Farmers Adaptation to Climate Variation: Barriers and Suggested Solutions

مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی

Article 1, Volume 30, Issue 3, October 2016, Pages 148-159   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jead2.v30i3.42826

Authors

T. Azizi Khalkheili^{* 1}; Gh.H. Zamani²; E. Karami²

¹Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

²Shiraz University

Abstract

Introduction: Human activities have induced change and variation in world climate. Climate change and variability are important issues because of their effects on agriculture, environment, public health and total society. Developing countries are generally more vulnerable to the consequences of these changes, as they tend to rely more on climate-sensitive sectors, such as subsistence agriculture where lack the resources to buffer themselves against the changes. Researches have been done in Iran indicate the occurrence of climate change and variation. The agriculture sector is one of those that seriously affected by climate change and variation therefore to maintain their livelihood farmers need to adapt to climate change and variation. Agriculture is a risky job inherently, and climate change with unexpected future worsens the situation. These changes are a serious threat, especially for smallholder farmers’ livelihood, because they lack sufficient resources such as credit or crop insurance to adapt to this change and to cope with challenges. Adaptation involves the action that people take in response to, or in anticipation of, projected or actual changes in climate to reduce adverse impacts or take advantage of the opportunities posed by climate change. There is very uncertainty about how farmers will respond to the climate change and variation, so more understanding of social and economic factors that affect farmers’ perception of climate change and variation and their response to these changes is needed. This research was conducted in three phases to investigate farmers’ barriers to adaptation to climate change and suggest solutions to improve the situation in Marvadasht County, Fars Province.
Materials and Methods: In phase one, consulting Marvdasht Jihad-Agriculture experts two villages purposefully selected as research sample. One village with highest climate variation and one village with lowest climate variation. A qualitative research using focus group depth interview technique was implemented in selected villages and farmers perspectives about main obstacles and barriers of farmers adaptation to climate variation was investigated. In phase two, based on phase one results also literature review, eight barriers recognized as a farmers main problem. Then to rank the importance of these barriers from farmers perspective a survey research was conducted on 307 farmers selected by multistage stratified random sampling from four sections of Marvdasht County. In phase three, based on the results of the previous phases as well library research, suggested solutions for improvement of the situation of farmers adaptation were determined. Perceptions of Marvdasht Jihad-Agriculture experts’ perspective was investigated about suggested solutions in an expert group session. Then, using a general question and open discussion experts perspective about farmers barriers to adaptation to climate variation and their suggested solutions were investigated.
Results and Discussion: Based on research findings, in phase one, eight barriers of farmers adaptation were recognized in two villages with a different situation in a focus group depth interview. These barriers include financial constraints and lack of saved money, lack of credit and loan problem, inequitable distribution of governmental facilities, unsuitable programing to distribute facilities, organizational bureaucracy, insurance problems, lack of a suitable market to sale products, and land fragmentation. In phase two, based on survey results barriers ranked in two groups of individual and institutional barriers, and in phase three based on Marvdasht Jihad-Agriculture experts’ viewpoints, the present and ideal condition of solutions to face the challenges of adaptation were presented in three dimensions (providing information, farm management, as well administration and financing). Based on experts’ perspective, these solutions ranked regarding their necessity and importance of attention. More essential solutions were: presenting information and consultation about whether situation and forecast to farmers in radio and television as well as agricultural extension service centers, decreasing bad usage of water resources and deeping the well, preventing the crops like rice with high water need and cultivating crops with low water need and drought resistant, improving the credit supply system to decrease farmers’ financial problems and lack of capital (include low interest loans, crop insurance, production subsidies…). According to experts’ view points, there are 12 barriers and obstacles for farmers’ adaptation to climate variation and they suggested some recommendations to reduce these barriers.
Conclusion: Agriculture is highly dependent on weather situation and alteration in weather parameters such as temperature, precipitation and CO2 as a result of climate change influence farming system outputs. Adaptation to climate change and variation is a prerequisite for sustainable development. Farmers to maintain their livelihood also coping and adapt to climate variation face different barriers and obstacles, they need support from related organizations to overcome these barriers. In this regard the first action of organizations and individual that have responsibility is suitable recognition of farmers’ situation and their problems. As research findings reveal there are various problems and obstacles regarding the perspective of farmers and experts. Considering these problems and suggested solutions from different stakeholders, it could be hopeful to see better adaptation to climate variation in the future.

Keywords

Agricultural experts; Farmers’ livelihood; Marvdasht Township

References

1- Adger W. N., Dessai S., Goulden M., Hulme M., Lorenzoni I., Nelson D. R., Naess L. O., Wolf J., and Wreford A. 2009. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Climatic Change, 93,335–354.

2- Adger W. N., Huq S., Brown K., Conway D., and Hulme M. 2003. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 179–195.

3- Apaydin A. 2010. Response of groundwater to climate variation: fluctuations of groundwater level and well yields in the Halacli aquifer (Cankiri, Turkey). Environ Monit Assess, 165, 653–663.

4- Barak B. 2006. Consideration for the impact of climate change information on stated preferences. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rhode Island, United States, Rhode Island. Retrieved January 29, 2011, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3248223).

5- Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE) 2011. Barriers to effective climate change adaptation. A submission to the productivity commission. Retrieved from: http://www.pc.gov.au/

6- Deressa T. T., Hassan R. M., and Ringler C. 2011. Perception of and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(1), 23-31.

7- Eakin H. 2005. Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico. World Development, 33(11), 1923–1938.

8- Esmaili R., Habibi Nokhandan M., and Fallah Ghalhary Gh. 2010. The Changes Assessment of Growth Season Length and Freezing due to climate Fluctuation- Case-study: Khorasan Razavi Province. Physical Geography Research, 42(73), 69-81.

9- Esmaeili R., Gandomkar A., and Ghayoor H.A. 2011. Zoning of climate changes rate base on agriculture approach in future climatic period (Case study Khorasan Razavi Province). Quarterly Geography and Environmental Planning, 22(1), 35-52.

10- Farajzadeh Asl M., kashki A.R., and Shayan S. 2009. Analaysis of rain-fed wheat yield product variability using climate change approach (Case study area: Khorasan Razavi Province). Quartery Modarres Human Sciences: 13(3): 227-256.

11- Forouzani M. 2012. Agricultural water poverty: The impact of knowledge and technology. PhD dissertation, Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Shiraz University.

12- Ghareli A.A. 2001. Determining the value of agricultural water and optimum planting model in water shortage situation (Lands under the Doroudzan dam). Department of agricultural economics, Shiraz University.

13- Golkar Hamzei Yazdi H.R. 2010. The effect of changes of climate on the time trend for some climatic parameters in Iran. Journal of Physical Geography, 3(7), 91-103.

14- Grothmann T., and Patt A. 2005. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199-213.

15- Hageback J., Sundberg J., Ostwald M., Chen D., Yun X., and Knutsson P. 2005. Climate variability and land-use change in Danangou watershed, China-Examples of small scale farmers’ adaptation. Climate Change, 72, 189-212.

16- Horton R. M. 2007. An Observational and Modeling Study of the Regional Impacts of Climate Variability. PhD dissertation, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University.

17- Jafari M. 2008. Investigation and Analysis ofclimate change factors in Caspian zone forests for last fifty years. Quartery Iranian Journal of forest and Poplar Research, 16(2), 314-326.

18- Khoush Akhlagh F., Ranjbar Firouz Toulabi S., and Masoumpour Samakoush J. 2010. Astudy on drought and its effects on water resources and agriculture in hydrologic water year of 1386-1387 (Case Study: Marvdasht county). Geography, 8(24), 119-136.

19- Klose S. L. 2001. A decision support system for agricultural producers. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, United States, Texas. Retrieved April 24, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Publication No. AAT 3011748).

20- Kolikow S., Kragt M. E., and Mugera A. 2012. An interdisciplinary framework of limits and barriers to climate change adaptation in agriculture. Working Paper 1202, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.

21- Mendenhall W., Ott L., and Scheaffer R. L. 1971. Elementary survey sampling. Duxbury press, a division of Wadsworth publishing company, Inc, Belmont: California.

22- Mohsenpour R., and Zibaei M. 2010. Assessing the consequences of drought at farm level: A case study of marvdasht region. Quarterly Water and Soil Science, 14(52), 49-62.

23- Mubaya C. P., Njuki J., Mutsvangwa E. P., Mugabe F. T., and Nanja D. 2012. Climate variability and change or multiple stressors? Farmer perceptions regarding threats to livelihoods in Zimbabwe and Zambia. Journal of Environmental Management, 102, 9-17.

24- Neuwirth C., and Hofer B. 2013. Spatial sensitivity of grassland yields to weather variations in Austria and its implications for the future. Applied Geography, 45, 332-341.

25- Nielsen J. O., and Reenberg A. 2010. Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: A case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Global Environmental Change 20 (2010) 142–152.

26- Ngigi S. N. 2009. Climate Change Adaptation Strategies: Water Resources Management Options for Smallholder Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. The MDG Centre for East and Southern Africa of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, New York, with financial support from the Rockefeller Foundation

27- O’Brien K. L. 2009. Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation?. In Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I. and O’Brien K. L. (eds.). Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge University Press.

28- Simoes A. F., Kligerman D. C., Rovere E. L. L., Maroun M. R., Barata M., and Obermaier M. 2010. Enhancing adaptive capacity to climate change: The case of smallholder farmers in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(8), 801-808.

29- Vaseghi E., and Esmaeili A. 2008. Investigation of the economic impacts of climate change on Iran Agriculture: A ricardian approach (Case study: Wheat). Quartery Water and Soil Science, 12(45B): 685-696.