Determining the Most Important Soil Properties Affecting the Yield of Saffron in the Ghayenat Area

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 29, Issue 3, July 2015, Pages 673-682   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.31230

Authors

amir ranjbar^{* 1}; H. Emami¹; Ali reza Karimi²; R. Khorassani¹

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²ferdowsi university of mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Saffron is one of the most important economic plants in the Khorasan province. Awareness of soil quality in agricultural lands is essential for the best management of lands and for obtaining maximum economic benefit. In general, plant growth is a function of environmental factors especially chemical and physical properties of soil (20). It has been demonstrated that there was a positive and high correlation between soil organic matter and saffron yield. Increasing the yield of saffron due to organic matter is probably due to soil nutrient, especially phosphorous and nitrogen and also improvement of soil physical quality (6, 28, 29). The yield of saffron in soils with high nitrogen as a result of vegetative growth is high (8). Shahandeh (6) found that most of the variation of saffron yield depends on soil properties. Due to the economic importance of saffron and the role of soil properties on saffron yield, this research was conducted to find the relationship between saffron yield and some soil physical and chemical properties, and to determine the contribution of soil properties that have the greatest impact on saffron yield in the Ghayenat area.
Materials and Methods: This research was performed in 30 saffron fields (30 soil samples) of the Ghayenat area (longitude 59° 10΄ 10.37˝ - 59° 11΄ 38.41˝ and latitude 33° 43΄ 35.08˝ - 33΄ 44΄ 02.78˝), which is located in the Khrasan province of Iran. In this research, 21 soil properties were regarded as the total data set (TDS). Then the principal component analysis (PCA) was used to determine the most important soil properties affecting saffron yield as a minimum data set (MDS) and the stepwise regression to estimate saffron yield. To estimate the yield of saffron in stepwise regression method, saffron yield was considered as a dependent variable and soil physical and chemical properties were considered to be independent variables.
Results and Discussion: According to the PCA method, among the 21 studied properties, 7 out of them including calcium, iron, zinc contents, sand, calcium carbonate equivalent percent, mean weight diameter of aggregates (MWD) and manganese (Mn) had the higher Eigenvalues. Therefore, the above properties were introduced as the most important soil properties in saffron fields. Calcium carbonate had the negative effect on the availability of micro-nutrients (26). Christensen et al. (15) found that by increasing the calcium carbonate in soil due to high pH and formation of insoluble components, the uptake of micro-nutrients is especially limited.
The results of stepwise regression method (equation 1) showed that soil acidity (pH), zinc content, bulk density, MWD, iron content, salinity (EC), organic carbon and available potassium in soil were the most important properties that affect the yield of saffron, so that the determination coefficient (R2) of the regression model was high (Table 2) and it can explain 74% of the variation of saffron yield.
Y = 6924.51 – 1187.31 pH – 89.65 EC + 71.6 Fe – 826.02 Zn + 471.55 OC, + 5490.96 K + 1353.56 BD + 752.82 MWD (1)
where Y: saffron yield (kgha-1), pH: soil acidity, EC: electoral conductivity (dSm-1), Fe: iron concentration (mgkg-1), Zn: zinc concentration (mgkg-1), OC: organic carbon (%), K: soil potassium (%), BD: soil bulk density (Mgm-3), and MWD: mean weight diameter of aggregates (MM).
Based on the absolute values of standard ß in the regression model (Table 3), pH value and then after Zn concentration had the most effect on saffron yield. In general, responses of different plants to soil pH is varied, and saffron grows satisfactory in pH = 7.8 (5). Soil pH influences the uptake of soil nutrients by plants (15), so that this parameter had the most effect on saffron yield and by increasing the soil pH, the yield of saffron decreases. According to the regression model, Zn concentration was the second parameter in saffron yield. Zn has the important role in structure of plant enzymes (30). After these 2 parameters, Bd, MWD, Fe concentration, EC, Organic carbon and K concentration in soil had more effect on saffron yield (Table 3).
Conclusion: According to both PCA and regression methods, the concentration of iron and zinc and MWD were determined as the important and effective soil properties on saffron yield in the Ghayenat area. In addition, soil pH in stepwise regression method and calcium carbonate in PCA method were determined as the effective properties on saffron yield. Therefore, it is suggested that the parameters of Zn, Fe, and MWD along with soil pH and calcium carbonate which were regarded individually in two methods, were considered as the most soil properties in saffron yield.

Keywords

Economic yield of saffron; Principal component analysis; Soil properties; Stepwise regression

References

1- Abrishami M.H. 1988. Knowledge of Iranian saffron. Towsan Tehran Press. (in Persian).

2- Andrews S.S., Mitchell J.P., Mancinelli R., Karlen K.L., Hartz T.K., Horwath W.R., Pettygrove G.S., Scow K.M. and Munk D.S. 2002. On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley. Agronomy Journal, 94: 12–23.

3- Arshad M.A. and Coen G.M. 1992. Characterization of soil quality: physical and chemical criteria. American American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 7(1-2): 25-31.

4- Azizbekova N.Sh., Milyaeva E.L., Lobova N.V. and Chaylakhya M.Kh. 1978. Effect of gibberellin and kinetin on formation of flower organs in saffron. Soviet Plant Physiology. 25(3): 471-476.

5- Bachman, G. and Kinzel H. 1992. Physiological and ecological aspects of the interaction between plant roots and rhizosphere soil. Soil Biology1. Biochemistry, 24: 543-552.

6- Barshad I.E., Halevy H.A.G. and Hagin G. 1956. Clay minerals in some limestone soils from Israel. Soil Science. 81: 423-437.

7- Behnia M. 1992. Agronomy of saffron. Tehran University press. (in Persian).

8- Christensen J.V., Legge W.G., Depauw R.M., Hennig A.M.F., McKenzie J.S., Siemens B. and Thomas J.B. 1995. Effect of seeding date, nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of rapeseed in Northwest Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 65: 275-284.

9- Dhar A.K., Sapru R., and Rekha K. 1998. Studies in Saffron in Kashmir. Crop Improvement. 15(1), 48-52.

10- Gee, G.W. and Bauder J.M. 1986. Partical-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monogroph No. 9 (2nd edition), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Pp 383-411.

11- Govaerts B., Sayre K.D. and Deckers J. 2006. A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research, 87: 163–174.

12- Hesse P.R. 1971. A text book of soil chemical analysis. John Murray. London.

13- Ingram J.S. 1964. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Tropical Science. 11: 1771-1784.

14- Kafi M., Rashed Mohasel M.H., Kocheki A. and MollaFilabi A. 2003. Saffron: technology of production and processing. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. (in Persian).

15- Karimi G., Hosseinzadeh H. and Khaleghpanah P. 2001. Study of antidepressant effect of aqueous and ethanolic extract of Crocus sativus in mice. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Science, 4: 11-15.

16- Kemper W.D. and Rosenau R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part a: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Pp 425–442.

17- Knudsen D., Peterson G.A. and Pratt P.F. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. p. 225-246. In: A.L. Page (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. America Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI.

18- Lindsay W.L. and Norvel W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper.

19- Lucas R.F. and Knezek B.D. 1973. Climatic and Soil Conditions Promoting Micronutrient Deficiencies in Plants. Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Science Society of America.

20- Madan C.L., Kapar B.M. and Gupta U.S. 1966 Saffron. Soviet Plant Physiology, 25, 227-233.

21- Masto RE., Chhonkar P.K, Singh D., and Patra A.K. 2008. Alternative soil quality indices for evaluating the effect of intensive cropping, fertilization and manuring for 31 years in the semi-arid soils of India. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 136: 419-435.

22- Munshi A. M. 1994. Effect of N and K on the floral yield and corm production in saffron under rainfed condition. Indian Arcanut and Spices Journal. 18: 24-44.

23- Negbi M. 1999. Saffron cultivation: past, present and future prespects. In: M. Negbi. (ed). Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) Harwood Amesterdam. Pp. 1-17.

24- Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watanabe F.S. and Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorous in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, D.C., USDA Circ. 939.

25- Omidi H., Golzad A., Torabi H., and Fatokian M.H. 2009. Effect of bio and chemical fertilizer on quality and quantity of saffron. Medicinal plant Journal, 2(30): 98-109. (in Persian).

26- Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, part2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of Aamerica, Madison, WI.

27- Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A. and Yang X.M. 2009. Use of indicators and pore volumefunction characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma, 152: 252-263.

28- Rezaee A.M. and Soltani A. 1999. An Introduction on Regression Analysis. Isfahan University of Technology Press, Isfahan, Iran. (in Persian).

29- Richards L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soil. USDA .Agriculture. Hand Book. No. 60.

30- Sadeghi B. 1997. Effect of storage and cultivation date on flowering of saffron. Scientifitic and industrial researches organization of Khorasan center press. (in Persian).

31- Saeedi Rad M. and Mokhtarian A. 2010. Scientifitic principles of cultivation, growing and harvesting of saffron. Sarva Press. (in Persian).

32- Saeedi Rad M., Akram A. and Mahdi Nia A. 2007. Manufacturing and evaluation of saffron cultivator. Iranian Journal of agricultural Science. 37(1): 167-174. (in Persian).

33- Shahandeh H. 1991. Evaluation physical and chemical properties of soil and water in relation to saffron yield in Gonabad area. Scientifitic and industrial researches organization of Khorasan center press. (in Persian).

34- Torbert H.A., Krueger E. and Kurtene D. 2008. Soil quality assessment using fuzzy modeling. International Agrophysics, 22: 365-370.

35- Vafa Bakhsh J., Ahmadian H., Sheibani D. and Bodagh Jamali J. 2003. Determination the potential of saffron cultivation in different area of Iran. The first festival of saffron, 2-3 Dcember, Ghayen, Iran. (in Persian).

36- Walkley A. and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29-37.

37- Wander M.M., Walter G.L., Nissen T.M., Billero G.A., Andrews S.S. and Cavanaugh-Grant D.A. 2002. Soil quality: science and process. Agronomy Journal, 94: 23–32.

38- Yanbing Q., Darilek J.L., Biao H., Yongcun Z., Sun W. and Gu Z. 2009. Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma, 149: 325-334.

39- Zarrin Kafsh M. 1990. Soil fertility and production. Tehran University press. (in Persian).