Challenges on the Logical Possibility of Religious Education with an Emphasis on Hirst View

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

Article 7, Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 18, March 2020, Pages 126-147   

Document Type: پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/fedu.v9i2.78373

Author

Mohammad Davoudi^*

Research Institute of Hawzah and University

Abstract

This research aims to assess theoretical challenges on the possibility of religious education, which are as non-sensibility of religious educational science, indoctrinatory of religious education, and the impossibility of independently understanding the meaning of religious propositions. This research showed that religious educational science is meaningful because religious educational science could not be wholly independent of and irrelevant from culture and religion of society. Religious education is necessarily introductory, but it pertains to the method used for teaching religious thoughts. It is possible to understand religious propositions independently because religion does not have an independent, different form of knowledge. Besides, if it is assumed so, it is possible to know religious propositions individually, because understanding the religious propositions only necessitates understanding some basal religious propositions

Keywords

indoctrination; religious educational science; understanding religious propositions; Hirst; Hand

References

باقری، خسرو، چیستی تربیت دینی، تهران، مرکز مطالعات تربیت اسلامی، 1380.

Bagheri, Khosrow (2001), Chisti Tarbiat Dini, Tehran, Center for Islamic Education Studies.

Gilroy, Peter(1999), The Aims of Education and The Philosophy of Education, in The Aims of Education, Edited by Roger Marples, London and New York, Routledge.

Hand, Michael(2006), Is Religious Education Possible, London and New York, continuum.

Sealy, John, religious education: philosophical perspective(1985), London: George Allen & Unwin.

Roger Marples (Edited by) 1999, The Aims of Education, London and New York, Routledge.