Status of the Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus Infection in Native and Imported Apple Tree Cultivars in the National Collection of Kamalshahr Horticulture Research Station

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 3, Volume 33, Issue 4 - Serial Number 46, December 2020, Pages 387-396   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v33i3.76550

Authors

Tayyebeh Keshavarz^{* 1}; H. Hajnajari²

¹Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection

²Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agriculture Research Education and Extension Organization, Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: Pome fruits are affected by many viruses that cause diseases with adverse effects in orchards worldwide. Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus (ACLSV) is one of the most widespread and economically important latent viruses that naturally affect many Prunus species, apples (Malus domestica Borkh.), pears (Pyrus communis L.) and the other rosaceous species. ACLSV infection rates of up to 80–100% in many commercial apple cultivars with yield losses of the order of 30–40% have been reported. In most commercial apple cultivars, the infection generally is latent, but insensitive cultivars, such as apple trees grown on Marubakaido (Malus prunifolia cv. Ringo) rootstocks, malformation and reduction in leaf size and chlorotic rings or line patterns are common. The severity of symptoms induced by ACLSV depends largely on the plant species and virus strains. Some virus isolates induce a severe disease in apricot and plum characterized by depressions and protuberances that deform the fruit, often confused with the “sharka” disease due to Plum pox virus (PPV), and named for this reason as “pseudopox.” ACLSV is a filamentous virus, 680–780 nm long and 12 nm in width as the type species of the genus Trichovirus in the family Betaflexiviridae. ACLSV contains a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA about 7.5–8 kb in size, with a polyadenylated 3" terminus and a cap at its5"-end, and also contain multiple copies of a single coat protein (CP) of 21–24 kDa. The economic importance of ACLSV is largely due to its worldwide distribution and its capacity to induce severe graft incompatibilities in some Prunus combinations, causing major problems in nurseries. In apple trees, ACLSV frequently is detected in coinfection with Apple stem grooving virus and Apple stem pitting virus. ACLSV is mainly transmitted by grafting. No natural virus vectors are known for this virus and are not known to be seed or pollen transmitted. The older National Apple Collection of Native and Imported apple cultivars in Kamalshahr Horticulture Research Station located in Karaj includes 85 cultivars and promising genotypes on seed stocks benefit a high genetic variability. Though the cultivars were screened for more biotic and abiotic factors, but no screening has been achieved yet for virus diseases, while this valuable germplasm comprises a wide range of newly released cultivars or in releasing procedure, high yield natives and those imported selected as adapt to Iranian climate, so a great need of healthy primary nucleus to establish mother orchards for certified plant material. As this valuable germplasm is very important in providing healthy primary nucleus to establish mother orchards for certified plant material so the aim of this research was an evaluation of native and imported apple tree cultivars of this Collection to ACLSV infection.
Material and Methods: To assess the occurrence and the prevalence of this virus in the collection, a total of fifty accessions were collected. The sample collection was carried out in summer (2016) and spring (2017). The collecting method consisted of sampling leaves homogeneously distributed around the canopy of the plant. All samples were screened for the presence of ACLSV by DAS-ELISA using the ACLSV specific polyclonal antibody using commercial kits purchased from Bioreba Company, Switzerland. To confirm ELISA results some cultivars were subjected to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Total RNA was isolated from some apple cultivars using CTAB RNA extraction method and was used as a template for RT-PCR. Specific oligonucleotide primers corresponding to a region of the ACLSV genome that encodes part of the CP, were used in RT-PCR. The amplified PCR products were analyzed in 1% agarose gel stained by ethidium-bromide and visualized under UV light after electrophoresis.
Result and Discussion: The ELISA results showed that 39 out of 50 cultivars were infected by ACLSV. RT-PCR on total RNA from the ELISA positive samples resulted in the amplification of an expected 358 bp DNA fragment. In RT-PCR out of 18 tested cultivars, five were infected. Some cultivars including Makintash, Red Rome Beauty, Starking, Ardebil1, Nayan Arangeh, Khorsijan, Red spur cooper, Yellow transparent 1, IR6-1 and Ardebil2 recognized ACLSV free in ELISA and RT-PCR, so could be used in the production and employment of virus-free propagating material program after infection testing to the other three important viruses Apple stem pitting virus, Apple stem grooving virus and Tomato ringspot virus. The results showed a high rate of ACLSV infection of native and imported apple cultivars in the older National Apple Collection in Kamalshahr Horticulture Research Station. Previous studies, in apple gardens and nurseries of Iran, have shown a high percentage of ACLSV infection too. Similar results have also been obtained on the percentage of infection with this virus in the Czech Republic, Romania, Albania, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. As germplasm exchanges are the main source of transmission of new viruses to countries, one of the most important strategies to control viruses in fruit trees is to prevent the introduction of virus-infected germplasm into the country.

Keywords

Apple germplasm collection; Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus; ELISA; RT-PCR; virus

References

1- Adams M.J., Candresse T., Hammond J., Kreuze J.F., Martelli G.P., Namba S., Pearson M.N., Ryu K.H., Saldarelli P., and Yoshikawa N. 2012. Family Betaflexiviridae. pp. 920–941. In: King AMQ, Adams M.J., Carstens E.B., Lefkowitz E.J., (eds). Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

2- Alemzadeh E., Katsiani A.T., Efthimiou K., and Katis N.I. 2016. Occurence of Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus in apple and quince in southern if Iran. Journal of Plant Pathology 98(1): 171-185.

3- Anonymous. 2015. Office of Statistics and Information Technology, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. Agricultural Statistics of the Year 1394-. (In Persian)

4- Barba M., Ilardi V., and Pasquini G. 2015. Control of pome and stone fruit virus diseases. Advanced in Virus Research 91: 47–61.

5- Brunt A.A., Crabtree K., Dalwitz M.I., Gibbs A.J., and Watson L. (eds). 1996. Plant viruses online: Viruses of plant: description and lists from the VIDE database. CAB International. Available at http://biology.anu.edu.au/ Groups/MES/vide.

6- Campbell A.I. 1990. The effects of viruses on the growth, yield and quality of three apple cultivars on healthy and infected clones of four rootstocks. Acta Horticulture 114: 114-117.

7- Chang S., Puryear J., and Chairney J. 1993. Simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 113-116.

8- Clark M.F., and Adams A.N. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosurbent assay for detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34: 475-458.

9- Eccher T., and Hajnajari H. 2006. Fluctuations of endogenous gibberellin A4 and A7 content in apple fruits with different sensitivity to russet. Acta Horticulturae 727: 537-544.

10- Hajnajari H. 2012. New early apple ‘Gol Bahar’, tolerant to spring cold with high flesh firmness, good storability and high yielding. Center of Agriculture Information & informative technology. Tehran.pp.20. (In Persian)

11- Hajnajari H. 2012. New early apple ‘Sharbati’ with upright growth habit and high yielding. Center of Agriculture Information & informative technology. Tehran.pp.20. (In Persian)

12- Hajnajari H., and Moradi M. 2014. The survey self-compatibility rate, pomology and inbreeding pressure in some of selected apples and fully self-compatible genotype IRI6. Iranian Horticulture Science 45(2): 163-174. (In Persian)

13- Hajnajari H. 2018. Atlas of Iranian Fruit Tree Cultivars. Nahre Amuzeh Keshavarzi (Agriculture Education publication).pp. 234. (In Persian)

14- Hassan M., Myrta A., and Polak J. 2006. Simultaneous detection and identification of four pome fruit viruses by onetube pentaplex RT-PCR. Journal of Virological Methods 133: 124–129.

15- Janick J., Cummins J.N., Brown S.K., and Hemmat M. 1996. Apples. pp. 1- 77. In: Fruit Breeding, Volume I: Tree and Tropical Fruits. Wiley, New York.

16- Keshavarz T., and Shams-Bakhsh M. 2015. Incidence and distribution of Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus in the main fruit growing areas of Iran. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 48: 306-312.

17- Lister R.M. 1970. Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus. CMI/AAB Description of plant viruses. No. 30.

18- Menzel W., Zahn V., and Maiss E. 2003. Multiplex RT-PCR ELISA compared with bioassay for the detection of four apple viruses. Journal of Virological Methods 110: 153–157.

19- Mink G.I., and Shay J.R. 1959. Preliminary evaluation of some Russian apple varieties as indicators for apple viruses. Plant Disease 254: 13–17.

20- Myrta A., Matic S., Malinowski T., Pasquini G., and Candresse T. 2011. Apple chlorotic leafspot virus in stone fruits. p. 85–90. In A. Hadidi, M. Barba, T. Candresse, and W. Jelkmann (eds.), Virus and virus-like diseases of pome and stone fruits. APS Press, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.

21- Nemchinov L., Hadidi A., Foster J.A., Candresse T., and Verderevskaya T. 1995. Sensitive detection of apple chlorotic leaf spot virus from infected apple or peach tissue using RT-PCR, ICRT-PCR, or multiplex IC-RT-PCR. Acta Horticulturae 386: 51-62.

22- Nemeth M. 1986. Virus, Mycoplasma and Rickettsia diseases of fruit trees. Academic publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

23- Paunovic S., and Jevremovic D. 2004. Apple stem pitting virus detection from dormant pome fruits by RT-PCR. Acta Horticulturae 657: 45–49.

24- Popescu S., Constantin G., and Mazilu C.R. 2004. Apple viral diseases diagnosed in the germplasm collection at ICDP Maracineni-Romania. Acta Horticulturae 657: 51–54.

25- Pupola N., Morocko-Bicevska I., Kale A., and Zeltins A. 2011. Occurrence and diversity of pome fruit viruses in apple and pear orchards in Latvia. Journal of Phytopathology 159: 597-605.

26- Sutic D.D., Ford R.G., and Tosic M.T. 1998. Handbook of plant virus diseases. CRC Press. Boca Raton, USA. pp533.

27- Yaegashi H., Yoshikawa N., and Candresse T. 2011. Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus in pome fruits. p. 17–22. In A. Hadidi M., Barba T., Candresse and W. Jelkmann (eds.) Virus and virus-likediseases of pome and stone fruits. APS Press, St Paul, Minnesota,USA.

28- Yanase H. 1974. Studies on apple latent viruses in Japan. Bulletin of the Fruit Tree Research Station, series C1:47–109.

29- Yoshikawa N. 2001. Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus. CMI/AAB Descriptions of Plant Viruses, 386 No. 30.