The Effect of some Factors on the Efficacy of Pheromone Traps for Capturing Leopard Moth in Walnut Orchards

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 2, Volume 30, Issue 3 - Serial Number 36, September 2017, Pages 407-415   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v30i3.38050

Authors

M.H. Besharatnejad^{* 1}; H. Ostovan²; mohammad rerza nemato allahi; Gh. Radjabi³

¹Isfahan Research and Education Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources

²Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

³Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: The leopard moth, Zeuzera pyrina (L.) (Lepidoptera, Cossidae), is an important xylophagous pest on different trees such as walnut, Juglans regia (L.), which weaken the host trees by canalling in the trunks. Regarding type of damage and host range of the pest, it is so difficult to control. Catching of the male moths by traps containing sex pheromone lures is a promising method to control the pest. There are many factors influencing potential of pheromone traps. Some of these factors, such as trap shape, trap color and height of trap placement, can be manipulated by the user or grower. One of the components of the pheromone blend of leopard moth is (E, Z)-2, 13-octadecadien-1-ol acetate, which seems to be the pheromone compound of the current clearwing moth Synanthedon tipuliformis (Clerck) (Sesiidae).
Materials and Methods: Separate experiments were conducted in walnut orchards (each having more than 10 years of damage history and area of 0.5-3.5 ha) of Najaf-Abad County (Isfahan, Iran). Pheromone traps were placed on the trees in late April. The traps were inspected at 5-day intervals until late July. The number of catched lthe moth males was recorded and also, during the growth season average of the capturing per trap per night was calculated. Lures were replaced monthly. In the present study the effects of four factors (pheromone type, trap shape, trap color and height of trap placement) on the number of catched leopard moth males were evaluated. The experiments for different factors were conducted as follows: 1. Pheromone type and lures of pheromones of S. tipuliformis and Z. pyrina, both of which were provided from Agriscense Company, were compared. 2. Trap shape, four shapes (cylindrical or standard, delta, wing and funnel) were compared. The experiment was conducted using white-colored traps placed at the height of 1.5m above the ground and had S. tipuliformis lures. 3. Trap color, three separate experiments were conducted as follows: delta traps with 3 colors (white, yellow and green), delta traps with 6 colors (white, yellow, green, glossy gray, normal gray and red), cylindrical traps with 4 colors (green, yellow, with and normal gray). In the experiments, traps with height of 2m above the ground had S. tipuliformis lures. 4. Height of trap placement, two separate experiments with delta and cylindrical traps were conducted for comparison of three placement heights of 1.5, 3 and more than 6 meters above the ground. The experiment was conducted using white - colored traps which had S. tipuliformis lures. All above experiments were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three or four replications. Analysis of variance was performed after data transformation, using log (x+1). In all experiments means were compared using Tukey̕s test, except for the experiment of pheromone type, which compared using t-student test.
Results and Discussion: In the present study the catching was started on 4th of May and lasted till 26 July. During 105 nights of trapping, traps, which were continuing lures of S. tipuliformis and Z. pyrina, were captured in total 77 and 7 leopard moth males, respectively. Means of capturing per trap per night were 0.18 and 0.01, respectively. Results showed that catching of male moths were significantly higher on traps containing lures of S. tipuliformis than those containing lures of Z. pyrina. In comparison to shape of traps, significantly the highest catches belonged to funnel trap. The superiority of the funnel traps could be related to its specific structure. Comparison of 6 colors with delta traps showed that green and yellow colors had the highest and the lowest catching, respectively. However, in comparison of 4 colors with cylindrical trap, the highest and the lowest catching belonged to normal gray and yellow, respectively. In the present study, ranking of trap colors changed by trap shape. The phenomenon might be related to the interactions between the factors of traps̕ shape and color. In the experiments of height of trap placement, the highest catching was obtained at the height more than 6 m with both delta and wing traps. It shows that the amount of catching is increasing by increasing in the height of trap placement.
Conclusion: Pheromone traps could be used as a useful method for catching leopard moths males. However efficacy of the pheromone traps was influenced by several factors, including type of pheromone, trap shape, trap color and height of trap placement.

Keywords

Height of trap placement; Pheromone type; Trap color; Trap shape; Zeuzera pyrina

References

1- Ahmad T. R., and Al-Gharbawi Z. A. 1986. Effects of pheromone trap design and placement on catches of codling moth males. Journal of Applied Entomology, 102: 52–57.

2- Ahmad T. R., and Khadhum A. A. 1986. Influence of pheromone trap design and placement on capture of peach twig borer Anarsia lineatella. Insect science and its Application, 7: 637-640.

3- Ardeh M. J., Mohammadipour A., Kolyaee R., Rahimi H., and Zohdi H. 2014. Effect of pheromone trap sizes and colors on capture of Leopard moth, Zeuzera pyrina L. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). J. Crop Prot. 2014, 3 (Supplementary): 631‐636.

4- Arias A., and Nieto J. 1982. Comparative effectiveness of treatment schedules (1974) and active ingredients (1976) against Zeuzera pyrina L., and some new data on its biology in the Vegas del Guadiana (Badajoz). Boletin del Servicio de Defensa Contra Plagas e Inspeccion Fitopatologica, 6: 31-47.

5- Arsura E., Capizzi A., Piccardi P., and Spinelli P. 1980. Some factors influencing the performance of pheromone trap for codling moth, oriental fruit moth and the two European grape vine moth species in Italy. Bollettino di Zoology Agraria e Bachicoltura, 2: 15-28.

6- Askari H., Zargaran M. R., Alemansour H., Mansour-Qazi M., Berimani M. H., Tabrizian M., and Ajam-Hosseini M. 2009. Effect of shape and dispenser of sex pheromone in capturing male moth of Tortrix viridana (Lep.: Tortricidae). Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 87: 33-50. (in Persian with English abstract)

7- Athanassiou C. G., Kavallieratos N. G., and Mazomenos B. E. 2004. Effect of trap type, trap color, trapping location and pheromone dispenser on capture of male Palpita unionalis (Lep.: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 97: 321-329.

8- Athanassiou C. G., Kavallieratos N. G., Gravanis F. T., Koukounitsas N. A., and Roussou D. E. 2002. Influence of trap type, pheromone quantity and trapping location on capture of the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 37: 385-391.

9- Barrett B. A. 1995. Effect of synthetic pheromone on captures of male codling moth in pheromone and virgin female moth-baited traps on different tree height in small orchard blocks. Environmental Entomology, 24: 1201-1206.

10- Behdad E.1996. Iran Phytomedicine Encyclopedia. Yadbood Publication. 3400 pp. (In Persian)

11- Besharatnejad M. H. 2002. Study on the effect of different pheromone traps for controlling leopard moth in walnut orchards. M. Sc. Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Science and Technology Branch. Tehran, Iran. 100 pp. (In Persian)

12- Borden A. B. 1931. Some field observations on codling moth behavior. Journal of Economic Entomology, 24: 1137-1145.

13- David P. J., and Horsburgh R. L. 1989. Effects of pheromone trap design placement and pheromone dispenser and load on male Platynota flavedana and P. idaeusalis (Lep.: Tortricidae) catches in Virginia apple orchards. Environmental Entomology, 18: 145-149.

14- El-Sayed A.M., Suckling D.M., Wearing C.H., and Byers J.A. 2006. Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99(5):1550-1564

15- Erfani Sh., Bagheri M. R., and Emami M. S. 1999. Study on different methods for controlling leopard moth in orchards of Isfahan province. In: Proceedings of the 13th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Karaj. P 140. (in Persian)

16- Esmaili M. 1988. An attractant pheromone for leopard moth and its direct control in orchards. Journal of Research in Science and Industry 20-21: 66-70. (in Persian)

17- Esmaili M. 1991. Important pests of fruit trees. Sepher publication, Tehran, Iran. 578 pp. (in Persian)

18- Falahzadeh M., Shojaee M., Tabrizian M., and Ostovan H. 2000. Effect of color, type, dose in dispenser and placement height on the efficiency of pheromone traps for Cydia pomonella (L.). Agricultural Science 1: 77-90. (in Persian)

19- Garcia Delpino F. 1988. Reproductive behaviour of the leopard moth, Zeuzera pyrina L. (Lep. :Cossidae). In: Actas III Congerso Iberico de Entomologia, Barcelona, Spain, Pp. 489-492.

20- Howell J. F., Schmidt R. S., Horton D. R., Khattak S., and White L. D. 1990. Codling moth: Male moth activity in response to pheromones lures and pheromone baited traps at different elevation within and between trees. Environmental Entomology, 19: 573-577.

21- Isaacs R., Mason K.S., Teixeira L.A.F., Loeb G., Hesler G., Weigle T., Muza A., Timer J., and Saunders M. 2012. Comparison of three dispenser distribution patterns for pheromone mating disruption of Paralobesia viteana. Lepidoptera: Tortricidae. in vineyards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 936-942.

22- Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization of Isfahan Province.2011. Isfahan Statistics of Fruit Crops. Retrieved August 15, 1013, from www.agri-es.ir/Default.aspx?tabid=1926. (In Persian)

23- Knight A. L., and Miliczky E. 2003. Influence of trap colour on the capture of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), honeybees, and non-target flies. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 100: 65-70.

24- Kutinkova H., Andreev R., and Arnaoudov V. 2003. Possibilities for monttoring of apple clerwing moth Synanthedon myopaeformis Borkh (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) by sex pheromones in Bulgaria. J Environ Prot Ecol 4(3):636-642.

25- Kutinkova H., Andreev R., and Arnaoudov V. 2006. The leopard moth borer, Zeuzera pyrina L. (Lepidotera: Cossidae) Important pest in Bulgaria. J Plant Protection Res 46(2):111-115.

26- Kydonieus A. F., and Beroza M. 1982. Pheromones and their use. CRC Press.

27- Laurent P., and Frerot B. 2007. Monitoring of European corn borer with pheromone-baited traps: Review of trapping system basics and remaining problems. Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 1797-1807.

28- Maleki-milani H. 1991. Insect pheromones. Pishtaz-e-Elm Publication. 120 pp. (in Persian)

29- Mcnally P. S., and Barnes M. M. 1981. Effects of codling moth pheromone trap placement, orientation and density on trap catches. Environmental Entomology, 10: 22-26.

30- Mcvay J. R., Eikenbary R. D., Morrison R. D., Kouskolelas C. A., and Dennison M. 1995. Effects of pheromone trap design and placement on capture of male Cydia caryana (Lep.: Tortricidae) in Alabama pecan orchards and the relationships of trap captures to fruit infestation. Journal of Entomological Science, 30: 165-175.

31- Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. 2011. Statistical Book of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry. 1st Volume: field and Fruit Crops. Retrieved August 15, 1013, from www.maj.ir/portal/Home/Default.aspx?categoryID=0ad5e49- c727- 4bc9- 9254- de648a5f4d 52. (In Persian)

32- Radjabi Gh. 1976. Wood borer insects of Rosacae fruit trees in Iran. Publication of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Institute. 214 pp. (In Persian)

33- Radjabi Gh.1986. Insect attacking Rosacaefruit trees in Iran. 2nd Volume: Lepidoptera. Publication of Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. 209 pp. (in Persian)

34- Radjabi Gh. 2002. Pests of Rosaceae fruit trees in Iran. Publication of Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. 199 pp. (In Persian)

35- Riedl H. 1987. Codling moth management: Use and standardization of pheromone trapping system. Western Regional Research Publication. California, USA. 23 pp.

36- Sajadi S. A. 1992. Study on the biology of leopard moth on walnut and possibility of using sex pheromone for its direct controlling in Anjadan region, Arak, Iran. M. Sc. Thesis. Tehran University. 150 pp. (In Persian)

37- Sanders C. J. 1986. Evaluation of high-capacity, non saturating sex pheromone traps for monitoring population densities of spruce bud worm (Lep.: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomologist, 118: 611-619.

38- Sanders C. J. 1988. Monitoring spruce budworm population density with sex pheromone trap. Canadian Entomologist, 120: 175-183.

39- Thwaite W. G., and Madsen H. F. 1983. The Influence of trap density, trap height, outside traps and trap design on Cydia pomonella captures with sex pheromone trap in New South Wales apple orchards. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 22: 97-99.

40- Tonini C. G., Cassani P., Massardo G., Guglielmetti G., and Catellari P. L. 1986. Study of female sex pheromone of Leopard moth Zeuzera pyrina (L.): Isolation and identification of three compounds. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12: 1545-1558.

41- Vacas S., Alfaro C., Navarro-Llopis V., and Primo J. 2009. The first account of the mating disruption technique for the control of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii Maskell. Homoptera: Diaspididae. Using new biodegradable dispensers. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 99: 415-423.

42- Yazdani A., and Mehrzad A. 2000. Use of pheromone traps for mass trapping of Kermaniapistaciella. In: Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Optimum Utilization of Chemical Fertilizers and Pesticides in Agriculture. Karaj, Iran. P 42-43. (In Persian)