Evaluation Yield of Sunflower (Farrokh cultivar) under Effects of Conventional Deficit Irrigation and Partial Root Zone Drying

آب و خاک

Article 2, Volume 28, Issue 5, November 2015, Pages 876-889   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.27022

Authors

H. Ahmadzadeh^{* 1}; saeed morid²; M. Delavar³

¹Tabriz University

²Tarbiat Modares

³Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Streamflows, actual evapotranspiration and crops’ yield are the main variables to estimate agricultural water productivity. Thus, simulation of these variables is of great importance in evaluation of different measures to increase water productivity. For this, application of conceptual models is a relevant approach and SWAT (soil and water assessment tool) is one of the well known models in this regard. The present paper aims to assess SWAT in simultaneous simulation of streamflows, actual evapotranspiration and the main crops’ yield of the Zarineh Rud basin. The reason for selection of this basin as the study area relates to its role to meet the Urmia Lake’s water requirement. The lake faces with serious water shortage in recent years and escalating water inflow depend to increase water productivity in the upper catchments. To setup SWAT, the basin was divided to 11 subbasins and 908 hydrological response units, which enables us to introduce more accurately the basin’s cropping pattern and water resources, which meet the requirements of the agricultural area. For simulation of the river flows, data from 6 gauging stations were used for calibration and validation of the model for periods of 1987 to 1999 and 2000 to 2006 respectively that resulted R2 and RMSE between 0.49 to 0.71 and 3.9 to 44.9 (m3/sec) for calibration period, and values of 0.54 to 0.77 and 2.07 to 55.7(m3/sec) for validation period respectively. There is no observed data for actual evapotranspiration in the basin. So, it was verified in the wet years by maximum evapotranspiration reported in National Water Document that results presented the values of 0.97 and 52.5(mm/year) for R2and RMSE respectively. Finally, the estimated yields of the 7 staple crops by the model were compared with the recorded data that showed very close values(R2=0.9 and RMSE=1.65(ton/ha)).

Keywords

Urmia Lake Basin; Zarinehrud Basin; Streamflow; Actual Evapotranspiration; Crop Yield; SWAT

References

1- علیزاده ا. و کمالی ق. 1386. نیاز آبی گیاهان در ایران، انتشارات دانشگاه امام رضا (ع).

2- مرکز آمار سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان آذربایجان غربی .1390.

3- مرکز آمار و اطلاعات وزارت جهاد کشاورزی ایران .1390.

4- مرید س. و مقدسی م. 1390. گزارش مدل تخصیص آب کشاورزی در شرایط خشکسالی در حوضه دریاچه ارومیه، طرح حفاظت از تالاب های ایران.

5-Abbaspour K.C., Yang J., Maximov I., Siber R., Bogner K., Mieleitner J., Zobrist J. and Srinivasan R. 2007. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333: 413-430.

6-Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. and Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, 300 pp.

7-Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S. and Williams J.R. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34: 73–89

8-De Medeiros G.A., Arruda F.B., Sakai E., and Fujiwars M. 2001. The influence of crop canopy on evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Agric. Water Manage. 49, 211–224.

9-Dragovic S. and Dj.Karagic L.M. 1996. Effect of stand density on formation of leaves and leaf area of sugar beet under irrigation. Journal of sugar beet research, 33.

10-Faramarzi M., Yang H., Schulin R. and Abbaspour K.C. 2010. Modeling wheat yield and crop water productivity in Iran: Implications of agricultural water management for wheat production. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 1861-1875.

11-Geethalakshmi V. and Srinivasan R. 2011. Study of ENSO effect on hydrology and rice productivity in Cauvery basin using SWAT.

12-Gosain A., Rao S., Srinivasan R. and Reddy N.G. 2005. Return flow assessment for irrigation command in the Palleru River basin using SWAT model. Hydrological processes, 19: 673-682.

13-Hadria R., Duchemin B., Lahrouni A., Khabba S., Er‐Raki S., Dedieu G., Chehbouni A. and Olioso A. 2006. Monitoring of irrigated wheat in a semi‐arid climate using crop modelling and remote sensing data: Impact of satellite revisit time frequency. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27: 1093-1117.

14-Jeimar P.P., Marcela Q. and Natalia E. 2011. application of crop growth modeling for the economic valuation of water in agriculture. The 3rd international forum on water and food Tshwane, South Africa.

15-Kang S., Gu B., Du T., and Zhang J. 2003. Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region. Agric. For. Meteorol. 59, 239–254.

16-Kang Y. and Liu H.J. 2006. Sprinkler irrigation scheduling of winter wheat in the North China Plain using a 20 cm standard pan. Springer- Verlag, DOI 10.1007/s00271-006-0042-z

17-Kaushal K., Luna B., Anju G., Biju G., Sreedhar A., Kiran J. and Narasimhan B. 2011. Spatial mapping of agricultural water productivity using SWAT model in Upper Bhima Catchment, India. Irrigation and Drainage. DOI: 10.1002/ird.618

18-King B.A. and Stark J.C. 1997. Potato irrigation management, University of Idaho, Cooperative Extension System, College of Agriculture.

19-Immerzeel W., Gaur A. and Zwart S. 2008. Integrating remote sensing and a process-based hydrological model to evaluate water use and productivity in a south Indian catchment. Agricultural water management, 95: 11-24.

20-Mollah M. and Paul N. 2009. Growth Attributes of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Relation to Soil Moisture Regimes and NPK Fertilizers. Journal of Bio-Science, 16: 19-24.

21-Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R. and Williams J.R. 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical document (version 2009), Texas water resource institute technical report.

22-Saeed I. and El-Nadi A. 1997. Irrigation effects on the growth, yield, and water use efficiency of alfalfa. Irrigation Science, 17: 63-68.

23-Schuol J., Abbaspour K.C., Yang H., Reichert P., Srinivasan R., Schar Ch. and Zehnder A.J.B. 2006. Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African Sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. J. Hydro. 352: 30-49.

24-Schuol J., Abbaspour K.C., Srinivasan R., and Yang H. 2008. Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology, 352: 30–49.

25-Singh R., Kumar S., Nangare D. and Meena M. 2009. Drip irrigation and black polyethylene mulch influence on growth, yield and water-use efficiency of tomato. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4: 1427-1430.

26-Williams L. and Ayars J. 2005. Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 132: 201-211.

27-Yan Y., Guoqiang W., and Jingsha Y. 2006. Groundwater depth simulation based on beijing county-level swat application tool. Unpublished manuscript, College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

28-Zhang J., Wei Q., Wang L., Sun X., Wang C. and Song K. 2010. Leaf Area Index Estimated with Plant Canopy Analyzer in Apple Orchards and Analysis of Its Reliability. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 37: 185-192.

29-Ziaei A.N. and Sepaskhah A. 2003. Model for simulation of winter wheat yield under dryland and irrigated conditions. Agricultural water management, 58: 1-17.