Assessing Some of Growth Indices in Safflower Using Regression Analysis

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 4 - Serial Number 44, January 2017, Pages 631-645   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v14i4.35100

Authors

F Khatib^{* 1}; B Torabi²; A Rahimi¹

¹Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan

²Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

Abstract

Introduction
The study of growth parameters such as net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf area ratio (LAR), relative growth rate (RGR) and leaf area duration (LAD) are important for analyzing yield constraints. The growth parameters can be used to understand the crop response to environmental variables during the growing season. The aims of the present study were to 1) consider the growth indices using regression method and 2) identify relationships between growth parameters and grain yield in different safflower cultivars and sowing dates.

Materials and Methods
A factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with four replicates was conducted in 2012 in Research Farm of Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan. The factors were included sowing dates (4 April, 25 April and 16 May) and safflower cultivars (411, Sina, Local Esfahan and Sofeh). Leaf area, leaf dry weight and stem dry weight were measured in 7–14 days intervals during the growth season. Grain yield was determined at the end of the growing season. The trend of variation for NAR, LAR, RGR and LAD during the season growth was determined by the nonlinear regression method using SAS software. Finally, the correlation between grain yield and growth parameters was identified by the PROC CORR procedure.
Results and Discussion
In all sowing dates, NAR increased to 43-53 days after sowing and then it showed a declining trend. Results showed that there was no significant difference among cultivars in terms of the time to maximum NAR among all sowing dates and among cultivars. As the growing season progressed, gradual increases in leaf area improved which resulted in increasing solar radiation interception and NAR. The NAR declining trend related to increasing leaves shading. In the first and third sowing dates, there was no significant difference in time to achieve maximum LAI among cultivars.
The maximum LAR was obtained in early growth season and its value decreased with slope of 0.033 to 0.051 cm2 g-1 d-1 among the cultivars and sowing dates. The rate of decreasing in LAR during growing season was the same among all sowing dates and cultivars. In the early growing season, the value of LAR in the first and second sowing dates was higher than third sowing date. It was probably due to high temperature effect on crop growth duration. As the growing season progressed, LAR started to decrease due to decrease in partitioning of dry matter to leaves. In the early growing season, the allocated dry matter to leaves were great which is resulted the higher ratio of leaf dry matter to total dry matter (LAR). The high LAR in early growing season is due to more interception of solar radiation by crop.
The trend of RGR during growing season was the same among all sowing dates and cultivars. The estimated maximum RGR varied between 0.149 to 0.169 g g-1 d-1 for the first sowing date, 0.087 to 0.211 g g-1 d-1 for the second sowing date and 0.192 to 0.251 g g-1 d-1 for the third sowing date. For each sowing date, the estimated maximum RGR had no significant difference among cultivars except for the second dates. However, the value of RGR was decreasing with progress towards the end of the growing season. The high RGR in the early growing season was due to the rapid crop growth, the more young tissues in plant and the low initial weight.
The value of LAD had the increasing trend in the early growth season and its value started to decrease between 50 and 62 days after sowing. In the second and third sowing dates, the maximum value of LAD obtained earlier than the third sowing date however, the value of LAD was lower than the first sowing date. It is probably due to decreasing the leaf area index and increasing the senesce rate in higher temperature in the last sowing date.
It is resulted that the highest grain yield obtained for the 411 and Local Esfahan cultivars in the first sowing date and the significant and positive correlation between grain yield and LAD (r = 0.88, Pr ≤ 0.01) observed whereas the value of grain yield increased 12.2 g m-2 per unit increase of LAD. Increasing the LAD increase solar radiation interception by crops and consequently the grain yield would increase.
Generally, it is concluded that the first sowing date with the highest LAD resulted the highest yield.

Keywords

Leaf area duration; Leaf area ratio; Net assimilation rate; Relative growth rate

References

1. Agha-Alikhani, M., and Safari, M. 2013. The effect of planting date on the changes of physiological growth indices of three varieties of sorghum. Journal of Plant Production Research 36:63-78. (In Persian with English Abstract).

2. Ali-Zade, A., Saki T., and Rafii, M. 2010. Calculation of morpho-physiological growth indices and yield components of chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars in different planting density. Plant Production Science 2:45-55. (In Persian with English Abstract).

3. Arvin, P., Azizi, M., and Soltani, A. 2009. Comparison of yield and physiological indices of spring cultivars of oilseed rape species. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 25:401-417. (In Persian).

4. Barzali, M., Tahmasb,i Z., Ghalavand, A., and Tavakol-Afshari, R. 2004. Evaluation the morphological and physiological characteriestics associated with early vigour in four cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 6:80-98. (In Persian with English Abstract)

5. Damavandi A., and Latifi N. 2009. Evaluation the effects of planting date on some growth indices and grain yield of two oil sunflower cultivars in Damghan province. Biology Journal, 4:1-11. (In Persian with English Abstract)

6. Dehdashti, S.M., and Majd-Nasiri, B. 2008. Evaluation the effects of sowing date on physiological indices of rape seed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 4:152-163. (In Persian).

7. Ebrahim-Pour, F., Ayine-Band A., Mesgarbashi M., and Choab A. 2010. Evaluation the changes in growth indices of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to planting density and sowing date of oat (Avena sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 3:91-108. (In Persian).

8. Fathi, G., Siadat, S.A., and Hemaiaty, S.S. 2003. Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of three oilseed rape varieties. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 51:249-255.

9. Ghadirian, R., Soltani, A., Zeinali, A., Kalate-Arabi, M., and Bakhshande, E. 2011. Evaluating non-linear regression models for use in growth analysis of wheat. Journal of Crop Production, 4:55-77. (In Persian with English Abstract)

10. Javadi, H., Rashed-Mohassel, M.H. Zamani, A., Azari Nasrabad, A., and Moosavi, Gh. 2006. Effect of plant density on growth indices of four grain sorghum cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 4:1-16. (In Persian with English Abstract)

11. Javaheri, M.A., Zinaldini, A., and Najafi, H. 2004. Effect of planting date on growth indices of sugar beet in Orzoieh Region (autumn sowing). Pajouhesh & Sazandegi 62:58-63. (In Persian with English Abstract)

12. Kashef, M. 1996. Evaluation the growth indices of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in different planting density. Msc thesis, Isfahan University of Technology.

13. Khatib, F. 2014. Effect of sowing date on growth indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars in Rafsanjan. Msc thesis, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan.

14. Khayat, M., Lak, Sh., Gohari, M., and Motii, M.M. 2009. Evaluation of the effects of sowing date on growth and yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Crop Physiology Journal 1:6-16. (In Persian).

15. Lopez, F.J., Lopez, R.J., Khalil, S.K., and Lopez, L. 2008. Effect of planting date on winter Kabuli chickpea growth and yield under rainfed mediterranian conditions. Agronomy Journal 100:957-964.

16. Mirshekari, B. 2011. The investigation of weed management strategies in citrus orchards. Journal of Weed Ecology 1:145-158. (In Persian with English Abstract).

17. Mirzai, Z., Berari, M., Rezai Zad, A., and Ashraf Mehrabi, A. 2012. . Effect of sowing date on growth indices of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) cultivars in Kermanshah. Crop Physiology Journal, 4:5-20. (in Persian)

18. Mirzakhani, M., Ardakani, M.R., and Shirani-Rad, A.H. 2007. Growth analysis of spring safflower cultivars in Arak. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 4:111-122. (In Persian)

19. Mohammadi, A., Asghari, H., and Gholami, A. 2013. The effect of mycorrhizal fungi inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer on growth indices of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Agroecology Journal, 5:263-271. (In Persian).

20. Sadrabadi-Haghighi, R., Amir Moradi, Sh., and Mirshahi, A. 2011. Investigation the growth indices of sugar beet in Chenaran. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 9:505-513. (In Persian).

21. Shirani-Rad, A.H. 2005. Crop Physiology. Dibagaran, Tehran.

22. Soghani, M., Vaezi, Sh., and Sabaghpour, S.H. 2010. Evaluation of morpho-physiological characteristics, grain yield and its components in common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 12:436-451. (In Persian with English Abstract).

23. Tahmasb, H., Siadat, A., Mameghani, R., and Rafii, M. 2003. Investigation the morphological and physiological characteristics affecting on yield and yield components of different wheat genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 5:23-36. (In Persian).

24. Tayo, T.O., and Morgan, D.G. 1975. Quantitative analysis of the growth, development and distribution of flowers and pods in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science 85:103-110.

25. Tesar, M.B. 1984. Physiological basis of crop growth and development. American Society of Agronomy, New York.

26. Zahedi, M., Mameghani, R., Mesgarbashi, M., Kashani, A., and Montaseri, A. 2008. . Evaluation the effects of planting date and irrigation regime on physiological indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. New Findings in Agriculture 2:239-252. (In Persian).