Measurement and Modeling of Cucumber Evapotranspiration Under Greenhouse Condition

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 29, Issue 5, November 2015, Pages 1247-1261   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v29i5.38053

Author

R. Moazenzadeh^*

Shahrood University of Technology

Abstract

Introduction: In two last decades, greenhouse cultivation of different plants has developed among Iranian farmers, approximately 45 percent of national greenhouse cultures consisting of cucumber, tomato and pepper. As huge amounts of agricultural water in Iran are extracted from groundwater resources and a large number of Iranian plains are in critical conditions, and because irrigation is the major consumer of water (95 percent), it must be performed in a scientific manner. One approach to this is to obtain the knowledge of the consumptive use of major crops which is named evapotranspiration (ETc).
Materials and Methods: This research was carried out in a north-south greenhouse belonging to Plant Protection Research Institute, located on northern Tehran, Iran, for estimating greenhouse cucumber evapotranspiration. Trickle irrigation method was used, and meteorological data such as temperature, humidity and solar radiation were measured daily. Physical and chemical measurements were conducted and electric conductivity (EC) and pH values of 3.42 dsm-1 and 7.19, respectively, were recorded. Soil texture and bulk density were measured as to be sandy loam and 1.4 gr cm-3, respectively. In order to measure the actual evapotranspiration, cucumber seeds were also cultured in six similar microlysimeters and irrigation of each microlysimeter was based on FC moisture. If any drained water was available, it was measured. Finally, with measured meteorological characteristics in greenhouse which are suggested to have an effect on ET and were measurable, the best multiple linear regression and artificial neural network were established. The average data from three microlysimeters were used for calibration and that from three other microlysimeters were used for validation set.
Results and Discussion: In the former case, when we used one multiple linear regression with measurable meteorological variables inside the greenhouse to predict cucumber ET for the entire growth period, high and considerable amounts of error occurred, as the difference between measured and predicted values of ET is approximately 2.86 mm day-1 which is noticeable. Overestimation of the cucumber ET in the first and last stages which will result in decreasing water use efficiency and underestimation in blooming and yielding fruit stages, when cucumber is more susceptible to water stress, are the other disadvantages of using one equation for the entire growth period to describe and predict cucumber ET. In contrast, when we divided growth period into four steps, the MLR method’s performance in prediction of ET was improved and the difference mentioned above between measured and predicted values of ET (2.86 mm day-1) decreased to about 1.32 mm day-1. The results showed that measured and predicted values of ET ranged from (0.08 to 4.75) and (0.13 to 4.25) when the whole growth period is considered as one step, respectively. These mentioned values were obtained (0.08 to 1.5) and (0.13 to 1.75); (0.71 to 2.64) and (1.31 to 4.25); (2.18 to 4.75) and (1.69 to 4.13); (1.32 to 2.61) and (2.66 to 3.74) for each of growth period stages, respectively. Also the value of total ET for the entire growth period is measured 273.45 mm and predicted 275.7 and 275.59 mm, when the whole growth period is considered as one step or divided into four stages, respectively. Although dividing the growth period improved ET prediction, the results in the first and especially the third stage are still discussable. Therefore, as with MLR method, the capability of ANN technique was investigated in prediction of cucumber ET. Comparison of measured and predicted values of ET confirms that ANN has better performance than MLR, even when growth period is divided.
Conclusion: Determining cucumber evapotranspiration in the greenhouse was the main objective of this study. For this purpose we used Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques. In MLR, first we used one equation for the entire growth period. The results showed that this single equation is not able to simulate actual ET of cucumber. To overcome this problem, we divided the growth period into four stages and derived a separate equation for each stage. The results showed that this procedure improves prediction of cucumber ET, especially in the second and last stages of growth period. Statistical indices such as RMSE, Ens, PBIAS and PSR, t-statistical results, measured versus predicted ET values, and predicted values of ET in the growth period indicate that ANN technique is not only reliable, but also easier than the MLR technique.

Keywords

Artificial neural network; Growth stage; Regression; Weighing microlysimeter

References

1- Ayas S., and Demirtas C. 2009. Deficit irrigation effects on cucumber (CucumissativusL. Maraton) yield in unheated greenhouse condition, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7: 645-649.

2- Blanco F.F., and Folegatti M. 2003. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of cucumber in greenhouse, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 7(2): 285-291.

3- Boulard T., and Wang S. 2000. Greenhouse crop transpiration simulation from external climate conditions, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 100: 25-34.

4- Carmassi G., Bacci L., Bronzini M., Incrocci L., Maggini R., Bellocchi G., Massa D., and Pardossi A. 2013. Modelling transpiration of greenhouse gerbera grown in substrate with saline water in a Mediterranean climate, Scientia Horticulturae, 156: 9-18.

5- Casanova P.M., Messing I., Joel A., and Canete M.A. 2009. Methods to estimate lettuce evapotranspiration in greenhouse conditions in the central zone of Chile, Chilean journal of agricultural research, 69 (1): 60-70.

6- ChoY.Y., Oh S., Oh M.M., and Sun J.E. 2007. Estimation of individual leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD value, Scientia horticulture, 111: 330-334.

7- Fathalian F., and Nouri-Emamzadei M.R. 2013. Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of cucumber using microlysimeter in greenhouse conditions, Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 3(12): 125-134. (in Persian with English abstract)

8- Fathalian F., Moazenzadeh R., and Nouri-Emamzadei M.R. 2009. Evaluation and Prediction of Greenhouse Cucumber Evapotranspiration at Different Growth Stages, Journal of Water and Soil, 23(4): 16-27. (in Persian with English abstract)

9- Ghaemi A.A., and Razmi Z. 2011. Crop and soil-water stress coefficients of tomato in the glass-greenhouse conditions, Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 2(7): 75-86. (in Persian with English abstract)

10- Grewal H.S., Maheshwari B., and Parks S.E. 2011. Water and nutrient use efficiency of a low-cost hydroponic greenhouse for a cucumber crop: An Australian case study, Agricultural Water Management, 98: 841-846.

11- Guerrero F.V., Kacira M., Rodriguez E.F., Kubota C., Giacomelli G.A., Linker R., and Arbel A. 2012. Comparison of three evapotranspiration models for a greenhouse cooling strategy with natural ventilation and variable high pressure fogging, ScientiaHorticulturae, 134: 210-221.

12- Harmanto Salokhe V.M., Babel M.S., and Tantau H.J. 2005. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment, Agricultural Water Management, 71: 225-242.

13- Jolliet O.1994. HORTITRANS, a model for predicting and optimizing humidity and transpiration in greenhouses, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 57: 23–37.

14- Lorenzo P., Garcia M.L., Sanchez-Guerrero M.C., Medrano E., Caparros I., and Gimenez M. 2006. Influence of mobile shading on yield, crop transpiration and water use efficiency, Acta Horticulturae, 719: 471-478.

15- Lovelli S., Pizza S., Caponio T., Rivelli A.R., and Perniola M. 2004. Lysimetric determination of muskmelon crop coefficients cultivated under plastic mulches, Agricultural water management, 72: 147-159.

16- Mao X., Liu M., Wang X., Liu C., Hou Z., and Shi J. 2003. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water use of greenhouse grown cucumber in the north China plain, Agricultural water management, 61: 219-228.

17- Medrano E., Lorenzo P., Sanchez-Guerrero M.C., and Montero J.I. 2005. Evaluation and modelling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions, Scientia horticulture, 105: 163-175.

18- Moller M., Tanny J., Li Y., and Cohen S. 2004. Measuring and predicting evapotranspiration in an insect-proof screenhouse, Agricultural and forest meteorology, 127: 35-51.

19- Orgaz F., Fernandez M.D., Bonachela S., Gallardo M., and Fereres E. 2005. Evapotranspiration of horticultural crops in an unheated plastic greenhouse, Agricultural water management, 72: 81-96.

20- Papadakis G., Frangoudakis A., and Kyritsis S. 1994. Experimental investigation and modelling of heat and mass transfer between a tomato crop and the greenhouse environment, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 57: 217–227.

21- Pollet S. 1999. Application of the Penman-Monteith model to calculate the evapotranspiration of head lettuce Lactuca sativa L. varcapitata in glasshouse conditions, Acta Horticulturae, 519: 151-161.

22- Qiu R., Song J., Du T., Kang S., Tong L., Chen R.,and Wu L. 2013. Response of evapotranspiration and yield to planting density of solar greenhouse grown tomato in northwest China, Agricultural Water Management, 130: 44-51.

23- Senyigit U., Kadayifci A., Ozdemir O.F., Oz H., and Atilgan A. 2011. Effects of different irrigation programs on yield and quality parameters of eggplant (Solanummelongena L.) under greenhouse conditions, African Journal of Biotechnology, 10: 6497-6503.

24- Wang Z., Liu Z., Zhang Z., and Liu X. 2009. Subsurface drip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20 cm standard pan evaporation in Northeast China, Scientia Horticulturae, 123: 51-57.

25- Yaghi T., Arslan A., and Naoum F. 2013. Cucumber (Cucumissativus, L.) water use efficiency (WUE) under plastic mulch and drip irrigation, Agricultural Water Management, 128: 149-157.

26- Zhang L., Gao L., Zhang L., Wang S., Sui X., and Zhang Z. 2012. Alternate furrow irrigation and nitrogen level effects on migration of water and nitrate-nitrogen in soil and root growth of cucumber in solar-greenhouse, Scientia Horticulturae, 138: 43-49.