Effect of Chitosan Coating on Physical, Mechanical and Chemical Properties of Grapes during Storage

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 8, Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 18, 2019, Pages 347-364   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v9i2.69423

Authors

S. Khodamoradi; E. Ahmadi^*

Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Grape fruit set its fruits and shortly after planting and due to high nutritious value and excellent food quality has been welcomed by many people in the world, but considering its soft tissue and high softening velocity and sensitivity to fungi attack it is known as an extensively vulnerable fruit. One of the most important ways to maintain fruit quality, decrease vulnerably and assist more appropriate storage, is the use of coating method and proper packing of agricultural products and combining these procedures to decrease damages in storage. Edible coatings provide a replacement and fortification of the natural layers at the product surface to prevent moisture losses, gas aromas, and solute movements out of the food, while selectively allowing for controlled exchange of important gases, such as oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene, which are involved in fruit respiration. Chitosan is the most common polysaccharide-based coatings. Chitosan films have been successfully applied as edible material in films and coatings for the quality preservation of different fruit. In this study, the effects of the application of chitosan edible coatings and storage time on some physical, chemical, mechanical and rheological properties of grape were investigated during storage.
Materials and Methods
Grape fruits were screened for physical damages, fungal infections, and size homogeneity after harvesting from the farm. Then fruits were divided into without coating and fruits with coating. Fruits being coated, prepared in chitosan emulsion and submerged for two minutes and kept at 20°C for one hour for drying the surface coating via airflow. In order to calculate the weight loss, three containers of each grape fruits (treatment and control) collected and after weighing and averaging weight loss were compared to initial weight during storage expressed as a percent. Color intensities were determined using colorimeter samples. In order to determine soluble solids from each sample, refract meter was used and pH amount of each sample was determined. Mechanical traits and fruit stiffness were measured through penetration test using materials test machine Zowick/ Roell having 500 N loadcell in line with the small diameter with concave probe (5 mm diameter), the penetration depth of 2 mm and loading rate of 10 mm s^-1. Mechanical traits including stiffness and elasticity module calculated from the force-deformation curve. Viscoelastic materials have the properties of both viscous and elastic materials and can be modeled by combining elements that represent these characteristics. A viscoelastic model, called the Maxwell model which can predict behavior was evaluated.
Results and Discussion
In this current study, the application of chitosan coating significantly reduced the fresh grape decay. Fruit decay of grape increased with storage time, but the coating reduced the rate of decay with the length of storage. According to the results, the application of these coatings has a positive impact on yield stress and energy of rupture product texture during the storage. Results of variance analysis showed that temperature, coating and storage time has a significant effect (1% level) on some of the engineering properties of the grape. Storage time has a significant effect on elasticity, while the coating does not have a significant effect on this parameter. Finally, results showed that the application of chitosan coating has an effect on relaxation time and stress. So during storage of coated samples these parameters decreased compared to uncoated.
Conclusion
Edible films and coatings may reduce the moisture transfer, the rate of oxidation and respiration which are considered important to prolong the shelf-life of these products. This investigation showed that the chitosan coatings are effective for grape shelf life extension and retarded the senescence process compared with control. The coat has been as a physical barrier for the gas exchange between the fruit and the environment. It was demonstrated that the coating reduced the loss of firmness and delayed the softening of fruit and texture change.

Keywords

Chitosan coating; Chemical; Grape; Mechanical; Physical properties; Storage

References

1. Bautista-Banos, S., A. N. Hernandez-Lauzardo, M. G. Velazquez-del Valle, M. Hernandez-Lopez, E. Ait Barka, E. Bosquez-Molina, and C. L. Wilson. 2006. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Protection 25:108-118.

2. Bravin, B., D. Peressini, and A. Sensidoni. 2004. Influence of emulsifier type and content on functional properties of polysaccharide lipid-based edible films. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 6448-6455.

3. Chi, S., S. Zivanovic, J. Weiss, and F. A. Draughon. 2003. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan films enriched with essential oils, Food Microbiology: Control of food borne microorganisms by antimicrobials IFT Annual Meeting – Chicago, jul. 18-21.

4. Chien, P. J., F. Sheu, and H. R. Lin. 2007. Coating citrus (Murcott tangor) fruit with low molecular weight chitosan increases postharvest quality and shelf life. Food Chemistry 100:1160-1164.

5. Cong, F., Y. Zhang, and W. Dong. 2007. Use of surface coatings with natamycin to improve the storability of Hami melon at ambient temperature. Postharvest Biology and Technology 46: 71-75.

6. Del-Valle, V., P. Hernandez-Muñoz, A. Guarda, and M. Galotto. 2005. Development of a cactus-mucilage edible coating (Opuntia ficus indica) and its application to extend strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) shelf-life. Food Chemistry 91: 751-756.

7. Du, J., H. Gemma, and S. Iwahori. 1997. Effects of chitosan coating on the storage of peach, Japanese pear, and kiwifruit. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 66: 15-22.

8. Eshghi, S., M. Hashemi, A. Mohammadi, F. Badie, Z. Mohammad hosseini, K. Ahmadi, and K. Ghanati. 2013. Effect of nano-emulsion coating containing chitosan on storability and qualitative characteristics of strawberries after picking. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology 8: 9-19. (in Farsi).

9. Hassanpour, A., M. Esmaiili, A. Modarres Motlagh, A. Rahmani Didar, and M. Nasiri, 2011. Determination of poisson’s ratio and modulus of elasticity during maturation of white seedless grapes. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal 6: 308-316.

10. Heidari, R., J. Khalafi, and N. Dolatabadzadeh. 2004. Anthocyanin pigments of siahe sardasht grapes, Journal of Sciences 15: 113-117. (in Farsi).

11. Hernandez-Munoz, P., E. Almenar, V. Del-Valle, D. Velez, and R. Gavara. 2008. Effect of chitosan coating combined with postharvest calcium treatment on strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) quality during refrigerated storage. Food Chemistry 110: 428-435.

12. Hong, K., J. Xie, L. Zhang, D. Sun, and D. Gong. 2012. Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit during cold storage. Scientia Horticulturae 144: 172-178.

13. Kofuji, K., C. J. Qian, M. Nishimura, I. Sugiyama, Y. Murata, and S. Kawashima. 2005. Relationship between physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of chitosan. European Polymer Journal 41: 2784-2791.

14. Lee, C., and M. Bourne. 1980. Changes in grape firmness during maturation. Journal of Texture Studies 11: 163-172.

15. Liu, J., S. P. Tian, X. H. Meng, and Y. Xu. 2007. Control effects of chitosan on postharvest diseases and physiological response of tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 44: 300-306.

16. Maciel, J., D. Silva, H. C. Paula, and R. De Paula. 2005. Chitosan/carboxymethyl cashew gum polyelectrolyte complex: synthesis and thermal stability. European Polymer Journal 41: 2726-2733.

17. Martin-Diana, A. B., D. Rico, J. Barat, and C. Barry-Ryan. 2009. Orange juices enriched with chitosan: optimisation for extending the shelf-life. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 10: 590-600.

18. Mohsenin, N. 1986. Physical properties of plants and animal materials: structure, physical characteristics and mechanical properties. New York: Gordon and Breach, in, Science Publishers Inc.

19. Mostofi, Y., M. Dehestani Ardekani, and H. Razavi. 2011. The effect of chitosan on postharvest life extension and qualitative characteristics of table grape “Shahroodi”. Journal of Food Science 8 (30): 93-102. (in Farsi).

20. Nadim, Z., and E. Ahmadi. 2016. Rheological properties of strawberry fruit coating with methylcellulose. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 6: 153-162. (in Farsi).

21. Plascencia-Jatomea, M., G. Viniegra, R. Olayo, M. M. Castillo‐Ortega, and K. Shirai. 2003. Effect of chitosan and temperature on spore germination of Aspergillus niger. Macromolecular Bioscience 3: 582-586.

22. Ribeiro, C., A. A. Vicente, J. A. Teixeira, and C. Miranda. 2007. Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biology and Technology 44: 63-70.

23. Sahraei Khosh Gardesh, A., F. Badii, and A. Yasini Ardakani. 2014. The Effect of Chitosan-Based Nano-Emulsion Coating on Extending the Shelf Life of Apple var. Golab Kohanz. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering 45: 113-120. (in Farsi).

24. Shiri, M. A., D. Bakhshi, M. Ghasemnezhad, M. Dadi, A. Papachatzis, and H. Kalorizou. 2013. Chitosan coating improves the shelf life and postharvest quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar Shahroudi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37: 148-156.

25. Taghinezhad Kafshgari, E., S. J. Hashemi, and S. R. Tabatabaie. 2013. Effect of chitosan and oortho phenyl phenol coating on shelf life of Thompson orange. Innovation in Food Science and Technology 5: 71-78.

26. Vliet, T. V. 1999. Rheological classification of foods and instrumental techniques for their study. In A.J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Food Texture Measurement and Perception. New York: Aspen 65-98.