Crop Rotation Effect on Spatial Dynamic of Fumaria vaillantti and Polygonum aviculare

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 4, Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34, July 2014, Pages 178-188   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v12i2.39143

Authors

A Bagheri^* ; M.H Rashed Mohasel; P Rezvani Moghaddam

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of crop rotation on spatial dynamic of Fumaria vaillantti and Polygonum aviculare a study was conducted at the three farms with different rotation in the Astan Ghods Razavi filed that located at 10 kilometers southeast of Mashhad, Iran. The rotations were alfalfa- fallow- wheat, canola- fallow- wheat, and wheat- fallow- wheat. At the crosses of 7×7 m quadrangular grids network, discrete systematic sampling was performed using 0.5×0.5m quadrates at three stages including before chemical control, after chemical control, and before harvesting and density of weed species were recorded separately. In each three rotations Fumaria vaillantti and Polygonum aviculare were part of dominant species at second and third sampling stages, But at the first sampling stage dominant species were different. Polygonum aviculare was became dominant species at the third sampling stage, Mean while, the importance of Fumaria vaillantti were reduce. Bing winter Fumaria vaillantti and summer Polygonum aviculare can be the cause of this phenomenon .Variogram parameters survey show that the minimum and maximum of nugget effects for studied species was 0.17 and 1.001 respectively. The range of weeds in field varied between 2.8 – 93.5m. Nugget effect and range were downside at each three rotations and at during of first and second sampling, while nugget effect and range variations of Fumaria vaillantti were different depend on rotation type. The distribution maps of studied weed were drawn after applying varigram parameters in Kriging method that showed patchy and plow directed distribution. Our Results showed that crop rotation and cultural operation effects dynamism of the weeds, that Knowledge of these effects can be an opportunity for more effective weed control.

Keywords

Crop rotation; Spatial distribution of weeds; Geostatistic; Weed maps

References

1- آینه بند، ا. 1384. تناوب گیاهان زراعی. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد. تعداد صفحه

2- اشرافی، آ.، م. بنایان، و م. ح. راشد محصل. 1382. مطالعه پویایی مکانی جمعیت علف‌های هرز یک مزرعه ذرت با استفاده از ژئواستاتیستیک. پژوهشهای زراعی ایران، 1 (2): 139- 154.

3- زند، ا.، ح. رحیمیان، ع. کوچکی، ج. خلقانی، ک. موسوی، و ک. رمضانی. 1383. اکولوژِی علفهای هرز (کاربردهای مدیریتی)، ترجمه. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد، مشهد. تعداد صفحه

4- سیاهمرگویی، آ. 1382. ارزیابی الگوهای توزیع مکانی علفهای هرز در تناوبهای چغندرقند ـ چغندرقند، چغندقند ـ جو علوفه‌ای و آیش ـ جو علوفه‌ای. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد علفهای هرز. دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

5- کوچکی، ع.، ح. ظریف کتابی، و ع. نخ فروش. 1380. رهیافتهای اکولوژیک مدیریت علف‌های هرز (ترجمه). انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد، مشهد. تعداد صفحه

6- محمدی، ج. 1385. پدومتری (آمار مکانی). جلد دوم، انتشارات پلک، تهران. تعداد صفحه

7- Burton, M. G., D. A. Mortensen, and D. B. Marx. 2005. Environmental characteristics affecting Helianthus annuus distribution in a maize production system. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 111: 30-40.

8- Cardina, J., and D. J. Doohan. 2008. Weed Biology and Precision Farming. Site-Specific Management Guideline [Online]. Available by www.ppi-far.org/ssmg.

9- Cousens, R. D., R. W. Brown, A. B. Mcbratney, and M. Moerkerk. 2002. Sampling strategy is important for producing weed maps: a case study using kriging. Weed Science. 50: 542-546.

10- Derksen, D. A., R. L. Anderson, R. E. Blackshaw, and B. Maxwell. 2002. Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal. 94: 174-185.

11- Dille, A. J., M. Milner, J. J. Groeteke, D. A. Mortensen, and M. M. Williams. 2002. How good is your weed map? A comparison of spatial interpolators. Weed Science 51: 44-55.

12- Fischer, R. A., F. Santiveri, and I. R. Vidal. 2002. Crop rotation, tillage and crop residue management for wheat and maize in the sub-humid tropical highlands I. Wheat and legume performance. Field Crops Research 79: 107-122.

13- Gerhards, R., D. Y. Wyse-Pester, and D. A. Mortensen. 1997. Characterizing spatial stability of weed populations using interpolated maps. Weed Science 45: 108-119.

14- Gerhards, R., and H. Oebel. 2006. Practical experiences with a system for site-specific weed control in arable crops using real-time image analysis and GPS-controlled patch spraying. Weed Research 46: 185-193.

15- Ghosheh, H., and N. Al-Hajaj. 2005. Weed seedbank response to tillage and crop rotation in a semi-arid environment. Soil and Tillage Research 84: 184-191.

16- Goudy, H. J., K. A. Bennett, and F. J. Tardif. 2001. Evaluation of site-specific weed management using a direct-injection sprayer. Weed Science 49: 359-366.

17- Isaaks, E. H., and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied geostatistices. Oxford University Press, New York.

18- Johnson, A., D. A. Mortensen, L. J. Young, and A. R. Martin. 1995. The stability of weed seedling populations models and parameters in Eastern Nebraska corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycin max) fields. Weed Science 43: 604-611.

19- Johnson, A., D. A. Mortensen, and C. A. Gotway. 1996. Spatial analysis of weed seedling populations using geostatistics. Weed Science 44: 704-710.

20- Liebman, M., and E. Dyck. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecologycal Applications 3: 92-122.

21- Naylor, R. E. L. 2002. Weed Management Handbook. Ninth ed. Published for the British Crop Protection Council by Blackwell Science.

22- Rew, L. J., and R. D. Cousens. 2001. Spatial distribution of weeds in arable crops: are current sampling and analytical methods appropriate? Weed Research 41: 1-18.

23- Rew, L. J., B. Whelan, and A. B. Mcbratney. 2001. Does kriging predict weed distributions accurately enough for site-specifc weed control? Weed Research 41: 245-263.

24- Thorp, K. R., and L. F. Tian. 2004. A review on remote sensing of weeds in agriculture. Precision Agriculture 5: 477-508.

25- Vanasse, A., and G. D. Lerous. 2000. Floristic diversity, size, and vertical distribution of the weed seedbank in ridge and conventional tillage systems. Weed Science 48: 454-460.

26- Webster, T. M., and J. Cardina. 1998. Spatial and temporal emergence patterns of hemp dogban (Apocynum Cannabium). Proceedings Weed Science Society of America 38: 9-12.

27- Williams, M. M., and D. A. Mortensen. 2000. Crop/Weed Outcomes from Site-Specific and Uniform Soil-Applied Herbicide Applications. Precision Agriculture 2: 377-388.