Effect of Terminal Heat Stress on Some Agronomic, Physiological and Oil Yield Traits of Safflower Cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Ahvaz Conditions

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 11, Volume 17, Issue 3 - Serial Number 55, October 2019, Pages 491-502   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v17i3.76975

Authors

F Salehi; A Rahnama Ghahfarokhi^* ; M Meskarbashee; Kh Mehdikhanlou

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Abstract

Introduction
Terminal heat stress is a major abiotic stress especially in tropical and sub-tropical regions that severely reduces crop growth and yield. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an oilseed crop grown mainly for the production of high quality edible oil rich in polyunsaturated acids. This annual crop is native to a climate with a long dry season and a limited rainy season and compares to other annual crops has more resistance to drought stress. In addition, it's resistant to some diseases and susceptible to humidity. Since, to obtain the maximum yield of a crop, it is necessary to escape the development stages of (the/a) plant from unfavorable environmental factors and the full utilization of plant from favorable environmental conditions. Since the length of development stages more affected by temperature and day length, hence sowing date can be selected so that the different stages of plant growth were adapt with optimal temperature and day length. Yau (2006) indicated that later sowing of spring safflower in semi-arid and high elevation Mediterranean environment resulted in lower seed yield and later flowering does not allow an escape from the terminal drought and heat. Yau (2006) indicated that later sowing of spring safflower in semi-arid and high elevation Mediterranean environment resulted in lower seed yield and later flowering does not allow an escape from the terminal drought and heat. The aim of this study was to investigate the yield and yield components of safflower cultivars in response to different sowing data in Ahvaz.
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of safflower cultivars, this experiment was carried out as split plot layout based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications in at the research farm of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz in 2017-2018. The main factor included three levels of sowing date (11 Dec, 31 Dec and 20 Jan), and a sub factor including four cultivars of safflower (Goldasht, Parnian, Faraman and Sofeh). Data collected on all parameters were analyzed statistically using SAS software and mean comparison was carried out using Duncan test at the 5% of probability level. The studied traits included grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, oil yield, total chlorophyll concentration, catalase and peroxidase enzyme activity and stress susceptibility index.
Results and Discussion
A significant interaction was observed between the levels of sowing date and the cultivars in terms of plant height, weight of plant, biological yield and grain yield. Among the safflower cultivars, the highest weight per plant (143.3 g plant-1), biological yield (23352 kg ha-1), grain yield (4151.1 kg ha-1) and the lowest plant high (128.8 cm), was recorded in Faraman cultivar in sowing date of 11 December. In contrast, grain yield severely decreased in the 20 January sowing date with compared to the 11 December. So that, studied cultivars of Sofeh, Parnian, Faraman and Goldasht cultivar were decreased 53% (1277.3 kg ha-1), 44% (1668.9), 60% (1650.8) and 47% (1887.3), respectively. Under the heat stress, due to delayed planting date and decreased enzymatic activity of catalase, enzyme activity changed and the cultivars exposed to the terminal heat stress, but enzymatic activity of peroxidase increased. Stress susceptibility index (SSI), Parnian and Goldscht cultivars had a high tolerance with mean 0.85 and 0.92, while Faraman and Sofeh cultivars with an index of 1.16 and 1.03 had a high sensitivity to stress.
Conclusions
This research appears the delay in optimal planting date leads to synchronize the plant's reproductive stages with a high temperature at the end of the season. As a result, shorter plants, lower biological yield, lower grain and oil yield will be observed, however, the response of the cultivars from each other was different depend on their enzymatic capacity and the ability to maintain chlorophylls. Planting date should be selected such a way that this process does not a coincidence with terminal heat season. So, under hot weather conditions in Khuzestan, selecting the optimum planting date can be an appropriate solution to reduce the negative aspects of the terminal heat stress on the grain yield and component yield of different cultivars of safflower.

Keywords

Antioxidant enzymes; grain yield; Heat stress; Oil percentage

References

1. Arnon, A. N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal 23: 112-121.

2. Chakraborty, U., and Pradhan, D. 2011. High temperature-induced oxidative stress in Lens culinaris, role of antioxidants and amelioration of stress by chemical pre-treatments. Journal of Plant Interactions 6 (1): 43-52.

3. Chance, B., and Maehly, A. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in enzymology 2: 764-775.

4. Dadashi, N., and Khajehpour, M. 2005. Effect of planting date and cultivar on growth, yield components and yield of safflower in Isfahan, Science and Technology of Agricultural and Natural Resources 8 (3): 95-112.

5. Dhindsa, R. S., Plumb-Dhindsa, P., and Thorpe, T. A. 1981. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany 32: 93-101.

6. Dhyani, K., Ansari, M. W., Rao, Y. R., Verma, R. S., Shukla, A., and Tuteja, N. 2013. Comparative physiological response of wheat genotypes under terminal heat stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8 (6): e24564.

7. Fernandez, G. C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: proceeding of the International symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other crops in temperature and water stress. Taiwan, 13-16 August 1992, 257-270.

8. Fischer, R. A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29 (5): 897-912.

9. Gilani, A. A., Siadat, S. A., Alami-Saeed, K., Bakhshandeh, A. M., Moradi, F., and Seidnejad, M. 2009. Effect of heat stress on grain yield stability, chlorophyll content and cell membrane stability of flag leaf in commercial rice cultivars in Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 11 (1): 82-100.

10. Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Alam, M., Roychowdhury, R., and Fujita, M. 2013. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14 (5): 9643-9684.

11. Heidari Zade, P. 2004. The effect of temperature and day length on safflower generative and reproductive growth (Kuseh cultivar). MSc Thesis. Industrial University of Isfahan. (in Persian).

12. Latif, S., and Anwar, F. 2008. Quality assessment of Moringa concanensis seed oil extracted through solvent and aqueous-enzymatic techniques. Grasas y aceites, 59 (1): 69-75.

13. Lombardini, L., Harris, M. K., and Glenn, D. M. 2005. Effects of particle film application on leaf gas exchange, water relations, nut yield, and insect populations in mature pecan trees. HortScience 40 (5): 1376-1380.

14. Moller, I. M., Jensen, P. E., and Hansson, A. 2007. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58: 459-481.

15. Moosavi, S. G., Seghatoleslami, M., and Ansarinia, E. 2014. Fennel morphological traits and yield as affected by sowing date and plant density. Advance in Agriculture and Biology 2: 45-49.

16. Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Cheema, S. A., and Wahid, A. 2013. Differential response of wheat cultivars to terminal heat stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 15 (6): 1354-1358.

17. Omidi, A. H., and Sharifmogadas, M. R. 2010. Evaluation of Iranian Safflower cultivars reaction to different sowing date and plant densities. World Applied Science Journal 8: 953-958.

18. Oz, M. 2016. Relationship between sowing time, variety, and quality in safflower. Journal of Chemistry 2016. 8

19. Pasban Eslam, B. 2018. Effect of planting date on reducing growth period of spring safflower cultivars in Tabriz cold and semi-arid climate. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15 (4): 851-860.

20. Pasban Eslam, B. 2003. Evaluation of fall safflower cultivars in different planting dated in khosrowshahr of Tabriz. Final Report of Research Project. No. 83.305. AREEO. Pp.: 8-15. (in Persian with English abstract).

21. Reynolds, M. P., and Lopes, M. S. 2009. Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots in associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 183: 129-136.

22. Reynolds, M. P., Pellergrineschi, A., and Skovmand, B. 2005. Sink –Limitation to yield and biomass: A summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 146 (1): 39-49.

23. Safara, N., Telavat, M. R. M., Siadat, S. A., Koochekzadeh, A., and Mousavi, S. H. 2016. Effect of sowing date and sulfur on yield, oil content and grain nitrogen of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in autumn cultivation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14 (3): 438-448.

24. Sahu, J., and Thakur, N. S. 2016. Response of date of sowing on yield and yield attributes of safflower cultivars. An International Quarterly Journal of life Sciences 11 (1): 503-507.

25. Samadi-Firouzabadi, B., and Yazdani, F. 2012. Effect of planting date on seed and oil yields of four safflower cultivars in Varamin areas. Seed and Plant Journal 2 (4): 459-470.

26. Shahid, M., Saleem, M. F., Anjum, S. A., Shahid, M., and Afzal, I. 2017. Biochemical markers assisted screening of Pakistani wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for terminal heat stress tolerance. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Sciences 54 (4): 817-825.

27. Shahsavari, M., Yasari, T., and Omidi, A. H. 2012. Effect of planting date on developmental stages and some agronomic traits of spring safflower cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 10 (2). 392-400.

28. Torabi, B., Adibniya, M., and Rahimi, A. 2015. Seedling emergence response to temperature in safflower: measurements and modeling. International Journal of Plant Production 9 (3): 393-412.

29. Uzun, B., Zengın, Ü., Furat, S., and Akdesır, Ö. 2009. Sowing date effects on growth, flowering, oil content and seed yield of canola cultivars. Asian Journal of Chemistry 21 (3): 1957-1965.