Criticizing and Examining Moral Literacy: An Agentic Perspective

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

Article 1, Volume 5, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages 88-109   

Document Type: پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/fe.v5i2.49069

Author

Narges Sajadieh^*

Tehran University

Abstract

The aim of this paper is examining and criticizing a new concept in moral education named moral literacy. Recent years, moral literacy approach attempts to redefine morality in the framework of literacy and via that, return moral education to the school. Logical-conceptual analysis of “moral literacy” indicated us some constructive elements of this combination like competency, knowledge, acquisition, rule, value and human action. On the other hand, formal- technical language analysis of it reveals three conceptual elements in moral literacy named: moral sensitivity, moral reasoning and moral imagination. This two kind of analysis, encounters us with conceptual challenges. These challenges are 1) reductionism in interpreting morality to literacy, 2) conceptual contradictions in moral literacy, 3) conceptual; overlapping of constructive elements, and 4) doubt insufficiency of moral literacy for actualization moral human.

Keywords

Morality; Literacy; moral sensitivity; reasoning; moral imagination; Agency

References

Bagheri, K., Sajadieh, N., andTavassoli, T. (2010). Approaches and methods of research in philosophy of education. Tehran: Research center of cultural and social studies. (In Persian).

Bagheri, K. (2009). Comparative analysis of Islamic schema of action and (post) structuralist anthropology. Journal of Education, 98, 36-98. (In Persian).

Bagheri, K. (2008). An introduction to philosophy of education of Islamic Republic of Iran: The goals and principles. Tehran: Scientific Cultural Press. (In Persian).

Bagheri. K. (2006). Second look to Islamic education. Tehran: School Press. (In Persian).

Bagheri, K. (2003). Nature of religious science. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Press. (In Persian).

Sajadieh, N. (2005). Comparative Analysis of human agency in Rorty’s neo pragmatist view and Islamic view of action. (M. A Dissertation, Tehran University, 2005). (In Persian).

Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination, distributed responsibility and vulnerable technological systems: the case of Snorre A. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1514973/Imagination_distributed_responsibility_and_vulnerable_technological_systems_the_case_of_Snorre_A at 10.12.2013

Ersoy, N., and Gundogmus, U. N. (2003). The ethical sensivity in Turkey. Nursing Ethics, 10(5), 472-484.

Herman, B. (2007). Moral literacy. London: Harvard University Press.

Hunt, E. (2008). A vision of powerful learning in the social studies: Building effective citizens. Social Education, 72(5), 277-280.

Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. London: University of Chicago Press.

Peters, R. S. and Hirst, P. (1980). The logic of education. Blackwell: London.

Roohipoor, M., and Rezakhanloo, M. (2013). University entrance examination: One critical challenge for Iranian multi-functional educational institutions, ACE 2013 Proceedings (Asian Conference on Education), 755-763.

Renner, A. (2009). Teaching community, praxis, and courage: A foundations pedagogy of hope and humanization. Educational studies, 45(1), 59-79.

Sagnak, M. (2012). School management and moral literacy: A conceptual analysis of the model. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 1425-1430.

Shapiro, J. and others (2008). In Thompson, D. C. andCrampthon, F. E. (Eds.), UCEA Conference Proceeding for Conventions.

Tuana, N. (2007). Conceptualization moral literacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(4), 364-377.

Van Leeuven, N. (2011). Imagination is where the action is. CVIII (2). Retrieved from http://www.journalofphilosophy.org/articles/108/108-2.htm at 10.12.2013.

Walker, L. J. (2002). The model and the measure: An appraisal of the Minnesota Approach to moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 353-367.

Weaver, K and Morse, J.M. (2006). Pragmatic utility: Using analytical questions to explore the concept of ethical sensitivity. Res Theory Nurs Pract, 20 (3),191-214.

Zdenek, B. and Schochor. D. (2007). Moral literacy as school reform: Implications for the classroom. The Beacon (A publication of the Pennsylvania school study council), 3(3), 1-8.