Optimization of Factors Affecting Beauveria bassiana Fungus Ability in Control of Greater Wax Moth (Galleria mellonella L.) by Response Surface Method

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 1, Volume 30, Issue 4 - Serial Number 34, December 2017, Pages 684-692   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v30i4.52462

Authors

Ali Heidari; shahrokh gharanjik^* ; Ali Derakhshan Shadmehri; Alireza Shabaninejad

Shahrood University of Technology

Abstract

Introduction: Stored product pests are a major problem in the storage of agricultural products that cause damage from harvest until consumption. Greater Wax Moth (Galleria mellonella L.) is one of the most important pests of stored products and beehives. The most common method to control this pest in many countries is use of chemical compounds. However, these compounds have disadvantages such as pesticide residues in wax, the development of resistance in pest and irreversible effects on the environment and humans. The use of insect pathogenic fungi due to its low risk on mammals and natural enemies can be a good alternative to conventional chemical pesticides. Response surface methodology (RSM) is a statistical technique that is employed to optimize processes that are affected by several variables. This technique uses regression analysis to obtain optimal equations to estimate the values. Using this method, while maintaining the quality in the experiments, the number of those could be reduced. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate response surface methodology to determine the effect of optimum lethal level of concentration of B. bassiana conidia, temperature as well as humidity variables on the mortality of fifth instar larvae of greater wax moth.
Materials and Methods: Wax moth-eating insects were raised in plastic containers containing artificial food and old black wax at 30 ± 1 ° C and a relative humidity of 85 ± 1 % and photoperiod of 14:10 h (L: D). Isolation of insect pathogenic fungus B. bassiana was done by using Galleria Bait Method (GBM). For this purpose, after preparation of the fungus suspension from the infected larvae, 1 ml volume of the suspension was transferred to the water-agar 1.2% and then sealed petri dishes incubated at 30 ° C for three days. After identifying the single colony and formation of pure isolates, microscopic slides were prepared and eventually recovered isolates were recognized as B. bassiana. The bioassay was performed by determining the lethal concentrations of the B.bassiana that cause 20% to 80% casualties with a lot of concentration by immersion method for 10 seconds. Concentrations 1×106 and 1×108 conidia/ml were identified as high and low lethality ranges, respectively. In this study, the central composite design and response surface methodology with three independent variables including temperature (25-35°C), humidity (70-80 percent) and concentration (1×106-1×108 conidia/ml) and six replications in the central point of the design (to calculate the repeatability of the process) were used to evaluate the increase in mortality. The number of experiments was twenty and the dependent variable (response) was the mortality of the fifth instar larvae of greater wax moth. For each experiment, 10 last instar larvae were randomly selected and then 10 sterile petri dishes containing sterile wax to feed insect were prepared. Larvae were immersed for 10 seconds in a solution containing the fungus and then were placed in containers.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the quadratic response surface model to factor mortality of the fifth instar larvae of greater wax moth showed that quadratic model is statistically significant (P≤0.001). Also high R2 (R2 = 0.9430) and coordination of adjusted R2 (Adj R2 = 0.9211) indicates the strength of the model to predict. According to tests, the optimal conditions for achieving maximum mortality of the fifth instar larvae of greater wax moth is 25 ° C temperature, 75% humidity and 1×108 conidia/ml concentration, respectively. Settings applied to the optimization process, was including maximum mortality. The effect of temperature on mortality of the fifth instar larvae of this insect showed that the mortality rate decreased with increasing temperature. Cause of mortality reduction as increasing the temperature is probably related to the characteristics of this fungus that could be affected by temperature, so that the impact of this fungus increases with decreasing temperature. The impact of the concentration on mortality rates showed that by gradually increasing of concentrations, the amount of mortality increases. This is because at the high concentrations of conidia, many more conidia could contact with the body of fifth instar larvae of this insect and could infect and destroy the larvae very quickly.
Conclusion: The results of current research indicate the efficiency of response surface method to optimize the use of insect pathogenic fungi. Among the conditions that were imposed on mortality, it was found that the increase in mortality is influenced by the quadratic response surface model of concentration and temperature, so that increasing the concentration caused increase in the mortality. Also increasing the temperature caused a decline in mortality rate.

Keywords

Beauveria bassiana; Galleria mellonella; Response surface method

References

1- Atkinson A.C., and Donev A.N. 1992. Optimum experimental designs. Oxford University Press, 5: 132-189.

2- Bagheri-Zenouz E. 2014. Pests and harmful factors warehouse and they control management: Bioecology insects, ticks and microorganisms. University of Tehran Press, pp. 476. (in Persian).

3- Baldini M., Danuso F., Turi M., and Vannozzi G.P. 2004. Evaluation of new clones of jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers. Industrial Crops and Products, 19: 25-40.

4- Barbarin A.M., Jenkins N.E., Rajotte E.G., and Thomas M.B. 2012. A preliminary evaluation of the potential of Beauveria bassiana for bed bug control. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 111: 82-85.

5- Caron D.M. 1992. Wax moth, Journal of American Bee, 132: 647-649.

6- Chang C.P., and Hsieh F.K. 1992. Morphology and bionomics of Galleria mellonella Linnaeus, China Journal of Entomology, 12: 121-129.

7- Colter D. 1995. Those pesky wax moths controls, Journal of American Bee, 135: 647-649.

8- Devi P.S.V., Prasad Y.G., Chowdary D.A., Rao L.M., and Balakrishenan K. 2003. Identification of virulent isolates of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi (F) samson for the management of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura. Journal of Mycopathology. 156(4): 365-373.

9- Draganova S., and Markova E. 2006. Bioassays with isolates of entomopathogenic fungi against Ephestia kuehniella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 12: 637-643.

10- El Damir M. 2006. Variation in germination, virulence and conidial production of single spore isolates of entomopathogenic fungi in response to environmental heterogeneity. Journal of Biological Sciences. 6(2): 305-315.

11- Ferron P. 1978. Biological control of insect pests by entomogenous fungi. Annual Review of Entomology. 23: 409-442.

12- Goldansaz H. 1992. Biological study of Galleria mellonella Linnaeus under laboratory conditions and controlled storage conditions, M. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).

13- Goodman R.D., Williams P., Oldroyd B.P., and Hoffman J. 1990. Studies on the use of phosphine gas for the control of greater wax moth (Galleria mellonella) in stored honey bee comb, Journal of American Bee, 130(7): 473-477.

14- Heidari A., Gharanjik Sh., and Derakhshan Shadmehri A. 2014. Introduction and study pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana against larva wax-eater honey bee (Galleria mellonella) in laboratory conditions. The First Electronic Conference New Findings in the Environment and Egricultural Ecosystems, New Energies and Environment Research Institute University of Tehran, Iran. (in Persian).

15- Hidalgo E., Moore D., and Patourel G. L. 1998. The effect of different formulations of Beauveria bassiana on Sitophilus zeamais in stored maize. Journal of Stored Products Research. 34(2): 171-179.

16- Humber R.A. 1997. Fungi: identification. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology Edited by Lacey L. A., pp. 409.

17- Humber R.A. 2012. Identification of entomopathogenic fungi, second edit. Academic Press: Elsevier.

18- Inglis G.D., Goettle M.S., Butt T.M., and Strasser H. 2001. Use of hyphomycetous fungi for managing insect pests. pp. 23-69. In: Butt T.M., Jackson C., and Magan N. (Eds.), Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems and Potential. CABI International/AAFC, Wallingford, United Kingdom.

19- James E.T., and Lord J.C. 2003. Tritrophic interactions and storage pest control: interaction of the fungus Beauveria bassiana with resistant oat varieties for control of Oryzaephilus surinamensis. Insect Pathology and Microbial Control. 4: 153-170.

20- Joglekar A.M., and May A.T. 1987. Product excellence through design of experiments, Cereal Food World, 32: 857-868.

21- Latifian M., Soleymannezhadian E., Ghazavi M., Hayati j., Mosadegh S.M.S., and Nikbakht P. 2009. Evaluation of three Beauveria bassiana isolates on saw-toothed beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis and the effect of different temperature on their germination and mycelium growth. Journal of Entomology and Phytopathology. 77(1): 151-168. (in Persian).

22- Lord J.C. 2005. Low humidity, moderate temperature, and desiccant dust favor efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Hyphomycetes: Moniliales) for the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). journal of Biological Control. 34: 180-186.

23- Mahdneshin Z., Vojoudi S., Ghosta Y., Safaralizade M.H., and Saber M. 2011. Laboratory evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi, Iranian isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch) Sorokin against the control of the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 5(29): 5215-5220.

24- Meyling N.V. 2007. Methods for isolation of entomopatogenic fungi from the soil environment. In Department of Ecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen Denmark. pp. 1-18.

25- Mohandass S., Arthur F.H., Zhu K.Y., and Throne J.E. 2007. Biology and management of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in stored products. Journal of Stored Products Research. 43: 302-311.

26- Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C., and Anderson-cook, Ch.M. 2009. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Third Edition. Wiley, New York. pp. 704.

27- Navon A., and Ascher K.R.S. 2000. Bioassay of entomophathogenic microbes and nematodes. CABI publishing. pp. 324.

28- Padin S., Dal Bello G., and Fabrizio M. 2002. Grain loss caused by Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus oryzae and Acanthoscelides obtectus in stored durum wheat and beans treated with Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Stored Products Research. 38(1): 69-74.

29- Petlamul W., and Prasertsan P. 2012. Evaluation of Strains of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana against Spodoptera litura on the basis of their virulence, germination rate, conidia production, radial growth and enzyme activity. Mycobiology 40(2): 111-116.

30- Pham T.A., Kim J.J., and Kim K. 2010. Optimization of solid-state fermentation for improved conidia production of Beauveria bassiana as a mycoinsecticide. The Korean Society of Mycology, 38: 137-143.

31- Poinar G.O., and Thomas G.M. 1984. Laboratory guide to insect pathogens and parasites. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 392.

32- Roy H.E., Brodie E.L., Chandeler D., Goettel M.S., Pell J.K., Wajnberg E., and Vega F.E. 2010. Deep space and hidden depths: understanding the evolution and ecology of fungal entomopathogens. BioControl. 55: 1-6.

33- Samson R.A., Evans H.C., and Latge J.P. 1988. Atlas of entomopathogenic fungi. Springer-Verlag, The Netherlands, pp 187.

34- St Leger R.J., Frank D.C., Robert D.W., and Staples R.C. 1992. Molecular cloning and regulatory analysis of the cuticle-degrading protease structural gene from the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. European Journal of Biochemistry. 204(3): 991-1001.

35- Tamiji Y., and Akbarzadeh M. 1983. Bee and diseases. Khod kafaii Press, Tehran, Iran. pp. 149. (in Persian).

36- Wraight S.P., Carruthers R.I., Jaronski S.T., Braddedly C.A., Garaz C.J., and Galanini-Wraight S. 2000. Evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus for microbial control of the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. Biological Control. 17: 203-217.

37- Shin T.Y., Choi J.B., Bae S.M., Koo H.N., and Woo S.D. 2010. Study on selective media for isolation of entomopathogenic fungi. International Journal of Industrial Entomology. 20(1): 7-12.