Evaluation of Growth Indices of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Affected by Density and Time of Emergence Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.)

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 3, Volume 15, Issue 4 - Serial Number 48, January 2018, Pages 761-775   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v15i4.41505

Authors

M Asadi¹; A Yadavi²; M Azimi Gandomani^{* 3}

¹Islamic Azad University of Shiraz Branch

²University of Yasouj

³Payamenoor University (PNU), Tehran

Abstract

Introduction
Weed is one of limiting factors in potato production.Weed management systems require comprehensive and accurate data on behavior of weeds and their impacts on the farming systems. Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) is third dicotyledonous weeds in the world that due to photosynthetic pathway of C4 and indeterminate, in high temperature and high light intensity conditions particularly in the fields of summer crops such as corn (Zea mays L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) shows more competitive. Weed density is the most important factor affecting on crop by weed competition and defines part of the decline in crop by weed competition. The emergence time of weed and competition period with crop are two important aspects that are often considered in competitive studies. Quantitative analysis of growth is a method for interpretation of plant response to environmental conditions that plant is encountered during its life. Plant growth analysis can be used as a factor to illustrate the competitiveness of the crop and weeds. Growth indices such as dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate (CGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), and leaf area index (LAI) have been used for assessing the effects of weed competition on crop yield. The aim of this study was the evaluation of growth indices of potato affected by density and time of emergence pigweed.

Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a factorial based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two factors and three replications at the experimental station of Borujen city in Charmahal and Bakhtiari province, Iran. Treatments were included a combination of pigweed density (5, 10, 15 pigweed plants m-1) and time of emergence pigweed (four and eight days before potato emergence, coincided with the potato emergence, and four days after potato emergence). Pigweed evaluated traits were included as plant height, and total dry weight as well as potato evaluated traits were included as LAI, total dry matter (TDM), (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), and tuber yield. Plot size was 15 m2 with four lines of 60 cm. Potato cv. was Bourne which is an early ripening cultivar was planted at 10 April. Irrigation was performed based on requirement of the plants, temperature and environmental conditions in 7 to 9 days. Potato tuber harvested at 20 June. Data were analyzed by SAS software and the mean data were compared according to least significant difference (LSD) Test at 5% probability level.

Results and Discussion
Results showed that the relative time of emergence and Pigweed plant density were significant on plant height and TDM of pigweed. Pigweed plant height and dry weight decreased, when pigweed emergence was later than potato. Pigweed plant height and TDM increased with increasing density of pigweed. Their interaction was significant only for potato tuber yield. Earlier relative emergence and increasing density of pigweed was reduced potato tuber yield. Five pigweed per m-2 at emergence of four days after potato and 15 pigweed per m-2 at emergence of eight days before potato had the highest (39800 kg ha-1) and the lowest (18400 kg ha-1) tuber yield, respectively. Also low density of pigweed in treatment of emergence at eight days before potato was caused more economic losses. Whatever emergence of weed delayed, more number of weed plants is needed to economic losses causes. Therefore emergence of weeds is important equally that weed density is important and should pay attention to the fact in Weed management. In general, the results showed that the pigweed can damage to potato production because its height is higher than potato and it also is C4, when relative appearance is earlier can be strong competitor to absorb light even in the less dense. Previous researches about crop-weed competition for light, have revealed that higher plant with lower LAI could overcome the plants with lower height and higher LAI. These findings showed that plant height have a main role in competition and height is one of the determinant factors for light competition.Therefore, it seems that pigweed which has this feature by itself, is a strong competitor for potato plant. This study concluded that because of that pigweed is C4 and its plant height is more than potato, so pigweed is superior competitor for light even in lower population.

Conclusions
Generally, according to the results it can be concluded that the relative earlier rise and increasing pigweed density through height gain and dry matter further, reduced tuber yield of potato. Furthermore, pigweed, due to a higher height than the potato as well as its C4 the if a relative early rise occurs, even at low density for absorb light, is still a strong competitor and can cause heavy damage to potato production. The relative earlier rise of this weed in potato fields can reduce the potato yield. After amaranth weed control in potato farming is very important and should be done as soon as possible.

Keywords

Competition; Relative Appearance; Weed; yield

References

1. Abbasdokht, H. 2003. Ecophysiological Study of Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L.) Competition. Agronomy Ph.D Thesis, Tehran University.

2. Aghabeigi, M. 2001. The ecophysiological aspects of competition in Pigweed and corn.Agronomy Ph.D Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University.

3. Aghabeigi, M. 2003. Study the ecophysiological aspects of Faten competition with Corn. Agronomy Master's thesis, Mazandaran University.

4. Ahmadvand, G., Mondani, F., and Golzardi, F. 2009. Effect of crop plant density on critical period of weed competition in potato. Scientia Horticulturae 121 (3): 249-254.

5. Blackshaw, R. E. 1993. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) density and row spacing effects on competation whit Green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Science 41: 403-408.

6. Blackshaw, R. E., Brandt, R. N., Janzen, H. H., Entz, T. C., Grant, C. A., and Derksen, D. A. 2003. Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Science 51: 532-539.

7. Board, J. E., and Harville, B. G. 1996. Growth dynamics during the vegetative period affects yield of narrow-row soybean. Agronomy Journal 88: 567-572.

8. Borrego, F., Fernandez, J. M., Lopez, A., Parga, V. M., Murillo, M., and Carvajal, A. 2000. Growth analysis in seven varieties of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Mexico Journal of Agronomia Mesoamericana 11 (1): 145-149.

9. Croster, M. P., and Witt, W. W. 2000. Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, Glycine max interefrence and weed-free period on Solanum ptycanthum. Weed Science 48: 20-26.

10. Dieleman, A., Hamill, A. S., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Empirical models of Pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) interference in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Weed Science 43: 612- 618.

11. Dunan, M. C., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1991.Competitive ability of wild Oats (Avena fatua) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Science 39: 558-563.

12. Evans, G. C. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. University of California press, Berkley.

13. Ghosheh, H. Z., Holshouser D. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1996. Influence of density of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) interference in field Corn. Weed Science 44: 879-883.

14. Hasanzadeh Delooi, M. 2002. Wheat Aydyutyp designed to compete with Weeds. Agronomy Ph.D Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.

15. Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant response to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Science 43: 474-482.

16. Izadi Darbandi, A. 2002. Study of the competitive effects of Pigweed and Redroot pigweed on yield and physiomorphological characteristics of Beans.Master's thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

17. Keating, J. D., and Cooper, P. J. 1983. Kabuli chickpea as a winter-sown crop in Northen Syria: Moisture relations and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 100: 667-680.

18. Keshiri, M., Latifi, N., and Ghasemi, M. 2003.Growth analysis of safflower with different arrangements planting under dryland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 10 (4): 85-94.

19. Khaleghi, F. 2004. Ecophysiological characteristics of potato varieties in terms of yield and power to compete with Weeds.Agronomy Master's thesis, Tehran University.

20. Kolodziejczyk, M. 2015. The effect of living mulches and conventional methods of weed control on weed infestation and potato yield. Scientia Horticulturae 191 (6): 127-133.

21. Koochaki, A., and Sarmadnia, Gh. H. 2008.Crop physiologh (translation). Published XIV. Mashhad University Jihad Publications.

22. Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Science 44: 309-313.

23. Love, S. L., Eberlein, C. V., Stark, J. C., and Bohl, W. H. 1995. Cultivar and seed piece spacing effects on Potato competitiveness with Weeds. American Potato Journal 72: 194-213.

24. Lynch, D. R., and Rowberry, R. G. 1977. Population density studies with Russet Burbank II. The effect of fertilization and plant density on growth, development and yield. American Potato Journal 54: 57-71.

25. Malik, V. S., Swanton, C. J., and Michaels, T. E. 1993. Interaction of white Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars, row spacing, and seeding density with annual Weeds. Weed Science 41: 62-68.

26. Massinga, R. A., Currie, R. S., Horak, M. J., and Boyer, J. 2001. Interference of palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Science 49: 202-208.

27. Najafi, H. 2002. Evaluation of the competition of three species of weed densities, Wallflower family on wheat. Agronomy Ph.D Thesis.Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.

28. Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Kropff, M. J. 1997. Simulation model for crop-weed competition, modified for LAD distribution function and extinction coefficient based on leaf dispersion. Agricultural Wageningen University. Netherlands.

29. Nganga, S. 1982. Physiological basis of Potato crop yield. Pp.: 13-16. In principles of Potato seed production for tropical Africa. International Potato Center (CIP), Lima. Peru.

30. Notghi Taheri, H. 1997. Investigation of weed competition in Potatoes.Agronomy Master's thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

31. Patil, Y. B., Patil, A. A., Madalgeri, B. B., and Patil, V. S. 1990. Correlation studies in sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Poir) as influenced by varying levels of nitrogen, potassium and inter-row spacing. Journal of Root Crops 16 (2): 98-102.

32. Peterson, C. T., Jorgensen, U., Svendsen, H., Hansen, H., Jensen, H. E., and Nilsen, N. E. 1995. Parameter assessment for simulation of biomass production and N uptake in winter rapeseed. European Journal of Agronomy 4: 77-89.

33. Rahimian, H., and Shariati, Sh. 1999. The modeling of weed competition and crop. Publish Agricultural Education.

34. Robert, G. W. 1993. Wild prosomillet (Panicum milliaceum) interference in dry bean. Weed Science 33: 654-657.

35. Ronald, A. E. 2000. Amaranthus retroflexus / Pigweed.U.S. Department of Agriculture press.

36. Samaee, M., and Daneshian, J. 2003. Study of Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) interference effects on Soybean growth index. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 42 (2): 127-139.

37. Sivakumar, M. V., and Shaw, R. H. 1978.Methods of growth analysis in field grown Soybean (Glycin max L.). Annual Botany 42: 213-222.

38. Sobhani, A. 1995. The planting date and seed tubers before germination on growth indices and yield of potato cultivars.Agronomy Master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.

39. Steinmaus, S. J., and Norris, R. F. 2002. Growth analysis and canopy architecture of velvetleaf grown under light conditions representative of irrigated Mediterranean-type agroecosystems. Weed Science 50: 42- 53.

40. Talei, A., Poostini, K., and Davazdah Emami, S. 2000. Planting pattern effects on physiological characteristics of several varieties of Bean. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 31 (3): 477-487.

41. Toller, J. E., Guice, J. B., and Murkdoch, E. 1996. Interference between Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and Soybean. Weed Science 44: 331-338.

42. Trehan, S. P., and Singh, B. P. 2013. Nutrient efficiency of different crop species and potato varieties – in retrospect and prospect. Potato Journal 40 (1): 1-21.

43. Vangessel, M. J., and Renner, K. A. 1990. Red root Pigweed (Amarantus retroflexus) and Barnyard grass (Echinochola crusgalli) interference in Potatoes (Solanum tubrerosum). Weed Science 38: 338-343.

44. Wall, D. A., and Friesen, G. H. 1990.Green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition in potato. Weed Science 38: 396-400.