The Effect of Mycorrhizal Fungi and Humic Acid on Yield and Yield Components of Sunflower

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 3, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 30, December 2016, Pages 567-582   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v8i4.47568

Authors

Hamideh Veysi; Gholamreza Heidari^* ; Yousef Sohrabi

University of Kurdistan

Abstract

Introduction
Cultivated sunflower is one of the largest oilseed crops in the world. Sunflower seed is the third largest source of vegetable oil worldwide, following soybean and canola. Nitrogen is one of the most important elements for crops to achieve optimum yields and quality. Phosphorus (P), next to nitrogen, is often the most limiting nutrient for crop and forage production. Phosphorus availability is controlled by three primary factors: soil pH, amount of organic matter and plant species (Reddy et al., 2003). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are one of the most important microorganisms in majority of the undamaged soils so that about 70% of the soil microbial biomass is formed by the mycelium of these fungi. Mycorrhizal association promotes plant absorption of scarce or immobile minerals, especially phosphorus, resulting in enhanced plant growth. Humic acids are dark brown to black, and are soluble in waterunder neutral and alkaline conditions. They are complex aromatic macromolecules with amino acid, amino sugar, peptide and aliphatic compounds linked to the aromatic groups. Humic acid contains nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, sulphur, copper and zinc (Subramanian et al., 2009).
Materials and methods
Experiment was conducted as split plot factorial based on randomized block design with three replications in 2011-2012. The main plots consisted of nitrogen and phosphorus application levels (zero percent or no chemical fertilizer application, 50% equivalent to 37.5 kg.ha-1 urea + 25 kg.ha-1 super phosphate triple and 100% equivalent to 75 kg.ha-1 urea + 25 kg.ha-1 super phosphate triple). Two species of mycorrhizal include (G. mosseae) and (G. interaradices) with three levels of humic acid (0, 8 and 16 kg.ha-1) were placed in subplots. The measured traits were: plant height, seed number per head, head diameter, seed oil content, thousand seed weight and seed yield. The data were analyzed using the Mstat-C statistical software. Mean comparison was performed using LSD method (at 5% level). The figures were prepared by Microsoft Excel.
Results and discussion
Mean comparisons showed that highest seed number per head belonged to plants under G. mosseae, without chemical fertilizer applying and without the use of humic acid (Fig. 5). The highest thousand seed weight obtained from using 8 and 16 kg.ha-1 humic acid without chemical fertilizer and applying 0 and 8 kg.ha-1 humic acid and using 50 and 100% chemical fertilizer. It seems that humic acid has antagonistic effects with chemical fertilizer in high levels. Interaction of humic acid and mycorrhiza species also showed that the highest thousand seed weight belonged to 8 kg.ha-1 humic acid and G. intraradices. Samarbakhash et al. (2009) in maize showed that Inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi significantly increased the average seed weight. The highest seed yield obtained from applying 50% chemical fertilizer and 8 kg.ha-1 humic acid. Mean comparison of interaction effect of humic acid levels and mycorrhiza strains also showed that the highest seed yield belonged to 8 kg.ha-1 humic acid and G. intraradices. This increase may be attributed to the extensive root development and hyphae that reduce the distance fordiffusion of essential elements thus enhancing the nutrient absorption. Mean comparison of interaction effect of chemical fertilizer levels and mycorrhiza strains indicated that chemical fertilizer levels had no considerable effect on G. mosseae efficiency from viewpoint of seed oil content but applying 50 and 100% chemical fertilizer along with using G. intraradices significantly increased seed oil content. Mirzakhani et al. (2008) in sprig safflower showed that mycorrhiza can solubilize phosphorus in soil and enhance absorb elements by plant.
Conclusion
In general, among applied humic acid levels, using 8 kg.ha-1 had positive effects on the studied traits of sunflower than its other levels. Furthermore, inoculation of seeds with mycorrhiza and using proportionate chemical fertilizers can cause increased grain yield and seed oil content.

Keywords

Chemical fertilizer; Oil percentage; Phosphorus; Seed number per head; Seed yield

References

Adani, F., Genevini, P., Zaccheo, P., and Zocchi, G. 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 21(3): 561-575.

Alizadeh, O., and Alizadeh, A. 2011. Consideration Use of mycorrhiza and vermicompost to optimizing of chemical fertilizer application in corn cultivation. Advances in Environmental Biology 5(6): 1279-1284.

Arienes, J., Palma, J.M., and Varion, A. 1993. Comparison protein pattern in nonmycorrhizal and VA mycorrhizal roots of red clover. New Phytologist 123: 763-768.

Arshi, Y. 1994. Science and Technology of Sunflower. General Office of Cotton and Oilseeds Publication. Ministry of Agriculture Publication, Tehran, Iran, 719 pp. (In Persian)

Atiyeh, R.M., Lee, S., Edwards, C.A., Arancon, N.Q., and Metzger, J.D. 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Technology 84(1):7-14.

Brundett, M.C., and Kendric, W.B. 1988. The mycorrhiza status, root anatomy, phenology of plant in a sugarmaple forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 1153-1173.

Chamola, B.P., and Mukergi, K.G. 2003. Compenndium of Mycorrhizal Research. A.P.H. Publisher. New Delhi p. 310.

Chen, B.D., Li, X.L., Tao, H.Q., Christie, P., and Wong, M.H. 2003. The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in calcareous soil spiked with variousquantities of zinc. Chemosphere 50: 839-846.

Delfine, S., Tognetti, R., Desiderio, E., and Alvino, A. 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25(2): 183-191.

FAO. 2014. Oil Crops. Food Outlook. Trade and Markets Division p. 17.

Ghorbani, S., Khazaeei, H.R., Kafi, M., and Banayan Aval, M. 2010. Effects of humic acid on yield and yield components of maize. Journal of Agroecology 2(1): 111-118. (In Persian with English Summary)

Mehraban, A., Noormohammady, G., Vazan, Ardakani, M.R., and Heydary Sharifabad, H. 2012. Effect of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) fungi on some characteristics of sorghum cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 8(2): 1-9. (In Persian with English Summary)

Mehrvarz, S., and Chaichi, M.R. 2008. Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms andphosphorus chemical fertilizer on forage and grain quality of barely (Hordeum vulgare L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 3(6): 855-860.

Mirzakhani, M., Ardakani, M.R., Ayneband, A., Shiranirad, H., and Rejali, F. 2008. Effects of inoculation with Azotobacterand mycorrhiza and different levels of nitrogen and phosphorous on grain yield and its components inspring safflower. The 10th Iranian Crop Production and Breeding Congress. Karaj, Iran. 18-20 p. 413. (In Persian)

Nasotimiandoab, R., Samavat, S., and Tehrani, M.M. 2011. Effects of liquid humus manure on iron concentration in green beans shoots. Regional Conference on Knowledge Management in Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran 49: 111-119. (In Persian with English Summary)

Nourbakhash, F., and Hajabbasi, M.A. 1998. Soil Biology. Ghazal Publication, Isfahan, Iran p. 198. (In Persian)

Rajabzadeh Motlagh, F., Mohammadi, E., and Asghari, H.R. 2012. Evaluation of dual inoculation of mycorrhiza and Sinorhizobium and nitrogen fertilizer application on annual medic (Medicago scutellata) growth. Journal of Rangeland 6(3): 216-227. (In Persian with English Summary)

Kolsarici, O., Kaya, M.D., Day, S., Ipek, A., and Uranbey, S. 2005. Effects of humic acid dosesonemergence and seeding growth of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 18(2): 151-155. (In Turkish with English Summary)

Lebaschi, M., Rezai, A., and Mazaheri, D. 2000. The quantitative aspects of dual use of oats and barley. Journal of Research and Manufacturers 21: 15-19. (In Persian)

Reddy, P.S., Rao, S.S., Venkataramana, P., and Suryanarayana, N. 2003. Response of mulberry varieties to VAM and Azotobacter biofertilizers inoculation. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 8(2): 171-174.

Samarbakhsh, S., Rejali, F., Ardakani, M.R., Pak Nejad, M., and Miransari, M. 2009. The combined effects of fungicides and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on corn (Zea mays L.) growth and yield under field conditions. Journal of Biological Sciences 9: 372-376.

Sharif, M., Khattak, R.A., and Sarir, M.S. 2002. Effect of different levels of lignitic coal derived humic acid on growth of maize plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33: 19-20.

Sharma, A.K., and Johri, B.N. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, interaction in plants, rhizosphere and soils. Science Publisher. INC, ENFILD, NH, USA. p. 110-112.

Subramanian, K.S., Charest, C., Dwyer, L.M., and Hamilton, R.I. 1995. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and water relations in maize under drought stress at tasselling. New Phytologist 129: 643-650.

Uhart, S.A., and Andraide, F.H. 1995. Nitrogen deficience in maize. Crop Science 35: 1376-1389.

Vaughan, D., and Malcom, R.E. 1985. Influnce of Humic substance on growth and physiological processes. In: Vaughan D, Malcom, R.E. (Eds), soil organic matter and biological activity martinus. Nijhoff/ Drwjung publication Dodrecht p. 37-75.