The Potential of Bayesian Belief Networks in Estimating and Evaluating Wind Erosion Rates (Case Study: Ilam Dhlran-Plain)

جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی

Article 5, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 32, January 2019, Pages 67-86   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/geo.v8i4.79097

Author

Ali Mohammadian Behbahani^*

University of Agriculture and Natural Recourses Sciences of Gorgan

Abstract

Introduction

Wind erosion is one of the important aspects of land degradation in arid and semi-arid areas. Countries in arid and semiarid belt of the world, including Iran, have always been associated with this phenomenon. In some studies, wind erosion index of IMDPA model is used to evaluate the wind erosion. Wind erosion assessment models use different scores to determine the erosion rate in a given class. However, due to the spatial and temporal complexities and the multiplicity of factors affecting the ecological conditions of the region, it is impossible to fully rely on the results and use them for targeting, prioritizing the areas and providing suitable solutions for management. But Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN) are based on probabilistic approaches which show the uncertainty in the evaluation of phenomena in terms of probability. These Networks are essentially developed as tools for analyzing decision-making strategies under uncertainty. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to estimate the rate of wind erosion based on the IMDPA model, and to assess the potential of the BBN as a relatively new and probable means for estimating the wind erosion, and finally, to evaluate the management scenarios for controlling wind erosion in Dehloran plain in Ilam province.

Materials and Methods

The wind erosion criterion of IMDPA model was used in this study. Three indicators were used to weight the wind erosion criterion. The "percent vegetation cover" and" emergence of erosion facies" indicators were valued based on existing maps and field visits. Data were collected from Dehloran synoptic station for a period of 30 years in order to evaluate the DSI index which stands for the number of the days with dust storm. The final score of wind erosion in each area was obtained based on the geometric mean. The information layer for each wind erosion criteria was prepared based on the weights given in the GIS environment and the final map of the wind erosion criterion was prepared. In order to begin the process of modeling the networks of Bayesian beliefs with regard to the purpose of the study and by a review of the resources and assisting experts, suitable variables were selected for modeling the BBN. In the next step, the relationships between the variables should be determined using the impact graph. The impact diagram shows the relationships and effects of the variables on each other and on the output node of the model (the amount of wind erosion). Finally, in order to create a model and formulate the conditional probability tables of model variables, the impact diagram was transformed into a BBN model using the Netica software.

Results and Discussion

After evaluating and scoring indices to measure wind erosion and calculating the geometric mean of work units, the emergence of erosion facies index indicates the lowest, and the dust storm index shows the highest weight with the greatest impact on the severity of wind erosion in the area. Based on the weights given to each standard wind erosion indices at the work unit level, the facies of sediment source, abandoned lands and fine-grained ridge plains have the most roles in the wind erosion of the area. Using the final model of Bayesian’s belief network, the causal relationships between the variables affecting the rate of wind erosion were shown. The target variable in this model is wind erosion. Based on the results, geological variables, land management, topography of the area, soil texture, rainfall and frequency of wind speed at speeds of more than 6 m/s were considered as key variables of the model. In order to run the model, information about each of the key variables was taken from the area at the unit level and fed to the model. Finally, the model was designed to estimate the amount of wind erosion in each unit. Based on the output of the model, the probability of wind erosion in each unit was used to zone the probability of wind erosion in the study area. The overall sensitivity analysis of the model also indicates that the wind erosion rate of the area has the most sensitivity to the wind velocity and speed, the frequency of wind speeds of more than 6 m/s and the protection of the earth's surface. On the other hand, the least sensitivity is to variables like soil texture, geology and topography. A high correlation between the results of the two models was found. There was a suitable and significant correlation coefficient at the level of α = 0/05 between the high probabilities of the BBN and wind erosion criterion of the IMDPA model.

Conclusion

It was shown that the BBN presents the probability of different wind erosion rates for each unit in the study area. In the BBN, the uncertainty of the evaluation results is expressed in terms of probability and managers are to choose and implement timely and appropriate management decisions to reduce the risk of wind erosion in the region. The designed model in this study can be implemented in all regions. However, depending on the conditions of each region, the number of variables in the model can be increased or reduced. In the model of Bayesian belief network, the data presented in this study show that land management and vegetation density are factors that affect the amount of wind erosion and, with regard to the environmental constraints of the area, they can be partially rectified. But other factors such as land form and soil texture cannot be changed due to the size of the area and economical instability.
 

Keywords

sensitivity analysis; Wind erosion; Bayesian belief networks (BBN); IMDPA

Supplementary Files

5-Behbahani - Final.pdf

References

احمدی، حسن؛ 1383. کالیبراسیون معیارها و شاخص‌های ارزیابی بیابان‌زایی در ایران(با استفاده از مدل IMDPA منطقه مورد مطالعه شرق اصفهان. مجله مرتع و مدیریت آبخیزداری، 58 (3)، 417-431.

آرخی، صالح؛ فتحی زاد، حسن؛ 1393. مقایسه روش های مختلف آشکارسازی تغییرات کاربری اراضی در منطقه بیابانی دهلران استان ایلام . مجله مهندسی اکوسیستم بیابان. 2(2)،65 – 80 .

بوعلی، عبدالحسین؛ بشری، حسین؛ جعفری، رضا؛ سلیمانی، محسن؛ 1396. پتانسیل‌یابی شبکه‌های باور بیزین جهت ارزیابی تأثیر معیار کیفیت خاک در بیابان‌زایی منطقه دشت سگزی اصفهان. نشریه علوم آب و خاک)علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی (، 21(2) ، صفحه 28 – 15.

خنامانی، علی؛ کریم زاده حمید؛ جعفری، رضا؛ 1390. استفاده از معیار خاک برای ارزیابی شدت بیابان‌زایی (مطالعه موردی : دشت سگزی اصفهان). مجله علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، علوم آب و خاک.17(63)، 59 – 49.

صفی‌یاری، راضیه؛ سرمدیان، فریدون؛ حیدری، احمد؛ یونسی، شیرین؛ 1394. بررسی حساسیت ارزیابی به فرسایش آبی و بادی با استفاده از مدل Raizal(مطالعه موردی: منطقه آبیک) مجله مرتع و مدیریت آبخیزداری، 66 (3)، 417-431.

طهماسبی بیرگانی، علی؛ سرداری، فرهاد؛ 1389 . طرح بازنگری کانون‌های بحرانی فرسایش بادی راهبردی مناسب برای مقابله با فرسایش بادی در چشم انداز بیست ساله کشور. دومین همایش ملی فرسایش بادی و طوفان‌های گرد و غبار. دانشگاه یزد.635ص.

کریمی، ابراهیم؛ 1389. ارزیابی خطر، خسارت و برنامه مدیریت زمین لغزش حوضه آبخیز چهل چای، استان گلستان، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، 147 ص.

مصباح زاده، طیبه؛ احمدی، حسن؛ زهتابیان، غلامرضا؛ فریدون، سرمدیان؛ 1389. ارزیابی شدت فرسایش بادی با بهره‌گیری از مدل IRIFR. E.A بررسی موردی: ابوزیدآباد (کاشان). مجله مرتع و مدیریت آبخیزداری، مجله منابع طبیعی ایران، 63 (3)، 499-399.

موحدان، محمود؛ عباسی، نادر؛ کرامتی، مجید؛ 1392. بررسی اثر پلی وینیل آستا بر فرسایش باد خاک‌های مختلف با تأثیر ذرات شن و ماسه، مجله حفاظت از آب و خاک، 20(1)، 55-75.

مهاجرانی، حدیث؛ خلقی، مجید؛ مساعدی، ابوالفضل؛ سعدالدین، امیر؛ مفتاح هلقی، مهدی؛ 1389. مدیریت کمی آبخوان با شبکه‌ی تصمیم بیزی. مجله آب و خاک. دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. 21(6)، 1534-1522.

Aalders, I., Hough, R. L., & Tower, W. (2011). Risk of erosion in peat soils – an investigation using Bayesian belief networks. Soil Use and Management, 27,538 –549.

Adriaenssens, V., Goethals, P. L. M,. Charles, J & De pauw, N. (2009). Application of Bayesian Belief network for the prediction of macro invertebrate taxa in rivers . Annales de limnologie – International journal of limnolog 40 ، No، 3pp، 181-191.

Bashari, H., & Hemami, M. (2013). A predictive diagnostic model for wild sheep (Ovis orientalis) habitat suitability in Iran. Journal of Nature Conservation. 21 : 319 – 325.

David, N., Barton, Tamara., Benjamin, Carlos. R., Cerdan, Fabrice., DeClerck, Anders. L., Madsen, Graciela. M., Rusch, Álvaro G., Salazar, Dalia. Sanchez., & Cristobal, Villanueva. (2016). Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks. Ecosystem Services 18: 165 – 174.

Gizachew, D., Solomon, T., & Rehan, S., 2015. Prediction of Soil Corrosivity Index: A Bayesian Belief Network Approach.International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Canada.

Landuyt, D., Broeckx, S. K., Van der, B., & Goethals, L. M. (2014).Probabilistic Mapping With Bayesian Belief Networks: An Application On Ecosystem Service Delivery In Flanders, Belgium. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 7th Intl. Congress on Env.

Marcot, B. G., Steventon, J., Sutherland, G.D. & McCann, R. K. (2006).Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Canadian Journal of forest Research 36(12): 3063-3054.

Mashhadi, M., Hanifehpoor, M., Amiraslani, F. & Sh. Mohamadkhan. (2016). A Study on The Wind Erosion Potential of Agricultural Lands after Crop Harvesting (Case study: Damghan Region). Journal of Desert 21(2), 133-141.

Skidmore, E. L. (2000). Air, soil, and water quality as influenced by wind erosionand strategies for mitigation, In: AGROENVIRON: 216-221. In: Second International Symposium of New Technologies for Environmental Monitoringand Agro-Applications Proceedings, Tekirdag, Turkey.

Subramaniam, N., & Chinappa, G.P. (2002). Remote sensing and GIS techniques for land degradation assessment due to water erosion, P 815-819. In: 17th WCSS, Thailand.

Wigley, T. M. L. (1995). MAGICC and SCENGEN: Integrate models estimating regional climate change in response to anthropogenic emissions, Journal of Studies in Environmental science 65, 93-94.

Zhang, K. Qu., Han, Q. & Z, An. (2012). Wind energy environments and aeolian sand characteristics along the Qinghai–Tibet Railway, China, Journal of Sedimentary Geology, 273–274, 91–96.

Zho, X., H, S. LIN & White, E. A. (2008). Surface soil hydraulic properties in four soil series under different land use and their temporal change. Catena (73): 180-188.