Effect of plant density and planting pattern on growth and yield characteristics of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under Baghmalek weather condition

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 1, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, December 2020, Pages 12-21   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v11i2.74268

Authors

Reza Jafari; Seyed Keyvan Marashi^*

Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) as one of the most important beans, has 20-25% protein and is a protein supplier that is needed by humans and plays an important role in this regard. Increasing yield per unit area is one of the most important factors for increasing production. Planting pattern and plant density per unit area are two important factors affecting the growth and yield of plants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of these parameters on growth and yield characteristics of mung bean under Baghmalek weather conditions.
 
 Materials & Methods
In order to evaluate the effect of plant density and planting pattern on growth and yield characteristics of mung bean under Baghmalek weather conditions, an experiment was carried out as factorial in a randomized complete block design. The studied factors includ, planting density in three levels of 20, 28 and 36 seeds per square meter, and the second factor include, hand scattering of seeds (control), between row distances of 15 cm and 30 cm. In hand scattering of seeds (control) (traditional) and row planting, the seeds were cultivated manually and uniformly in different amounts according to the plant densities. Field preparation included plowing, disks and leveling. After preparation of the field, nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers were mixed with the disk machine at a depth of 15 cm. Nitrogen from the source of urea (46%) was 80 kg nitrogen per hectare, 50% before planting, 25% in stem elongation and 25% in flowering stage and phosphorus fertilizer from the source of triple superphosphate at a rate of 100 kg/ha P (48%) was used. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.2 and comparing of the means was based on Duncan method at 5% probability level.
 
Results & Discussion
The results showed that planting pattern with 30 cm spacing compared to hand scattering of seeds improved yield, number of seeds per plant, seeds per pod, pods per plant, 1000-grain weight and plant height. The maximum plant height as 81 cm was obtained from a row planting pattern with a spacing of 30 cm and 28 plants per square meter and the minimum height with an average of 65 cm from density 36 plants per square meter. The maximum grain yield with 2317 kg/ha was obtained from row pattern with 30 cm distance and density of 36 seed per square meter. The minimum grain yield with 1027 kg/ha belonged to hand scattering of seeds and density of 20 seed per square meter.Increasing of 1000-grain weight and number of plants per unit area was the main cause for increasing of grain yield. In other words, the reason for increasing yields in more densities can be attributed to the greater number of plants per unit area and 1000-grain weight. The highest biological yield as 5784 kg/ha was observed from the row planting pattern with a row spacing of 30 cm and a density of 36 plants per square meter, and the lowest biological yield was 3174 kg/ha and a density of 20 plants per square meter. The increase in biological yield at 36 plants per square meter was higher than the density of 20 and 28 plants per square meter due to increase in plant number and also increase in dry matter production per unit area. The maximum percentage of harvest index with an average of 40% was belonged to the interaction of row planting pattern with a distance of 30 cm and density of 28 and 36 plants per square meter.
 
Conclusion
In general, the results of the experiment showed that in all three planting patterns, the lowest height, number of pods per plant, seeds per pod and seeds per plant were obtained at 36 plants per square meter. The maximum grain yield was obtained at 36 plant density per square meter and the row planting pattern with a distance of 30 cm by 2317.5 kg/ha and the lowest was obtained by 1027.5 kg/ha at a density of 20 plants per square meter and hand scattering of seeds (control). Therefore, this combination of planting pattern and plant density in region can be suggested for optimal use of environmental conditions and maximum grain yield.

Keywords

Biological yield; Grain yield; Number of seeds per plant; Plant height

References

1. Alavi Fazel, M. , Lak, S., and Momeni Chalaki, R. 2015. Study of plant density effect on grain yield of mung bean cultivars in climate conditions of Izeh city. Journal of Crop Production Research 7(2): 145-161. (In Persian with English Summary).
2. Anonymous. 2016. Meteorological organization of Khuzestan province. Statistical Yearbook of Izeh and Baghmalak Station.
3. Asadipour, M., and Haj Seyed Hadi, M.R. 2013. Influence of vermicompost and plant density on some morphological traits and biological yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 5(3): 319-323.
4. Baghestani, M.A. 2009. Competitive strength of rival varieties of different densities of noncompeting wheat in wheat and turnip. Final Report of the Research Project, Weed Research Division Research Institute, p. 131.
5. Dainavizadeh, P., and Mehranzadeh, M. 2013. Effect of seed rate on growth, yield components and yield of mung bean grown under irrigated conditions in the north of Khuzestan. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5(20): 2359-2364.
6. Dhanjal, R., Prakash, O.M. and Ahlawat, I.P.S. 2001. Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to plant density. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 46: 277-281.
7. Fathi, G. 2010. Effects of plant density on yield and yield components of mung bean in Khoozestan growing conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 41(1): 19-27. (In Persian with English Summary).
8. Fernando, H., Pablo Calvino, A., Cirilo, A., and Barbieri, P. 2002. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interaction. Agronomy Journal 94: 975-980.
9. Karatian, A., Ahmadi, G.M., and Heidar Sharif Abadi, H. 2002. Effect of seed size and plant density on yield and yield components of peas. 7^th National Iranian Crop Science Congress. Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
10. Kaur, S., Gupta, A., Kuar, N. 2004. Gibberellin A3 reverses the effect of salt stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seedlings by enhancing amylase activity and mobilization of starch cotyledons. Plant Growth Regulation 26: 85-90.
11. Kazemi, Z., Esmaeili, M., Amini, A., Bankehsaz, M., and Moarefiyan, A. 2008. Effects of planting pattern and plant density changes on yield and yield components of two cultivars of maize. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 26: 38-45.
12. Kochaki. A., and Banayan Aval, M. 1994. Physiology of Crop Yield. Jahad Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad. (In Persian).
13. Mirzaee, A. and Modhaj, A. 2005. Effects of plan spacing on grain yield and yield components of Vigna radiata L. (CV. Gohar) in Ilam condition. The 1^th Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium. Mashhad Ferdowsi University. Mashhad. (In Persian with English Summary).
14. Nabila Zaki, M., Hassanein Karima, M.S., and Gamal EL-Din, M. 2007. Growth and yield of wheat cultivars irrigated with saline water in newly cultivated land as affected by bio fertilization. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3(10): 1121-1126.
15. Nienhuis, J., and Singh, S.P. 2004. Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Science 25: 579-584.
16. Radmehr, M., Lotf-Ali Aeyneh, G.A., and Naderi, A. 2004. A study on source-sink relationship of wheat genotypes under favorable and terminal heat stress conditions in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 6(2): 101-114. (In Persian with English Summary).
17. Samadi Firouzabadi, B., and Farahani, E. 2013. Effect of planting date on seed yield and its components of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes in varamin region in Iran. Seed and Plant Production Journal 29(3): 387-401. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Sandha, T.S., Bhllav, H. Chema, S., and Gill, A. 2007. Variability and interrelationship among grain protein yield and yield components in mung been. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 871-882.
19. Sarmadnia, G., and Kochaki, A. 2012. Crop Plant Physiology. Mashhad University. Iran. P. 400.
20. Sekhavat, R., and Samadi Firouzabadi, B. 2012. The effect of planting pattern and plant density on seeds yield and yield components of mung bean. The 5^th Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium. Tehran University. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
21. Shapiro, C.A., and Wortman, C.S. 2006. Corn response to nitrogen rate, row spacing and plant density in eastern Neberaska. Agronomy Journal 98: 529-535.
22. Singh, K., Bali, A., and Shah, M. 1991. Effect of spacing and seed rate on yield of green gram in Kashmir valley. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 61: 326-327.
23. Soleymani Sardoo, M., Afsharmanesh, G., and Roudbari, Z. 2017. Evaluating the effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of mung bean in Jiroft County. Journal of Crop Science Research in Arid Regions 1(1): 27-34. (In Persian with English Summary).
24. Tajbakhsh, M. 1996. Seed (study, control and certification). Ahrar Press. Tabriz. 179 p. (In Persian).
25. Toker, C., Ulger, S., Karhan, M., Canci, H., Akdesir, O., Ertoy, N., and Cagirgan, M.I. 2004. Comparison of some endogenous hormone levels in different parts of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 233-237.
26. William, D., Widdicom, B., and Kurtd, B. 2002. Row width and plant density effects on corn forage hybrids. Agronomy Journal 894: 326-330.
27. Youe, J.M., and Poehlman, J.M. 2002. Genetic variability in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek. Crop Science 12: 461-464.