Influence of Different Slope Aspects on Some Soil Properties and Forest Soils Evolution (Case Study: Rostam Abad Region, Guilan Province)

آب و خاک

Article 8, Volume 29, Issue 3, July 2015, Pages 648-662   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.31149

Authors

M. Zarinibahador¹; - K. Nabiollahi²; M. Norouzi^{* 3}

¹Shahrekord University

²Kordestan University

³Tabriz University

Abstract

Introduction: Spatial variation of soil properties is significantly influenced by numerous environmental factors such as landscape features, including position, topography, slope gradient and aspect, parent material, climate and vegetation. Soil properties vary spatially in south- and north-facing hill slopes. This factor (different slope aspects) can affect the distribution of soil organic matter, the presence or absence of a layer, pH, nutrient levels, soil mineralogical and micromorphological properties. Topographic factors such as the orientation of the hill slope and the steepness of the slope affect microclimate, vegetation establishment, water movement and erosion. Aspect and slope control the movement of water and materials in a hill slope and contribute to differences in soil properties. Temperature, precipitation and climate vary with elevation and influence pedogenic processes. Accelerated rates of weathering and soil development were found to occur in soils on south-facing slopes. Slopes with a south aspect are dominated by stone and bare soil patches, while slopes with a north aspect are dominated by biotic components. Northern slopes have higher productivity and species diversity compared to Southern slopes. Slope aspect has a significant effect on the composition, species richness, structure and density of plant communities, differed significantly between North- and South- facing slopes.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, the effects of two slope aspects on some soil properties and soil evolution was investigated in Northern Rostam Abad region in the Guilan Province. Five profiles in Southern hill slope(South-facing hill slopes) and five profiles in Northern hill slopes(North-facing hill slopes) with 40% slope and same parent material (basaltic andesite) and same plant cover were dug. The elevation of two slope aspects was 240 meters from the sea level. Average annual temperatures and precipitation are16 degrees centigrade and 1359 mm, respectively. Thus, the soil moisture and temperature regimes are udic and thermic, respectively. The physical and chemical analysis were carried out on soil samples including particle size distribution, bulk density, pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphor and cation exchange capacity. This study was done in a completely randomized design several observational with five replications. The total of 34 soil samples were collected in the two slope aspect of the profile and all samples were tested and statistical analyzed. For the micromorphological study, thin sections were prepared from undisturbed samples. The samples were impregnated with polyester resin and later sectioned. The thin sections were prepared and analyzed in petrographic microscope equipped with polarized light.
Results and Discussion: The results of multivariable analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Hotteling's T2 showed that there is significant different in soil properties between two hill slopes(p≤0.01). Also, the results of t-test showed the values of pH, content of sand, sand to clay ratio and available phosphorous significantly was higher in Southern hill slope in comparison with Northern hill slope(p≤0.01). Whereas, clay content and cation exchange capacity significantly were higher in Northern hill slope in comparison with Southern hill slope(p≤0.05). Also observed micromorphological studies showed biological activity was stronger in Northern hill slope in comparison with Southern hill slope. Properties observed in thin sections of Northern slope aspect include fungal hyphae, spherical and ellipsoid excrement of microorganisms in root residual (related to oribatid mites) which indicated stronger biology in Northern slope aspect soils as compare to Southern slope aspect soils. Also, more accumulates* of clay inside voids, nodules, fragmented of coating of well-oriented, micro laminated, reddish-brown clay, chamber voids in Northern slope soils toward Southern slope soils were observed. B-fabricobserved in Northern hill slope soils is stipple speckled in surface horizons and in subsurface horizons is grano-striated and stipple speckled and b-fabric observed in Southern hill slopes soils in surface horizons and subsurface horizons is stipple speckled.
Conclusion: Higher content of clay, Cation exchange capacity, Accumulation of clay in pores, Fragments of clay coating (papule), chamber pores, Fe/Mn oxide nodule and micro-laminations in Northern hill slope and higher values of pH, higher content of sand, sand to clay ratio and available phosphorous, lithorelict in Southern hill slope showed that weathering was higher in Northern hill slope in comparison with Southern hill slope. Generally, Southern hill slope had less developed soils (Entisols and Udorthents great group) and Northern hill slope had high developed soils (Alfisols and Hapludalfs great group).

Keywords

Slope aspect; soil evolution; Soil micromorphology; Fe/Mn oxide nodules

References

1- Bardy M., and Fritsch E. 2008. Micromorphology and spectroscopic characteristics of organic matter in waterlogged podzols of the upper Amazon basin. Geoderma, 145:222-230.

2- Begum F., Bajracharya R., Sharma S., and Sitaula B.K. 2010.Influence ofslope aspect on soil physico-chemical and biological properties in the mid hills of central Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 17(5): 438 - 443

3- Birkeland P.W. 1999. Soils and Geomorphology.3nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.

4- Blake G.R., and Hartge K.H. 1986. Bulk density, In: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd ed. Part 1- Physical and mineralogical methods, Agronomy Monograph. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:363-375.

5- Bremner J.M. 1996. Nitrogen-total. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph. (Eds. Sparks DL), ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:1085-1121.

6- Brewer R., and Sleeman J.R. 1964. Glaebules: their definition, classification and interpretation. European Journal of Soil Science, 15: 66-78.

7- Broxton P.D., Troch P.A., and Lyon S.W. 2009. On the role of aspect to quantify water transit times in small mountainous catchments. Water Resources Research, 45: W08427, doi:10.1029/2008WR007438.

8- Bullock P., Fedoroff N., Jongerius A., Stoops G., and Tursina T. 1986. Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description, Waine Research Publishers, Wolverhalpton. p.182.

9- Casanova M., Messing I., and Joel A. 2000. Influence of aspect and slope gradient on hydraulic conductivity measured by tension infiltrometer. Hydrological Processes, 14(1):155–164.

10- Castorena C., and Sanchez P. 2007. Clay coating formation in tepetates from Texcoco, Mexico. Catena, 71:411-424.

11- Chen Z.S., Hsieh C.F., Jiang F.Y., Hsieh T.H., and Sun I.F. 1997. Relationship of soil properties totopography and vegetationin a subtropical rain forest in southern Taiwan, Plant Ecology. 132:229–241.

12- Darvish zadeh. A. 1992. Iran geology. Amir Kabir publication, Tehran.)in Persian(

13- Davidson A.D. 2002. Impact of fauna on an upland grassland soil as determined by micromorphological analysis. Geoderma, 20:133-143.

14- Fisher R.F., and Binkley D. 2000. Ecology and management of forest soils. 3nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York. p.489.

15- Gee G.W. 2002. Particle-size analysis. In: Dane, J. H. and Topp, G.C. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 4- Physical methods. Monograph. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:255-293.

16- Geroy I.J., Gribb M.M., Marshall H.P., Chandler D.G., Benner S.G., and Mc Namara J.P. 2011. Aspect influences on soil water retention and storage. Hydrology journal. Process, 25: 3836-3842.

17- Griffiths R.P., Madrich M., and Swanson A. 2009. The effects of topography on forest soil characteristics in the Oregon Cascade Mountains (USA): Implications for the effects of climate change on soil properties. Forest and Ecology Management, 257:1-7.

18- Habibi Bibalani G., and majnonian B. 2005. Increased Stability of Landslide prone Slopes from Iron-wood Trees (Parrotia persica). Environmental Sciences, 8:21-28. (in Persian)

19- Hagen-Thorn A., Callesen I., Armolaitis K., and Nihlgard B. 2004. The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantation on former agricultural land. Forest and Ecology Management. 195:373-384.

20- Khormali F., and Shamsi S. 2009. Micromorphology and quality attributes of the loess derived soils affected by land use change: a case study in Ghapan watershed, northern Iran. Journal of Mountain Science. 6:197–204.

21- Khumalo G., Holechek J., Thomas M., and Molinar F. 2008. Soil depth and climatic effects on desert vegetation dynamics. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 61:269–274.

22- Kirschbaum M.U.F. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic storage. Soil Biol. Biochem, 27: 753–760.

23- Klemmedson J.O., and Wienhold B.J. 1992.Aspect and species influences on nitrogen andphosphorus in Arizona chaparral soil-plantsystem. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 6:105–116.

24- Kooistria M.J., and Pulleman M.M. 2010. Features related to faunal activity. In: Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. Stoops, G. Marcelino V. Mees F. (Eds.). Elsevier’s Science and Technology. Oxford, UK.p.109-127.

25- Kramer S., and Green D.M. 2000. Acid and alkaline phosphatase dynamics and their relationship to soil microclimate in a semiarid woodland, Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:179–188.

26- Kuo S. 1996. Phosphorus. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph. (Ed. DL Sparks), ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, 9:869-920.

27- Kutiel P., and Lavee H. 1999. Effect of slope aspect on soil and vegetation properties along anaridity transect. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 47:169–178.

28- Lindbo D.L., Stolt M.H., and Vepraskas M.J. 2010. Redoximorphic Features. In: Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. Stoops G. Marcelino V. and Mees F. (Eds.). Elsevier’s Science and Technology, Oxford, UK. P.129-147.

29- Marcela I. 2007. Neighbor leaf-cutting ants and mound-building termites: comparative nest micromorphology. Geoderma. 141:224-234.

30- McKenzie N.J., and Ryan P.J. 1999. Spatial prediction of soil propertiesusing environmentalcorrelation. Geoderma, 89:67–94.

31- Miura K., Araki Sh., and Kyuma K. 1988. Genesis of soils derived from various type of parent rock in southwestern Japan. I. Morphological and general characteristics. Soil Science Plant Nutriet, 34:1-16.

32- Murphy C.P. 1986. Thin Section Preparation of Soils and Sediments. A&B Academic Publ. Berkhamsted. p.149.

33- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbone, organic carbone, and organic matter. In: Sparks, D. L., (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:961-1010.

34- Olivero A.M., and Hix D.M. 1998. Influence of slope aspect and stand age on ground flora of southeastern Ohio forest ecosystems. Plant Ecology, 139:177–187.

35- Parsakhoo A., and Jalilvand H. 2009. Effects of iron wood (Parrotia persica C.A. Meyer) leaf litter on forest soil nutrients content. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci, 5:244-249.

36- Roohi moghaddam A., Hosaeni S., Ebrahimi M., Rahmani A., Tabari koochak A., and Saraee M. 2006. The effect of mixing rates on qualitative and quantitative characteristics of oak – zelkova plantation. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 77:155-168. (in Persian)

37- Sabeti H. 2008. Forests, trees and shrubs of Iran. Yazd university publication. (in Persian)

38- Sauer D., Schellmann G., and Stahr K. 2007. A soil chronosequence in the semi-arid environment of Patagonia (Argentina). Catena, 71:382–393.

39- Schoeneberger P.J., Wysocki D.A., Benham E.C. Field book for describing and sampling soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.

40- Smith TJ. 2010. Using soil moisture trends a cross topographic gradients to examine controls on semi-arid ecosystem dynamics. M.Sc. Thesis Boise State University. 193 pp.

41- Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 11nd ed. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

42- Stoops G. 2003.Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin sections. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. p.184.

43- Stotzky G. Soil as an environment for microbial life. 1997. In: J.D.Van Elsas J.T. Trevors .M.H. Wellington (Eds.), Modern Soil Microbiology, Marcel Dekker, New York. p. 1–20.

44- Sumner M.E., and Miller W.P. 1996. Cations exchange capacity and Exchange Coefficients. In: Sparks, D.L. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:1201-1230.

45- Tatsuhara S., and Kurashige H. 2001. Estimating foliage biomass in a natural deciduous broad-leaved forest area in a mountainous district. Forest Ecol. Manage. 152:141–148.

46- Tesfa TK., and Tarboton DG. Chandler DG. and Mc Namara JP. 2009. Modeling soil depth from topographic and land cover attributes. Water Resources Research 45: W10438, DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007474.

47- Thomas G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- chemical methods. Agronomy Monograph. (Ed. DL Sparks), ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 9:475-490.

48- Tsui C.C., Chen Z.S., and Hsieh C.F. Relationships between soilproperties and slope position in a lowland rain forest ofsouthern Taiwan. 2004. Geoderma, 123:131–142.

49- Yimer F., Sting L., and Adelkadir A. Soil property variations inrelation to topographic aspect and vegetation community inthe south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. 2006. For. Ecol. Manage, 232:90–99.

50- Zhang C., Sha X.A., Guobin B., Liu. C., and Changsheng Z. D. 2012. Effects of Slope Aspect on Soil Chemical and Microbial Properties during Natural Recovery on Abandoned Cropland in the Loess Plateau, China. Advanced Materials Research, 360:2422-2429.