Integrated Management Study (Chemical and Mechanical) of Swallow-wort (Cynanchum acutum) in Qazvin Province

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 7, Volume 28, Issue 3 - Serial Number 25, September 2014, Pages 387-392   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v28i3.23711

Authors

F. Meighani^{* 1}; M. Mirvakili²; Parviz Shimi³; M. A. Baghestani³

¹Iranian Plant Protection Research Institute

²Agricultural Research Center, Yazd

³Plant Pest and Disease Research Institute

Abstract

Swallow wort is a perennial weed which has caused damage in agricultural fields in Iran especially in orchards. Therefore, an experiment was conducted during 2009-2011 in order to its integrated management in arachis orchard in Abyek based on randomized complete block design with three replications and 18 treatments. The treatments included gramaxon (Paraquat 20% SL), roundup (Glyphosate 41% SL), garlon (Triclopyr 62% EC), cutting, and their combination together control without spraying. Among the treatments, application 3 times Glyphosate 6 L/ha was the best treatment for swallow wort density decrease in the first year, and in the second year best treatments were 2 and 3 times Triclopyr 2 L/ha, and 3 times Glyphosate 6 L/ha. The best treatments in the third year were 2 and 3 times Triclopyr 2 L/ha, and 3 times Glyphosate 6 L/ha. At the third year, the best treatment for swallow wort biomass decrease was 3 times Glyphosate 6 L/ha. However, it had not significant difference with 2 and 3 times Triclopyr 2 L/ha, 3 times Glyphosate 4 L/ha, and 2 times Glyphosate 6 L/ha. Therefore, Glyphosate and Triclopyr had more efficiency in the control of swallow wort, compared to Paraquat and cutting.

Keywords

Swallow wort (Cynanchum acutum); Chemical control; Herbicide; Integrated Management; Perennial weed

References

1- بدلی خ. 1376. بررسی علف کش های گروه سولفونیل اوره در ذرت دآن‌های. گزارش سالیانه طرح. بخش تحقیقات آفات و بیماری‌های گیاهی، مغان.

2- پهلوانی ا. ح.، میقانی ف.، راشدمحصل م .ح.، و باغستانی م. ع. 1386. بررسی مراحل فنولوژی علف‌هرز کاتوس (Cynachum acutum)‌. پژوهش و سازندگی 76: 24-16.

3- پهلوانی ا. ح.، راشدمحصل م. ح.، میقانی ف.، باغستانی م. ع.، نصیری محلاتی م. و آل ابراهیم م. ت. 1386. بررسی رفتار جوانه‌زنی بذر علف‌هرز کاتوس. پژوهش‌های زراعی ایران 5 (1): 47-52.

4- شماع م.، و ساعدی ه. 1375. گیاهان سمی. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

5- شیمی پ. 1383. مبارزه با کاتوس (Cynanchum acutum) در باغات سیب. گزارش نهایی طرح تحقیقاتی. موسسه تحقیقات گباه‌پزشکی کشور.

6- عزیزیان ع.، میقانی‌ ف.، میروکیلی م.، و باغستانی م. ع. 1390. بررسی‌ مدیریت تلفیقی و فنولوژی تطبیقی علف‌هرز کاتوس‌ (Cynanchum acutum L.) در باغ پسته. مجله به‌زراعی کشاورزی 13 (2): 61-73

7- فقیه ا.، و سلیمی ح. 1376. طرح بررسی بیولوژی و فنولوژی و پراکنش علف‌هرز کاتوس. گزارش نهایی طرح تحقیقاتی. موسسه تحقیقات گباه‌پزشکی کشور.

8- میقانی ف.، شیمی‌ پ، و باغستانی م. ع. 1388. بررسی امکان کنترل تلفیقی علف‌هرز کاتوس ‌(Cynanchum acutum L.). گزارش نهایی طرح تحقیقاتی. موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور.

9- Coble H.D., and Slife F.W. 1970. Development and control of honeyvine milk weed. Weed Science, 18: 352-356.

10- Demir H., Ergin E.A., and Vural M. 2011. Antimicrobal and antioxidant activities of Cynanchum acutum, Cionura erecta and Venetum subsp. sarmatiense grown wild in Turkey. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9: 186-189.

11- Di Tommaso A., Lawlor F.M., and Darbushire S.J. 2005. The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 2. Cynanchum rossicum (Kleopow) Borhidi [= Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar.] and Cynanchum louiseae (L.) Kartesz & Gandhi [= Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 85: 243-263.

12- EL-Demerdash A., Dawidar M., Keshk E.M., and Abdel-Mogib M. 2009. Coumarins from Cynanchum acutum. Revista Latinoamericana de Quimica, 37: 65-69.

13- Kristine M.A., DiTommaso A., and Morris, S.H. 2008. Response of Pale Swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum) to Triclopyr application and clipping. Invasve Plant Science Management, 1: 196-206

14- Lawlor F.M. 2002. Element stewardship abstract for Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench. &. Vincetoxicum rossicum (Swallow-wort). The Nature Conservancy, Wildland Invasive Species Program, University of California, Davis, CA. 13pp.

15- Lawlor F.M., and Raynal D.J. 2002. Response of swallow-wort to herbicide. Weed Science, 50: 179-185.

16- O’Connor R. 2008. Swallow-wort control fact sheet. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, MI. 1p.

17- Soteres J.K., and Murray D.S., 1982. Root distribution and reproductive biology of honeyvine milkweed (Cynanchum leave). Weed Science, 30: 158-163.

18- Soteres J.K., Murray D.S., and Basler E., 1983. Absorption of 2,4-D, Dicamba, and glyphosate by excised honeyvine milkweed (Cynanchum leave) leaves. Weed Science, 31: 241-247.

19- Tewksbury L., Casagrande R., and Gassmann A. 2002. Swallow-Worts, Biological Control of invasive plants in the Easted United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET, 413 pp.

20- Waldecker M.A., and Wyse L., 1985. Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Science, 33: 299-305.

21- Zimdahl R.C., 1999. Fundamentals of weed science. Academic Press.