Environmental risk assessment of registered insecticides in Iran using Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) index

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 6, Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20, June 2014, Pages 250-265   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v6i2.39367

Authors

Seyed Shahabodin Moinoddini^{* 1}; Eskandar Zand²; Jafar Kambouzia³; AbdolMajid Mahdavi Damghani⁴; Reza Deihim Fard³

¹Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Tehran, Iran

³Research Institute of Environmental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

⁴Research Institute of Environmental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Irann

Abstract

In the last decades, pesticides have been used extensively, in order to control pests and plant diseases, but negative impacts of pesticides caused several environmental problems and put human health in danger. In order to decrease environmental hazards of pesticide, risk of pesticide application should be measured briefly and precisely. In this study environmental impacts of registered insecticides in Iran which applied in 2001-2002, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, are considered using environmental impact quotient (EIQ) index. Results showed that among considered insecticides, Imidacloprid, Fipronil and Tiodicarb, potentially (EIQ) were the most hazardous insecticides, respectively. Taking rate of application and active ingredient of insecticide in to account, environmental impact (practical toxicity) per cultivated hectare (EIQ Field) of each provinces were investigated. In this regard, among different province of Iran, Kerman, Mazandaran and Golestan were in danger more than the others, respectively. Besides, considering the amount of agricultural production in provinces, environmental impact per ton of production were calculated for each provinces which three northern provinces of Mazandaran, Golestan and Guilan, respectively endure the most environmental impact per ton of production. Eventually based on environmental impact quotient, results demonstrated that majority of environmental impacts of insecticide in Iran were due to inadequate knowledge and also overuse of a few number of insecticides. Therefore, by improving knowledge about environmental impact of pesticides and also developing environmental friendly and ecological based methods, negative environmental impacts of insecticides will be reduced significantly.

Keywords

Environmental impacts; Environmental impact quotient; Pesticide

References

Deihimfard, R., Zand, E., Damghani, A.M., and Soufizadeh, S. 2007. Herbicide risk assessment during the wheat self-sufficiency project in Iran. Pest Management Science 63: 1036-1045.

Dunn, A.M. 2004. A relative risk ranking of pesticides used in Prince Edward Island. Surveillance Report. Environmental protection Branch. Atlantic Region. Canada.

Feola, G., Rahn, E., and Binder, C.R. 2011. Suitability of pesticide risk indicators for Less Developed Countries: A comparison. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 142: 238– 245.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. 2011. Available on web site www.fao.org. (Verified 10 June 2011).

Gallivan, G.J., Berges, H., and McGee, B. 2005. Evaluation of the changes in pesticide risk. Research Project SR9128. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Guelph.

Gallivan, G.J., Surgeoner, G.A., and Kovach, J. 2001. Pesticide risk reduction on crops in the province of Ontario. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 798-813.

Gustafson, D.I. 1989. Groundwater Ubiquity Score: A Simple Method for Assessing Pesticide Leachability. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 8: 339-357.

Holvoet, K. 2006. Monitoring and modeling the dynamic fate and behavior of pesticides in river systems at catchment scale. PhD thesis. Ghent University, Belgium, pp. 242.

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Available on www.iupac.org. (Verified 10 September 2012).

Ioriatti, C., Agnello, A.M., Martini, F., and Kovachk, J. 2011. Evaluation of 330 the environmental impact of apple pest control strategies using pesticide risk indicators. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9999:1–8.

kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin139: 1-8.

Kromann, P., Pradel W., Cole, D., Taipe, A., and Forbes, G.A. 2011. Use of the environmental impact quotient to estimate health and environmental impact of pesticide usage in Peruvian and Ecuadorian potato production. Journal of Environmental Protection 2: 581-591.

Levitan, L. 1997. An overview of pesticide impact assessment systems. Workshop on Pesticide Risk Indicators. Copenhagen, Denmark,12: 21-23.

Levitan, L., Merwin, I., and Kovach, J. 1995. Assessing the relative environmental impacts of agricultural pesticides: The quest for a holistic method. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 55: 153-168.

Maud, J.,Edwards-Jones, G., and Quin, F. 2001. Comparative evaluation of pesticide risk indices for policy development and assessment in the United Kingdom. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86: 59-73.

Metcalf, R.L. 1982. Insecticides in Pest Management. In: Metcalf, R.L. and W.H. Luckman. Eds., Introduction to Insect Pest Management, 2nd ed., John Wily, NY, (1982), p. 217- 277.

Pease, W.S., Liebman, J., Landy, D., and Albright, D. 1996. Pesticide use in California. Strategies for reducing environmental health impacts. California Policy Seminar, University of California, Berkeley 93 pp.

Plant Protection Institute (PPI). 2006. Permissible pesticide of Iran 441-450. (In Persian)

Plant Protection Institute (PPI). 2011. Pesticide research guideline plan 107-110. (In Persian)

Report of the ministry of agriculture, Report and Information. 2002, 187. Available on http://www.maj.ir

Report of the Ministry of Agriculture, Report and Information. 2003, 226. Available on http://www.maj.ir

Report of the Ministry of Agriculture, Report and Information. 2004, 201. Available on http://www.maj.ir

Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan , M., Van derwerf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blumel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. 2002. Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 90: 177-187.

Sande, D., Mullen, J., Wetzstein, M., and Houston, J. 2011. Environmental impacts from pesticide use: a case study of soil fumigation in Florida tomato production. Intern. Journal of Environmental Research in Public Health 8: 4649-4661.

Stenrod, M., Bolli, H.H.E., and Eklo, M. 2008. Testing and comparison of three pesticide risk indicator models under Norwegian conditions: a case study in the Skuterrud and Heiabekken catchments. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 123: 15-29.

Turgut, C., and Erdogan, O. 2005. The environmental risk of pesticide in cotton production in Aegean region, Turkey. Journal of Applied Science 5(8): 1391-1393.

Vercruysse, F., and Steurbaut, W. 2002. POCER, the pesticide occupational and environmental risk indicator. Crop Protection 21: 307-315.