Effect of Intercropping Patterns of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgarMill), Sesame (Sesamum indicum) and Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) on Growth, Qualitative and Quantitative Characters and Yield Components

علوم باغبانی

Article 11, Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2016, Pages 406-416   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhorts4.v30i3.32673

Authors

Fatemeh Ranjbar^* ; Alireza Koocheki; Mahdi Nasiri Mahalati

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Ecological agriculture is an integrated system that gives credit to higher quality of products. Using of ecological agriculture and low input systems or other similar systems as a replacement for conventional systems turn out to progress in sustainable agriculture and protecting environment health. One of the best approaches to achieve these goals is to use mixed farming. Many experiments have shown that mixed farming has higher yield than sole cropping. The other benefits of mixed farming are: management of insects, weeds and diseases, promotion of diversity, improvement of products quality and also increase in stability and sustainability. These goals also achieved by decreasing in use of non-renewable resources and also reducing environment risks. Hence, assessment of intercropping patterns of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgar), Sesame (Sesamum indicum) and Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) on qualitative and quantitative characters and yield components were the purposes of this experiment.
Materials and methods: In order to study yield and yield components in different intercrops of fennel, sesame and bean, an experiment was conducted in Agricultural Research Station, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during 2010-2011growing season. The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block with three replications. The treatments were consisted of: pure stand of fennel, sesame and bean, row intercropping of sesame-bean with recommended density (1:1), fennel-bean (1:1), fennel-sesame (1:1) and intercrops of fennel- sesame - bean (1:1:1). The field of experiment was prepared at the end of March, a month before sowing; 30 ton/ hectare manure fertilizer was used. Because of sowing these 3 crops in a low input system, non-chemical approaches to control weeds and diseases during the growth season were employed. In order to determine crops seed yield and their biological yield in this experiment, sampling was done after omitting of margin effects (0.5 m first and end of each row) and 8 m2 area was harvested. All harvested crops were dried under free condition and shadow, then was weighted and after that seeds were separated from crops. To measure yield components five samples were selected. For fennel: umbel number per plant, umbellate number per plant, seed number per umbellate, 1000 seed weight, for sesame: capsule number per plant, seed number per capsule and 1000 seed weight and for bean: pod number per plant, seed number per pod and 1000 seed weight were measured.
Results and discussion: Results indicated that the yield and yield components of intercropped and pure fennel treatments significantly affect grain and biological yield, harvest index, the number of umbels per plant, the number of fertile umbellates per plant, and vegetative essential oil. In addition, these treatments in sesame showed significant effect on biological yield, grain yield, harvest index, plant height and seed weight per capsule. The results for bean revealed significant effects on biological yield, grain yield and the number of seeds per pod. Moreover, the highest percentage of essential oil in fennel was obtained in fennel-sesame treatment. The highest percentage of oil in sesame was obtained in sole crop of fennel. Furthermore, the results showed that the highest LER (1.22) was observed in sesame-fennel treatment. Considering this ratio, this treatment was selected as a superior treatment among the other treatments.
An experiment on mixed cultivation of Zea maize and bean showed higher amount of biological yield, in intercropping treatments (RezvanBeydokhti et al., 2005). Another experiment on mixed cropping of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris M.)showed higher amount of seed yield in intercropping treatments and biological yield in sole cropping .

Keywords

Biological yield; Essential oil; LER; Medicinal plants; Row intercropping

References

1- AOCS: Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists Society. 1993. AOCS Press, Champaign, II. (USA).

2- Arganosa G.C., Sosuskli F.W. and SlikardA.E. 1998. Seed yield and essential oil of biennial caraway grown in Western Canada. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants, 1(9): 9-17.

3- Alikamar R. 2004. Density of cumin and chickpea intercropping with emphasis on weed control in Mashhad. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).

4- Beheshti A. 1995. Effect of different planting density on yield and yield components of grain sorghum and soybean in mixed cropping system.Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).

5- Carrubba A., Torre R. and MatrangaA. 2008. Cultivation trials of some aromatic and medicinal plants in asemi-arid mediterranean environment. Proceedings of an International Conference on MAP, ActaHorticulture(ISHS).

6- Gliessman S. R. 1997. Agroecology: Ecological Process in Sustainable Agriculture. Arbor Press. 357p.

7- Gheshm R. and Tajbakhsh A. M. 2001.The effect of planting density on corn and soybeans and corn Heading on yield components and yield,competition and production ecological on the intercropping. Agricultural Sciences and Technology Journal, 15(2): 65-73

8- Iftikhar hussain B., Ahmad R., Jabbar A., Nazir M. S. and Mahmood T. 2006 Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume Intercropping Systems. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 2:165-167.

9- Francis C.A. 1986. Biological efficiencies in multiple cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy Journal42: 1-41.

10- Jackson L.E., Pascual U. and Hodgkin T. 2007. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agronomy Ecosystem Environment, 121: 196-210.

11- Jahani M., Koocheki A., Nassiri Mahallati M., 2008. Comparison of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris M.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 6: 67-78.(In Persian with English Summary(

12- Javanshir A., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab A., Hamidi A., and Gholipour C. (Eds.), 2000. The ecology of intercropping (translation). Jihad, Mashhad University Press.

13- Jahan M. 2004. Examine the ecological aspects of cultivation, manure mixed with chamomile and calendula Agronomy. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).

14- Jahan M., Koocheki A., and Nassiri. Mahallati. M. 2008.Investigate various combinations of intercropping of lentil and cumin in low input agricultural systems. Iranian journal of field crop research, 6:67-78

15- Haggaard H., Ambus P. and Jensen E. S. 2001. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea barley intercropping. Field Crop Research 70: 101-109.

16- Hasanzade F. 2007. The effect of density on yield and agronomic characteristics of savory and persian clover intercropping. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).

17- Koocheki A., Nassiri Mahallati M., Khorramdel S., Anvarkhah S., Sabt Teimouri M. and Sanjani S. 2010. Evaluation of growth indices of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in intercropping with replacement and additive series. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 2:30-40.

18- Koocheki A., Nakh Forosh A. and Zarif ketabi K. 1997. Organic Agriculture. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad press.

19- Kombiok J. M., Buah S. S. J. and Dzomeku K. 2012. Rice influence on grain yield of maize in maize/rice mixture in the Northern Guinea Savanna zone of Ghana .Journal of Crop Improvement, 26(1): 87-100.

20- Maffei M. and Mucciarelli M. 2003. Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crop Research, 84: 229-240.

21- Mahale M.M., Nevase T. and Chavan P.G. 2008. Yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by different intercropping ratios and sulphur levels Legume Research, 31:268-271

22- Mirhashemi S.M., Koocheki A., Parsa M. and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2010. Evaluation of growth indices of ajowan and fenugreek in pure culture and intercropping based on organic agriculture. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 7: 685-694. (In Persian with English Summary).

23- Olowe v.I.O. and Adeyemo A.Y. 2009. Enhanced crop productivity and compatibility through intercropping of sesame and sunflower varieties. Annals of Applied Biology, 155:285–291

24- Pelzer E., Bazot M. and Makowski D. 2012. Pea–wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. European Journal of Agronomy, 40: 39-53.

25- Pour. Amir. F., Nassiri. Mahallati. M., Koocheki. A. and Ghorbani. R. 2010. The effect of different combinations of croping on yield and yield components of sesame and pea intercropping on incremental series. Iranian journal of field crop research, 8(3): 339-402

26- Sasatawa B.M., Lawan M. and Maina Y.T. 2004. Management of insect pests of soybean: effects of sowing date and intercropping on damage and grain yield in the Nigerian Sudan savanna. Crop Protection, 23: 155-161.

27- Sujatha S., Bhat R., Kannan C. and Balasimha D. 2011. Impact of intercropping of medicinal and aromatic plants with organic farming approach on resource use efficiency in arecanut (Areca catechu L.) plantation in India IndustrialCrops and Products,33(1): 78-83.

28- Tripathi S. and Dwivedi A. K. 2009. Economics of intercropping fennel with cauliflower. Annals of Horticulture, 2(1): 32-37.