدالت فضایی در چارچوب نظریة شهر عدالت‌محور، مورد پژوهی: مناطق بیست‌دوگانة شهرداری تهران. مدیریت شهری. 14 (38)، 423- 391.

3. ثقه اسلامی، ع؛ بهنمامی فرد، م. (1391). تحلیل مرزبندی محلات قراردادی با استفاده از نقشه-های شناختی ساکنان، مطالعة موردی محله‌بندی شهرداری مشهد. چهارمین همایش برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت شهری مشهد، 20 و 21 ادریبهشت 1391. دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

4. حبیبی، س. مسائلی، ص. (1378). سرانه‌های فضاهای شهری. تهران: سازمان ملی زمین و مسکن.

5. حکمت نیا، ح؛ موسوی، م. (1390). کاربرد مدل در جغرافیا با تأکید بر برنامه‌ریزی شهری. چاپ دوم. یزد: انتشارات علم نوین .

6. دداش پور، ه؛ ستمی، ف. (1390). سنجش عدالت فضایی خدمات عمومی شهری بر اساس توزیع جمعیت ، قابلیت دسترسی و کارایی در شهر یاسوج. مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای. 3 (10)، 22-1.

7. رفیعیان, م؛ شالی، م. (1391). تحلیل فضایی سطح توسعه‌یافتگی تهران به تفکیک مناطق شهری. مدرس علوم انسانی – برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا. 16 (4)، 25-49.

8. رهنما, م؛ ذبیحی، ذ. (1391). تحلیل توزیع تسهیلات عمومی شهری در راستای عدالت فضایی با مدل یکپارچة دسترسی در مشهد. جغرافیا و توسعه ،23، 26-5 .

9. ساجدی، ع. (1389). عدالت اجتماعی و نقش آن بر توسعة پایدار. سومین همایش جغرافیا و رویکرد علمی به توسعة پایدار. پیرانشهر.

10. شکویی، ح. (1374). دیدگاه نو در جغرافیای شهری. چاپ دوم. تهران: سمت.

11. شکویی، ح. (1385). اندیشه‌های نو در فلسفة جغرافیا. جلد اول. چاپ هشتم. تهران: گیتاشناسی.

12. شکوئی، ح. (1388). فلسفه‌های محیطی و مکتب های جغرافیایی. تهران: گیتاشناسی.

13. شماعی، ع. تیموری؛ س و بهرامی اصل، ح. (1395) تحلیل فضایی جمعیت و خدمات شهری با رویکرد عدالت فضایی (مطالعة موردی: شهر خرم آباد). جغرافیایی سرزمین. 13 (49)، 64-47.

14. شماعی، ع. و پوراحمد، ا. (1385). بهسازی و نوسازی شهری. چاپ دوم. تهران: دانشگاه نهران.

15. شهرداری اصفهان. (1391). آمارنامة شهر اصفهان 1391 . اصفهان: معاونت برنامه‌ریزی ، پژوهش و فناوری اطلاعات.

16. شیعه، ا. (1386). مقدمه‌ای بر برنامه‌ریزی شهری. تهران: علم و صنعت.

17. طهماسبی‌زاده، ف. (1392). تحلیل فضایی عدالت اجتماعی در شهر، مطالعة موردی شهر اصفهان. پایان‌نامة منتشرنشدة کارشناسی‌ارشد رشتة جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری. دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد نجف‌آباد، نجف آباد، ایران.

18. عسگری، ع. (1390). تحلیل آمار فضایی با ARC GIS . تهران: سازمان فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات شهرداری تهران.

19. مطهری، م. (1403 ق). بررسی اجمالی مبانی اقتصاد اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات حکمت اول.

20. هزار جریبی، ج. (1390) بررسی احساس عدات اجتماعی و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مطالعة موردی شهر تهران). جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، سال 22 ، شمارة پیاپی 23، شمارة 3، 62-31.

21. وارثی، ح. قائد رحمتی، ص؛ و باستانی فر، ا. (1386). بررسی اثرات توزیع خدمات شهری در عدم تعادل فضایی جمعیت، مطالعة موردی شهر اصفهان. مجلة جغرافیا و توسعه، 5 (9)، 106-91. هاروی، د. (1379). عدالت اجتماعی و شهر. (ترجمه، ف. حسامیان و دیگران). تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.

22. یعقوبی، د. (1388). درک ایرانیان از عدالت. تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.

23. Albo, G. (2009). Challenges for urban social justice movements: Neoliberal urbanism, the Canadian city and Toronto. Toronto, ON: Centre for Social Justice.

24. Bowen, W. M. (2002). Environmental justice through research-based decision-making. London, England: Routledge.

25. Bullard, R. (2015). Environmental Justice in the United States. In J. Wright (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 756-762). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

26. Buzzelli, M. (2008). Environmental justice in Canada: It matters where you live. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks.

27. Dufaux, F. (2008). Birth announcement, justice spatial/spatial justice. Retrieved from www.jssj.org.

28. Kinman, E. L. (1999). Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia. Social Science & Medicine, 49(5), 663-678.

29. Kunzmann, K. R. (1998). Planning for spatial equity in Europe. International Planning Studies, 3(1), 101-120.

30. Li, B., Li, T., Yu, M., & Chen, B. (2017). Can equalization of public services narrow the regional disparities in China? A spatial econometrics approach. China Economic Review, 44, 67-78.

31. Liu, W., Chen, W., & Dong, C. (2017). Spatial decay of recreational services of urban parks: Characteristics and influencing factors. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 25, 130-138.

32. Lorestani, A., Yaghoubpour, Z., & Shirzadian, R. (2016). Analysis of spatial distribution of Tehran Metropolis urban services using models of urban planning. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 1(2), 83-92.

33. Marshall, G., & Swift, A. (1993). Social class and social justice. British Journal of Sociology, 44 (2), 187-211.

34. Martnez, J. (2005). Monitors intra-urban nequalities with GIS-based indicators with a case study in Rosario, Argentina (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

35. Ouyang, W., Wang, B., Tian, L., & Niu, X. (2017). Spatial deprivation of urban public services in migrant enclaves under the context of a rapidly urbanizing China: An evaluation based on suburban Shanghai. Cities, 60, 436-445.

36. Pearsall, H., & Pierce, J. (2010). Urban sustainability and environmental justice: Evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse. Local Environment, 15(6), 569-580.

37. Soja, E. (2008, March 12). The city and spatial justice, justice spatial/spatial justice. Paper presented in the Conference of Spatial Justice, Nanterre, Paris, France.

38. Stephens, C., & Church, C. (2017). Environmental justice and health. In S. R. Quah (Ed.). International encyclopedia of public health (2nd ed.) (pp. 499-506). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

39. Swyngedouw, E., & Heynen, N. C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35(5), 898-918.

40. Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., & Chang, Y. L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424-435.

41. Wüstemann, H., Kalisch, D., & Kolbe, J. (2017). Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 124-131.