Effect of Harvest Time on Forage Yield and Quality Maize under Intercropping with Legume Plants

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 10, Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 34, July 2014, Pages 237-245   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v12i2.39155

Authors

Sh Nazari; F Zaefarian^* ; E Farahmandfar; E Zand; S Azimi Sooran

-

Abstract

In order to evaluation the different sowing date and different harvest time in intercropping of maize and legume plants on maize forage quality, a randomized complete block with three replications conducted in research field of university of Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources in 2011. Treatments were included three legume plants (soybean, fenugreek and cowpea) at two sowing time (simultaneously with maize, and 21 days after sowing of maize), and control treatment (maize without legume plants). The results showed that delay in harvest time was caused increasing the dry matter from milky stage to dough stage, while maize harvest at dough stage the dry matter yield in maize pure stand (17%), soybean at both time (14 and 9%), fenugreek at both time (11 and 22%) and cowpea at both time (3 and 11%) than the increase in milk yield the dry matter. The highest forage of legume plants was related to cowpea. The study showed that the harvest at milky stage than dough stage have higher forage quality. The maximum CP and DMD of maize forage were obtained at first time of cowpea and second time of soybean, respectively. The maximum of WSC also was observed in monoculture of maize (without legume plant). Weed dry matter decreased significantly (P

Keywords

Cover crop; Crude protein (CP); Dry matter digestibility (DMD)

References

ابوطالبیان، م. ع. و د. مظاهری. 1390. اثر توأم خاک دهی و مالچ زنده بر کنترل علف های هرز و عملکرد سیب زمینی. مجله علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران. 42 (2): 255-264.

2- امین غفوری، ا. و پ. رضوانی مقدم. 1388. بررسی اثر گیاهان پوششی بر کنترل علفهای هرزکرچک. چکیده مقالات همایش ملی گیاهان دانه روغنی، اصفهان، 2-1 مهر. صفحه 17.

3- چائی چی، م. ر. و ف. دریایی. 1386. ارزیابی عملکرد علوفه سورگوم و یونجه در کشت مخلوط و تاثیر آن بر پویایی جمعیت علف های هرز. مجله علوم گیاهان زراعی. 39 (1): 143-137.

4- دهمرده، م.، ا. قنبری، ب. سیاه سر، و م. رمرودی. 1389. بررسی اثر نسبت کاشت و زمان برداشت بر کیفیت علوفه ذرت در کشت مخلوط با لوبیا چشم بلبلی. مجله علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران. 41(3): 644-635.

5- صمدانی، ب. و م. منتظری. 1388. استفاده از گیاهان پوششی در کشاورزی پایدار. موسسه تحقیقاتی گیاه پزشکی کشور.

6- عیشی رضایی، ا.، پ. رضوانی مقدم، ح. ر. خزاعی، و ع. ا. محمدآبادی. 1390. تأثیر تراکم و الگوی کشت مخلوط (درهم و ردیفی) ارزن و سویا بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد علوفه آنها در شرایط آب و هوایی مشهد. نشریه پژوهشهای زراعی ایران. 9(1): 50-59.

7- کریمی، ه. 1386. زراعت و اصلاح گیاهان علوفه ای. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

8- نصیری محلاتی، م.، ع. کوچکی، پ. رضوانی مقدم، و ع. بهشتی. 1386. اگرواکولوژی. (ترجمه). انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

9- نورمحمدی، ق.، ع. سیادت، و ع. کاشانی. 1376. زراعت غلات. انتشارات دانشگاه شهید چمران .

10- Abdin, O. A., X. M. Zhou, D. Cloutier, D. C. Coulman, M. A. Faris, and D. L. Smith. 2000. Cover crops and interrowtillage for weed control in short season maize (Zea mays). European Journal of Agronomy. 12: 93–102.

11- Assaeed, A. M., M. Y. Saiady, and I. I. El-Shawaf. 2000. Yield and quality of soybean forage as affected by harvesting time and cultivar. Agricultural Research Center. 89: 5-13.

12- Ateh, C. M., and J. D. Doll. 1996. Spring-planted winter rye (Secale cereale) as a living mulch to control weeds in soybean (Glycine max L.). Weed Technology. 10: 347–353.

13- Caamal-Maldonado, J. A., J. J. Jime´nez-Osornio, A. Torres-Barraga´n, and A. L. Anaya. 2001. The use of allelopathic legume cover and mulch species for weed control in cropping systems. Agronomy Journal. 93:27–36.

14- Canevari, W. M., S. B. Orloff, R. N. Vargas, and K. J. Hembree. 2003. Raptor, a new herbicide for alfalfa weed control. Proc. Calif. Weed Science. 55: 107-111.

15- Carol, C., and A. Gene. 2000. Harvest stage effects on yield and quality of winter forage. 31st California Alfalfa and Forage Symposium: 12-13 December, 2001, Modesto, CA, UC Cooperative Extension University of California, Davis. (See http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu).

16- Eskandari, H., and A. Ghanbari. 2009. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna sinensis) as whole-crop forage: Effect of different planting pattern on total dry matter production and maize forage quality. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 37 (2): 152-155.

17- Evans, J. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationship in leaves of C3 plants. Ecological. 78: 9-19.

18- Kashani, A., and J. Bahrani. 1993. Increasing forage quality and quality through mixed cropping in Khuzestan, Iran. Proceeding of the XVLI International Grassland Congress: 504-505.

19- Geren, H., R. Avcioglu, H. Soya and B. Kair. 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: Biomass yield and silage quality. African Journal of Biotechnology. 7(22): 4100-4104.

20- Hintz, R. W., K. A. Albrecht, and E. S. Oplinger. 1992. Yield and quality of soybean forage as affected by cultivar and management practices. Agronomy Journal. 84: 795-798.

21- Johnson, R.R., and K.E. McClure. 1968. Corn plant maturity: IV. Effects on digestibility of corn silage in sheep. Journal of Animal Science. 27: 535-539.

22- Johns, M. 2004. Millet for forage use frequently Asked Questions. Agriculture Information Center. Food Rural Dev. Alberta pp. 1-3.

23- Mohajer, S., H. Ghods, R. Mat and A. Talati. 2012. Effect of different harvest time on yield and forage quality of three varieties of common millet (Panicum miliaceum). Scientific Research and Essays. 7(34): 3020-3025.

24- Muhammad, A., A. N. Muhammad, T. Asif, and H. Azhar. 2002. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and harvesting times on the growth, yield and quality of sorghum fodder. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 1(4): 304-307.

25- Munoz, A. E., E. C. Holt, and R. W. Weaver .1983. Yield and quality of soybean hay as influenced by stage of growth and plant density. Agronomy Journal. 75:147-149.

26- Ngouajio, M., and M. E. Mcgiffen.2002. Going organic changes weed population dynamic. Horticulture Technology. 12:155-159.

27- Putnam, A. R.1990. Vegetable weed control with minimal herbicide input. Horticulture Science. 25:155-159.

28- Putnam, D. H., S. J. Herbert, and A. Vargas. 1986. Intercropped corn-soybean density studies, II.Yield composition and protein Experimental Agriculture. 22: 373-381.

29- Samarajeewa, K. B. D. P., T. Horiuchi, and S. Oba. 2006. Finger millet (Eleucine corocana L. Gaertn.) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yield of soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research. 90: 93–99.

30- Singh, N. B., P. P. Singh, and K. P. P. Nair. 1986. Effect of legume intercropping on enrichment of soil nitrogen, bacterial activiy and productivity of associated maize crops. Experimental Agriculture. 22: 339-344.

31- Spitters, C. J. T. and J. P. Vandenberg. 1982. Competition between crop and weeds: A system approach. In: Holzner, W. and N. (eds.), Numata biology and ecology of weeds Dr. W. Junk Publication, The Hague.

32- Tsubo, M., S. Walker, and H.O. Ogindo. 2005. A simulation model of cereal–legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions. II. Model application. Field Crops Research, 93: 23- 33.

33- Uchino, H., K. Iwama, Y. Jitsuyama, T. Yudate, and S. Nakamura. 2009. Yield losses of soybean and maize by competition with interseeded cover crops and weeds in organic-based cropping systems. Field Crops Research 113: 342–351.