Evaluation of the Effect of Sulfur Application and Thiobacillus on Some Soil Chemical Characteristics and Yield of Canola in Wheat-Canola Rotation System

آب و خاک

Article 13, Volume 29, Issue 6, January 2015, Pages 1688-1698   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v29i6.41985

Authors

H. Besharati^{* 1}; R. Motalebifard²

¹Soil and Water Research Institue

²Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Research and Education Center

Abstract

Introduction: After soybean and palm oil, canola is third important oil seed in the world which belongs to the genus Brassicaceae, that its seeds contain about 40% oil. The per capita consumption of oil in Iran is about 14 kg, so approximately 900 thousand tons of oil will be required for each year. However, only less than 10% of this oil is produced in the country. In recent years, special attention has been paid to canola cultivation in order to increase oil production, so during recent years an apparent increase in canola cultivated lands is significant. In most of these canola cultivated lands, the soil is calcareous therefore; some available nutrients such as phosphorus, iron and zinc are less than the amounts required by plants. Increasing qualitative and quantitative yield of canola in calcareous soils is a priority to canola cultivation improvement. Sulfur plays an important role in oil content of oily seed crops. On the other hands sulfur oxidation in calcareous soils can improve some nutrients availability. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of sulfur on yield, oil content and nutrients uptake and also its impact on soil chemical properties with 8 treatments, in 3 replications.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in Ekbatan research station in Hamedan province for 2 years as completely randomized block design with 8 treatments and 3 repetitions. The treatments were: T1: Control (Without sulfur and Thiobacillus), T2: Application of 150 kg sulfur per ha, T3: T2+ Thiobacillus inoculums (2% of applied sulfur), T4: Application of 300 kg sulfur per ha, T5: T4+ Thiobacillus inoculums (2% of applied sulfur), T6: Application of 600 kg sulfur per ha, T7: T6+ Thiobacillus inoculums (2% of applied sulfur) T8: Fertilizing based on soil test without sulfur and Thiobacillus. Thiobacillus inoculant containing about 107 cells of Thiobacillus bacteria which belonged to neutrophile Thiobacilli were prepared at soil biology Dep. of Soil and Water Research Institute. In this research treatments were applied in two separate sites (each site contains 24 plots which their dimensions were 2.4×10 meter). For evaluating the residual effect of treatments, the experiment was carried out in constant plots in second year. Phosphorus, iron, zinc, manganese and sulfate, were not applied to any of the treatments except for T8, and the above mentioned treatments were just received 250 kg urea. These all treatments were applied only in the first year and on the second year of experiment their Residual effects on canola were evaluated. During the growing season agricultural practices such as irrigation, weed and pest control in all units were managed uniformly. Soil chemical data were obtained by analyzing of Ec, pH and bicarbonate each year in May. The leaf and seed samples were taken for essential analysis. When plants growth completed, each plot was harvested separately then canola yield and also the phosphorus, iron and zinc content of shoots and grain were measured.
Results: The results of two years indicated that the treatments had no significant effects on pH and bicarbonate of soil while increasing sulfur application rate, caused a decrease in soil bicarbonate content. In addition to that, the treatments did not affect the yield of canola significantly. In the first year of experiment, treatments had shown significant effects (P=0.01) on glucosinolates, seed sulfur and Cu of leaf, whereas no effect determination was occurred about indices of leaf and seed of canola. the results also suggested an increase of 800 kg in the sixth treatment (600 kg sulfur consumption without Thiobacillus) and canola seed yield of treatment T6 enhancedfrom 3446 kg to 4531 kg per ha. Fertilization treatment (T8) could not increase canola yield, so it confirms that the nutrient concentration in experiment sites were near the critical level for canola.
Conclusion: In total results revealed that different sulfur treatments have no significant and considerable impacts on canola yield and soil chemical properties, and the effects was not observed in the second year of experiment, too. Probably the sulfur consumed or sulfur oxidation in the experiments was not enough to cope with high lime (14%) and buffering capacity of the soil. Also probably the nutrient concentration in test sites were more than critical level for canola and plants absorbed enough nutrients from the soil. No increase in canola yield in fertilization treatments (T8) can confirm this opinion, though. It also seems that there were no favorable conditions (soil moisture) for the oxidation of sulfur in the soil.

Keywords

Available; Bicarbonate; Elemental sulfur; Glucosinolate; Inoculum

References

1- Ahmadi, M.R., and Javidfar F. 1998. Plant nutrition of oilseed rape (Translated). Oilseeds Committee Publications, Joint Stock Company for Oilseed cultivation Development, Tehran, Iran.

2- Anonymous. 2004. Agricultural statistics of Hamedan province. Agricultural Jihad Organization of the province, Hamedan, Iran.

3- Attoe O. J., and Olson R.S. 1966. Factors affecting the rate of oxidation of elemental sulfur and that added in rock phosphate sulfur fusion. Soil Science, 101: 317-324.

4- Azari H.M. 1991. Effect of sulfur on soil phosphorus availability. Final Report of Research Project. Soil and Water Research Institute, Karaj, Iran.

5- Besharati H. 1998. Effect of sulfur application and Thiobacillus inoculation on increasing of nutrient availability in soil. M.s. thesise, soil Science Dep., Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran.

6- Besharati H., and Saleh-Rastin N. 2000. Effect of application of Thiobacillus spp. inoculants and elemental sulfur on iron and zinc uptake by corn under greenhouse conditions, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 12(7): 63-73. (in persian with english abstract)

7- Besharati H., and Saleh-Rastin N. 1999. Effect of application of Thiobacillus Spp. Inoculants and elemental sulfur on phosphorous availability, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 13(1): 1-17. (in persian with english abstract)

8- Besharati H., Khavazi K., and Saleh-Rastin N. 2001. Evaluation of some carriers for Thiobacilli inoculants used along with sulfur to increase uptake of some nutrients by corn and improve its performance, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 12(11): 1-9. (in persian with english abstract)

9- Besharati H., Natourgholipour F., Malakouti M.J., and Khavazi K. 2001. Review on the direct application of rock phosphate on the calcareous soils, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 12(11):20-31. (in persian with english abstract)

10- Fimes J., Vong P.C., and Guckert A. 1999. Use of labeled sulphur-35 for tracing sulfur transfers in developing of field grown oilseed rape Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analaysis, 30(1-2): 221-234.

11- Jalili F., Malakouti M.J., and Kasrai R. 2000. The role of balanced fetilizationr on yield and yield component of winter rapeseed in Khoy region, Journal of Soil and Water, 12(12): 35-42. (in persian with english abstract)

12- Kalbasi M., Filsoof F., and Rezai- Nejad Y. 1998. Effects of sulfur treatment on yield and uptake of Fe, Zn and Mn by corn, sorghum and soybean, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 11(6-11): 1353-1360.

13- Klute A. 1986. Methods of soil analysis. Part I-Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Microbiological and chemical methods. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI. USA.

14- Kuo S. 1996. Phosphorus. p. 869-919. In: Sparks, D.L. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. 3rd ed. SSSA Book Series No. 5. Madison, WI. USA.

15- Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42: 421-428.

16- Malakouti M.J., and Rezai H. 2001. The role of sulfur, calcium and magnesium on yield increasing and improving agricultural products quality. Agricultural education press, Karaj, Iran.

17- McCready R.G.L., and Krouse H.R. 1982. Sulfur isotope fractixation during the oxidation of elemental sulfur by Thiobacillus in a solonetzic soil, Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 92:105-110.

18- Mclean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. p. 199–224. In: Page et al. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis. Part Π. Microbiological and chemical methods. 2nd ed. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI. USA.

19- Mishra S., and Singh A. 1989. Study on sulfur and phosphorus availability and uptake of P and S by groundnut Ut. Legume Research, 12 (4): 160-164.

20- Narula N., Mishra M.M., and Vyas S.R. 1972. The effect of Thiobacillus inoculation on alkali soils, Indian Journal of Agricultural Chemistry, 7(1): 85-87.

21- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. P. 539–579. In: A. L. Page et al. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part Π. Microbiological and chemical methods. 2nd ed. ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI. USA.

22- Richards L.A. 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Salinity Laboratory Staff. Agricultural handbook. No.60.USDA.USA.

23- Rosa M.C., Muchovej J.J., and Alwarez J.V.H. 1989. Temporal relations of phosphorus fractions in an oxisol amended with rock phosphate and Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Soil Science Society of American Journal, 53:1096-1100.

24- Rozeto B. 1982. Treatments of iron chlorosis in peach trees, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 5:917-922.

25- Sagare B., Rewatker S., and Shawghare P. 1988. Micronutrient harvest by peanut as influenced by sulfur and phosphorus application in vertisol soils, Annals Plant Physiology, 2(2): 187-192.

26- Saha M., and Singh H. 1987. Effect of sulphur on prevention of iron chlorosis and plant composition of groundnut on alkaline calcareous soil. Journal Agriicultural Science, 109(1): 73-77.

27- Salimpour S., Mirzashahi K., Daryashenas A., and Malakouti M.J. 2000. Effect of dose and method application of zinc sulfate on oilseed rape in Safiabad-e-Dezful, Journal of Soil and Water, 12(12): 22-27 (in Persian with english abstract).

28- Surendra S., and Singh A. 1991. Direct and residual effect of pyrites on yield, sulphur content and quality characters of groundnut, Journal Indian Society of Soil Science, 39(2): 328-331.

29- Tabatabai M. A. 1986. Sulfur in Agriculture. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI., U. S. A.

30- Tavassoli A.R., Besharati H., Khavazi K., and Rejali F. 2001. The effect of phosphate fertilizers, sulfur and Thiobacillus inoculants on the corn root colonization by mycorrhizae Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences. 12(11):10-20. (in persian with english abstract)

31- Wandworth S. K., and Kentsille B. 2001. The effect of added sulfur on the production of onions in Noja Scotia./ URL/ http/ www.gov .ns.ca/nsaf/elibrary/archive.