Genetic analysis of milk solid no-fat percentage by fixed and random regression models in Kurdi sheep of Shirvan

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 9, Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 25, March 2016, Pages 162-173   

Document Type: Genetics & breeding

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.v8i1.41859

Authors

fatemh kazemi borzel abad^{* 1}; Saeed Hassani¹; Firooz Samadi¹; Mojtaba Ahani Azari²; Davoud Ali Saghi³

¹Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

²Department of Animal and Poultry Breeding and Genetics, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

³Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center

Abstract

Introduction Milk solid no-fat is economically very important in cheese industry. Compared to the other kinds of milk, ewe’s milk contains higher amount of milk solids no-fat. Milk solids no-fat (MSNF) contains lactose, caseins, whey proteins, and minerals.
The use of test day records in random regression method has several benefits including flexibility to account for the environmental and genetic components of the shape of lactation, reducing generation interval and cost of recording by making fewer measurements, increasing the accuracy of genetic evaluation and direct correction for fixed effects. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to estimate genetic parameters for test-day milk solid no-fat percentage in Kurdi sheep of Shirvan using fixed and random regression models.
Materials and methods In the present investigation, genetic analysis of milk solid no-fat percentage was carried out using fixed and random regression models by Wombat software. Data included 1094 test day records of milk solid no-fat percentage collected from 250 ewes in Hossien Abad Kurdi sheep breeding station. Milking was carried out by hand milking combined with lamb suckling at 14 days interval starting from May to August 2012. Then, 50 ml of milk samples were immediately analysed by Ecomilk total to determine the milk solid no-fat percentage. Fixed effects of litter size, parity, month of recording and days in milk as covariate and random effects of direct genetic and permanent environmental effects were included in the models. General linear model was used to identify effective fixed effects on the trait by SAS 9.1 software. Variance and covariance components were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood procedure. In random regression model, orthogonal Legendre polynomials of order 2 for permanent environmental and additive genetic effects was fitted.
Results and Discussion Average milk solid no-fat percentage of Kurdi ewes was 11.83. Average heritability, repeatability, additive genetic variance, permanent environmental variance, phenotypic variance and residual variance of milk solid no-fat percentage were estimated as 0.06, 0.26, 0.029, 0.094, 0.0471, and 0.0348, respectively in fixed regression model. In a study on northern Thailand dairy cows, heritability, additive genetic variance and residual variance estimates were 0.133, 0.36, and 0.238, respectively. In random regression model, heritability of milk solid no-fat percentage was higher in second than first part of lactation period. The highest and the lowest heritability were estimated at 14 (0.068) and 112 (0.193) days, respectively. Repeatability of milk solid no-fat percentage was higher in second than first part of lactation period. The highest and the lowest repeatability were estimated at 14 (0.279) and 126 (0.732) days, respectively. In a study on milk solid no-fat percentage in Holstein cow in Korea, the range of heritabilities were from 0.305 to 0.489 and higher estimates of heritability for milk solid non fat percentage occurred in second half of lactation. Additive genetic variance in early lactation was lower than that of the end of lactation. The highest and the lowest additive genetic variance were estimated at 5 (0.013) and 126 (0.143) days, respectively. Permanent environmental variance was estimated higher in second than first part of lactation period and the highest and the lowest permanent environmental variances were estimated at 21 (0.05) and 126 (0.39) days, respectively. Phenotypic variance of milk solid no-fat percentage during lactation was not constant, the highest and the lowest permanent environmental variances were estimated at 5 (0.27) and 126 (0.79) days, respectively. Residual variance for the model considered to be constant for all days in milk (0.191). Genetic correlations between milk solid no-fat percentages at different days in milk were positive and ranged from 0.391 to 0.999. Permanent environmental correlation between Milk solid no-fat percentage at different days in milk were ranged from -0.343 to 0.999. Milk solid non fat percentage additive genetic and permanent environmental correlations between adjacent test days were more than between distant test days.
Conclusion Generally, results indicated that Shirvan Kurdi ewes had high milk solid no-fat production potential. Moreover, higher heritability for this trait at the end of lactation probably indicated higher contribution of additive genetic variation to the total variation and selection of ewes in this part of lactation would be preferred.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the devoted team of Hossien Abad Kurdi sheep breeding station for their continuing collaboration in milk recording.

Keywords

Genetic parameters; Milk solid no-fat percentage; Sheep; Test Day Model

References

1- Baker, A., K. N. Dosky., and J. E. Alkass. 2009. Milk yield and composition of karadi ewes with the special reference to the method of evacuation. The 2nd Conference on Biological Sciences. Kurdistan, 12: 210-215.

2- Byeong, w. k., L. Deukhwan., T. J. Jin., and G. L. Jung. 2009. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk production traits using a random regression test-day model in Holstein cow in Korea. Journal of Animal Science, 22: 923-930.

3- Castillo-Juarez. H., P. O. Oltenacu., R. W. Blake., C.E. Culloch., and E. G. Cienfuegos-Rivas. 2000. Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 807-814.

4- Chongkasikit, N., T. Vearasilp., and U. Meulen. 2002. Heritability estimates of protein %, fat %, lactose %, non fat solids and total solids of dairy cattle in northern Thailand. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Witzenhausen. October 9-11.

5- Eilami, B. 2008. Lactation performance and lamb growth of Torky Ghashghaii sheep. Journal of Pajohesh and Sazandegi, 76: 80–89. ( In Persian)

6- Gengler, N., G. R. Wiggans., and A. Gillon. 2004. Estimated heterogeneity of phenotypic variance of test-day yield with a structural variance model. Journal of Dairy Science, 87:1908–1916.

7- Grosu, H., E. Ghita., and R. Raducu. 2007. The prediction of breeding value in a dairy sheep population using the test day animal models. 3rd Joint Meeting of the Network of Universities and Research Institutions of Animal Science of the South Eastern European Countries. 6 pp.

8- Hadi tavatori, M. H., M. Mohammadian., G. H. Nikonam., M. Moustashari., and M. Monem. 2008. Lactation and milk characteristics of Qazvin Shal sheep. Journal of Pajohesh and Sazandegi, 77: 34–41. (In Persian with English abstract)

9- Hajihossinlo, A., S. Sadeghi., S. A. Rafat., M. Bohluli., and M. R Bahrani Behzadi. 2012. Estimated of milking characteristic, milk composition and their determinants effects in Ghezel pure breed ewes and Ghezel×Arkhamerino, Moghani×Arkharmerino crossbreds. Proceedings of the 5th Congress on Animal Science, pp. 543-548., Iran, Esfahan. (In Persian)

10- Horstick, A., H. Hamann., and O. Distl. 2001. Genetic analysis of milk performance and linear type traits in East Friesian and Black and Brown milk sheep. Dissertation. Tierarztlich Hochschule, Hannover, 73: 345-352 (Abstract).

11- Horstick, A., H. Hamann., and O. Distl. 2002. Estimation of genetic parameters for daily milk performance of East Friesian milk sheep by random regression models. Pages 263-266 in Proc. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France.

12- Jamrozik, J., and L. R. Schaeffer. 1997. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day model with random regression for production of first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 80: 762-770.

13- Kawahara, T., Y. Gotoh., and S. Yamaguchi. 2006. Variance component estimates with dominance models for milk production in Holsteins of Japan using method R. Asian-Aust. Journal of Animal Science, 19: 769-774.

14- Khanzadeh, H., N. Ghavi Hosen Zadeh., and M. Naserani. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters and trends for milk fat and protein percentages in Iranian Holsteins using random regression test day model. Archiv Tierzucht,. 56: 1-21.

15- Kheirabadi, K., S. Alijani., L. Zavadilova., S. A. Rafat., and G. Moghaddam. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters for daily milk yields of primiparous Iranian Holstein cows. Archiv Tierzucht, 56: 1-12.

16- Komprej, A., G. Gorjanc., D. Kompan., and M. Kovac. 2009. Covariance components by a repeatability model in Slovenian dairy sheep using test-day records. Czech. Journal of Animal Science, 54: 426-434.

17- Komprej, A., D. Kompan., and M. Kovac. 2011. Genetic and environmental dispersion parameter estimation by test interval method in dairy sheep. Journal of Acta agriculture Slovenica, 98: 5-13.

18- Komprej, A., S. Malovrh., G. Gorjanc., D. Kompan., and M. Kovac. 2013. Genetic and environmental parameter estimation for milk traits in Slovenian dairy sheep using random regression model. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57: 231–239.

19- Mayeres, P., J. Stoll., J. Bormann., R. Reents., and N. Gengler. 2004. Prediction of daily milk, fat, and protein production by a random regression test-day model. t. Journal of Dairy Science, 87:1925-1933.

20- Meyer, K. 2006. WOMBAT- A program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. User notes, Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Armidale, 55 pp.

21- Mrod. R. A. 2005. Linear models for the prediction of animal Breeding values. 2nd ed. Escatland University Press, Adenborg. 444 pp.

22- Nezamidoust, M., A. Kominakis., and A. Safari. 2013. Use of Wood’s model to analyze the effects of milking methods on lactation curve in sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 113: 195-204.

23- Pavic, V., N. Antunac., B. Mioc., A. Ivankovic., and J Havranek. 2002. Influence of stage of lactation on the chemical composition and physical properties of sheep milk. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 47: 80-84.

24- Pesinova, P., A. Vejcik., and M. Miroslav. 2012. Milk quality of the original Valachian in a submontane region. Journal of Agrobiology, 48: 147-155.

25- Rahman Ahmed, M. N. A. 2010. Evaluation of performance and estimation of genetic parameters for milk yield and some reproductive traits in sheep breeds and crosses in the west bank. Ph.D Thesis. Faculty of Graduate Studies at An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

26- Roman, R. M., C. J. Wilcox., and F. G. Martin. 2000. Estimates of repeatability and heritability of productive and reproductive traits in a herd of Jersey cattle. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 23: 113-119.

27- SAS Institute. 2001. SAS user Guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Carry, NC.

28- Schaeffer, L. R., and J. C. M. Dekkers. 1994. Random regressions in animal models for test- day production in Dairy cattle. Proc. 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Onatario, Canada, 18:442–446.

29- Schaeffer, L. R. 2004. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livestock Production Science, 86: 35-45.

30- Serrano, M., E. Ugarte., J. J. Jurado., M. D. Perez-Guzman., and A. Legarra. 2001. Test day models and genetic parameters in Latxa and Manchega dairy ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 67: 253-264.

31- Seyeddokht, A. A. Aslaminejad., and M. Tahmorespur. 2012. Genetic analysis of milk yield using random repression test day model in Tehran province Holstein dairy cow. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 2: 168-174. (In Persian)

32- Shamahirgran, y., A. Aslaminejad., H, Farhangfar., and M. Tahmorespur. 2011. Comparison of Fixed Regression and Random Regression Test-Day Models for genetic evaluation of milk yield trait in Holstein cows Razavi Khorasan province. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 3: 67-73. (In Persian)

33- Teimouri y, A. 2006. Milk production and Processing. 1nd ed. Avay-masih Press. 668 pp. (In Persian)

34- Van der Werf, J. H. J., M. E. Goddard, and K. Meyer. 1998. The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records. Journal of Dairy Science, 81: 3300-3308.

35- Zare-Shahneh, A., S. Rashti., and A.R. Salehi. 2005. Determination of lactation performance, milk composition and lamb growth in shall and zandi ewes. Journal of Agriculture Science Natural Research, 12: 100–108. (In Persian)