Effect of Irrigation and Plant Density on Yield and Growth Indices of Purple Coneflower (Echinacea purpurea (L.) Monch)

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 1, Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 52, June 2022, Pages 193-204   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v1i1.51328

Authors

Alireza Koocheki^* ; Reza Ghorbani; Hossein Zare; Reza Moosa Pour Bardsiri

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Purple coneflower is one of the most important medicinal plants known for its anti-bacterial and anti-virus effects. This perennial herb from the Asteraceae family is native to North America and is planted widely in Europe. All parts of the plant contain useful chemical compounds such as Chicoric acid, Isobutyl, Polysaccharides, and Essential oils. Planting population and the amount of water applied are important management practices for all crops, particularly medicinal plants, due to a prefund effect of these parameters on the chemical constituents of these plants. An optimum planting population of 25 plants per m² is normally practiced for Purple coneflower, but higher populations of up to 40 plants per m² have also been reported. Water stress has been reported to increase Chicoric acid and Folic acid but not Essential oils. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate plant density and the amount of irrigation water on different agronomic criteria of Purple coneflower under climatic conditions of Mashhad.
Materials and Methods
In order to investigate the effects of different irrigation levels and plant density on yield and other criteria of Purple coneflower, an experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of the Faculty of Agriculture, the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during the years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. A split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted. Irrigation with four levels at 50, 100. 150 and 200 mm evaporations from evaporation pan class A were allocated to the main plots, and two plant densities of 20 and 30 plants per m² were used as subplots. Leaf area index, dry matter yield, plant height, number of branches, number of flowers per plant, average flowers weight per plant, number and dry weight of flowers per plant, number of flowers per unit area, fresh and dry weight of flower and root dry weight were recorded.
Results and Discussion
Results showed that all the investigated criteria were affected by irrigation levels. Plant density also affected all criteria except those of weight per flower and fresh flower weight per unit area. The highest flower yield per unit area was obtained from 50 mm irrigation level and plant density of 30 plants per m². The lowest flower yield was obtained from 200 mm irrigation level and 20 plants per m². However, irrigation levels of 50 and 100 mm and plant density of 30 plants per m² were the most promising practices for maximum flower yield.
Conclusion
Since irrigation levels and plant density are two important factors affecting most plant criteria, it is important to investigate these practices for crop production, particularly in medicinal plants where chemical compounds are also sensitive to these two parameters. For Purple coneflower, it appears that irrigation levels of 50 and 100 mm and plant density of 30 plants per m² are practices that can be recommended, though more investigations are required to make assurance.
Keywords: Dry Matter, LAI, Medicinal plant, Water stress
 
 

Keywords

Dry Matter; LAI; Medicinal plant; Water stress

References

Adiku, G.K.S., Ozier-Lafontaine, H., and Bajazet, T., 2001. Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize-cowpea mixture grown under greenhouse conditions. Plant and Soil 235: 85–94.

Birt, D.F., Widrlechner, M.P., Hammer, K.D.P., Hillwig, M.L., Wei, J.Q., Kraus, G.A., Murphy, P.A., McCoy, J.A., Wurtele, E.S., Neighbors, J.D., Wiemer, D.F., Maury, W.J., and Pric, J.P., 2009. Hypericum in infection: Identification of anti-viral and anti-inflammatory constituents. Pharmaceutical Biology. New York: Informa Healthcare 47(8): 774-782.

Birt, D.F., Widrlechner, M.P., LaLone, C.A., Wu, L.K., Bae, J.H., Solco, A.K.S., Kraus, G.A., Murphy, P.A., Wurtele, E.S., Leng, Q.A., Hebert, S.C., Maury, W.J., and Price, J.P., 2008. Echinacea in infection. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 87 (2) Bethesda: American Society for Clinical Nutrition 488S-492S.

Brevedan, R.E., and Egli, D.B., 2003. Short periods of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence, and yield of soybean. Crop Science 43: 2083-2088.

Callan, N.W., Yokelson, T., Wall-MacLane, S., Westcott, M.P., Miller, J.B., and Ponder, G., 2005. Seasonal trends and plant density effects on cichoric acid in Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plant 11(3) Binghamton: Haworth Herbal Press 35-46.

Cosculleola, F., and Fact, J.M., 1992. Determination of the maize (Zea mays L.) yield functions in respect to water using a line source sprinkler. Field Crops Abstract 93: 5611.

Debaeke, P., and Aboudrare, A., 2004. Adaptation of crop management to waterlimited environments. Europ. Journal of Agronomy 21: 433-466.

Foster, S., 1991. Echinacea: Nature’s Immune Enhancer, Healing Arts Press, Rochester, VT.

Frank, R., Schenk, R., and Nagell, A., 1999. Echinacea pallida (Nutt.) Nutt. - yield and ecidnacoside content. Acta Horticulture 502: 163-166.

Gray, D.E., Pallardy, S.G., Garrett, H.E., and Rottinghaus, G.E., 2003. Acute drought stress and plant age effects on alkamide and phenolic acid content in purple coneflower roots. Planta Medica 69(1) Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 50-55.

Hobbs, C.B., 1994. Echinacea, a literature review. Herbalgram 30: 33-47.

Javadi, H., 2008. Effect of planting dates and nitrogen rates on yield and yield components of black cumin (Nigella Sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 6(1): 59-66. (In Persian with English Summary)

Kafi, M., Zand, E., Kamkar, B., Sharifi, R., and Goldani, M., 2000. Plant Physiology. Mashhad Jihad University Press, Iran. 379 pp. (In Persian)

Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M., 1993. Soil and water relations in plants. Mashhad Jihad University Press, Iran. 560 pp. (In Persian)

Laboski, C.A.M., Dowdy, R.H., Allmars, R.R., and Lamb, J.A., 1998. Soil strength and water content influences on corn root distribution in a sandy soil. Plant and Soil 203: 239-247.

Martin, R.J., and Deo, B., 2000. Effect of plant population on Calendula officinalis flower production. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 28(1): 37-44.

Nesmith, D.S., and Ritchie, J.T., 1992. Short - and long - term responses of corn to a pre - anthesis soil water deficit. Agronomy Journal 84: 107-113.

Norozpoor, G., and Rezvani Moghadam, P., 2006. Effect of different irrigation intervals and plant density on oil yield and essences percentage of black cumin (Nigella sativa). Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 73: 133-138. (In Persian with English Summary)

Omidbeigi, R., 1995. Approach to Production and Processing of Medicinal Plants. Rahan Nashr Prss, Iran. 424 pp. (In Persian)

Omidbeigi, R., 2001. Investigation and adaptablity cultivation of purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea) in northern of Tehran. Journal of Agriculture Science. Natur. Resour. 6(2): 231-240. (In Persian with English Summary)

Parmenter, G.A., and Littlejohn, R.P., 1997. Planting density effects on root yield of purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 25 (2): 169-175.

Pol Shekan-e Pahlavan, M.R., Movahedi Naeini, S.A.R., Eatesam, G.R., and Keykha, G., 2008. Wheat plant growth and yield with different planting systems and irrigation frequency 2-soil and plant nutrients. Journal of Agriculture Science Nature Resour 14(5): 51-63. (In Persian with English Summary)

Sarmadnia, G., and Koocheki, A., 1991. Crop Physiology. Mashhad Jihad University Press, Iran. (In Persian)

Sepehri, A., Modares-Sani, S.A., Ghareyazi, B., and Yamini, Y., 2002. The effect of water stress and different levels of nitrogen on the growth, yield and yield components of maize. Iranian Crop Sciences 4: 184-201. (In Persian with English Summary)

Shalaby, A.S., El-Gengaihi, S.E., Agina, E.A., El-Khayat, A.S., and Hendawy, S.F., 1997. Growth and yield of Echinacea purpurea L. as influenced by planting density and fertilization. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 5(1): 69-76.

Sirousmehr Member, A., Shakiba, M.R., Aliyari, H., Toorchi, M., and Dabbagh Mohammadinasab. M., 2008. Effects of water deficit stress and plant density on yield and some morphological traits of Autumn-sown safflower cultivars. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 78: 80-87. (In Persian with English Summary)

Watson, R.R., and Preedy, V.R., 2008. Herbs and infectious diseases. Botanical medicine in clinical practice Wallingford: CAB International 222-227.