Effect of Water and Potassium Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Subsurface Irrigation Condition

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 2, Volume 20, Issue 1 - Serial Number 65, April 2022, Pages 15-28   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v0i0.71123

Authors

B Yousefi¹; H. R Khazaei^{* 2}; M Parsa²

¹PhD student in Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is the most important environmental stress that limit plant growth and crop production around the world. Long-term tension affects all metabolic processes of the plant and as a result, it often reduces plant production. On the other hand, potatoe is important for dry matter production and dietary intake and has been ranked as the fourth crop for volume of production after wheat, rice and corn. Due to water scarcity, population increase and necessity of more production of this crop, it is necessary to study the effects of water deficit on the yield and physiology and quality of potato. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effect of various irrigation regimes by subsoil irrigation at different depths on the potato yield and potassium effects as a damage reducer factor caused by irrigation reduction.
Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted in 2014 at Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. The experiment was split factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In this experiment, the main plot consisted of irrigation at three levels of 100 percent irrigation (control), 80 percent and 60 percent of the required blueberries throughout the plant growth period and Sub plots consisted of two sub-surface drip irrigation systems in two levels, including drip tape in depth 7.5 cm soil layer and drip tape in depth 15 cm layer of soil and the factor of potassium fertilizer application in two levels, including 100 percent and 120 percent recommended soil test. In this research, Fontaneh, cultivar which has a better adaptability with Mashhad conditions than the other cultivars, were used for growing season and industrial market. Plant water requirement in Mashhad conditions was also determined using software (OPTIWAT). Irrigation volume during growth season to supply 100 percent water requirement was 6840 cubic meters per hectare, for 80 percent was 5742 cubic meters per hectare and for 60 percent was 4104 cubic meters per hectare. Weeding is carried out manually. The measured indexes included number of tubers per plant, tuber mean weight, tuber yield, relative water content of leaves (RWC), dry matter content, electrolyte leakage and chlorophyll content. The data were analyzed by SAS statistical program and the meanings were compared by Duncan test at 5 percent level.
Results and Discussion
The results of the experiment showed that irrigation have a significant effect on most traits. So that the highest number of tubers in the plant and the relative water content was obtained in the control treatment, namely 100 percent water requirement of potatoes, but percentage of dry matter, electrolyte leakage and chlorophyll were increased with irrigation reduction. There was a significant difference between the two drip irrigation systems in terms of gland performance, and the amount of this trait was higher in the treatment of the drip tape at 7.5 cm depth. The results of this experiment showed that there was no significant difference between two levels of potassium fertilizer in terms of most traits. In general, it can be concluded that although irrigation treatment has a significant effect on most of the studied traits, the trend of changes in the two types of drip irrigation systems used in this experiment is one.
Conclusion
The results of this experiment showed that reduction of irrigation water in the potato whole growth season can have a negative effect on morphological characteristics, yield and yield components compared to the full supply of water. The tuber yield decreases with decreasing irrigation volume, due to the sensitivity of the plant to soil moisture, especially at the time of tuber initiation and tuberization.

Keywords

Cell membrane stability; Drip irrigation tape; Relative water content; Tuber yield

References

1. Abdul Hannan, A., Arif, M., Ranjha, A. M., Abid, A., Fan, X. H., and Li. Y. C. Using soil potassium adsorption and yield response models to determine potassium fertilizer rates for potato crop on a calcareous soil in Pakistan. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42 (6): 645-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.550378.
2. Abedi, T., and Pakniyat, H. 2010. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 46 (1): 27-34.
3. Agricultural Statistics. 2018. (in Persian).
4. Akhavan, S., Mosavi, S. F., Mostafazadeh Fard, B., and Ghadami Firoozabadi, A. 2007. Investigation of type and furrow irrigation in terms of yield and water use efficiency in potato farming. Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources 11 (41): 15-26. (in Persian).
5. Arvin, M. J., and Donnelly, D. J. 2008. Screening potato cultivars and wild species to abiotic stresses using an electrolyte leakage bioassay. Journal of Agriculture Science Technology 10: 33-42.
6. Baghani, J., Alizadeh, A., and Faridhosseini, A. 2012. The Effect of Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation on Quantity and Quality Potato. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 3 (6): 238-244. (in Persian).
7. Cakmak, I. 2002. Plant nutrition research: Priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant Soil 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021194511492.
8. Cakmak, I. 2005. K alleviates detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants Journal of Plant Nutrition. 168: 521-530. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420485.
9. Camp, C. R., Lamm, F. R., Evans, R. G., and Phene, C. J. 2000; Subsurface drip irrigation Past, Present and Future. Proceedingof the 4^th
10. Coleman, W. K. 2008. Evaluation of wild solanum for drought resistance 1.Solanum gandarillasii Cardenas
11. Decov, , Tsonev, T., and Yordanov, I. 2000. Effects of water stress and hightemperature stress on the structure and activity of photosynthetic apparatus of Zea mays and Helianthus annuus. Photosynthetica 38: 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010961218145.
12. Eskandari, A., Khazaei, H., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., and Majdabadi, A. 2011. The effect of irrigation regime on physiological characteristics, yield and potato water use efficiency in Mashhad weather conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science 25 (2): 201-210. (in Persian).
13. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2017. https://www.fao.org/home/en.
14. Ghadami Firozabadi, A., and Parvizi, Kh. 2009. Effect of low irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of new potato clones in strip drip irrigation (type). Journal of Water in Agriculture 4 (2): 133-144. (in Persian).
15. Hagman E., and Martenssen, A. 2009. Cultivation practices and potato cultivars suitable for organic potato production. Potato Research (in Persian .(
16. Hossaeini, S. M., and Amini, Z. 2013. Effect of potassium sulfate on potato stomatal resistance in Fars province. Journal of Water in Agriculture 28 (2): 365-373. (in Persian).
17. Jafarzadeh, L., Omidi, H., and Bostani, A. A. 2014. The study of drought stress and bio fertilizer of nitrogen on some biochemical traits of Marigold medicinal plant (Calendula officinalis). Journal of Plant Research 27 (2): 180-192. (in Persian).
18. Kamkar, B., Daneshmand, A. R., Ghooshchi, F., Shiranirad, A. H., and Safahani Langeroudi A. R. 2011. The effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on some agronomic traits of canola under a semiarid environment. Agricultural Water Management 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.01.009.
19. Khazaei, H. R. 2003. The effect of drought stress on yield and physiological characteristics of wheat resistant and sensitive cultivars and introducing the most appropriate drought resistance indices, Ph.D. in Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian).
20. Khosravifar, S., Yarnia, M., Khorshidi Benam, M. B., and Hosseinzadeh Moghbeli, A. H. 2008. Effect of potassium on drought tolerance in potato cv. Agria. Proceedings of the10^th Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. Iran. Pp: 358. (in Persian).
21. Moon, K., Lim, H. H. C., and Hyun, H. N. 2006. Water use efficiency of potato between sprinkler and drip irrigation systems under field condition 18^th World Congress of Soil Science. July 9-15, Philadel phia, Penncylvania, USA.
22. Motalebi Fard, R., Najafi, N. A., Ostan, Sh., Naeishabori, M., and Valizadeh, M. 2014. Effect of soil moisture, phosphorus and zinc on growth characteristics of potato under greenhouse conditions. Iranian Soil and Water Research (Iranian Agricultural Science) 41 (1): 75-86. (in Persian).
23. Nayyar, , and Gupta, D. 2006. Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 58: 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.021.
24. Ngouajio, M., Wang, G., and Goldy, R. 2007. Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agricultural Water Management 87: 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.07.007.
25. Oron, G. D., Campos, C., Gillerman, L. and Salgot, M. 1999. Wastewater treatment, renovation and reuse for agriculturalirrigation in small communities. Agricultural Water Management 38: 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00066-3.
26. Patel, N., and Rajput, T. B. S. 2007. Effect of drip tape placement depth and irrigation level on yield of potato. Agricultural Water Management 88 (1-3): 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.017.
27. Sairam, R. K., Rao, K. V., and Srivastava, G. C. 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to longterm salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science 163. 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00278-9.
28. Shaw, , Thomas, T. H., and Cooke, D. T. 2002. Responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to drought and nutrient deficiency stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 37: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020381513976.
29. Shock, C. C., and Feibert E. B. G. 2002. Deficit irrigation on potato. In Deficit irrigation practices. FAO. Rome. pp: 47-56.
30. Shock, C. C. 2004. Efficient irrigation scheduling. Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon StateUniversity, Oregon, USA.
31. Stengrobe, B., and N. Claassen. 2000. Potassium dynamics in the rhizosphere and K efficiency of crops. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 163: 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(200002)163:1<101::AID-JPLN101>3.0.CO;2-J.
32. Tolga, E., Yesim, E., and Hakan, O. 2005. Water Yield relationship of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens, University of Trakya, Dept of farm, Structures and Irrigation. http://terdem. Tu. Tz. Edu. Tr.