Astudy on accuracy of predicted breeding value for body weight at eighth week of age in Khorasan native chickens

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 11, Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, June 2015, Pages 208-217   

Document Type: Genetics & breeding

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.v7i2.40953

Authors

faeze ghorbani^{* 1}; Seyyed Homayoun Farhangfar¹; Nazar Afzali²; mohammad ebrahim navidizade³

¹Department of Animal Science, Birjand Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand, Iran

²Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

³Jahad Agriculture Organisation, Razavi Khorasan Province

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic resources in any country are valuable materials which needed to be conserved for a sustainable agriculture. An animal phenotype is generally affected by genetic and environmental factors. To increase mean performance in a population under consideration not only environmental conditions, but also genetic potential of the animals should be improved. Although, environmental improvement could increase the level of animals’ production in a more rapid way, it is not a permanent and non-cumulative progress. In any breeding schemes prediction breeding value of the candidate animals is needed to be obtained with a high precision and accuracy for making a remarkable genetic gain for the traits over the time. The main objective of the present research was to study accuracy of predicted breeding value for body weight at eighth week of age in indigenous chickens of Khorasan Razavi province.

Materials and methods: A set of 47,000 body weight (at the age of eight weeks) records belonging to 47,000 head of male and female chicks (progeny of 753 sires and 5,154 dams) collected during seven generations (2006-2012) was used. The data were obtained in Khorasan Razavi native chicken breeding center. An animal model was applied for analyzing the records. In the model, contemporary group of generation*hatch*sex (GHS) as a fixed effect, weight at birth as a covariable, as well as direct and maternal additive genetic random effects were taken into account. In an initial analysis using SAS software, all fixed and covariate factors included in the model were detected to be significant for the trait. All additive genetic relationships among the animals in the pedigree file (47,880 animals) were accounted for. Variance and covariance components of direct and maternal additive genetic effects were estimated through restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method. Breeding value of the animals was obtained by best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). Selection accuracy was then calculated based on prediction error variance (PEV). The model was fitted to the data using DMU package. Post analysis of breeding values (genetic trend estimation and statistical comparison of groups using student’s t test) was also undertaken using SPSS software.

Results and Discussion: Average and standard deviation of body weight at the age of eight weeks were 607.93 g. and 127.347 g., respectively. As expected, males (668.98 g.) were generally heavier than females (549.86 g.) chickens. Additive and maternal genetic variance components were 3183.9253 and 350.8929, respectively. Based on genetic covariance (-363.8555) the correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects was revealed to be -0.3442. Direct and maternal heritability for the trait were found to be 0.4387 and 0.0483, respectively. Mean direct and maternal breeding values were 76.65 g. and -7.91 g., respectively. The corresponding figures for the direct and maternal accuracies were 0.741 and 0.427, respectively. Genetic trends for direct and maternal breeding value were 26.951 g. (SE=1.344 g.) and -2.252 g. (SE=0.199 g.), respectively and statistically significant (P

Keywords

Animal model; Body weight; Indigenous chickens; Selection accuracy

References

1- Bulmer, M. G. 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. The American. Naturalist, 105:201-211.

2- Cameron, N. D. 1997. Selection Indices and Prediction of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding. CAB International.

3- Dobson, A. J. 1991. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall. London, UK.

4- Emamgholi Begli, H., S. Zerehdaran, S. Hassani, and M. A. Abbasi. 2010. Estimation of genetic parameters of economically important traits in native fowl, Yazd province. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 40(4):63-70. (In Persian).

5- Emam Jomeh Kashan, N. 1997. Genetic Evaluation in Animal Husbandry. NAS Scientific and Cultural Institute. (In Persian).

6- Esmaeilkhanian, S., S. Ansari Mahyari, A. Nejati Javaremi, M. H. Banabazi, M. Sadeghian, and M. Tatari. 2014. Study of polymorphism in Mazandaran and Esfahan native chicken population using microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 6(2):165-172. (In Persian).

7- Fathi, A., R. Vaez Torshizi, and N. Emam Jomeh Kashan. 2005. Maternal effects on production and reproduction traits in a commercial broiler line. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 67:16-21. (In Persian).

8- Ghorbani, S. 2002. Study of genetic change for economic traits in native Fars chickens and evaluation of inbreeding effect on performance. M.Sc. thesis, Shiraz University. (In Persian).

9- Ghorbani, S., M. A. Kamali, and M. A. Abbasi. 2010. Estimation of heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations among productive traits in native Fars chickens. Fourth Congress of Animal Science, p. 3162-3165. (In Persian).

10- Ghorbani, S., M. A. Kamali, M. A. Abbasi, and F. Ghafouri Kesbi. 2012. Estimation of maternal effects on some economic traits of North Iranian native fowls using different models. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14:95-103.

11- Grindstaff, J. L., E. D. Brodie, and E. D. Ketterson. 2003. Immune function across generations: integrating mechanism and evolutionary process in maternal antibody transmission. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 270:2309-2319.

12- Hartmann, C., E. Strandberg, L. Rydhmer, and K. Johansson. 2002. Genetic relations between reproduction, chick weight and maternal egg composition in a White Leghorn line. Animal Science, 52:91– 101.

13- Haunshi, S., M. Shanmugam, M. K. Padhi, M. Niranjan, U. Rajkumar, M. R. Reddy, and A. K. Panda. 2012. Evaluation of two Indian native chicken breeds for reproduction traits and heritability of juvenile growth traits. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44:969-973.

14- Iraqi, M. M., A. F .M. El-Laban, and M. H. Khalil. 2000. Estimation of breeding values and their accuracies using multivariates animal model analysis for growth traits in three local strains of chickens. Egyptian Poultry Science, 20:981-1002.

15- Kamali M. A., S. Ghorbani, M. Moradi Shahrbabak, and M. J. Zamiri. 2007. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of economic traits in Iranian native fowl and estimated genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients. British Poultry Science, 48(4):443-448.

16- Lakhi, M. 2011. Evaluation of genetic change resulted from selection for body weight at age eight weeks in native chickens of Razavi Khorasan. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Birjand. (In Persian).

17- Lakhi, M., H. Farhangfar, S. M. Hosseini, and M. E. Navidizadeh. 2013. Heritability estimation and evaluation of genetic change resulted from selection for body weight at week eight in native chickens of Razavi Khorasan. Journal of Animal Science Researches, 23(2):169-179. (In Persian).

18- Leeson, S., and J. D. Summers. 2000. Broiler Breeder Production. Nottingham University Press.

19- Malekshahdehi, S., S. H. Hafezian, G. Rahimi Mianji, and Z. Ansari Pirsaraii. 2014. Comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms of Mx gene in different strains of commercial broiler, layer and native chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 6(1):92-97. (In Persian).

20- Navidizadeh, M. E. 2009. Estimation of phenotypic and genetic parameters for productive traits of indigenous chickens of Khorasan province. M.Sc. Thesis University of Birjand. (In Persian).

21- Navidizadeh, M. E., H. Farhangfar, S. M. Hosseini, D. A. Saghi, and R. A. Mirzaei. 2009. Estimation of phenotypic and genetic parameters for productive traits of indigenous chickens of Khorasan province. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 85:62-69. (In Persian).

22- Niknafs, S., H. Abdi, S. A. Fatemi, M. B. Zandi, and H. Baneh. 2013. Genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients effects for growth and reproductive traits in Mazandaran indigenous chicken. Journal of Biology, 3(1):25-31.

23- Norris, D., J. W. Ngambi. 2006. Genetic parameter estimates for body weight in local Venda chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 38(7-8):605-609.

24- Osfoori, R. 1997. Genetic markers in ten breeds of native Iranian sheep. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 34:156-162. (In Persian).

25- Pashmi, M. 2009. Essentials of Animal Breeding. Sarva Press, Tehran. (In Persian).

26- Robinson, D. L. 1996. Models which might explain negative correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects. Livestock Production Science, 45:111-122.

27- Robinson, F. E., J. L. Wilson, M. W. Yu, G. M. Fasenko, and R. T. Hardin. 1993. The relationship between body weight and reproductive efficiency in meat-type chickens. Poultry Science, 72:912-922.

28- Sadeghi, N. 1995. Genetics of growth and meat production in native chickens and their crosses with exotic breeds. M.Sc. Thesis. Isfahan University of Technology. (In Persian).

29- Saffari, M., G. Askari Jafarabadi, M. Aminafshar, and S. J. Fatemi. 2010. Study of maternal effects for economic important traits in native chickens of Mazandaran province. Fourth Congress of Animal Science, p. 3080-3084. (In Persian).

30- Salehinasab, M., S. Zerehdaran, M. A. Abbasi, S. Alijani, and S. Hassani. 2013. Determination of the best model for estimating heritability of economic traits and their genetic and phenotypic trends in Iranian native fowl. Archiv Tierzucht, 56(23):237-245.

31- Sang, B. D., H. S. Kong, H. K. Kim, C. H. Choi, S. D. Kim, Y. M. Cho, B. C. Sang, J. H. Lee, G. J. Jeon, and H. K. Lee. 2006. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Korean native chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 3:319-323.

32- Seraj, A., R. Vaez Torshizi, and A. Nejati-Javaremi. 2007. Estimation of genetic parameters for production and reproduction traits of Mazandaran native fowls using different animal models. Second Congress of Animal Science. p. 1171-1174. (In Persian).

33- Seraj, A., R. Vaez Torshizi, and A. Nejati-Javaremi. 2008. Maternal effects on production and reproduction traits in Mazandaran native fowl. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 38(2):538-543. (In Persian).

34- Shadparvar, A. A., and B. Enayati. 2012. Genetic parameters for body weight and laying traits in Mazandaran native breeder hens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2(3):251-256.

35- Shafaat, K., R. Vaez Torshizi, and N. Emam Jomeh Kashan. 2008. Investigation of sire and year interaction effect on correlation between direct and maternal genetic of body weight at 6 weeks in a commercial Broiler Line. Third Iranian Congress of Animal Science. (In Persian).

36- Simm, G. 1998. Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep. First Edition, Farming Press, UK.