Identification and Population Estimation of Epiphytic Ice Nucleation Active Bacteria Isolated from Stone Fruit Trees in Khorasan-Razavi Province

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 10, Volume 29, Issue 3 - Serial Number 32, September 2015, Pages 449-458   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v29i3.44334

Authors

E. Taheri; S. Tarighi^* ; P. Taheri

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Epiphytic bacteria are common inhabitants of plant leaflet surfaces and can have important influences on the plants on which they live. Accurate estimates of epiphytic bacterial population sizes are needed to detect their roles in several important biological phenomena. For example, reliable disease forecasts and anticipate of frost damage depend on the exact estimation of bacterial population in their habitant. Frostbite is one of the major agricultural problems in Iran and is one of the most important environmental stresses which influences plant growth and crops productivity. Chilling and freezing limit the geographical distribution and growing season of many crops and cause significant crops losses. Apical meristem and upper leaves show the first symptoms of frostbite. Without bacteria involved, freezing damage on actively growing shoots is usually limited to the tip or outer branches, and the plant will recover. Freezing is not the sole reason of severe damage to such plants and if such damage or dieback occurs there must be synergistic effects between frost and bacterial infection. Ice nucleation epiphytic bacteria are one of the casual agents of frost and canker in stone fruit trees.
Materials and Methods: In order to identify ice nucleation active (INA) bacteria, 248 samples from twigs of sour cherry, sweet cherry, apricot, prune, peach, nectarine, almond and plum from the main areas of stone fruit tree orchards in Khorasan-Razavi province were collected in spring of 2013. In each area, 2 orchards and in each orchard 4 trees were randomly selected. The samples were placed in paper bags and were kept in a refrigerator until use. The weight of tissues was measured and bacteria were washed from the surface of plant parts in distilled water treated with 0.2 percent. The samples were homogenized for 1 hour at 100 rpm rotary shaker. One milliliter of this suspension was serially diluted to 10−9, 10−8, 10−7 and 10−6 cfu/ml. Twenty-five micro liter of each dilution was cultured on King’s medium B. Among bacterial colonies grown after 48 h, 820 isolates were randomly selected (10 colony of each types that observed on petri dishes). Bacterial population in different areas and hosts, were estimated by counting of the bacterial colonies in each gram of fresh weight. To discover INA bacteria, bacterial suspensions in distilled water were incubated at -5 to -7 °C. After 30 min freezed bacterial suspensions were selected. The population of INA bacteria were estimated by the formula - . The ice nucleation active bacteria were purified and identified by different tests including Gram reaction, catalase, fluorescent pigment production on KB or casamino acid medium, levan, oxidase, arginine dihydrolase, potato rot and hypersensitive reaction on tobacco. The growth with 5% and 7% NaCl, anaerobic condition, at 37 °C, were also tested. The yellow bacteria were cultured on YDC, and the production of xanthomonadin was tested.
Results and Discussion: Among these 820 isolates that analyzed, 110 isolates were determined as INA. These bacteria were identified by phenotypic and biochemical tests. According to our data 56, 27, 8, 6 and 3 percent isolates were identified as Pseudomonas syringae, P. fluorescens, P. viridiflava, Pantoea agglomerans and Xanthomonas sp., respectively. The population of INA bacteria in chenaran and Mashhad was higher than other cities. There was no correlation between plant species and the population of INA bacteria. Although our data indicated the positive correlation between canker symptoms and the population of INA bacteria. This study indicated that plant species cause significant differences in bacterial population size. Effects of plant species on epiphytic bacterial population sizes may also reflect physiological differences. It is fascinating that, for some species, different plants of the same genotype grown in the same area and under similar environmental conditions would exhibit significant differences in mean bacterial population size. It is possible that diversity in soil and water content, soil nutrient availability, release nutrient deposition, nutrient leakage from plants, presence of unseen wounds through which leakage occurs, or exposure to immigrants contribute to the generation of significant differences in bacterial population sizes among plants. Perhaps bacterial population sizes on plant species in which resources required for epiphytic colonization are abundant and are less susceptible to influenced by exogenous factors, therefore fewer variables among plants. We found that bacterial population sizes were varied in relation to plant host, and the physical environment.
Conclusion: The ice formation and frost damage in plants are normally depend on the logarithm of the ice nuclei number in freezing time. Therefore, population estimation of the epiphytic INA microorganisms is very important for frost forecasting. Our results, for the first time, demonstrated the population dynamics and the presence of different species of ice nucleation active bacteria in Khorasan-Razavi province.

Keywords

Ice nucleation active bacteria; Khorasan-Razavi province; Population; Stone fruit trees

References

Fahy P.C., and Persley C.J. 1983. Plant Bacterial Disease A Diagnostic Guide, Academic Press Sidney, Australia.

2- Fahy G.M., MacFarlane D.R., Angell C.R., and Meryman H.T. 1984. Vitrification is an approach to cryopreservation, Cryobiology, 21:407-426.

3- Gangimoghaddam A. 2011. Fruit planting in temperate regions, Agricultural Extension and Education Publications, Tehran. (In Persian).

4- Garnham C.P., Campbell R.L., Walker V.K., and Davies P.L. 2011. Novel dimeric β-helical model of an ice nucleation protein with bridged active sites, BMC Structural Biology, 11-36.

5- Goodnow R.A., Harrison M.D., Morris J.D., Sweeting K.B., and LaDuca R.J. 1990. Fate of ice nucleation-active Pseudomonas syringae in alpine soils and waters and in synthetic Snow samples, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56:2223-2227.

6- Govindarajan A.G., and Lindow S.E. 1988. Phospholipid requirement for expression of ice nuclei in Pseudomonas syringae and in vitro, Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 19:9333-9338.

7- Graether S.P., and Jia Z. 2001. Modeling Pseudomonas syringae ice nucleation protein as a β-helical protein, Biophysical Journal, 3:1169-1173.

8- HasanZadeh N. 1995. Principles and methods of plant bacteriology,Islamic Azad University Press. (In Persian).

9- Hirano S.S., and Upper C.D. 1985. Ecology and physiology of Pseudomonas syringae, Bio/Technology, 3:1074-1078.

10- Hirano S.S., and Upper C.D. 2000. Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 3:624-653.

11- Hugh R., and Leifson, E. 1953. The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrate by versus gram negative bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 66:24-26.

12- Kawahara H., Nakano Y., Omiya K., Muryoi N., Nishikawa J., and Obata H. 2004.Production of two types of ice crystal-controlling proteins in Antarctic bacterium,Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,3:220-223.

13-Khadivi E. 2010. Fruit planting (public and private),Agricultural Extension andEducation Publications, Tehran. (In Persian).

14- Kinkel L.L., Wilson M., and Lindow S.E. 2000. Plant Species and Plant Incubation Conditions Influence Variability in Epiphytic Bacterial Population Size, Microbial Ecology, 39:1-11.

15- Klement Z., Farkas G.L., and Lovrekovich H. 1964. Hypersensitive reaction induce by phytopathogenic bacteria in the tobacco leaf, Phytopathology, 54:474-477.

16- Kovacs N. 1956. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyana by the oxidase reaction, Nature, 178:703-708.

17- Kozolff L.M., Turner M.A., Arellano F., and Lute M. 1991. Phosphatidylinositol, a phospholipid of ice-nucleating bacteria, Journal of Bacteriology, 6:2053-2060.

18- Lelliott R.A., and Stead D.E. 1987. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial disease of plants. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, Boston.

19- Leveau J.H.J., and Lindow S.E. 2001. Appetite of an epiphyte quantitative monitoring of bacteria sugar consumption in the phyllosphere, Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98:3446-3453.

20- Li J., Izquierdo M.P., and Lee T.C. 1997. Effects of ice-nucleation active bacteria on the freezing of some model food systems, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 1:41-49.

21- Lindemann J., and Suslow T.V. 1987. Competition between ice nucleation-active wild-type and ice nucleation deficient deletion mutant strains of Pseudomonas syringaeand Pseudomonas fluorescensBiovar I and biological control of frost injury on strawberry blossoms, Phytopathology, 77:882-886.

22- Lindow S.E., Arny D.C., and Upper C.D. 1978. Distribution of ice nucleation-active bacteria on plants, Applied Environmental Microbiology, 6:831-838.

23- Lindow S.E., Arny D.C., and Upper C.D. 1982. Bacterial ice nucleation: A factor in frost injury to plants, Plant Physiology, 70:1084–1089.

24- Lindow S.E. 1983. The role of bacterial ice nucleation in frost injury to plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 21:363-384.

25- Lindow S.E. 1987. Competitive exclusion of epiphytic bacteria by Ice- mutants of Pseudomonas syringae,Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53:2520-2527.

26- Lindow S.E. and Gurian-Sherman D. 1993. Bacterial ice nucleation: significance and molecular basis,FASEB, Journal, 7:1338-1343.

27- Lindow S.E, and Andersen G.L. 1996. Influence of immigration epiphyic bacteria populations on navel orange leaves, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62:2978-2987.

28- Manulis S., Haviv-Chesner A., Brandl M.T., Lindow S.E., and Barash I. 1998. Differential involvement of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthetic pathways in pathogenicity and epiphytic fitness of Erwiniaherbicolapv. Gypsophilae,Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 7:634–642.

29- Mazaree M. and Ghasemi A. 1993. Identification and seasonal variation of populations of ice nucleation active bacteria on stone fruit trees in Shahrood, Journal of Plant Pathology,60:57-29.(In Persian with English abstract)

30- Mercier J., and Lindow S.E. 2000. Role of leaf surface sugar in colonization of plants by bacterial epiphytes, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66:369-374.

31- Mosivand M., Akbarievala S., and Hejazi M.A. 2005. Relationship between dispersion of ice nucleation active bacteria and frost damage in some of the crops in Iran,Applied science conference on ways to deal with frostbite, Yazd. (In Persian).

32- O’Brien R.D., and Lindow S.E. 1988. Effect of plant species and environmental conditions on ice nucleation activity of Pseudomonas syringae on leaves, Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology, 9:2281–2286.

33- O’Brien R.D., and Lindow S.E. 1989. Effect of plant species and environmental conditions on epiphytic population sizes of Pseudomonas syringae and other bacteria, Phytopathology, 79:619–627.

34- Rouse D.I., Nordheim E.V., Hirano S.S., and Upper C.D. 1985. A model relating the probability of foliar disease incidence to the population frequencies of bacterial plant pathogens, Phytopathology, 75:505-509.

35- Sahragard N., Banihashemi Z., and Taghavi M. 1997. Identification of ice nucleation active bacteria on stone fruit trees in Fars province, Journal of Plant Pathology, 330:209-215. (In Persian with English abstract)

36- Sahragard N. 2005. Decrease of frost damage (freezing) of flowers in stone fruit trees by controlling of ice nucleation active bacteria,Applied Science Conference on ways to deal with frostbite, Yazd. (In Persian).

37- Sarhan M.A.A. 2011. Ice nucleation protein as a bacterial surface displayprotein. Archives of Biological Sciences, 4:943–948.

38- Schaad N.W., Joneas J.B., and Chun C. 2001. Laboratory guid for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria,st Paul, Minnestota, Aps press.

39- Shimazu M., Mulchandani A., and Chen W. 2001. Cell surface display of organophosphorus hydrolase using ice nucleation protein, Biotechnology Progress, 17:76-80.

40- Suslow T.V., Schroth M.N., and Isaka M. 1982. Application of a rapid method for gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria without staining, Phytopathology, 72:917-918.

41- Tang C., Sun F., and Zhao T. 2003. Construction of ice nucleation active Entrobacter cloacae for control of insect pests, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2:175-180.

42- Warren G.J., Lindemann J., Suslow T.V., and Green R.L. 1987. Ice nucleation deficient bacteria as frost protection agents. In Applications of Biotechnology to Agricultral Chemistry (LeBaron, L., Mumma, R., Honeyeutt, and Duesing, J. Eds), American Chemical Society. Washington.

43- Zhang C., Zhang H., Wang L., Gao H., Xiao N.G., and Hui Y.Y. 2007. Improvement oftexture properties and flavor of frozen dough by carrot (Daucuscarota) antifreeze protein supplementation, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 23:9620–9626.