Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristic of Forage Kochia (Kochia scoparia) in Different Salinity Levels and Time

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 6, Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 36, January 2015, Pages 613-620   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v12i4.45144

Authors

J Nabati^{* 1}; M Kafi²; A Nezami²; P Rezvani Moghaddam²; A Masoumi; M Zare Mehrjerdi³

¹Yakta Seed Technologists Company

²Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³Higher Education Complex of Shirvan

Abstract

Increase salinity in soil and water resourses in agricultural lands has created major challenges in crops production. Kochia can grow under saline conditions and used as fodder in dry and saline areas. Therefore, three experiments was conducted in complete randomize design with four replication, to study effects of different levels of salinity (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 dS m-1) at different growth stages (planting and early seedling) and salinity appllication intervally. Results of applying saline water at the beginning of growth showed that kochia seedling was able to survive up to 30 dS m-1 sodium chloride. The results showed that increasing salinity at planting and early seedling satge reduced plant height, branches number, shoot fresh and dry weight, and increased digestible dry matter, digestive value, and crude protein yield. On the other hand with increasing salinity digestibility of dry matter, organic matter digestibility, crude protein and ash percentage were increased. Total phenol was not significantly affected by salinity in all treatments. Application of salinity intermittently at early seedling except of digestive value and ash percentage had no significant affect on other treats. Generally, results showed that the kochia seedlings are sensitive to salinity higher than 30 dS m-1 and also kochia be able to keep biomass production with salinity appllication intervally.

Keywords

Ash; digestibility; Digestive value; Pheno; Protein

References

نباتی. ج، کافی. م، نظامی. ا، رضوانی مقدم. پ، معصومی. ع و زارع مهرجردی. 1392. اثر شوری بر سلولز، همی سلولز و لیگنین ساقه و برگ و خصوصیات دیواره‌های سلولی ساقه کوشیا ( (Kochia scoparia. مجله علوم زراعی ایران. 561-551.

2- Barrett-Lennard, E. G., C. V. Malcolm, and A. D. Bathgate. 2003. Saltland Pastures in Australia. Land & Water Australia, Canberra.

3- Ben-Ghedalia, D., R. Solomonb, J. Mirona, E. Yosefa, Z. Zombergb, E. Zukermanb, A. Greenbergc and T. Kipnisa. 2001. Effect of water salinity on the composition and in vitro digestibility of winter-annual ryegrass grown in the Arava desert. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 91: 139-147.

4- Bryant, J.P., F.D, Provenza, J. Pastor, P.B. Reichardt, T.P. Clausen, and J.T. Du Toit. 1991. Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 22: 431-446.

5- Danesh Mesgaran, M., and M.D. Stern. 2005. Ruminal and post-ruminal protein disappearance of various feeds originating from Iranian plant varieties determined by the in situ mobile bag technique and alternative methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 118: 31–46.

6- Edwing, K., and J.P. Dobrowolski. 1992. Dynamics of shrub die of a salt desert plant community. Journal of Range Management Archives. 45: 194-199.

7- Francois, L.E. 1976. Salt tolerance of prostrate summer cypress (Kochia prostrata). Agronomy Journal. 68: 455-457.

8- Fuehring, H.D., R.E. Finkner, and C.W. Oty. 1985. Yield and composition of kochia forage as affected by salinity of water and percent leaching. [On-line]. http://wrri.nmsu.edu/publish/techrpt/abstracts/abs199.html. [4 Jun 2005].

9- Guerrero-Rodriguez, J.D. 2006. Growth and nutritive value of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and Melilotuse (Melilotuse albus Medik.) under saline conditions. Thesis (Ph.D.)-School of Agriculture, Food and Wine Adelaide Australia.

10- Jami Al Ahmadi, M., and M. Kafi. 2008. Kochia (Kochia scoparia): To be or not to be? In: Crop and Forage Production using Saline Waters. (Eds.): M. Kafi and M.A. Khan. NAM S&T Centre. Daya Publisher, New Delhi.

11- Kafi, M., H. Asadi and A. Ganjeali. 2010. Possible utilization of high salinity waters and application of low amounts of water for production of the halophyte Kochia scoparia as alternative fodder in saline agroecosystems. Agricultural Water Management. 97: 139-147.

12- Khan, M.A., and I.A. Ungar. 2001. Seed germination of Triglochin maritima as influenced by salinity and dormancy relieving compounds. Biologia Plantarum. 44: 301-303.

13- Khan, M.A., R. Ansari, H. Ali, B. Gul and B.L. Nielsen. 2009. Panicum turgidum, a potentially sustainable cattle feed alternative to maize for saline areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 129: 542–546.

14- Lu, C.M., N.W. Qiu, Q.T. Lu, B.S. Wang, and T.Y. Kuang. 2002. Does salt stress lead to increased susceptibility of photosystemII to photoinhibition and changes in photosynthetic pigment composition in halophyte Suaeda salsa grown outdoors? Plant Science. 163: 1063–1068.

15- Maas E.V. 1993. Salinity and citriculture. Tree Physiology. 12: 195-216.

16- Maas E.V., and Hoffman G.J. 1977. Crop salt tolerance- current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division. 103: 115-134.

17- Makkar, H.P.S., M. Bluemmel, N.K. Borowy, and K. Becker. 1993. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 61: 161–165.

18- Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants 2nd Ed. Academic Press: London.

19- Masters, D.G., S.E. Benes and H.C. Norman. 2007. Biosaline agriculture for forage and livestock production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 19: 234–248.

20- Menke, K.H. and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from the chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development (Germany). 28: 7–55.

21- Munns, R. and M. Tester. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 59: 651-681.

22- Noaman, M.H., and E. El-Haddad. 2000. Effects of irrigation water salinity and leaching fraction on the growth of six halophyte speciesJournal of Agricultural Science. 135: 279–285.

23- Parida, A.K., and A.B. Das. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 60: 324-349.

24- Riasi, A., M. Danesh Mesgaran, M.D. Stern, and M.J. Ruiz Moreno. 2008. Chemical composition, in situ ruminal degradability and post-ruminal disappearance of dry matter and crude protein from the halophytic plants Kochia scoparia, Atriplex dimorphostegia, Suaeda arcuata and Gamanthus gamacarpus. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 141: 209-219.

25- Robbins, C.T., T.A, Harley, A.E. Hagerman, O. Hjeljord, D.L. Baker, C.C. Schwartz, and W.W. Moutz. 1987. Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: Reduction in protein availability. Ecology. 68: 98-107.

26- Robinsona, P.H.S., R. Grattanb, G. Getachew, C.M. Grievec, J.A. Possc, D.L. Suarezc and S.E. Benesd. 2004. Accumulation and potential nutritive value of some forages irrigated with saline-sodic drainage water. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 111: 175-189.

27- Salehi, M., Kafi, M., and Kiani, A. 2009. Growth analysis of kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) schrad) irrigated with saline water in summer cropping. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 41: 1861-1870.

28- Sherrod, L.B. 1971. Nutritive value of Kochia scoparia. I. Yield and chemical composition at three stages of maturity. Agronomy Journal. 63: 343-344.

29- Sherrod, L.B. 1973. Nutritive value of kochia hay compared with alfalfa hay. Journal of Dairy Science. 56: 923-926.

30- Sultana, N., T. Ikeda and R. Itoh. 1999. Effect of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation in developing rice grains. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 42: 211–20.

31- Suyama, H., S.E. Benes, P.H. Robinson, S.R. Gratten, C.M. Grieve, and G. Getachew. 2007. Forage yield and quality under irrigation with saline-sodic drainage water: Greenhouse evaluation. Agricultural Water Management. 88:159–172.