Comparison of TS and ANN Models with the Results of Emission Scenarios in Rainfall Prediction

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 29, Issue 4, September 2015, Pages 943-953   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.32168

Authors

S. Babaei Hessar^* ; R. Ghazavi

Kashan University

Abstract

Introduction: Precipitation is one of the most important and sensitive parameters of the tropical climate that influence the catchments hydrological regime. The prediction of rainfall is vital for strategic planning and water resources management. Despite its importance, statistical rainfall forecasting, especially for long-term, has been proven to be a great challenge due to the dynamic nature of climate phenomena and random fluctuations involved in the process. Various methods, such as time series and artificial neural network models, have been proposed to predict the level of rainfall. But there is not enough attention to global warming and climate change issues. The main aim of this study is to investigate the conformity of artificial neural network and time series models with climate scenarios.
Materials and Methods: For this study, 50 years of daily rainfall data (1961 to 2010) of the synoptic station of Urmia, Tabriz and Khoy was investigated. Data was obtained from Meteorological Organization of Iran. In the present study, the results of two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Time Seri (TS) methods were compared with the result of the Emission Scenarios (A2 & B1). HadCM3 model in LARS-WG software was used to generate rainfall for the next 18 years (2011-2029). The results of models were compared with climate scenarios over the next 18 years in the three synoptic stations located in the basin of the Lake Urmia. At the first stage, the best model of time series method was selected. The precipitation was estimated for the next 18 years using these models. For the same period, precipitation was forecast using artificial neural networks. Finally, the results of two models were compared with data generated under two scenarios (B1 and A2) in LARS-WG.
Results and Discussion: Different order of AR, MA and ARMA was examined to select the best model of TS The results show that AR(1) was suitable for Tabriz and Khoy stations .In the Urmia station MA(1) was the best performance. Multiple Layer Perceptron with a 10 neurons in hidden layer and the output layer consists of five neurons had the lowest MSE and the highest correlation coefficient in modeling the values of annual precipitation. So MLP was determined as the best structure of neural network for rainfall prediction. According to results, precipitation predicted by the ANN model was very close to the results of A2 and B1 scenario, whereas TS has a significant difference with these scenarios. Average rainfall predicted by two A2 and B1 scenarios in Urmia station has more difference than other stations. Based on the B1 scenario, precipitation will increase 11 percent over the next two decades. It will decrease 10.7 percent according to A2 emissions scenario. According to ANN models and two A2 and B1 scenarios, the rates of rainfall will increase in Tabriz and Khoy stations. However, according to TS model, rainfall will decline 5.94 and 3.63 percent for these two stations, respectively.
Conclusion: Global warming and climate change should have adverse effects on groundwater and surface water resources. Different models are used for simulating of thes effects. But, conformity of these models with the results of climate scenarios is an issue that has not been addressed. In the present research coincidence of TS model, ANN model and climate change scenarios was investigated. Results show under emissions scenarios, during the next two decades in Tabriz and Khoy stations, precipitation will increase. In Urmia station B1 and A2 scenario percent increase by 11 percent and 10.5 percent decline predicted, respectively. The results of Roshan and et al (4) and Golmohammad and et al, (7) investigations show increasing trend in the rainfall rate and confirming the results of this study According to results, the performance of ANN model is better than TS model for rainfall prediction and its result is similar to climate change scenarios. Similar results have been reported by Wang et al (29) and the Norani et al (20). Due to the significant difference between the TS and climate scenarios used in the study area, is not recommended, though it can be used as a plausible climate scenario to predict the precipitation of stations in the future studied. At the end, it is suggested that the similar studies carried out in a larger number of stations in the country with respect to global warming and climate change, to determine the validity of the methods used to the predicted rainfall.

Keywords

Climate change; Emission Scenario; Neural Network; LARS-WG; Time Seri

References

1- Ahmadi F. 2004. Prediction of annual Rainfall using Time Seri in Khorasan, MA thesis. Ferdowsi Mashhad University, 284 P. (In Persian with English abstract).

2- Aivazi M., and Mosaedi A. 2010. Comparison of monthly rainfall forecasting based on time series ARMA and nonlinear functions in meteorological stations of Naharkhoran Gorgan. Second National Conference of Integrated Water Resources Management, Kerman. (In Persian).

3- Ashofteh P., and Massah B. A. 2010. The impact of climate change on Maximum discharge, Case study, Aydughmush basin West Azerbaijan. Journal of Science and Technology Agriculture and Natural Resource, 53:25-39. (In Persian).

4- Barbulescu A., and Pelican E. 2008. On the sulina precipitation data analysis using the ARMA models and a Neural Network technique. Proceedings of the 10th Wseas International Conference on Mathematical and Computational Method in Science and Engineering.

5- Golmohammadi M., and Massah B.A. 2011. The perusal of climate change impact on drought intensity and duration. Journal of Water and Soil, 25: 315-326. (In Persian with English abstract).

6- Karamouz M., Fallahi M., Nazif S., and Rahimi Farahani M. 2010. Long lead rainfall prediction using statistical downscaling and artificial Neural Network modeling. Civil Engineering, 16(2): 165-172.

7- Khazaei M.R., Zahabiyoun B., and Saghafian B. 2011. Assessment of climate change impact on floods using weather generator and continuous rainfall-runoff model. International Journal of Climatology.doi: 10.1002/joc.2416.

8- Kia S.M. 2011. Neural Network in MATLAB. Second edition, Publications of Kia Rayaneh Sabz, 409 P.

9- Ki kim M., Sik kang I., Kyupark C., and Myong kim K. 2004. Super ensemble prediction of regional precipitation over Korea. International Journal of Climatology.

10- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (IPCC), Climate Change. 2007. Synthesis report of the forth assessment report, IPCC.

11- Mahdizadeh M. 2004. Artificial Neural Networks and Its Application in Civil Engineering. Publications of Abedi, 130 P.

12- Mckerchar A.I., and Delleur L.W. 1974. Application of seasonal parametric linear stochastic models to monthly flow data. J. water resource reservoir. 10: 246-255.

13- Mirzavand M., Ghasemieh h., and Vali A. 2012. Using uncertain Models in the prediction of monthly average discharge using Time Series models, (Case study: Cheshmeh Soleiman of Kashan). Journal of Engineering eco-systems desert, 1: 51-58. (In Persian).

14- Naveh H., Khalili K., Alami M.T., and Behmanesh J. 2012. Forecasting river flow by bilinear nonlinear Time Series model, (Case study: Barandoz chai and Shahar chai rivers). Journal of Water and Soil, 5: 1299-1307. (In Persian with English abstract).

15- Nourani V., Alami M.T., and Aminfar M.H. 2009. A combined neural-wavelet model for prediction of Ligvanchai watershed precipitation. Engineering Applications of Artificial intelligence, 22: 466-472.

16- Qian B., Hayhoe H., and Gameda S. 2005. Evaluation of the stochastic weather generators LARS-WG and AAFC-WG for climate change impact studies. Climate Research, 29: 3-21.

17- Roshan G., Khoshakhlage F., and Azizi G. 2012. Testing suitable general circulation model for prediction temperature and precipitation of Iran under the situation of global warming. Geography and Development, 27: 19-36. (In Persian).

18- Saplioglu K., Cimen M., and Akman B. 2010. Daily precipitation prediction in Isparta station by Artificial Neural Network. Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia. 25-29.

19- Semenov M.A., Barrow E.M. 2002. A stochastic weather generator for use in climate impact studies. User manual, Version 3.2.

20- Semenov M.A. 2008. Simulation of extreme weather events by a stochastic weather generator. Climate Research, 35: 203-212, doi: 10.3354/cr00731.

21- Semenov M.A., Bennett S.P., and Calanca P. 2013. Validation of ELPIS 1980−2010 baseline scenarios using the observed European Climate Assessment data set. Climate Research, 57:1-9.

22- Semenov M.A., and Stratonovitch P. 2010. Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Climate Research, 41:1-14, doi: 10.3354/cr00836.

23- Soltani S., Modarres R., and Eslamian S. S. 2007. The use of time series modeling for the determination of rainfall climates of Iran. Intl. J. Climatol. 819-829.

24- Thomas H.A. and Fiering M.B. 1962. Mathematical synthesis of stream flow sequences for the analysis of river basin by simulation. Harward university press, cambrige, 751p.

25- Wang W., Chau K.W Cheng C.T., and Qiu L. 2009. A Comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. Journal of Hydrology, 374: 294-306.

26- Zahabiun b., Gudarzi M., and Massah B. A. 2010. Application of SWAT model in estimation of runoff in the future periods affected by climate change. Journal of Climate Research, 34: 43-58. (In Persian).

27- Zahedi M., Sarraf B.H., and Jameei J. 2010. Modeling rainfall in the stations Urmia and Tabriz. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 7:1-16. (In Persian).