Changes of Weed Flora and Species Diversity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Field of Gloestan Province after One Decade

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 9, Volume 32, Issue 4 - Serial Number 42, December 2019, Pages 553-568   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v32i4.67754

Authors

masoumeh Younesabadi^{* 1}; Mehdi Minbash Moeini²; Leila habibian¹; Alireza Savarinejad¹; Abdolaziz Haghighi¹

¹Agricultural and natural resources research and education center of Golestan province

²Associates Professor of Department of Weed Research, Plant Pest and Disease Research Institute, AREEO, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Wheat, as a strategic crop, has a special place in agricultural production of Iran and it has the highest cultivation area in the country. One of the most important limiting factors of wheat production in the world and in the country is weeds. Having comprehensive knowledge of the flora and species diversity of weeds is one of great importance for wheat management and it perceived as a primary need for production management and effective method of weed control in wheat farming program. In order to study of weed flora and evaluation of species, functional and structural diversity of weeds in wheat field of Golestan province, weeds population were surveyed at different cities during 2015 and the results were compared with the findings of last decade surveys.
Material and Methods: Randomized sampling method as W shape was conducted systematically using 0.5×0.5 m quadrate. All weeds in each quadrate were identified, counted and recorded for subsequent data entry and analysis. Mean density, frequency and uniformity percentage and relative abundance were calculated based on Thomas, 1985. Species Similarity index between different cities and Shannon and Simpson species diversity indices in each city were calculated based on available formula. Then cluster analysis based on average linkage method is carried out by SAS 9.2 for clustering different cities on basis of calculated traits that mentioned above.
Result and Discussion: In this study, 51 plant species from 20 families were recorded. The most number of weeds were recorded in Poaceae, Fabaceae and Asteraceae families with 14, 7 and 6 weed species, respectively, but Poaceae, Polygonaceae and Brassicaceae were the most important weed families in wheat fields of Golestan provice, based on their relative abundance, respectively. The results showed that 78.43 % of recorded weeds were annual and the rest were perennial, 29.41 % of weeds were monocotyledons and 70.48% were dicotyledones. Avena ludoviciana and Phlaris minor with 40.21 and 37.11% relative abundance were the most important weed from narrow-leaved weeds and Sinapis arvensis with 32.42% relative abundance was the most important weed from broad-leaved weeds. P. minor, A. ludoviciana، Veronica persica poir. and Stellaria media (L.) Vill. had the highest mean density in wheat fields of provice, respectively. The result of this study showed that the density of Avena ludoviciana, Sinapis arvensis, Phalaris minor, Lolium rigidum, Polygonum aviculare, Fumaria officinalis and Veronica persica has increased while the density of Polygonum convolvulus and Melilotus officinalis decreased over time gradually. Increase of narrow-leaved weeds than last decade may be related to continuous application of aryloxy phenoxy propionate herbicides for the years and resistance of weeds to this group of herbicides. Decrease of P. convolvulus density than last decade can be contributed to successful control of this weed by available herbicides such as tribenuron methyl, bromicid M.A. (bromoxinil+MCPA) and 2, 4, D. The most uniformity index was observed in A. ludoviciana (29.15), S. arvensis (26.57), P. minor (21.90) and V. persica (18.03), respectively. S. arvensis, A. ludoviciana, P. minor and V. persica with 42.55, 41.49, 41.49 and 30.85 % had the most frequency, respectively.
The highest richness (the number of species) was observed in Khan Bebin (26 species) and the lowest (8 species) was in Kord Koy. Low richness in Kord Koy may be contributed to poor drainage of soil in this city that many of weed species cannnot adapt with this condition. The highest and Shannon diversity index was observed in Gonbad (2.48) and Khan Bebin (2.44) and the lowest value was observed in Kord Koy (1.18). The highest Simpson diversity index was observed in Kalaleh (0.43) and Minoo Dasht (0.4) and the lowest value was observed in Gonbad (0.11) and Khan Bebin (0.11). Different cities of Golestan Provience were grouped in 7 clusters for weed uniformity and weed abundance but for weed density they were grouped in 8 clusters.
Conclusion: The most important weed in Aq qala, Bandargaz, Khan Bebin, Kord Koy, Kalaleh and Gorgan cities were Melilotus officinalis, P. minor, S. arvensis, Phalaris paradoxa, P.convolvulus, V. persica. A. ludoviciana was the most important weed in Ali Abad, Gonbad and Minoo Dasht cities. In general A. ludoviciana (40.21), P. minor (37.11), S. arvensis (32.42), and V. persica (27.96) had the most relative abundance in wheat fields and study of their control methods must be considered as research priorities in Golestan provice.

Keywords

Density; Frequency; Simpson and Shanon index; Relative abundance; Uniformity

References

1. Ahmadi K., Gholizadeh H., Ebadzadeh H., Hoseinpoor F., Hatami F., Fazli B., Kazemian A. and Rafiee M. Agriculture Statistics Book. 2013-2014. (1). Agricultural crops. (In Persian)

2. Bourdot G.W., Hurrell G.A. and Saville D.J. 1998. Weed flora of cereal crops in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 26: 233-247.

3. Bukun B. 2004. The Weed flora of winter wheat in sanilifura, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 7: 1530-1534.

4. Dale M.R.T. and Thomas A.G. 1987. The structure of weed communities in Saskatchewan fields. Weed Science, 35: 348-355.

5. Dale, M.R.T., Thomas, A.G., and John E.A. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70: 1931-1939.

6. Delafuente E.B., Suarez S.A., and Ghersa C.M. 2006. Soybean weeds community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment, 115: 229-236.

7. Dutoit T., Gerbaud E., Buisson E., and Roche P. 2003. Dynamics of a weed community in a cereal field created after ploughing a seminatural meadow: Roles of the permanent seed bank. Ecoscience, 10: 225-235.

8. Derksen D.A., Anderson R.L., Blackshaw R.E., and Maxwell B. 2002. Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 94: 174-185.

9. Doucet C., Weaver S.E., Hamill A.S., and Zhang J. 1999. Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Science, 47: 729-735.

10. Edim H., Sarani M., and MinbashiMoeini M. 2010. Determining weed maps and population characteristics of irrigated wheat fields for Sistan and Baluchestan province. Weed Research Journal. 2 (1): 1-14. (In Persian)

11. Eiszner H., Salazar D., and Pohlan J. 1996. The effect of crop rotation and weed control on the weed seed bank in the soil. Tropenlandwirt, 97: 63-73.

12. Frick B., and Thomas A.G. 1992. Weed survey in different tillage systems in Southeastern Ontario field crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 72: 1337-1347.

13. Hume L. 1987. Long-term effects of 2, 4-D application on weed community in wheat crop Canadian Journal of Botany, 65: 2530- 2536.

14. Koocheki A., NasiriMahalati M., Tabrizi L., Azizi G. and Jahan M. 2006. Evaluation of species, functional and structural diversity of weeds in wheat and sugar beet fields of various provinces in Iran. Journal of Agronomy Research of Iran, 1(1): 105-129.(In Persian with English abstract)

15. Koocheki A., Kamkar B., JamiAlahmadi M., Mahdavi Damghani A., Farsi M., Rezani P., and Barzegar A. 2006. Agriculture Biodiversity (Translation). Ferdosi Mashhad University Publications.(In Persian)

16. Kossali A. 2014. Evaluation of weeds distribution and diversity in wheat fields (Triticum aestivum) in Turkmen. M.Sc. thesis. Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch. (In Persian with English abstract)

17. Kooler M., and Lanini W.T. 2005. Site-specific herbicide applications based on weed maps provide effective control. California Agriculture, 59: 182-187.

18. Minbashi Moeini M., Baghestani M.A., and Mashhadi H.R. 2008. Introducing an abundance index for assessing weed flora in survey study, Weed Biology & Management, 8: 172-180.

19. Minbashi Moeini M. 2012. Producing of weed map for irrigated wheat fields of Iran using Geographic Information System (GIS). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 95: 22-31. (In Persian with English abstract)

20. Montazeri M. 2007. Wheat and barley weeds and theire chimical control in Gorgan. Proceeding of Iranian Plant Protection Congress, pp 208. (In Persian with English abstract)

21. Narimani V., Minbashi Moeini M. and Mohamadi Poor M. 2006. Evaluation and determination weed dominance with guantitative index in wheat and barley fields in Eastern Azarbaeejan. The 9th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress, Abouryhan Campus, University of Tehran. (In Persian with English abstract)

22. Norozzadeh Sh., Rashed Mohasel M.H., Nassiri Mahallati M., Koocheki A., and Abbas Pour M. 2008. Evaluation of species, functional and structural diversity of weeds in wheat fields of Northern, Southern and Razavi Khorasan provinces. Journal of Agronomy Research of Iran, 6(2): 471-485. (In Persian with English abstract)

23. Poorazar R., and Minbashi Moeini M. 2007. Identification and evaluation density, abundance and uniformity of wheat and barley weeds in Khozestan province. Proceedings of 15th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, pp 13. (In Persian with English abstract)

24. Poggio S.L. 2005. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 109: 48-58.

25. Soodmand M.A. 1999. Identification main crop weeds of part of Gorgan and preparation seed and seedling key for them. M.Sc. thesis. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran. (In Persian with English abstract)

26. Tahbaz F. and Sanei Shariat Panahi M. 1985. Weed Biology. Tehran University Publications. pp. 297. (In Persian)

27. Thomas A.G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskathevan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Science, 33: 34-43.

28. Veisi M., Rahimian Mashhadi H., Alizadeh H., Minbashi Moeini M. and Oveisi M. 2014. Weed flora change in irrigated wheat fields of Kermanshah after a decade. Iranian Journal of weed science, (10).pp. 1-20. (In Persian with English abstract)

29. Waheed A., Qureshi R. and Jakhar G.S. 2009. Weed community dynamics in wheat crop of district Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41: 247-254.

30. Yazdani M., Hematallah P. and Esmaeili M.A. 2009. Evaluation species diversity, density and dominant weeds in wheat and barley fields in sari. Proceedings of 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, pp 21. (In Persian with English abstract)

31. Younesabadi M. 2004. Annual report of identification and producing weed map for irrigated wheat and barley fields of Iran using Geographic Information System (GIS). Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Golestan Province, Gorgan. (In Persian)

32. Zand E., Baghestani M.A., and Mighani F. 2009. Sustainable weed management. Printed in new agriculture book (Kocheki, A & M, Khajehoseini). Publications of Jehade-daneshgahi Mashhad. (In Persian)