Effect of different level of irrigation regimes and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 10, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, December 2020, Pages 137-149   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v11i2.79226

Authors

Seyed Farhad Saberali^{* 1}; Marjan Yosefi-fard²; Kamal Sadat Asilan³

¹Department of Horticulture, High Educational Complex of Torbat e Jam, Khorasan Razavi, Iran

²Department of Agronomy, Payame Noor, Karaj, Iran

³Department of Agronomy, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is the most important stress factor that affects agricultural production in the arid and semiarid areas and reduce crop production. Iran is a country with a warm and dry climate that more than 85% of it located in arid and semi-arid areas. Improving the water use efficiency through agronomic management is one of the most effective and low cost approches for water management in the agricultural fields. The main objective of this study was to investigate the growth and yield response of kidney bean to deficit irrigation with the aim of increasing water use efficiency. In addition, the other objective of this study was to determine the desired level of nitrogen fertilizer at each level of water stress that make improve water uses efficiency.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency of kidney bean, an experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design with a split plot arrangement of tratment in 2016 in Saveh, Iran. The deficit irrigation treatments as a main plot were irrigation at 40% of soil moisture depletion (non-stress treatment), irrigation at 50% of soil moisture deplation and at 60% of soil moisture deplation. The irrgation at 40% soil moisture depletion was considered as an acceptable moisture discharge rate for achieving maximum yield and other irrigation treatments considered as deficit irrigation. Sub-plot was included nitrogen fertilizer application rate at 0 (control), 25, 50 and 100% of maximum nitrogen requirement of dry bean plant. The middle two rows of 60 cm length were harvested for seed yield and LAI determination. At harvest time, a sub-sample of 10 plants were sampled from each plot to determine the number of pods per plantand seeds per pod.Biomass was obtained by drying plants at 70◦C. After drying and threshing, grain yield was determined.
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that drought stress under irrigation after 60% soil moisture depletion decreased leaf area index, dry matter, seed number per unit area and finally kidney bean seed yield. However, mild stress treatment (50% soil moisture deplation) had a significant decrease in seed number per unit area and seed yield compared to optimal irrigation treatment. Furthermore, water use efficiency in kidney bean was increased at both levels of deficit irrigation compared to the full irrigation treatment. The results also showed that growth and yield traits and water use efficiency of kidney bean improved with nitrogen fertilizer application compare to no nitrogen application. The results also showed that the response of seed yield to nitrogen fertilizer was dependent on the amount of applied irrigation water in different irrigation regimes. At irrigation regime by 40% soil moisture depletion, seed yield of kidney bean increased by 11, 16 and 13% with nitrogen application rates of 50, 100 and 200 kg ha^-1, respectively. While, seed yield was increased by 9, 14 and 10% with nitrogen application rates of 50, 100 and 200 kg ha^-1, respectively, when kidney bean plants irrigated at 60% soil moisture depletion. The water use efficiency of kidney bean had no significant differences between 100 and 200 kg N ha^-1. However, the N application rate less than 100 N ha^-1 caused a significant reduction in water use efficiency of kidney bean plant. The regression analysis also showed that the responses of seed yield and water use efficiency to nitrogen fertilizer application rate at all irrigation levels were quadratic, and this quadratic response explaind 99 % of varion in these traits.
 
Conclusion
The results showed that the irrigation of kidney bean at 50% soil moisture depletion compared to irrigation at 40% soil moisture depletion could increase water use efficiency without any significant reduction in seed yield. The irrigation at 50% soil moisture depletion saved irrigation water about 270 m^-3 ha^-1 compared to the irrigation at 40% soil moisture depletion. We also concluded that the application of 50 % of maximum nitrogen requirement for bean plant could produce maximum seed yield and water use efficiency in all irrigation regimes.

Keywords

Gholi cultivar; Irrigation deficit; Leaf area index; Nutrition

References

1. Agricultural Statistics. 2013. Crop Plants (First volume). Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. pp.118. (In Persian).
2. Amiri, E., and Abdzad Gohari, A. 2015. Effect of irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency and estimated yield function of common bean (Case Study: Astaneh Ashrafiyeh). Agricultural Water Managment 22: 1-10. (In Persian with English Summary).
3. Antolin, M.C., Yoller, J., and Sancchez-Diaz, M. 1995. Effects of temporay drought on nitratefed and nitrogen-fixing alfalfa plants. Plant Science 107(3): 156-165.
4. Bayat, A.A., Sepehri, A., Ahmadvand, G., and Dorri, H.R. 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 12(1): 42-54. (In Persian with English Summary).
5. Bayati, Kh., Majnoun-Hosseini, N., Moghadam, H., and  Basiri, R. 2017. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen on grain yield and some agronomic traits of red kidney bean cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 48(4): 1069-1081.
6. Bliss, F.A. 1993. Breeding common bean for improved biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 152(1): 71-79.
7. Davis, J.G. 1994. Managing plant nutrients for optimum water use efficiency and water conservation. Advances in Agronomy 53(1): 85-120.
8. Emam, Y., Shekoofa, A.F., and Salehi & Jalali, A.H. 2010. Water stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 9(5): 495-499.
9. De Costa, W.A.J., and Ariyawansha, B.D.S.K. 1996. Effect of water stress on water use efficiency of different variety of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 24(4): 253-266.
10. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., and Jones, V.A. 2011. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops (Third edition). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742.
11. Finke, R.L., Harper, J.E., and  Hageman, R.H. 1982. Efficiency of nitrogen assimilation by N2-fixing and nitrate grown soybean plants (Glycine max). Plant Physiology 70(5): 1178-1184.
12. Frahm, M.A., Rosas, J.C., Mayek-Perez, N., Lopez-Salinas, E., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., and Kelly, J.D. 2004. Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica 1362: 223-232.
13. Graham, P.H. 1981. Some problems of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Phaselous vulgaris L. Rev. Field Crops Research 4(1): 93-112.
14. Hopkins, W.G., and Hüner, N.P.A. 2004. Introduction to Plant Physiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. USA. pp. 539-540.
15. Hu, W.H., Yan, X.H., Xiao, Y.A., Zeng, J.J., Qi, H.J., and  Ogweno, J.O. 2013. 24-Epibrossinosteriod alleviate drought-induced inhibition of photosynthesis in Capsicum annum. Scientia Horticulturae 1502: 232-237.
16. Jalilian, J., Modarres-Sanavya, S.A.M., Saberalia, S.F., and  Sadat-Asilan, K. 2012. Effects of the combination of beneficial microbes and nitrogen on sunflower seed yields and seed quality traits under different irrigation regimes. Field Crops Research 127(1): 26-34.
17. Jones, H.G. 1980. Interaction and integration of adaptive responses to water stress: the implications of an unpredictable environment. In: N.C Turner and P.J. Kramer (Eds.). Adaptation on Plant to Water and High Temperutre Stress. p. 353-365, Wiley, New York.
18. Keshavarz M., Karami, E., and Vanclay, F. 2013. The social experience of drought in rural Iran. Land Use Policy 30(1): 120-129.
19. Lynch, J., and White, J.W. 1992. Shoot nitrogen dynamics in tropical common bean. Crop Science 322: 392-397.
20. Madani, K. 2014. Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4(4): 315-328.
21. Maia Souza, G., Aidar, S.T., Giaveno, C.D., and de Oliveira, R.F. 2003. Drought stability in different common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 3(3): 203-208.
22. Majnoun-Hosseini, N. 2008. Grain Legume Production. Jihad-Daneshghahi Pub. University of Tehran. p. 283 (In Persian).
23. Makino, A., Sato, T., Nakano, H., and  Mae, T. 1997. Leaf photosynthesis, plant growth and nitrogen allocation in rice under different irradiances. Planta 2032: 390-398.
24. Mansouri-Far, C., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., and  Saberali, S.F. 2010. Maize yield response to deficit irrigation during low-sensitive growth stages andnitrogen rate under semi-arid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management 97(1): 12-22.
25. Megyes, A., Ratonyi, T., and  Huzsvai, L. 2004. Irrigation of maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to fertilization in a long-term field experiment. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 53(1): 41-46.
26. Nleya, T., Walley, F., and  Vandenberg, A. 2001. Response of four common bean cultivars to granular inoculant in a short-season dryland production system. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81(3): 385-390.
27. Ramirez-Vallejo, P., and Kelly, J.D. 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99(1): 127-136.
28. Rosales-Serna, R., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Trejo-López, C., Ortiz-Cereceres, J., and Kelly, J.D. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research 852: 203-211.
29. Saberali, S.f., Modarres-Sanavya, S.A.M., Bannayanb, M., Baghestani, M.A., Rahimian-Mashhadid, H., and  Hoogenboome, G. 2012. Dry bean competitiveness with redroot pigweed as affected by growth habit and nitrogen rate. Field Crops Research 135(1): 38-45.
30. Salvagiotti, F., Cassman, K., Specht, J., Walters, D., Weiss, A., and  Dobermann, A. 2008. Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. Field Crops Research 108(1): 1-13.
31. Santos, M.G., Ribeiro, R.V., Oliverira, R.F., Machado E.C., and Pimetel, C. 2006. The role of inorganic phosphate on photosynthesis recovery of common bean after a mild water deficit. Plant Science 170(3): 659-664.
32. Schubert, S. 1995. Nitrogen assimilation by legumesprocesses and ecological limitations. Fertilizer Research 42(1): 99-107.
33. Sinclair, T.R. 2004. Improved carbon and nitrogen assimilation for increased yield. In: H.R. Boerma and J.E. Specht (Eds.). Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
34. Sinclair, T.R., and  Horie H. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Science 29(1): 90-98.
35. Singh, Y., Rao, S.S., and Regar, P.L. 2010. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in shallow soils of semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management 97(6): 965-970.
36. Soltai, A. 2015. Application of SAS in Statistical Analysis. Jahad Daneshgahi Publishers (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad).
37. USDA-NRCS. 1997. National Engineering Handbook, Part 652: Irrigation Guide. Chapter 3, p. 7. Available at http://www.ks.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/ks_supplements/neh652.html
38. Webber, H.A., Madramootoo, C.A., Bourgault, M., Horst, M.G., Stulina, G., and Smith, D.L. 2006. Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 86(3): 259-268.
39. Westermann, D., Terán, H., Muñoz-Perea, C., and  Singh, S. 2011. Plant and seed nutrient uptake in common bean in seven organic and conventional production systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 9(5): 1089-1099.