Estimation and Selection of Fuel Consumption Forecasting Model for MF399 Tractor (Case study: Pars Abad Region of Moghan)

ماشین های کشاورزی

Article 18, Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20, 2020, Pages 337-346   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jam.v10i2.73385

Authors

S. Abbasi^{* 1}; A. Shokri²; M. Gholami Par-Shokohi³; S. M. Seyedan⁴; A. Jafari⁴

¹Research division of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Hamedan Province, Research Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization, Iran

²Crop Production Department, Moghan Agro-Industry Co., Iran

³Department of Biosystems Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran

⁴Agricultural Economic and Humanity, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Hamedan Province, Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Considering the high consumption of diesel fuel in the agricultural sector, it is necessary to find solutions to reduce its consumption, and it will be feasible to have a convenient mathematical model more easily and transparently.Fuel and lubrication costs range from at least 16% to more than 45% of total machine costs, depending on the type of fuel and the amount of time that the tractor or the machine carries out for agricultural operations. Therefore, the fuel consumption index has a significant role in the selection and management of tractors and agricultural equipment. Most budgeting models also use a simple method to estimate the consumption of diesel fuel, but it is needed a model that describes the real conditions of agronomic operations used to compare agricultural machinery management policies.
Materials and Methods
This case study was conducted in Parsabad city of Moghan, the northernmost province of Ardabil province. The main agricultural products in Pars-Abad Moghan include wheat, maize, maize, canola and sugar beet. The product of this study was irrigated wheat with a crop area of 18042 hectares.In this study, in order to create homogeneous conditions in the study of diesel fuel consumption and the ineffectiveness of the type and model of tractor in it, only diesel fuel consumption was considered by the tractor MF-399. Selection of sample farmers was also carried out among owners of this type of tractor. Selection of owners of tractor MF-399 in Pars-Abad Moghan city was done by random sampling method. For this purpose, Cochran formula was used. Two-way flexible and non-flexible models have been used to predict the diesel fuel consumption. The model used includes the Cobb-Douglas function and transcendental function. Statistical calculations in this study were performed using Excel software and SPSS16 software.
Results and Discussion
For comparing the best form of the fuel function, the test formulas for the comparison of the form of functions such as bounded least squared F, LR test, White test, Breusch-Godfrey test and Rigorous test were used. Diagnostic statisticians (well-fitting coefficient), the normal distribution of distorted sentences, and the heterogeneity of variance showed that both forms were acceptable. Based on the LR statistic, zero statistics did not rule out the discrepancy between the two coherent models (Cobb-Douglas) and non-dominant (transcendent), but the coherent model was preferable to be the transcendental model because of its simplicity and power of explanation.
According to the estimated model, the duration of soil tillage operations had a positive stretch in diesel fuel consumption and, among other variables, had the highest elongation. It should be noted that the average time required for tillage operations was 387.6 min ha^-1, which will save 0.31 L ha^-1, if one percent of this time (3.9 minutes) is reduced. Thus, the value of the amount of gasoline saved will be about 990 Rials per hectare and equal to 7.7 percent of the value of one kilogram of wheat. Therefore, if the operating time is reduced at the macro level of the country, a significant amount of cost will be saved. Therefore, it is imperative that farm managers take time management in serious soil tillage operations and try to reduce this time.
So that, in exchange for an increase of 1% over the duration of the tillage, a fuel consumption of 0.6% would be increased. It is also clear that an increase of 0.6% in fuel consumption for tillage operations is significant, indicating the fact that farm managers have made the need for time management, especially in the tillage operations, to reduce this time. According to the estimated model, the duration of the planting operation also had a positive stretch in the consumption of diesel fuel. So that, in exchange for an increase of 1% over the duration of the planting operation, a fuel consumption of 0.04% would be increased.
Conclusion
Use of the Cobb-Douglas model with five sentences and four independent variables including cropping area, soil tillage operation time, planting time and weeding operation time in order to predict the amount of diesel fuel used to produce wheat, had acceptable results and as a predictive model with low complexity but with high precision, can be easily used in annual budgeting for the production of wheat.

Keywords

“ Cobb-Douglas model”; “Diesel Fuel”; “Farm Size”; “Irrigation Wheat”; “Operation Time”

References

1- Banaeian, N. and M. Zangeneh. 2011. Modeling Energy Flow and Economic Analysis for walnut production in Iran. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology: 3:194-201.

2- Bonari, E. and M. Mazzoncini and A. Peruzzi. 1995. Effect of conservation and minimum tillage on winter oilseed rape in a sand soil. Soil and Tillage Research 33: 91-108.

3- Borin, M. and L. Sartori. 1997. Effects of tillage systems on energy and carbon balance in north-eastern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research 40(3-4): 209-226.

4- Canakci, M., M. Topakci, I. Akinci and A. Ozmerzi. 2005. Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region , Turkey. Energy Conversion and management 46: 655-666.

5- Center, I. S. 2017. Results of the census in 2011, revised in May 2013. Iran Statistics Center: Iran Statistics Center. Report no.

6- Cochran, W. G. 1963. Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

7- Emadi, B., A. Nikkhah, M. Khojasteh Poor and S. H. Peyman. 2015. Effect of farm size on energy consumption and input costs for pinut production in Gillan province. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5(1): 217-228.

8- Grisso, R. D. and D. H. Vaughan and G. T. Roberson. 2008. Fuel prediction for specific tractor models. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24(4) 423-428.

9- Hemmat, A. and M. R. Mossadeghi. 2001. Tillage for production in low rainfall area. Author Godwin, R. G. Published research organization, education and agricultural extension.

10- Moghimi, M. R., B. Mohammadi Alasti, M. A. Hadad Drafsh, M. Abasgholipor ghadim and M. Taki. 2013. Energy consumption and assessment of econometric model between input and output for wheat production in Gorve country, Kordestan Province of Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5(20): 2342-2348.

11- Mohammadi, A., S. Rafiee, S. S. Mohtasebi, H. Rafiee and . 2009. Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renewable Energy 35: 1071-1075.

12- Pimentel, D. and M. Pimentel. 1996. Food, Energy and Society. Pages 400. Niwet: Colorado Press, Taylor & Francis.

13- Pimentel, D., L. E. Hurd, A. C. Bellotti, M. J. Forster, I. N. Oka, O. D. Sholes and R. J. Whitman. 1973. Food production and the energy crisis. Science 182: 443-449.

14- Safa, M. and A. Tabatabaeefar. 2008. Fuel Consumption in Wheat Production in Irrigated and Dry Land Farming. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(1): 86-90.

15- Safa, M. and S. Samarasinghe and M. Mohsen. 2009. Modeling fuel consumption in wheat production using neural networks. in 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns. Australia

16- Shrestha, B. L. 1998. Energy analysis in selected crop in Nepal.

17- Siemens, J. C. and W. W. Bowers. 1999. Machinery management: How to select machinery to fit the real needs of farm managers. John Deere Publishing. East Moline.

18- Singh, H. and D. Mishra and N. M. Nahar. 2002. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India, part I. Energy Conversion and Management 43: 2275-2286.

19- Unnamed. 2013. Census results of 2011. . Iran Statistical Center. (In Farsi).