Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Radiation Interception and Utilization Efficiency of two Spring Rapeseed Cultivars

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 8, Volume 17, Issue 2 - Serial Number 54, July 2019, Pages 291-303   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v17i2.72882

Authors

S. A Siadat; A Derakhshan^*

Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan

Abstract

Introduction: Crop biomass accumulation is directly related to the amount of photosynthetically active intercepted radiation by the canopy during the crop’s cycle. The slope of this relationship represents the radiation use efficiency (RUE), defined as crop biomass produced per unit of total solar or photosynthetically active intercepted radiation (IPAR). Therefore, above-ground biomass (g m−2) can be expressed as a product of the cumulative IPAR (MJ m−2) during the crop cycle and RUE (g MJ−1). The amount of IPAR depends on the length of the crop cycle over which radiation is accumulated, the fraction of intercepted radiation (FIR) by the canopy each day and the total incident solar radiation. The length of crop cycle is affected by the genotype and/or environmental factors mainly temperature and photoperiod. Indeed, soil constraints such as nutritional deficiencies have shown minor impacts on the crop cycle. FIR depends on the leaf area index (LAI) and the canopy light extinction coefficient (k). Several studies on different crops have shown that IPAR is negatively affected by nitrogen (N) deficiency. RUE is affected by the crop species, environmental conditions and also by management factors such as crop nutritional status. Over the past few decades, one of the aspects of improving crop productivity has been increasing N fertilizer utilization. Nitrogen application is one of the key inputs for crop production that determines the potential of total crops dry matter production through its effect on IPAR, RUE, and/or both. The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate in two rapeseed cultivars their responses on IPAR, RUE and related traits under different N availabilities at field conditions.
Materials and Methods: In this study, the effects of N utilization on IPAR and RUE of two spring rapeseed cultivars (Hyola 401 and Dalgan) were investigated. Field experiment was conducted as a split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan. N consumption in seven levels of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 kg ha-1 was considered as the main factor and the type of rapeseed cultivar in two levels as the sub-factor.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the response of the above-ground biomass to N supply in both of the studied rapeseed cultivars was related to the change in both IPAR and RUE. The total accumulated IPAR during the growing season under of consumption of 200 kg N ha-1 was about 27 and 35% higher than those of the control treatments in the cultivars Hyola 401 and Dalgan, respectively. In both rapeseed cultivars, IPAR was strongly dependent on LAI and LAD. This means that N utilization with increasing LAI and LAD resulted in an increase in IPAR. Reduction of LAI in response to N deficiency can be explained by (1) changing the phyllochron, (2) decreasing leaf blade area, and (3) the higher rate of loss of old leaves. Utilization of N had no effect on the light extinction coefficient (K) of crop canopy, and this coefficient was estimated to be 0.65 (± 0.02) in the cultivar Hyola 401 and 0.73 (± 0.02) in the cultivar Dalgan. Depending on N level, the above-ground biomass varied from 932 to 2192 g m-2 in the cultivar Hyola 401 and between 853 and 1811 g m-2 in the cultivar Dalgan. Depending on the availability of N, the RUE varied between 2.02 (control treatment) and 3.25 g MJ-1 (200 kg N ha-1) for the cultivar Dalgan and between 1.86 (control treatment) and 3.62 g MJ-1 (300 kg N ha-1) for the cultivar Hyola 401. Reducing RUE in N-limit treatments may be due to reduced leaves nitrogen content, which reduces their photosynthetic capacity.
 Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the above-ground biomass production by two rapeseed cultivars was related to differences in their growth rates in response to the applying different amounts of N. The physiological traits that explained above-ground biomass responses of both cultivars were the cumulative intercepted radiation during the crop cycle and radiations use efficiency. In both rapeseed cultivars, the K coefficient was not affected by N utilization, which indicates that IPAR responses were the result of changes in LAI and LAD during the crop cycle affecting the fraction of intercepted radiation by the crop.

Keywords

Crop Growth Rate; fraction of intercepted radiation; Leaf area duration; Leaf Area Index; Light extinction coefficient

References

1. Abeledo, G., Calderini, D., and Slafer, G. 2003. Genetic improvement of yield responsiveness to nitrogen fertilization and its physiological determinants in barley. Euphytica 133 (3): 291-298.

2. Ayaz, S., McKenzie, B., McNeil, D., and Hill, G. 2004. Light interception and utilization of four grain legumes sown at different populations and depths. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142 (3): 297-308.

3. Bassu, S., Giunta, F., and Motzo, R. 2011. Effects of sowing date and cultivar on radiation use efficiency in durum wheat. Crop and Pasture Science 62 (1): 39-47.

4. Colnenne, C., Meynard, L. M., Roche, R., and Reau, R. 2002. Effects of nitrogen deficiencies on autumnal growth of oilseed rape. European Journal of Agronomy 17 (1): 11-28.

5. Dreccer, F., Schapendonk, A. H. C. M., Slafer, G. A., and Rabbinge, R. 2000. Comparative response of wheat and oilseed rape to nitrogen supply: absorption and utilization efficiency of radiation and nitrogen during the reproductive stages determining yield. Plant and Soil 220 (1-2): 189-205.

6. Gabrielle, B., Denoroy, P., Gosse, G., Justes, E., and Andersen, M. N. 1998. Development and evaluation of a CERES-type model for winter oilseed rape. Field Crops Research 57 (1): 95-111.

7. Jamieson, P. D., Martin, R. J., Francis, G. S., and Wilson, D. R. 1995. Drought effects on biomass production and radiation-use efficiency in barley. Field Crops Research 43 (2-3): 77-86.

8. Jeuffroy, M. H., and Recous, S. 1999. Azodyn: a simple model simulating the date of nitrogen deficiency for decision support in wheat fertilization. European Journal of Agronomy 10 (2): 121-144.

9. Justes, E., Denoroy, P., Gabrielle, B., and Gosse, G. 2000. Effect of crop nitrogen status and temperature on the radiation use efficiency of winter oilseed rape. European Journal of Agronomy 13 (2-3): 165-177.

10. Kemanian, A. R., Stöckle, C. O., and Huggins, D. R. 2004. Variability of Barley Radiation-Use Efficiency. Crop Science 44 (5): 1662-1672.

11. Masomipour, A., Torabi, B., and Rahimi, A. 2016. Studing extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency in different cultivars of Safflower under different levels of Nitrogen (N) fertilizer. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 9 (3): 67-86. (in Persian with English abstract).

12. Massignam, A., Chapman, S., Hammer, G., and Fukai, S. 2009. Physiological determinants of maize and sunflower grain yield as affected by nitrogen supply. Field Crops Research 113 (3): 256-267.

13. Mendham, N. J. 1995. Physiological basis of seed yield and quality in oilseed rape. Proceedings of the Ninth International Rapeseed Congress, Cambridge.

14. Mendham, N. J., Russell, J., and Jarosz, N, K. 1990. Response to sowing time of three contrasting Australian cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science 114 (3): 275-283.

15. Muurinen, S., and Peltonen-Sainio, P. 2006. Radiation-use efficiency of modern and old spring cereal cultivars and its response to nitrogen in northern growing conditions. Field Crops Research 96 (2-3): 363-373.

16. Olesen, J. E., Jorgensen, L. N., and Mortensen, J. V. 2000. Irrigation strategy, nitrogen application and fungicide control in winter wheat on a sandy soil. Ii. Radiation interception and conversion. The Journal of Agricultural Science 134 (1): 13-23.

17. Plenet, D., Mollier, A., and Pellerin, S. 2000. Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency. II. Radiation use efficiency, biomass accumulation and yield components. Plant and Soil 224 (2): 259-272.

18. Ratjen, A. M., and Kage, H. 2013. Is mutual shading a decisive factor for differences in overall canopy specific leaf area of winter wheat crops? Field Crops Research 149: 338-346.

19. Salvagiotti, F., and Miralles, D. 2008. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 28 (3): 282-290.

20. Sandana, P., and Pinochet, D. 2011. Ecophysiological determinants of biomass and grain yield of wheat under P deficiency. Field Crops Research 120 (2): 311-319.

21. Sandana, P., Ramirez, M., and Pinochet, D. 2012. Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of wheat and pea under different P availabilities. Field Crops Research 127: 44-50.

22. Sieling, K., Böttcher, U., and Kage, H. 2016. Dry matter partitioning and canopy traits in wheat and barley under varying N supply. European Journal of Agronomy 74: 1-8.

23. Sinclair, T. R., and Horie, T. 1989: Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Science 29 (1): 90-98.

24. Sinclair, T. R., and Muchow, R. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65: 215-265.

25. Soltani, A., Robertson, M. J., Rahemi-Karizaki, A., Poorreza, J., and Zarei, H. 2006. Modeling Biomass Accumulation and Partitioning in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192 (5): 379-389.

26. Valle, S., Carrasco, J., Pinochet, D., and Calderini, D. 2009. Al toxicity effects on radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of Al-tolerant and Al-sensitive wheat cultivars under field conditions. Field Crops Research 114 (3): 343-350.

27. Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops I. Variation in NAR and LAR between species and varieties and within and between years. Annals of Botany 11 (1): 41-46.

28. Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E. A., Vos, J., and Spiertz, H. J. 2003. A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Annals of Botany 91 (3): 361-71.

29. Zhou, Z., Plauborg, F., Kristensen, K., and Andersen, M. N. 2017. Dry matter production, radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of potato in response to temperature and nitrogen application regimes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 232: 595-605.